Experience Sampling

经验抽样
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:生态瞬时评估(EMA)是一种测量方法,涉及重复收集有关参与者在其自然环境中的行为和经验的实时数据。虽然EMA允许研究人员获得对动态行为过程的有价值的见解,需要频繁的自我报告可能是繁重和破坏性的。遵守EMA协议对于准确、无偏抽样;然而,EMA研究设计没有“黄金标准”来促进合规性。
    目的:这项研究的目的是使用阶乘设计来确定最佳研究设计因素,或多种因素的组合,实现基于智能手机的EMA的最高完成率。
    方法:在2×2×2×2设计(32个条件)中,从美国各地招募的参与者被随机分配到5个设计因素中的2个水平中的1个:因子1-每个EMA调查的问题数(15对25);因子2-每天的EMA数量(2对4);因子3-EMA提示时间表(随机与固定时间;基于EMA类型的滑块型反应量表与Likert型反应量表;这是唯一的人内因素;每个参与者在研究期前14天或后14天被随机分配完成滑块型或Likert型问题).要求所有参与者完成提示的EMA28天。检查了每个因素对EMA完成的影响,以及因子相互作用对EMA完成的影响。最后,研究了人口和社会环境因素与EMA完成情况之间的关系。
    结果:参与者(N=411)年龄为48.4(SD12.1)岁;75.7%(311/411)为女性,72.5%(298/411)为白人,18.0%(74/411)是黑人或非裔美国人,2.7%(11/411)是亚洲人,1.5%(6/411)是美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民,5.4%(22/411)属于一个以上的种族,9.6%(38/396)为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。平均而言,参与者完成了83.8%(28,948/34,552)的预定EMA,96.6%(397/411)的参与者完成了后续调查。结果表明,设计因素对依从性没有显着的主要影响,也没有显着的相互作用。分析还表明,老年人,那些没有物质使用问题的历史,那些没有当前抑郁症的人往往比他们的同龄人完成更多的EMA。没有其他人口统计学或社会环境因素与EMA完成率相关。最后,该应用程序很受欢迎(即,系统可用性量表得分=82.7),并且在喜欢应用和EMA依从性之间存在统计学上显著的正相关。
    结论:研究结果对于制定使用EMA方法的未来研究的最佳实践指南具有广泛的意义。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT05194228;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05194228。
    BACKGROUND: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a measurement methodology that involves the repeated collection of real-time data on participants\' behavior and experience in their natural environment. While EMA allows researchers to gain valuable insights into dynamic behavioral processes, the need for frequent self-reporting can be burdensome and disruptive. Compliance with EMA protocols is important for accurate, unbiased sampling; yet, there is no \"gold standard\" for EMA study design to promote compliance.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use a factorial design to identify optimal study design factors, or combinations of factors, for achieving the highest completion rates for smartphone-based EMAs.
    METHODS: Participants recruited from across the United States were randomized to 1 of 2 levels on each of 5 design factors in a 2×2×2×2×2 design (32 conditions): factor 1-number of questions per EMA survey (15 vs 25); factor 2-number of EMAs per day (2 vs 4); factor 3-EMA prompting schedule (random vs fixed times); factor 4-payment type (US $1 paid per EMA vs payment based on the percentage of EMAs completed); and factor 5-EMA response scale type (ie, slider-type response scale vs Likert-type response scale; this is the only within-person factor; each participant was randomized to complete slider- or Likert-type questions for the first 14 days or second 14 days of the study period). All participants were asked to complete prompted EMAs for 28 days. The effect of each factor on EMA completion was examined, as well as the effects of factor interactions on EMA completion. Finally, relations between demographic and socioenvironmental factors and EMA completion were examined.
    RESULTS: Participants (N=411) were aged 48.4 (SD 12.1) years; 75.7% (311/411) were female, 72.5% (298/411) were White, 18.0% (74/411) were Black or African American, 2.7% (11/411) were Asian, 1.5% (6/411) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 5.4% (22/411) belonged to more than one race, and 9.6% (38/396) were Hispanic/Latino. On average, participants completed 83.8% (28,948/34,552) of scheduled EMAs, and 96.6% (397/411) of participants completed the follow-up survey. Results indicated that there were no significant main effects of the design factors on compliance and no significant interactions. Analyses also indicated that older adults, those without a history of substance use problems, and those without current depression tended to complete more EMAs than their counterparts. No other demographic or socioenvironmental factors were related to EMA completion rates. Finally, the app was well liked (ie, system usability scale score=82.7), and there was a statistically significant positive association between liking the app and EMA compliance.
