Bronchogenic cysts, first described in 1859, are rare congenital cystic malformations of the respiratory tract, with an incidence of one per 42,000-68,000 hospital admissions in one hospital series. They comprise 10-15% of mediastinal tumors and between 50% and 60% of mediastinal cystic lesions. Its clinical diagnosis is often challenging due to the absence of distinct imaging features. This case report focuses on the case of a 51-year-old female who initially received a misdiagnosis of esophageal leiomyoma. Subsequently, during exploration in the operating theater, right thoracoscopy revealed the presence of an esophageal bronchogenic cyst.

Background: Although heartburn and reflux are frequently reported in ulcerative colitis [UC], the correlation between UC and gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD], and its complications, esophageal stricture and Barrett\'s esophagus [BE], is not well understood. This study aims to examine the prevalence and associated risk of GERD and its complications within the UC population. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset, consisting of 7,159,694 patients, comparing GERD patients with and without UC to those without GERD. We assessed the degree of colonic involvement in UC and the occurrence of esophageal complications. Bivariate analyses were conducted using the chi-squared test or Fisher exact test (two-tailed). Results: A higher prevalence of GERD (23.0% vs. 16.5%) and GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) (22.3% vs. 16%) and erosive esophagitis (EE) (1.2% vs. 0.6%), was found in UC patients (p < 0.01), including pancolitis, proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, left-sided colitis, and indetermined UC (with undefined colonic involvement). UC patients were more likely to develop GERD (1.421), NERD (1.407), and EE (1.681) (p < 0.01). A higher prevalence of esophageal stricture (16.9 vs. 11.4 per 10,000 patients) and BE without dysplasia (94.5 vs. 39.3 per 10,000 patients) was found in UC (p < 0.05). The odds of developing BE without dysplasia were higher (1.892) in patients with UC (p < 0.01), including ulcerative pancolitis, proctitis, and indeterminate UC (OR of 1.657, 3.328, and 1.996, respectively) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates an increased risk of developing GERD and its complications in UC. This highlights the importance of vigilant monitoring and early intervention to minimize associated GERD-related risks in patients with UC.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard therapy for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC) presently. However, postoperative mucosal defects often lead to esophageal stricture. Although steroid application is effective prophylaxis, the efficacy and safety of various steroid administration modes remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different steroid administrations for SEC patients post-ESD.
METHODS: A search for relevant studies was conducted on China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to March 25, 2024. Treatment strategies were categorized into four groups: no prevention as control (CON), steroid injection (SI), oral steroids (OS), and SI combined with OS (SI+OS). Comparative meta-analysis was conducted to assess outcomes, including postoperative esophageal stricture rate and the number of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) sessions required after stricture.
RESULTS: A total of 25 studies, involving 1555 patients, were included. The SUCRA rankings were as follows: SI+OS (98.9%) > OS (59.9%) > SI (41.2%) > CON (0.0%) in preventing postoperative esophageal stricture rate, and OS (76.9%) > SI+OS (62.1%) > SI (61.0%) > CON (0.0%) in the number of EBD sessions required. Forest plot results indicated that compared with the non-steroid group, steroid interventions were associated with lower rates of postoperative stricture and fewer EBD sessions. Additionally, SI+OS was superior to SI or OS alone in preventing stricture, with no significant differences observed between different steroid administrations in terms of EBD sessions. The incidence of adverse reactions was less than 10% for all interventions, mostly mild and resolvable upon discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that combined administration appears preferable for preventing esophageal stricture in patients post-ESD, and steroids could enhance stricture prognosis. However, due to the lack of large-sample RCT studies comparing different steroid administrations, more high-quality research is necessary to confirm these findings in the future.

