背景:有不同的手术策略可以治疗涉及单独节段的同步结直肠癌(SCRC),即广泛切除术(EXT)和左半结肠保留切除术(LHS)。我们的目标是比较分析短期手术结果,肠功能,以及接受两种不同手术策略的SCRC患者的长期肿瘤学结局。
方法:肿瘤医院收集了138例位于右半结肠和直肠或乙状结肠的SCRC病变患者,中国医学科学院,2010年1月至2021年8月北京大学第一医院,分为EXT组(n=35)和LHS组(n=103),取决于他们的手术策略。比较两组患者术后并发症,肠功能,异时性癌症的发病率,和预后。
结果:LHS组的手术时间明显短于EXT组(268.6vs.316.9分钟,P=0.015)。术后总Clavien-Dindo≥II级并发症和吻合口漏(AL)的发生率分别为8.7和11.4%(P=0.892)和4.9vs.LHS和EXT组的5.7%(P=1.000),分别。LHS组的平均每日排便次数明显低于EXT组(1.3vs.3.8,P<0.001)。无低位前切除综合征(LARS)的比例,小调LARS,LHS和EXT组的主要LARS分别为86.5和80.0%,9.6vs.0%,和3.8vs.20.0%,分别为(P=0.037)。在51个月(中位持续时间)随访期间,在残留的左结肠中未发现异时性癌。LHS组5年总生存率和无病生存率分别为78.8%和77.5%,EXT组分别为81.7%和78.6%(P=0.565,P=0.712),分别。多变量分析进一步证实了N期,但不是手术策略,作为独立影响患者生存的危险因素。
结论:LHS似乎是涉及不同节段的SCRC的更合适的手术策略,因为它显示出更短的手术时间,没有增加AL和异时性癌症的风险,并且没有不良的长期生存结果。更重要的是,它可以更好地保留肠功能,并倾向于降低LARS的严重程度,从而改善SCRC患者的术后生活质量。
BACKGROUND: There are different surgical strategies that can treat synchronous colorectal cancer (SCRC) involving separate segments, namely extensive resection (EXT) and left hemicolon-sparing resection (LHS). We aim to comparatively analyze short-term surgical results, bowel function, and long-term oncological outcomes between SCRC patients treated with the two different surgical strategies.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-eight patients with SCRC lesions located in the right hemicolon and rectum or sigmoid colon were collected at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and the Peking University First Hospital from January 2010 to August 2021 and divided into EXT group (n = 35) and LHS group (n = 103), depending on their surgical strategies. These two groups of patients were compared for postoperative complications, bowel function, the incidence of metachronous cancers, and prognosis.
RESULTS: The operative time for the LHS group was markedly shorter compared with the EXT group (268.6 vs. 316.9 min, P = 0.015). The post-surgery incidences of total Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II complications and anastomotic leakage (AL) were 8.7 vs. 11.4% (P = 0.892) and 4.9 vs. 5.7% (P = 1.000) for the LHS and EXT groups, respectively. The mean number of daily bowel movements was significantly lower for the LHS group than for the EXT group (1.3 vs. 3.8, P < 0.001). The proportions of no low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), minor LARS, and major LARS for the LHS and EXT groups were 86.5 vs. 80.0%, 9.6 vs. 0%, and 3.8 vs. 20.0%, respectively (P = 0.037). No metachronous cancer was found in the residual left colon during the 51-month (median duration) follow-up period. The overall and disease-free survival rates at 5 years were 78.8% and 77.5% for the LHS group and 81.7% and 78.6% for the EXT group (P = 0.565, P = 0.712), respectively. Multivariate analysis further confirmed N stage, but not surgical strategy, as the risk factor that independently affected the patients\' survival.
CONCLUSIONS: LHS appears to be a more appropriate surgical strategy for SCRC involving separate segments because it exhibited shorter operative time, no increase in the risk of AL and metachronous cancer, and no adverse long-term survival outcomes. More importantly, it could better retain bowel function and tended to reduce the severity of LARS and therefore improve the post-surgery life quality of SCRC patients.