OBJECTIVE: To report on adverse events during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with external fixators.
METHODS:  .
METHODS: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Two Level 1 trauma centers.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis undergoing MRI between January 2005 and September 2023.
UNASSIGNED: Adverse events, defined as any undesirable event associated with the external fixator being inside or outside the MRI bore during imaging, including (subjective) heating, displacement or pullout of the external fixator, or early MRI termination for any reason.
RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with 110 external fixators underwent at least one MRI scan with an external fixator inside or outside of the MRI bore. The median age was 51 years (interquartile range: 39-63) and 56 (58%) were male. The most common external fixator locations were the ankle (24%), knee (21%), femur (21%), and pelvis (19%). The median duration of the MRI was 40 minutes (interquartile range: 26-58), 86% was performed using 1.5-Tesla MRI, and 14% was performed using 3.0-Tesla MRI. Ninety-five percent of MRI was performed for the cervical spine/head. Two MRI scans (1.6%), one of the shoulder and one of the head and cervical spine, with the external fixator outside of the bore were terminated early because of patient discomfort. There were no documented events of displacement or pullout of the external fixator.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that MRI scans of the (cervical) spine and head can be safely obtained in patients with external fixators on the appendicular skeleton or pelvis. Given the low numbers of MRI scans performed with the external fixator inside the bore, additional studies are necessitated to determine the safety of this procedure. The results from this study can aid orthopaedic surgeons, radiologists, and other stakeholders in developing local institutional guidelines on MRI scanning with external fixators in situ.
METHODS: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND: Total talus dislocation without ankle (malleoli) fracture is a very rare injury with prevalence of only 0.06% of all dislocations and only 2% of talar injuries, and are usually associated with common complications such as infection, avascular necrosis, and posttraumatic arthritis. The treatment usually involves debridement, reduction, stabilization of the ankle joint, and primary or secondary closure of the wound.
METHODS: We present the case of a 40-year-old South Asian woman who was involved in an accident. She was rushed to our hospital, whereby subsequent examination revealed an open total talus dislocation with the talus being exposed in its entirety from a contaminated wound in the medial side. Furthermore, radiograph confirmed total talus dislocation without concomitant malleoli fracture. She was immediately taken to the operating theater whereby debridement and immediate reduction was performed under anesthesia, and the ankle was stabilized with external fixator for about 6 weeks. She is now able to bear weight on the affected ankle with minimal tolerable pain and has normal range of motion of the ankle.
CONCLUSIONS: Open total talus dislocation without concomitant malleoli fracture is a rare injury. Reduction of the talus in combination with complete wound debridement potentially successfully avoids infection, provides early revascularization preventing avascular necrosis, and preserves the normal ankle anatomy.

UNASSIGNED: A 2-year follow-up study.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the effectiveness of modified halo-pelvic Ilizarov distraction assembly in the management of patients with severe kyphoscoliosis.
UNASSIGNED: Severe and rigid scoliosis curves are always a challenge for operating surgeons. Preoperative correction through halo-pelvic devices successfully minimizes the severity of the curve; however, cumbersome complications are also reported with its use. Modified assembly could be safe for these cases.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with severe kyphoscoliosis having coronal Cobb angle >90° were applied with modified halo-pelvic Ilizarov distraction assembly preoperatively. The modified assembly consisted of a pelvic component and halo ring, and distraction was given at the rate of 2-3 mm/day for 6-12 weeks. Complete clinical assessments along with pulmonary function tests were performed, and scoliosis series X-ray images were assessed for coronal and sagittal Cobb angle and other spinopelvic parameters before applying the assembly and during 2 years of follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-four patients (age, 9-27 years; male/female ratio of 18:16) were included. The coronal and sagittal Cobb angles were 116°±16.2° and 84°±28.3°, respectively. Correction rates obtained through modified halo-pelvic assembly were nearly 52% (p=0.001) in coronal and 40% (p=0.001) in sagittal Cobb angles, with improvement in height (p=0.001). Apical vertebral translation and coronal balance were also improved significantly (p=0.001). Further improvements in all the parameters were obtained after definitive surgery, with improvements in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (p =0.002) and forced vital capacity (p=0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Our modified halo-pelvic Ilizarov distraction assembly can achieve good correction in severe spinal deformities without significant risk to neurology, has fewer complications, and promotes good patient compliance.