    CONCLUSIONS: Study results have broad implications for developing best practices guidelines for future studies that use EMA methodologies.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT05194228; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05194228.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    传统上,对痴呆症非认知特征的研究集中在神经精神症状和挑战性行为上,因此集中在疾病的负面方面。尽管临床观察到许多患者经常报告主观幸福感并经常表达积极情绪,但对该定义的研究很少。痴呆症患者主观幸福感和幸福感的测量和决定因素。此外,很少有研究,使用回顾性问卷和亲属或照顾者的账户检查幸福感。然而,在痴呆症中,经历自我变得更加重要,因为过去和未来的思考正在逐渐消失。这里,我们回顾了这个领域相对稀缺的文献,讨论不同的心理结构及其对痴呆症研究的适用性,并提出了测量痴呆症患者的目标结构的方法。特别是,我们提出了使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)研究参与者在经历的时刻的幸福感和积极情绪的方法。我们认为,除了目前使用的生活质量指标外,适当的瞬时主观幸福感指标可能成为临床痴呆试验的重要结果参数。
    Research on non-cognitive features of dementia traditionally focusses on neuropsychiatric symptoms and challenging behavior and thus on negative aspects of the disease. Despite the clinical observation that many patients frequently report subjective well-being and often express positive emotions there is only little research on the definition, measurement and determinants of subjective well-being and happiness in people living with dementia. Furthermore, the few studies there are, examined happiness using retrospective questionnaires and the accounts of relatives or caregivers. However, in dementia, the experiencing self becomes more significant since past and future thinking are fading into the background. Here, we review the relative scarce literature in this field, discuss different psychological constructs and their applicability for dementia research, and suggest methods for measuring the addressed constructs in people with dementia. In particular, we propose methodology to study happiness and positive emotions in the experienced moment of the participants using ecological momentary assessments (EMA). We believe that adequate measures of momentary subjective well-being might become an important outcome parameter in clinical dementia trials beyond the currently used quality of life measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社会因素在精神病的发展和维持中可以发挥重要作用。澄清这种关系对于推进理论理解和发展有针对性的干预措施至关重要。精神病越来越多地使用经验抽样方法(ESM)进行研究,它提供了一种生态有效的方法,这减少了召回偏见。尚未总结研究社会因素与精神病之间的短暂关联的研究。
    方法:我们通过预先注册的系统检索已发表文献,确定了29项ESM研究,调查社会因素与积极精神病经历之间的关联。
    结果:独处并不能预测精神病的增加;然而,与孤独相关的评价和感受,如社交脱节的感觉,孤独和不想要的。与熟悉的公司在一起被发现可以减少精神病经历,但当前公司的压力会增加精神病。
    结论:虽然样本量和可概括性的问题意味着这些结果应谨慎解释,可以得出一些推定的结论。有精神病或新出现症状的个人应提供干预措施,以改善社交网络,如同伴支持,社区参与和参与技能培训。这些人也可以从虚拟现实或基于同情心的干预中受益,这些干预旨在减轻感知到的社会威胁。此外,监测预测症状复发的社会变量变化的数字干预措施将允许早期干预以预防心理健康危机。
    BACKGROUND: Social factors can play an important role in the development and maintenance of psychosis. Clarifying this relationship is vital for advancing theoretical understanding and development of targeted interventions. Psychosis is increasingly researched with an experience sampling methodology (ESM), which provides an ecologically valid approach, that reduces recall biases. Studies examining momentary associations between social factors and psychosis have not yet been summarised.
    METHODS: We identified 29 ESM studies investigating associations between social factors and positive psychotic experiences through a pre-registered systematic search of the published literature.