UNASSIGNED: Long-term (>30 days) esophageal stenting is controversial. Previous studies have documented complications associated with long-term esophageal stent use. This study\'s objective was to investigate complications associated with long-term esophageal stent use.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of stenting done by thoracic surgery for any reason between 2010-2020 was completed. Patients were included if they had at least 30 days of follow-up after their initial stent placement. Outcomes included stent dwell time, patient outcomes, procedural and stent-related complications.
UNASSIGNED: Fifty-six patients, with 25 having ≥2 stents placed were included; overall, 90 stents were placed. The median length of initial esophageal stent dwell time was 59 [interquartile range (IQR), 21-119] days. Stent migration was the most common complication and occurred more with benign indications (P=0.12). As the length of dwell time increased, prevalence of any complication decreased. Complication rates between short-term (<30 days) and long-term stents were not significantly different (P=0.39). No instances of esophageal perforation or aortoesophageal fistulas related to stents were identified. There was one instance of post-esophagectomy tracheoesophageal fistula which was managed successfully with prolonged stenting.
UNASSIGNED: Over a 10-year period, there were no instances of stent erosion into the aorta or esophageal perforation, and the most frequent stent-related complication was stent migration. Long-term esophageal stenting did not result in increased rates of stent related complications in our cohort. This case series demonstrates that long-term stents may be safely used for many different indications. Randomized controlled studies may be needed to validate these findings.

UNASSIGNED: A key unknown in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is the long-term course of esophageal stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate the course of esophageal strictures using structured serial esophagrams and determine predictors of diameter improvement in patients with EoE.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study of 78 EoE patients who completed 2 structured esophagrams at an academic tertiary referral center between 2003 and 2021. Maximum and minimum esophageal diameters were measured during esophagram using a standardized protocol to reduce measurement errors.
UNASSIGNED: The median age at first esophagram was 36.2 (12.9-64.3) years; 60.3% of patients were male; 41 patients had active EoE; and 9 were inactive. Of the patients, 39.7% had allergic rhinitis, asthma (32.1%), and atopic dermatitis (7.7%). Medical therapies at second esophagram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy included proton pump inhibitors (39.5%), swallowed topical steroids (31.6%), diet elimination (13.2%), biologic therapies (1.3%), and clinical trial medications (1.3%). Median maximum diameter significantly increased by 1.0 mm (Q1: -1.0 mm, Q3: 3.0 mm) (P = .034), independent of dilation (P = .744). Increase was most profound in patients starting in the lowest maximum diameter group (9-15 mm) with median increase of 3.0 mm. For patients in disease remission at the second esophagram, there was a significant increase in maximum diameter per year compared to active disease at 0.8 mm (Q1: 0.0 mm, Q3: 5.3 mm) and 0.0 mm (Q1: -0.4 mm, Q3: 0.6 mm) respectively (P = .019).
UNASSIGNED: Long-term improvement in esophageal strictures in patients with EoE may occur but is modest and likely occurs over years. Progression also appears to be minimal. Continuous medical treatment may reduce the rate of stricture recurrence and may improve stricture diameter over time.

