BACKGROUND: There is an imbalance between goal-directed and habitual-learning system in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). At present, the relationship between cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) as a first-line therapy and goal-directed and habitual-learning disorder is still unclear. We attempted to discuss the effect of CBT treatment in patients with OCD, using abnormalities in goal-directed and habitual-learning-related brain regions at baseline as predictive factors.
METHODS: A total of 71 subjects, including 35 OCD patients and 36 healthy controls, were recruited. The OCD patients underwent 8 weeks of CBT. These patients were divided into two groups based on treatment response (Nresponders = 18, Nnonresponders = 17). Further subgroup analysis was conducted based on disease duration (Nshort = 17, Nlong = 18) and age of onset (Nearly = 14, Nlate = 21). We collected resting-state ROI-ROI functional connectivity data and apply repeated-measures linear mixed-effects models to investigate the differences of different subgroups.
RESULTS: CBT led to symptom improvement in OCD patients, with varying degrees of effectiveness across subgroups. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and insula, key regions for goal-directed behavior and habitual-learning, respectively, showed significant impacts on CBT efficacy in subgroups with different disease durations and ages of onset.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the goal-directed system may influence the efficacy of CBT through goal selection, maintenance, and emotion regulation. Furthermore, we found that disease duration and age of onset may affect treatment outcomes by modulating functional connectivity between goal-directed and habitual-learning brain regions.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Some persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) refuse or drop out of treatment because of the aversive nature of exposure and response prevention therapy when they have to face and tolerate unpleasant thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations. Indeed, one study suggested that a higher willingness to experience unpleasant thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations (WTE) predicts a better treatment outcome, but this finding has not been replicated yet.
METHODS: We examined whether WTE at admission predicted treatment outcome in a sample of 324 inpatients with OCD who received a multimodal treatment that included cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention sessions.
RESULTS: Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (based on OCD-specific self-report questionnaires) decreased with medium-to-large effect sizes (all ps < 0.001) and global functioning (based on therapist ratings) increased with a large effect size (d = 1.3, p < 0.001) from admission to discharge. In contrast to previous findings, however, WTE did not predict treatment outcome (all ps > 0.005). The effect of WTE on treatment outcome remained non-significant when controlling for any comorbidity, age, sex, length of stay, and antidepressant medication and was not moderated by these variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that higher WTE at the beginning of inpatient treatment does not facilitate improvements in obsessive-compulsive symptoms from admission to discharge. However, they also indicate that lower WTE at the beginning of inpatient treatment does not adversely affect treatment outcome, that is, even patients who indicate that they are unwilling to face the negative experiences associated with exposure and response prevention can still achieve considerable symptom reductions.

Inhibitory learning (IL) theory offers promising therapeutic strategies. However, more evidence is needed, especially regarding OCD treatment in routine care. The present pilot study investigated the positive and negative effects of IL-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in a university outpatient setting. A total of N = 21 patients (57.14% male, mean age 31.14, SD = 12.39 years) passed through manualized therapy delivered by licensed psychotherapists. Between the first and 20th IL-focused CBT session, obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised, d = 3.71), obsessive beliefs (Obsessive-Beliefs Questionnaire, d = 1.17), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, d = 3.49), and overall psychological distress (Global Severity Index, d = 3.40) decreased significantly (all ps < 0.01). However, individual patients reported some negative effects of therapy. The results underline the value of thorough investigations of novel therapeutic interventions in naturalistic settings.

Tics can have a serious impact on the quality of life of children and their families. Behavioural therapy is an evidence-based first line treatment for tic disorders. This randomised controlled trial studied the efficacy of a brief, condensed group-based programme for children with tics (Dutch Trial Registry NL8052, 27 September 2019). Tackle your Tics is a four-day group treatment, including exposure and response prevention and supporting components, delivered by therapists and \'experts by experience\'. We collected outcome measures at baseline (T1), directly post-treatment (T2), and at three- and 6-months follow-up (T3, T4) including tic severity (primary outcome measure), tic-related impairment, quality of life, tic-related cognitions, emotional/behavioural functioning, family functioning, treatment satisfaction and adherence. Outcomes directly post-treatment improved in both the treatment group (n = 52) and waiting list (n = 54), but showed no statistically significant differences between the conditions (differential change over time T1-T2) on tic severity (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale), quality of life (Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome Quality of Life Scale), tic-related cognitions and family functioning. At longer term (T3), again no between-group difference was found on tic severity, but tic-related impairment, quality of life and emotional/behavioural functioning significantly improved in the treatment group compared to the waiting list. Mean treatment satisfaction scores were favourable for both children and parents. Directly posttreatment, Tackle your Tics showed no superior effect compared to waiting list. However, on longer term this brief four-day group treatment was effective in improving tic-related impairment, quality of life and emotional/behavioural functioning.

Exposure and response prevention (ERP) is the gold-standard, evidence-based psychotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but few receive it. Video telehealth can increase access to ERP for OCD and may enhance the salience of exposures. This study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of video telehealth-delivered ERP. We conducted a pilot open trial with 11 Veterans, using mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. Treatment completers (n = 9) had significantly reduced OCD and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms posttreatment. Patients expressed greater comfort in engaging in ERP at home than in clinics. Therapists reported that seeing patients\' home environments helped them understand their symptoms and identify relevant OCD exposures. Results suggest that video telehealth-delivered ERP is feasible and acceptable to patients and therapists and promising for reducing OCD symptoms. Future research should compare its effectiveness to usual care and evaluate patients\' preferences for treatment delivery. Abbreviations: ERP: exposure and response prevention; GAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale; OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder; OCI-R: Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, Revised; PCL-5: PTSD Checklist; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire; PTSD: posttraumatic stress disorder; VA: epartment of Veterans Affairs; Y-BOCS: Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, self report form.