    RESULTS: Being alone did not predict increase in psychosis; however, appraisals and feelings associated with being alone such as feeling socially disconnected, lonely and unwanted did. Being with familiar company was found to reduce psychosis experiences but feeling stressed by the current company increased psychosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: While issues with sample size and generalisability mean these results should be interpreted with caution, some putative conclusions can be made. Individuals with psychosis or emerging symptoms should be offered interventions that improve social networks such as peer support, community participation and engagement skills training. These individuals may also benefit from virtual reality or compassion-based interventions which aim to dampen perceived social threat. Moreover, digital interventions which monitor changes in social variables that predict relapse in symptoms would allow early intervention to prevent mental health crises.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自我伤害的思想和行为(SITB)是死亡的主要原因,和人际过程(IP)似乎在SITB中发挥作用。本系统综述综合了日常生活中有关IP和SITB的文献,并解决了四个关键问题:(1)评估了哪些IP以及如何评估,(2)与SITB相关的个人之间的IP差异如何?(3)与SITB相关的个人之间的IP差异如何?(4)IP与自我伤害思想的关系与行为的关系是否不同?我们的审查遵循PRISMA指南,合格文献在2024年4月25日之前进行了筛选。我们确定了58项经验抽样研究(32.76%的每日日记研究),其中最侧重于主要SITB理论的IP(例如,受挫的归属感),但在很大程度上使用了不一致的操作。来自39项调查人内关联的研究的结果喜忧参半。根据26项研究,个人之间的IP差异是否与SITB有关尚不清楚。三项研究调查了IP是否与从思想到行为的转变有关,但需要时间模型来得出坚定的结论。调查日常生活中的IP和SITB的研究在很大程度上没有定论。经过心理测量验证的措施是必要的,未来的日常生活研究将受益于从理念到行动的框架。
    Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITBs) are a leading cause of death, and interpersonal processes (IPs) appear to play a role in SITBs. This systematic review synthesises the literature on IPs and SITBs in daily life and addresses four critical questions: (1) Which IPs have been assessed and how, (2) How are differences in IPs between individuals associated with SITBs?, (3) How are differences in IPs within individuals associated with SITBs? and (4) Do IPs relate differently to self-injurious thoughts than behaviours? Our review followed PRISMA guidelines and eligible literature was screened until 25 April 2024. We identified 58 Experience Sampling studies (32.76% daily-diary studies) of which most focused on IPs from major SITBs theories (e.g., thwarted belongingness) but largely used inconsistent operationalizations. Results from 39 studies investigating within-person associations were mixed. Based on 26 studies, whether differences in IPs between individuals relate to SITBs remains unclear. Three studies have investigated whether IPs relate to the transition from thoughts to behaviours, but temporal models are needed to draw firm conclusions. Studies investigating IPs and SITBs in daily life are largely inconclusive. Psychometrically validated measures are warranted, and future daily-life studies would benefit from drawing on ideation-to-action frameworks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    睡眠不足变得越来越普遍,并且与不良健康结果有关。阳光照射可以通过调节昼夜节律来改善睡眠,增加维生素D,并影响褪黑激素的生产。然而,关于阳光-睡眠关联的研究是有限的,尤其是在横截面设计之外。这项研究调查了103名成年人的每日自我报告的阳光照射与夜间睡眠质量之间的关系,长达70天。阳光照射的时间预测了第二天晚上的睡眠质量。具体来说,早晨的阳光照射,相对于没有阳光,根据对简短匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的反应,预测更好的睡眠质量。阳光照射的持续时间通常与睡眠质量无关。早晨的阳光可以调节昼夜节律,改善睡眠。研究结果对睡眠干预和夏令时政策有潜在影响。未来的研究应该测试早晨阳光照射是否可以提高睡眠干预的有效性。
    Poor sleep is becoming increasingly prevalent and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Sunlight exposure may improve sleep by regulating circadian rhythms, increasing vitamin D, and influencing melatonin production. However, research on the sunlight-sleep association is limited, especially outside of cross-sectional designs. This study examined associations between daily self-reported sunlight exposure and next-night sleep quality in 103 adults for up to 70 days. The timing of sunlight exposure predicted next-night sleep quality. Specifically, morning sunlight exposure, relative to no sunlight, predicted better sleep quality based on responses to the brief Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index. Duration of sunlight exposure was generally not associated with sleep quality. Morning sunlight may regulate circadian rhythms, subsequently improving sleep. Findings have potential implications for sleep interventions and daylight savings time policies. Future research should test whether morning sunlight exposure can enhance the effectiveness of sleep interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通常使用经验抽样方法来衡量个人的思维漂移趋势,在这种方法中,嵌入在计算机化认知任务中的探测问题试图在任务执行过程中以随机间隔捕捉任务外思想的发作。然而,思维游荡的问题和回答选项通常是临时选择的,并且在研究之间有所不同,关于这些方法学决策的心理测量学后果的指导很少。在本研究中,我们使用项目反应理论(IRT)的方法研究了几种常见方法的心理测量特性。IRT潜在建模表明,根据及时提供探针的时间,测量信息通常分布在性状估计的范围内。与后来提出的探针相比,较早提出的探针提供了更多有关个体更容易走神的信息。此外,在连续尺度上或使用多个分类评级选项进行的心灵游走评级提供了更多关于个体的潜在心灵游走倾向的信息-在更广泛的特征连续体中-比将评级分为任务上和任务外类别。此外,IRT提供的证据表明,“与任务相关的思想”的报告有助于构建连续体的以任务为中心的维度,为将这些反应概念化为一种与任务相关的焦点的研究提供理由。一起,我们希望这些发现将有助于指导研究人员希望最大限度地提高他们的思维游荡评估程序的测量精度。