OBJECTIVE: Bone transport has become the gold standard for treating large segmental tibial bone defects. The technique for application the Ilizarov circular fixator (ICF) has a long learning curve and is associated with many complications. There are few clinical studies on bone transport via the Taylor spatial frame (TSF). The main purpose of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical and outcomes of bone transport by using the TSF and the ICF.
METHODS: There were 62 patients included in this retrospective study from June 2011 to June 2021 and distributed to two groups according to the fixation method: a TSF group consisting of 30 patients and an ICF group consisting of 32 patients. Demographic information, surgical duration, external fixation times, external fixation index, final radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded and examined. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the ASAMI criteria during the most recent clinical visit. Then, statistical analysis such as independent-samples t tests or chi-Square test was performed.
RESULTS: The mean surgical duration in the TSF group was 93.8 ± 7.3 min, which was shorter than that in the ICF group (109.8 ± 1.4 min) (p < 0.05). Compared to the ICF group (10.2 ± 2.0 months), the TSF group (9.7 ± 1.8 months) had a shorter average external fixation time (p > 0.05). The external fixation index was 1.4 ± 0.2 m/cm and 1.5 ± 0.1 m/cm in the two groups. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two groups. At the last follow-up visit, the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) in the TSF group were 88.1 ± 12.1° and 80.9 ± 1.3°, respectively. The MPTA and PPTA in the ICF group were 84.4 ± 2.4° and 76.2 ± 1.9°, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups (all p < 0.05). The complication rate was 50% in the TSF group and 75% in the ICF group. Moreover, the ASAMI score between the two groups was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was found in clinical outcomes between the use of Taylor spatial frame and Ilizarov circular fixator for treating large segmental tibial bone defects. However, TSF is a shorter and simpler procedure that causes fewer complications and improves limb alignment.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for chronic perilunate dislocations using single-stage, two-stage, and salvage procedures. The study also compares these approaches with each other and with results from existing literature.
METHODS: A total of 15 patients with chronic perilunate injuries from 2013 to 2019 were included in the study. Pre-operative and post-operative assessments were conducted using plain radiographs, with CT scans performed selectively for detailed morphology and fracture pattern analysis. Among the patients, 13 underwent ORIF, while 2 underwent salvage procedures. Among the ORIF cases, single-stage procedures were performed in 4 patients, and two-stage procedures in 9 patients. External fixators, including unilateral uniplanar external fixators (UUEF) and bilateral uniplanar external fixators (BUEF), were applied in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. Our methodology of treating chronic perilunate injuries has evolved over the years. We started with single stage ORIF then graduated to a two staged procedure initially using a external fixator as a carpal distractor applied only on the radial side and finally settling down with bilateral carpal distraction using external fixators both on the radial and ulnar sides.
RESULTS: Among the 15 patients, 3 were lost to follow-up. Of these, one underwent four-corner fusion, while the remaining two had UUEF. The mean time interval between injury and surgery was 3.60 months. The post-operative mean scapholunate angle measured 52.46°, with a negative radio-lunate angle (indicating flexion) observed in two patients, while others showed a positive angle (indicating extension). Two cases exhibited nonunion and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the scaphoid, while one case presented with lunate AVN. Mid-carpal and radio-carpal arthritis was observed in 4 and 2 patients, respectively. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Mayo\'s wrist score categorized as good for two-stage BUEF cases and satisfactory for UUEF and single-stage procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Staged reduction utilizing the BUEF followed by open reduction has demonstrated superior outcomes when compared to UUEF, single-stage open reduction and salvage procedures.
METHODS: 4.

