Human immunoglobulin products are used for the treatment of a number of diseases, such as primary or secondary immunodeficiencies and autoimmune conditions due to the complete absence of antibodies or the production of defective immunoglobulins. Quality control of human immunoglobulin products is essential to ensure therapeutic functionality and safety. This includes testing for Fc function and anticomplementary activity (ACA), as well as verification of appropriate molecular size distribution using size-exclusion chromatography as prescribed in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monographs 0338, 0918, 2788 and 1928. To this end, specific biological reference preparations (BRPs) must be used. Stocks of the Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP were running low and therefore a collaborative study was run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme, to calibrate replacement batches. Eighteen laboratories, including manufacturers and Official Medicines Control Laboratories, took part in the study. Three batches of candidate BRPs were assessed and compared to Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP 3 to ensure continuity. Based on the study results, the candidate BRPs were adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Ph. Eur. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) BRP batch 4, 5 and 6.

The level of anti-D antibodies in human immunoglobulin products for intravenous administration (IVIG) is controlled by the direct haemagglutination method prescribed by the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) that requires 2 control reference reagents. The World Health Organization (WHO) positive control International Reference Reagent (IRR; 02/228) with a nominal titre of 8 defines the highest acceptable titre, while the negative control preparation (02/226) has a nominal titre of <2. Working reference preparations (04/132 and 04/140) were subsequently established as Biological Reference Preparations (BRPs) for the Ph. Eur., and for distribution by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC). Due to diminishing stocks of these working reference preparations across the 3 institutions, a joint international study was organised to establish harmonised replacement batches. Sixteen laboratories contributed data to the study to evaluate positive and negative candidate replacement batches (13/148 and 12/300, respectively) against the WHO positive and negative control IRRs and the current working reference preparations (BRPs). The results show that the candidate reference preparations (13/148 and 12/300) are indistinguishable from the corresponding IRRs and current BRPs. The candidate preparations 13/148 and 12/300 were adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Immunoglobulin (anti-D antibodies test) BRP batch 2 and Immunoglobulin (anti-D antibodies test negative control) BRP batch 2 with nominal haemagglutination titres of 8 and <2, respectively. The same materials were also adopted as NIBSC and US FDA reference preparations, thus ensuring full harmonisation.

Patch testing is the only clinically applicable diagnostic method for Type IV allergy. The availability of Type IV patch test (PT) allergens in Europe, however, is currently scarce. This severely compromises adequate diagnostics of contact allergy, leading to serious consequences for the affected patients. Against this background, the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) has created a task force (TF) (i) to explore the current availability of PT substances in different member states, (ii) to highlight some of the unique characteristics of Type IV vs. other allergens and (iii) to suggest ways forward to promote and ensure availability of high-quality patch testing substances for the diagnosis of Type IV allergies throughout Europe. The suggestions of the TF on how to improve the availability of PT allergens are supported by the ESCD, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and intend to provide potential means to resolve the present medical crisis.

This publication describes the outcome of a project to develop a replacement European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for Human tetanus immunoglobulin (TIg) as well as for the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human. Bulk TIg was kindly provided by a European manufacturer and was used to prepare the candidate standard. The candidate standard was freeze-dried and calibrated in an international collaborative study jointly co-ordinated by the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe). The results of this study show that there was good agreement between laboratories for the potency estimates obtained for the candidate standard relative to the current WHO IS/Ph. Eur. BRP. The study also demonstrated that the candidate standard is suitable for use in Ph. Eur. assays for potency testing of TIg products and there was good agreement in the potency estimates obtained using the different assay methods included in the study. Accelerated degradation studies performed at the MHRA over a period of 4 years suggest that the freeze-dried candidate standard will be very stable. The candidate standard was established as Ph. Eur. BRP for Human tetanus immunoglobulin, batch 2 with an assigned potency of 45 IU/ampoule. The same preparation was also adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) to serve as the WHO 2nd IS for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human (13/240).