    The tendency for individuals to mind wander is often measured using experience sampling methods in which probe questions embedded within computerized cognitive tasks attempt to catch episodes of off-task thought at random intervals during task performance. However, mind-wandering probe questions and response options are often chosen ad hoc and vary between studies with extant little guidance as to the psychometric consequences of these methodological decisions. In the present study, we examined the psychometric properties of several common approaches for assessing mind wandering using methods from item response theory (IRT). IRT latent modeling demonstrated that measurement information was generally distributed across the range of trait estimates according to when probes were presented in time. Probes presented earlier in time provided more information about individuals with greater tendency to mind wandering than probes presented later. Furthermore, mind-wandering ratings made on a continuous scale or using multiple categorical rating options provided more information about individuals\' latent mind-wandering tendency - across a broader range of the trait continuum - than ratings dichotomized into on-task and off-task categories. In addition, IRT provided evidence that reports of \"task-related thoughts\" contribute to the task-focused dimension of the construct continuum, providing justification for studies conceptualizing these responses as a kind of task-related focus. Together, we hope these findings will help guide researchers hoping to maximize the measurement precision of their mind wandering assessment procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以前的研究结果表明,人们往往感觉不到他们想要的感觉,支持“实际影响”和“理想影响”之间的区别。“但是是否有某些活动可以减少实际影响和理想影响之间的差异?基于流动理论和社会情绪选择性理论,我们研究了人们的实际和理想的积极影响之间的差异是否会在更有利于流动的活动期间更小(强烈吸收和集中的状态),愉快,和熟悉。在研究1中,年龄在17-79岁(N=393)的美国参与者报告了他们理想的影响以及他们在不同程度的挑战和技能活动中的感受。对于低唤醒积极情感(LAP)和高唤醒积极情感(HAP),参与者报告称,在有利于流动的活动期间(当技能与挑战相匹配时),实际-理想影响差异较小.研究2是一项14天的经验抽样研究,其中18-83岁的香港参与者(个人=109)报告了他们短暂的实际和理想的影响,以及他们的活动是多么愉快和熟悉(Nexperience=3,815)。更高的活动熟悉度与实际理想LAP的较小差异相关,而更大的活动愉悦度与实际理想HAP的较小差异相关。这些发现提供了有关活动的见解,可以帮助人们更轻松地实现其理想效果。
    Previous findings demonstrate that people often do not feel how they want to feel, supporting the distinction between \"actual affect\" and \"ideal affect.\" But are there certain activities that reduce the discrepancy between actual and ideal affect? Based on flow theory and socioemotional selectivity theory, we examined whether the discrepancy between people\'s actual and ideal positive affect would be smaller during activities that were more conducive to flow (a state of intense absorption and concentration), pleasant, and familiar. In Study 1, U.S. participants aged 17-79 (N = 393) reported their ideal affect and how they felt during activities with varying degrees of challenges and skills. For both low-arousal positive affect (LAP) and high-arousal positive affect (HAP), participants reported smaller actual-ideal affect discrepancies during flow-conducive activities (when skills matched challenges). Study 2 was a 14-day experience sampling study, in which Hong Kong participants aged 18-83 (Nindividual = 109) reported their momentary actual and ideal affect, and how pleasant and familiar their activities were (Nexperience = 3,815). Greater activity familiarity was associated with smaller discrepancies in actual-ideal LAP, while greater activity pleasantness was associated with smaller discrepancies in actual-ideal HAP. These findings provide insights on the activities that help people achieve their ideal affect more easily.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字表型和监测工具是自动检测即将到来的抑郁发作的最有前途的方法。尤其是,语言风格被视为抑郁的潜在行为标志,正如横断面研究显示的那样,例如,较少使用积极情绪词,强化使用负面情绪词,与健康对照组相比,抑郁症患者的自我参考更多。然而,纵向研究较少,因此尚不清楚人内抑郁严重程度波动是否与个体语言风格相关.