UNASSIGNED: Ankle fusion is considered a treatment of choice for end-stage ankle arthritis when a total ankle replacement procedure is not indicated. However, the potential risk of secondary arthritis in the adjacent joint after ankle fusion raises arguments on whether preserving the adjacent joint during an isolated tibiotalar (TT) fusion brings about any future benefits with regard to pain and gait discomfort. In this study, we intended to present midterm results following TT or tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator and to investigate whether spontaneous fusion occurred in the subtalar or midtarsal joint.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective observational study. Medical records of patients who underwent TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint between 1994 and 2018 were manually searched. Forty-one patients were included and the status of the joints adjacent to the fusion site was evaluated in radiographic examinations.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 34 patients who underwent TT fusion, 30 patients (88.3%) had a spontaneous fusion in the adjacent joints. Specifically, 11 patients (29.4%) had subtalar joint fusion and 19 patients (55.9%) had both midtarsal joint and subtalar joint fusion. In TTC fusion, the midtarsal joint was spontaneously fused in all 7 patients.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, we observed spontaneous adjacent joint fusion following TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint. Although a careful approach should be made since patients treated in this study may not represent typical candidates that need primary joint-sacrificing procedures, we believe that this study may draw attention from surgeons concerned about the fate of the adjacent joint status after TT or TTC fusion.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for open tibial shaft fractures include external fixation with or without early conversion to internal fixation.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe 1) early conversion to internal fixation and definitive external fixation and 2) in case of conversion, to identify risk factors for complications.
METHODS: Seventy-two external fixations of open fractures of the tibial shaft (Gustilo classification, 7 fractures (9.7 %) grade I, 25 fractures (34.7 %) grade II, 40 fractures (55.6 %) grade III (31 grade IIIA and 9 grade IIIB)) were included in a continuous non-randomised study. Thirty-three fractures without infection signs were converted to internal fixation at a mean time of 40.5 +/-15 days (IF group). External fixation was maintened in the remaining 39 fractures (EF group).
RESULTS: In the \"IF\" group, the union rate was 69.7 % at 6.3 +/-3.6 months (3-16). All patients had complete union at 16 months, requiring 2.8 +/-0.8 reoperations. Fixation with external fixation only (\"EF\" group) showed a union rate of 51.3 % at 8.9 +/-4 (5-22) months and 96 % at 16 months after 3.7 +/-0.9 reoperations. Superficial infection (12.1 %; p = 0.011) and numerous surgeries (2.76; p = 0.004) were found to be risk factors for deep infection. Time to wound closure >7 days (p = 0.049), time to reoperation >28 days (p = 0.00), numerous surgeries (2.76; p = 0.004) and deep infection (6.1 %; p = 0.027) were found to be union failure factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Early conversion of external fixation to internal fixation is an effective option to achieve bone union of open tibial fractures in selected patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of intramedullary nailing (IMN), percutaneous external plate fixation (PEPF), and re-applied external fixation (REF) in the treatment of refracture at the consolidated docking site following the removal of external fixation in patients with tibial defects who had previously undergone the Ilizarov bone transport technique.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who received IMN, PEPF, or REF for refracture at the consolidated docking site subsequent to the removal of external fixation. A collection of data was made regarding the following parameters: age, gender, defect size, treatment methods, external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), time of refracture (TOR) subsequent to fixation removal, and docking reunion time (DRT). Bone and functional outcomes were evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaire.
RESULTS: The study included 14 males and 5 females with an average age of 38.1 ± 8.9 years (range, 26 to 55 years). Etiologies included post-traumatic osteomyelitis in 11 cases and post-traumatic bone loss in 8 cases. The median bone defect was 5.11 ± 0.87 cm (range, 3.8 to 6.8 cm). Following docking site refracture, 6 cases were treated with IMN, 8 with PEPF, and 5 with REF. All patients achieved both satisfactory bone union and functional outcomes, and there was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data or postoperative outcomes among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: IMN, PEPF, and REF were all demonstrated favorable postoperative bone and functional outcomes, suggesting their reliability as treatment options for managing docking site refracture following external fixation removal.

UNASSIGNED: To analyze the effectiveness of external fixator combined with Kirschner wire (EF-KW) fixation in the treatment of oblique and comminuted distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (DHMDJ) fractures in children.
UNASSIGNED: A clinical data of 22 children with DHMDJ fractures who met the selection criteria between April 2021 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with EF-KW fixation. There were 14 boys and 8 girls with an average age of 6.8 years (range, 1.5-12.0 years). The time from injury to operation was 14-38 hours (mean, 24.2 hours). There were 18 cases of comminuted fractures and 4 cases of oblique fractures; and 1 case of median nerve injury and 1 case of radial nerve injury before operation. The occurrence of postoperative complications was recorded. At last follow-up, the function of the affected elbow joint was evaluated according to the Mayo elbow joint function score, and the Baumann\'s angle (BA) and humero-capitellar angle (HCA) of the affected and healthy sides were recorded and compared.