For more than 50 years, in vivo assays have been used for testing pharmaceutical product safety due to their assumed ability to broadly detect potential unidentified contaminants. As part of these in vivo tests, the animal tests for depressor substances and histamine have been described in the European Pharmacopoeia since its first edition in 1977. Both tests measure the effect of histamine and histamine-like substances, using guinea-pigs and cats respectively. In 2024, the Histamine (2.6.10) general chapter is referenced in the Production section of four monographs and 10 monographs have variations of a sentence on designing the manufacturing process to eliminate or minimise substances lowering blood pressure in this same section, without referencing the chapter. The Depressor substances (2.6.11) chapter is referenced only in the Histamine (2.6.10) chapter as a next step if the histamine test is invalid. A historical search was performed and it has shown that the tests for histamine and for depressor substances were introduced by different groups of experts in an inconsistent way at different times, and for different reasons, leading to non-harmonised approaches across monographs. The control of histamine and other depressor substances has been the subject of numerous debates where their use was questioned. During these discussions, reports on positive cases or batches failing the test for histamine or depressor substances were anecdotal. In addition, in vivo tests can be considered non-specific, very variable, time-consuming, costly and ethically doubtful. More importantly, the majority of in vivo methods originate from a time when good manufacturing practice was not widely used and formal method validation requirements were not yet established. In view of the above, the removal of all references to animal tests for histamine or depressor substances from all texts still referring to them is proposed. Since the sentences in the Production section referring to the control of \"substances lowering blood pressure\", \"vasoactive substances\" or \"hypotensive substances\" appeared as remainders of the animal test without further guarantee of safety, it will also be proposed to remove all these sentences from the concerned monographs. Ultimately, the suppression of general chapters 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 from the Ph. Eur. is envisaged. Independently from the above, it is also envisaged to elaborate a new general chapter Histamine in active substances (2.5.47) to include physicochemical or immunochemical methods enabling the detection of histamine. This new text would aim at supporting manufacturers in their histamine control strategy following the inclusion of precaution statements in the general monograph on Products of fermentation (1468); these statements had been added in Ph. Eur. Supplements 9.6 and 10.4, following adverse events related to a GMP issue with gentamicin sulfate. This strategy has been endorsed by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission at its 177th Session in November 2023. The concerned monographs would be a subject of public consultation in Pharmeuropa 36.2 (April 2024).

In 2010, the reporting of thrombotic adverse events for one subcutaneous and certain intravenous immunoglobulins (IGs) raised some concerns. In Europe, regulatory bodies rapidly revised compendial specifications for therapeutic IGs to ensure they do not exhibit thrombogenic (procoagulant) activity (PCA). At the global level, a working group (GWG) was launched with the aim of assessing PCA measurement methods and limits, considering results obtained by human IG manufacturers during in-process controls. The GWG created three dedicated subgroups to investigate the FXIa chromogenic assay, the non-activated partial thromboplastin time (NAPTT) test and the thrombin generation assay (TGA). The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) was responsible for co-ordinating the subgroup in charge of evaluating the FXIa chromogenic assay in a study that assessed the sensitivity and robustness of two commercial chromogenic FXIa test kits. The impact of IG product formulation on FXIa recovery and the suitability of PCA-containing IG products as potential reference standards/controls were also assessed. IG materials representative of marketed products were provided to four laboratories for a study that was carried out in two steps: 1) two chromogenic FXIa test kit manufacturers assessed the performance and determined optimal test conditions by their respective methods, 2) two OMCLs studied both kits using an optimised study design. Regarding sensitivity, the study results identified suitable dose-response intervals and limits with both chromogenic FXIa test kits. This allowed the establishment of dilution ranges for optimal detection of FXIa/PCA in 5 % and 10 % IG products in the range of 1-6 mIU/mL. However, careful optimisation of the sample dilutions was required (notably to avoid potential matrix effects) and the choice of the mode of data acquisition (kinetic or end-point method) contributed to sensitivity in routine use. Importantly, the composition of IG products was of minor concern for FXIa determination with both test kits. Potential reference materials evaluated in the study behaved as expected and could be useful should a separate reference standard to the FXIa WHO IS be deemed necessary in future.

This publication describes the outcome of a project to develop a replacement European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for Human tetanus immunoglobulin (TIg) as well as for the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human. Bulk TIg was kindly provided by a European manufacturer and was used to prepare the candidate standard. The candidate standard was freeze-dried and calibrated in an international collaborative study jointly co-ordinated by the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe). The results of this study show that there was good agreement between laboratories for the potency estimates obtained for the candidate standard relative to the current WHO IS/Ph. Eur. BRP. The study also demonstrated that the candidate standard is suitable for use in Ph. Eur. assays for potency testing of TIg products and there was good agreement in the potency estimates obtained using the different assay methods included in the study. Accelerated degradation studies performed at the MHRA over a period of 4 years suggest that the freeze-dried candidate standard will be very stable. The candidate standard was established as Ph. Eur. BRP for Human tetanus immunoglobulin, batch 2 with an assigned potency of 45 IU/ampoule. The same preparation was also adopted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) to serve as the WHO 2nd IS for Tetanus Immunoglobulin, Human (13/240).