    方法:要纵向捕获情感状态和伴随语音样本,我们采用动态评估方法,通过智能手机对接受睡眠剥夺治疗的抑郁症患者进行每日多次采样.这种干预有望在短时间内迅速改变情感症状,确保抑郁症状具有足够的变异性。我们使用语言查询和单词计数从转录的语音样本中提取单词类别。
    结果:我们的分析显示,更愉快的情绪短暂状态(较低的报告抑郁严重程度,较低的负面情感状态,较高的积极情感状态,(正)价,精力充沛的唤醒和镇定)反映在使用更少的负面情绪词和更多的积极情绪词。
    结论:我们得出结论,患者的语言风格,尤其是使用积极和消极的情绪词,与自我报告的情感状态相关,因此是基于语音的自动监测和预测即将到来的事件的一个有前途的功能,最终导致更好的病人护理。
    BACKGROUND: Digital phenotyping and monitoring tools are the most promising approaches to automatically detect upcoming depressive episodes. Especially, linguistic style has been seen as a potential behavioral marker of depression, as cross-sectional studies showed, for example, less frequent use of positive emotion words, intensified use of negative emotion words, and more self-references in patients with depression compared to healthy controls. However, longitudinal studies are sparse and therefore it remains unclear whether within-person fluctuations in depression severity are associated with individuals\' linguistic style.
    METHODS: To capture affective states and concomitant speech samples longitudinally, we used an ambulatory assessment approach sampling multiple times a day via smartphones in patients diagnosed with depressive disorder undergoing sleep deprivation therapy. This intervention promises a rapid change of affective symptoms within a short period of time, assuring sufficient variability in depressive symptoms. We extracted word categories from the transcribed speech samples using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.
    RESULTS: Our analyses revealed that more pleasant affective momentary states (lower reported depression severity, lower negative affective state, higher positive affective state, (positive) valence, energetic arousal and calmness) are mirrored in the use of less negative emotion words and more positive emotion words.
    CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a patient\'s linguistic style, especially the use of positive and negative emotion words, is associated with self-reported affective states and thus is a promising feature for speech-based automated monitoring and prediction of upcoming episodes, ultimately leading to better patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:美国心血管疾病(CVD)发病率和死亡率的种族/民族和性别差异是显而易见的。在几乎每个度量标准中,非西班牙裔黑人女性总体心血管健康状况较差.新出现的证据表明,在育龄黑人女性中,CVD风险因素增加的负担不成比例,这对母婴结局都有深远的影响,导致CVD的过早发作,并进一步扩大CVD的种族差异。人们越来越认识到,心血管疾病中持续存在的种族/民族差异的根本驱动因素,以及身体活动和睡眠等行为风险因素的差异,是结构性种族主义。Further,种族歧视的亲身经历不仅对健康行为有负面影响,但也与心血管疾病风险的各种生理途径有关,如内在化应激导致促炎状态。有限的研究,然而,研究了日常经验和健康行为之间的相互作用,受健康的上游社会决定因素的影响,以及对非妊娠黑人育龄女性心血管健康生物/生理指标的下游影响。
    方法:BLOOM研究是一项观察性研究,将10天监测期内的实时动态评估与深入的基于实验室的生理和生物学评估相结合。我们将使用手腕佩戴的活动计设备来捕获24小时的运动行为和电子生态瞬时评估来捕获感知的歧视,微侵略,和压力。血压将通过腕带连续捕获。唾液样本将自我收集以评估皮质醇水平作为心理压力的生物标志物。实验室评估包括空腹静脉血样本,并评估周围和脑血管功能/健康状况的各种指标。参与者的地址或主要住所将用于获取邻里级建筑环境和社会环境特征。我们计划招募80名18至49岁的健康黑人女性参加这项研究。
    结论:这项研究的结果将为多层次的发展提供信息(即,个人,人际关系,和社会环境水平)根据黑人妇女的生活经历量身定制的生活方式干预措施,目的是降低CVD风险。
    结果:
    NCT06150989。
    BACKGROUND: The racial/ethnic and gender disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality in the United States are evident. Across nearly every metric, non-Hispanic Black women have poorer overall cardiovascular health. Emerging evidence shows a disproportionately high burden of increased CVD risk factors in Black women of childbearing age, which has a far-reaching impact on both maternal and child outcomes, resulting in premature onset of CVD and further widens the racial disparities in CVD. There is growing recognition that the fundamental driver of persistent racial/ethnic disparities in CVD, as well as disparities in behavioral risk factors such as physical activity and sleep, is structural racism. Further, the lived personal experience of racial discrimination not only has a negative impact on health behaviors, but also links to various physiological pathways to CVD risks, such as internalized stress resulting in a pro-inflammatory state. Limited research, however, has examined the interaction between daily experience and health behaviors, which are influenced by upstream social determinants of health, and the downstream effect on biological/physiological indicators of cardiovascular health in non-pregnant Black women of childbearing age.