Exposure and response prevention (ERP) is an evidence-based treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Theories for how it works vary in their emphasis on active mechanisms of change. The current study aimed to clarify mechanisms of change in ERP for OCD using network analysis, comparing ERP networks at the start and end of intensive treatment (partial hospital and residential). In our sample of 182 patients, the most central node in both networks was engagement with exposure, which was consistently related to greater understanding of ERP rationale, higher willingness, and less ritualization, accounting for all other variables in the network. There were no significant differences in networks between the start and end of treatment. These results suggest that nonspecific parameters like facilitating engagement in exposures without ritualizing and providing a clear rationale to clients may be key to effective treatment. As such, it may be useful for clinicians to spend adequate time underscoring the need to eliminate rituals to fully engage in exposure tasks and explaining the rationale for ERP prior to doing exposures, regardless of theoretical orientation. Nonetheless, findings represent group-level statistics and more fine-grained idiographic analyses may reveal individual-level differences with respect to central mechanisms of change. Other limitations include demographic homogeneity of our sample.

BACKGROUND: While exposure and response prevention (ERP) is the first-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), up to half of patients do not effectively respond. In an effort to better understand the mechanisms behind ERP, the inhibitory learning model emphasizes the roles of increasing perceived self-efficacy and distress tolerance. While self-efficacy and distress tolerance have separately been shown to predict OCD symptoms and treatment outcomes, no studies have assessed their joint effects in ERP. The current study examined distress tolerance as a mediator of the relationship between self-efficacy and ERP outcomes.
METHODS: Patients in an intensive ERP-based treatment program (N = 116) completed weekly self-report measures.
RESULTS: Over the course of treatment, as OCD symptoms reduced, self-efficacy and distress tolerance both significantly increased. Importantly, increases in self-efficacy and distress tolerance mediated each other in explaining symptom reduction, suggesting a possible bi-directional effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The temporal relationship between changes in self-efficacy and distress tolerance is worthy of further investigation. In addition, the current sample had limited racial diversity and might not be representative of patients receiving lower levels of care. Findings merit replication to be ascertained of their reliability.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that during ERP, patients gain confidence in their abilities both to cope with general challenges and to withstand distress, potentially helping them engage with exposures and overcome initial fears. These findings provide support for the inhibitory learning model and highlight the mechanistic roles of self-efficacy and distress tolerance in ERP. Clinical implications to target both in treatment are discussed.

Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is effectively treated with exposure and response prevention (ERP), yet very few veterans receive ERP for OCD within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Veterans are a clinically complex population, and no prior research has evaluated the effectiveness of ERP in veterans with OCD or comorbid OCD and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Given the limited accessibility of ERP-trained providers within VHA, assessment of video telehealth (VTH) delivery of ERP is warranted.
A sample of 160 veterans with OCD (80 diagnosed with comorbid PTSD) will be randomly assigned to receive up to 16 sessions of ERP or a stress management training control delivered via VTH. Assessments will occur at baseline, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome will evaluate the impact of ERP on participants\' functioning, and secondary outcomes will include quality of life and OCD symptoms. At posttreatment, qualitative interviews with veterans, clinicians, and administrators will explore barriers and facilitators to treatment delivery, and the implementation potential of ERP.
Results will provide direction for the treatment of OCD and comorbid PTSD in veterans, as well as guidance for future implementation efforts for ERP within VHA.
gov Identifier:NCT05240924.

Though exposure and response prevention (ERP) is a well-proven treatment for OCD across the lifespan, prior RCTs have not studied adolescent and adult patients with the same ERP protocol relative to an active comparator that controls for non-specific effects of treatment. This approach assesses differences in the effect of OCD-specific exposures in affected adolescents and adults and in response to ERP compared to a stress-management control therapy (SMT).
This assessor-blinded, parallel, 2-arm, randomized, ambulatory clinical superiority trial randomized adolescents (aged 12-18) and adults (24-46) with OCD (N = 126) to 12 weekly sessions of ERP or SMT. OCD severity was measured before, during and after treatment using the child or adult version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (C/Y-BOCS), depending on participant age. We predicted that ERP would produce greater improvement in OCD symptoms than SMT and that there would be no significant post-treatment differences across age groups.
ERP (n = 63) produced significantly greater improvements on C/Y-BOCS scores at post-treatment than SMT (n = 63) (Effect size = -0.72, CI = -0.52 to -0.91, p < .001). ERP also produced more treatment responders (ERP = 86%, SMT = 32%; χ2 = 46.37, p < .001) and remitters than SMT (ERP = 39%, SMT = 7%; χ2 = 16.14, p < .001). Finally, there were no statistically significant post-treatment differences in C/Y-BOCS scores between adolescents and adults assigned to ERP.
A single ERP protocol is superior to SMT in treating both adolescents and adults with OCD. OCD-specific therapy is necessary across the lifespan for optimal outcomes in this highly disabling disorder, though non-specific treatments like SMT are still all-too-commonly provided.