UNASSIGNED: All fractures were successfully treated with closed reduction and no complications such as nerve injury occurred. Superficial infection occurred in 4 cases after operation and healed after symptomatic treatment. The incisions of other patients healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 9-24 months (mean, 13.8 months). At last follow-up, according to the Mayo elbow joint function score, the elbow joint function was rated as excellent in 15 cases, good in 6 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 95.5%. The neurologic injury before operation recovered gradually. X-ray films reexamination showed that all fractures healed, and the healing time of fractures ranged from 29 to 61 days, with an average of 35.6 days. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in BA and HCA between the healthy side and the affected side ( P>0.05). During follow-up, 1 case developed mild cubitus varus, while the other patients had no serious complications.
UNASSIGNED: EF-KW fixation for oblique and comminuted DHMDJ fractures in children has the advantages of less trauma, simple operation, easy reduction, good stability after reduction, low incidence of serious complications, and good elbow functional recovery.
UNASSIGNED: 探讨外固定架联合克氏针固定治疗儿童倾斜型和粉碎型肱骨远端干-骺交界区（distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction，DHMDJ）骨折的疗效。.
UNASSIGNED: 回顾性分析2021年4月—2023年12月收治且符合选择标准的22例儿童DHMDJ骨折临床资料，均行外固定架联合克氏针固定治疗。其中男14例，女8例；年龄1.5～12.0岁，平均6.8岁。受伤至手术时间14～38 h，平均24.2 h。骨折类型：粉碎型18例，倾斜型4例。术前合并正中神经损伤1例、桡神经损伤1例。记录术后并发症发生情况；末次随访时，采用Mayo评分标准评估患侧肘关节功能，测量健、患侧肘关节活动度并基于X线片测量健、患侧鲍曼角、髁干角，比较健患侧差异。.
UNASSIGNED: 术中骨折均闭合复位成功，手术顺利完成，无神经损伤等并发症发生。术后4例发生浅表感染，对症处理后愈合；其余切口均Ⅰ期愈合。患儿均获随访，随访时间9～24个月，平均13.8个月。末次随访时，肘关节功能根据Mayo标准获优15例、良6例、可1例，优良率95.5%。术前合并神经损伤者均逐渐自行恢复。X线片复查示骨折均愈合，愈合时间29～61 d，平均35.6 d；末次随访时，健、患侧鲍曼角和髁干角差异均无统计学意义（ P>0.05）。随访期间1例出现轻度肘内翻畸形，其余患儿均无严重并发症发生。.
UNASSIGNED: 对于儿童倾斜型和粉碎型DHMDJ骨折，采用外固定架联合克氏针固定具有创伤小、操作简便，骨折易于复位且复位后稳定性好，严重并发症发生率低、术后功能恢复好等优势。.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if rates of pin site infection and surgical site infection among patients managed with primary closure after external fixator removal were similar to those allowed to heal secondarily.
METHODS:
METHODS: Retrospective cohort.
METHODS: Urban/Suburban Academic Level I Trauma Center.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who had received a lower extremity external fixator for provisional management before definitive fixation of lower extremity fractures were included with pin site wounds closed primarily or allowed to heal by secondary intention.
UNASSIGNED: The rate of pin tract infection and surgical site infection following primary closure of external fixator pin sites relative to patients whose pin sites were allowed to heal through secondary intention.
RESULTS: In total, 256 patients were evaluated: 143 patients (406 pin sites) in the primary closure group and 113 patients (340 in sites) in the secondary closure group. The average age was 49 ± 16 years. Sixty-five percent of included patients were male. There was no difference in pin tract infections between cohorts (primary = 0.5%, secondary = 1.5%, P = 0.26). External fixator duration in the primary closure group was 11.5 ± 8.4 days and 13.0 ± 8.1 days in the secondary closure group (P = 0.15). There was a greater rate of surgical site infections in the secondary intention cohort (15.9% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in pin site infection rate after primary pin site closure relative to patients who were allowed to heal through secondary intention. Furthermore, there was a lower rate of surgical site infection after primary closure. These results challenge the dogma of secondary closure for ex fix pin sites, suggesting that debridement and primary closure is a safe option for management of external fixator pin sites and may impart benefit in decreasing infection risk.
METHODS: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.