    METHODS: The BLOOM Study is an observational study that combines real-time ambulatory assessments over a 10-day monitoring period with in-depth cross-sectional lab-based physiological and biological assessments. We will use a wrist-worn actigraphy device to capture 24-h movement behaviors and electronic ecological momentary assessment to capture perceived discrimination, microaggression, and stress. Blood pressure will be captured continuously through a wristband. Saliva samples will be self-collected to assess cortisol level as a biomarker of psychological stress. Lab assessments include a fasting venous blood sample, and assessment of various indices of peripheral and cerebral vascular function/health. Participants\' address or primary residence will be used to obtain neighborhood-level built environmental and social environmental characteristics. We plan to enroll 80 healthy Black women who are between 18 and 49 years old for this study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study will inform the development of multilevel (i.e., individual, interpersonal, and social-environmental levels) lifestyle interventions tailored to Black women based on their lived experiences with the goal of reducing CVD risk.
    RESULTS:
    UNASSIGNED: NCT06150989.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分裂型是检查病因的有用和统一的构建体,发展,和精神分裂症谱系精神病理学的表达。积极的,负,和杂乱无章的分裂型维度与精神分裂症谱系症状和损害的不同模式相关。此外,他们通过精神病样的平均水平来区分,可疑,负,以及日常生活中混乱的精神分裂经历,以及影响的时间动态。因此,假设分裂类型的维度可以通过日常生活中分裂类型经历的时间动态来区分。
    方法:本研究在大量非临床确定样本(n=693)中采用经验抽样方法来检查多维分裂型与精神病样的关联,可疑,负,以及日常生活中混乱的精神分裂经历,以及它们的时间动态(可变性,反应性,惯性,和不稳定性)。
    结果:我们复制了日常生活中多维分裂型和分裂型经历之间的平均水平关联。此外,积极的,负,杂乱无章的分裂型被证明是假设的,分裂型经验的时间动态的差分模式。杂乱无章的分裂型表现出最强烈的关联,包括强度,可变性,以及无序分裂经验的惯性。在先前报道的压力之后,杂乱无章的分裂型也减轻了精神病样和杂乱无章的分裂型经历的反应性。分裂型阳性与精神病样经历的强度和变异性有关。阴性分裂型与阴性分裂型经验的强度和变异性有关。
    结论:研究结果表明,分裂型维度可以通过精神病样的平均水平和时间模式来区分,可疑,负,以及日常生活中混乱的精神分裂经历,具有以应激反应为独特特征的杂乱无章的分裂型。
    OBJECTIVE: Schizotypy is a useful and unifying construct for examining the etiology, development, and expression of schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology. The positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy dimensions are associated with distinct patterns of schizophrenia-spectrum symptoms and impairment. Furthermore, they are differentiated by mean levels of psychotic-like, suspicious, negative, and disorganized schizotypic experiences in daily life, and by temporal dynamics of affect. The schizotypy dimensions were thus hypothesized to be differentiated by the temporal dynamics of schizotypic experiences in daily life.
    METHODS: The present study employed experience sampling methodology in a large nonclinically ascertained sample (n = 693) to examine the associations of multidimensional schizotypy with psychotic-like, suspicious, negative, and disorganized schizotypic experiences in daily life, as well as with their temporal dynamics (variability, reactivity, inertia, and instability).
    RESULTS: We replicated the mean-level associations between multidimensional schizotypy and schizotypic experiences in daily life. Furthermore, positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy demonstrated hypothesized, differential patterns of temporal dynamics of schizotypic experiences. Disorganized schizotypy demonstrated the most robust associations, including intensity, variability, and inertia of disorganized schizotypic experiences. Disorganized schizotypy also moderated reactivity of psychotic-like and disorganized schizotypic experiences following previously reported stress. Positive schizotypy was associated with intensity and variability of psychotic-like experiences. Negative schizotypy was associated with intensity and variability of negative schizotypic experiences.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that schizotypy dimensions can be differentiated by both mean levels and temporal patterns of psychotic-like, suspicious, negative, and disorganized schizotypic experiences in daily life, with disorganized schizotypy uniquely characterized by stress reactivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号