An international collaborative study was run within the framework of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the Council of Europe and the Commission of the European Union to establish replacement batches for European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Heparin Low-Molecular-Mass (LMM) for calibration Chemical Reference Substance batch 3 (CRS3) used for the characterisation of LMM heparins by high performance size-exclusion chromatography. Two candidate batches (A, cCRS4 and B, cCRS5) were filled using the same material as the existing official calibrants, adopted with either an assigned number-average molecular mass (Mna) or a broad standard table (BST). Fifteen laboratories evaluated the suitability of these candidate batches for use as calibrants with the pharmacopoeial dual refractive index/ultraviolet (RI/UV) detector calibration method, as well as with a modified mobile phase and the BST calibration method. Seven preparations of LMM heparin were tested. The results confirmed that the proposed batches are suitable for use with the same characteristic Mna as CRS3 and with the BST established for the World Health Organization (WHO) 2nd International Standard (IS). The BST calibration method gave comparable results to the RI/UV method, while showing better reproducibility, being easier to perform and requiring no calibrant with UV absorbance. The modified mobile phase had no impact on the calculated values while improving separation between the calibrant and salt peaks. The two candidate batches were adopted as Ph. Eur. Heparin LMM for calibration CRS batches 4 and 5, respectively, with the assigned Mna value of 3800 and a BST. In anticipation of the depletion of the calibrant required for use with the RI/UV method, and taking into account the unlikely procurement of a new lot of suitable starting material, it was recommended to include the BST method in Ph. Eur. monograph 0828, Heparins, low-molecular-mass. In order to improve peak separation, it was also recommended to include the use of ammonium acetate solution as mobile phase in the monograph, both for the Ph. Eur. RI/UV and the proposed BST calibration methods. Further to this study, Ph. Eur. monograph 0828 was revised to replace the RI/UV method by the BST method. This contributed to the harmonisation of methods across regions, thereby facilitating a concerted global action for the development and establishment of the next batches of calibrants for the quality control of LMM heparins.

Several analytical procedures are described in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) to determine total protein content. However, the method for the determination of protein content in therapeutic immunoglobulins prescribed in the Ph. Eur. monographs is the Kjeldahl method. The Kjeldahl method is time-consuming and requires the use of large amounts of hazardous reagents, which also results in the production of a large amount of hazardous chemical waste. The purpose of this work was to validate an alternative chromatographic method that requires no hazardous reagents and saves time, using the same instrumental conditions specified in the Ph. Eur. for the human immunoglobulin size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SEC-HPLC) molecular-size distribution assay. The chromatographic separation was achieved with a TSKgel G3000SW (600 × 7.5 mm, 10 µm) column, using an isocratic elution, with detection at 280 nm wavelength. The mobile phase consisted of an aqueous solution of 0.03 M disodium hydrogen phosphate dehydrate, 0.01 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate, 0.2 M sodium chloride and 1 mM sodium azide. The protein content of the test samples was determined referring to a standard with a known protein concentration (i.e. Human immunoglobulin (molecular size) Biological Reference Preparation). The method was validated evaluating the characteristics precision and trueness according to the ICH Q2 guideline, and the goodness of linear fit for the signal response was assessed (given for information only). In addition, the equivalence of methods was evaluated with two one-sided t-tests (TOST) analysis with the Kjeldahl method mentioned in Ph. Eur. monographs on therapeutic immunoglobulins, and with Bland-Altman analysis of SEC-HPLC and manufacturers\' data (Kjeldahl and biuret methods). The uncertainty of measurement was also calculated in order to evaluate the accuracy and quality of the results, thus facilitating a reliable compliance/non-compliance decision. Based on the outcome, the method is proposed as a suitable and convenient alternative for the determination of protein content in human immunoglobulins.

Monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) are the basis for quality control of medicinal plants and therefore important to ensure the consistency, quality, safety, and efficacy of phytopharmaceuticals. The traditional medicinal plant sundew (Drosera sp.) has disappeared from therapy due to nature conservation, but can now be cultivated sustainably on rewetted peatland. However, currently there is no valid Ph. Eur. monograph for the quality control of Droserae herba. In this study, sundew material from different species and sources was investigated with the aim of developing quality control methods based on the Ph. Eur. and defining a uniform quality standard for Droserae herba. It was possible to distinguish between sundew species of different quality, using macroscopic, microscopic, and chromatographic methods. Special emphasis was laid on the content of flavonoids and naphthoquinones as important quality parameters as their content differed between the sundew species. The differences in content and toxicity result in the recommendation that only round-leaved sundew (Drosera rotundifolia L.) should be used as a medicinal plant for the production of phytopharmaceuticals in the future.