A 73-year-old male patient was referred to us with a long Barrett\'s esophagus (BE). He had a history of pulmonary embolism under anticoagulant therapy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a C8M9 BE with no macroscopic lesions. Random biopsies from the BE revealed multifocal high-grade dysplasia. The case was discussed in a multidisciplinary team conference and the decision for full resection of BE with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was made. Considering the large ESD resection and the high risk of stricture, we developed a novel preventive technique: the \"steroid lifting method\" for submucosal injection during ESD. Complete circumferential ESD with en bloc resection was performed using the \"steroid lifting method\", without adverse events. Oral liquids were initiated on day 1 and the patient was discharged on day 4. Oral prednisolone (30 mg per day) was started and tapered for a total of 6 weeks. The pathological examination confirmed multifocal high-grade dysplasia, with radical and curative resection. The patient had neither stricture, dysphagia nor recurrence of Barrett\'s mucosa at the 2, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up. International guidelines recommend oral prednisolone and triamcinolone injection to prevent stricture formation in large ESD of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, there is no solid data on BE ESD. The risk factors for stricture formation and the optimal preventive management after large BE ESD is not known. The \"steroid lifting method\" might be an option in this context. Large prospective studies addressing stricture formation and preventive measures on BE ESD are necessary.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of intralesional steroid treatment in refractory caustic esophageal stricture.
METHODS: An analytical, retrospective study of patients receiving intralesional steroid treatment with triamcinolone acetonide as a result of refractory caustic esophageal stricture was carried out. Demographic variables, stricture characteristics, number of dilations, steroid injections, and dilation score (no. of dilations/follow-up period in months) pre- and post-treatment were collected. Stricture characteristics (diameter and length) and dilation score pre- and post-treatment were compared using the T-Test or Wilcoxon test.
RESULTS: N= 5. Median age: 5 years (17 months-7 years). Follow-up: 6.60 ± 2.70 years. Swallowed products included NaOH, KOH, and ClH. Zargar classification at follow-up initiation was IIb (n= 2), IIIa (n= 1), and two chronic strictures. 6.6 ± 9.23 esophageal dilations were carried out before steroid treatment initiation. The mean number of intralesional therapy sessions was 11.20 ± 6.14. Stricture length decreased by 3.60 ± 2.63 cm (t= 3.06; p= 0.019). No differences were found in terms of diameter increase: -1.60 ± 3.58 mm (t= -1.00; p= 0.187). The dilation score diminished from 1.47 ± 0.86 to 0.47 ± 0.18 dilations per month of follow-up (Z= -2.02; p= 0.043).
CONCLUSIONS: Even though there is limited evidence available in the pediatric population, intralesional triamcinolone treatment is seemingly useful in the treatment of refractory caustic esophageal stricture, since it reduces length and dilation score.
OBJECTIVE: Analizar la eficacia del tratamiento intralesional con corticosteroide en estenosis esofágicas cáusticas refractarias.
METHODS: Estudio analítico y retrospectivo de pacientes tratados con corticosteroide intralesional (triamcinolona acetónido) por estenosis esofágicas cáusticas refractarias. Se recogieron variables demográficas, características de la estenosis, número de dilataciones, inyecciones de corticosteroide e índice de dilatación (nº dilataciones/periodo de seguimiento en meses) pre y post tratamiento. Se compararon las características de la estenosis (diámetro y longitud) e índice de dilatación pre y post tratamiento con T-Test o Test de Wilcoxon.
RESULTS: N= 5. Edad mediana 5 años (17 meses-7años) y seguimiento de 6,60 ± 2,70 años. Los productos ingeridos fueron NaOH, KOH y ClH. La clasificación de Zargar al inicio del seguimiento fue IIb (n= 2), IIIa (n= 1) y dos estenosis crónicas. Se realizaron 6,6 ± 9,23 dilataciones esofágicas previas al tratamiento con corticosteroide. El número de sesiones de terapia intralesional promedio fue 11,20 ± 6,14. La longitud de la estenosis mostró una reducción de 3,60 ± 2,63 cm (t= 3,06 ; p= 0,019). No encontramos diferencias en el incremento del diámetro: –1,60 ± 3,58 mm (t= –1,00 ; p= 0,187). El índice de dilatación se redujo de 1,47 ± 0,86 a 0,47 ± 0,18 dilataciones por mes de seguimiento (Z= –2,02 ; p= 0,043).
CONCLUSIONS: Aunque la evidencia disponible en población pediátrica es limitada, la terapia con triamcinolona intralesional parece ser útil en el tratamiento de estenosis esofágicas cáusticas refractarias, al reducir su longitud y el índice de dilatación.

OBJECTIVE: There is a high incidence of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cervical esophageal cancer. We aimed to elucidate the risk factors for stricture and evaluate the efficacy of steroid injection for stricture prevention in the cervical esophagus.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent ESD for cervical esophageal cancer to: (1) identify the factors associated with stricture among patients who did not receive steroid injection; (2) compare the incidence of stricture between patients with and without steroid injection.
RESULTS: Among 48 patients who did not receive steroid injection, there were significant differences in tumor size (P = .026), resection time (P = .028), and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect (P = .005) between patients with stricture (n = 5) and without stricture (n = 43). Compared with patients without steroid injection, patients with steroid injection had a significantly lower incidence of stricture when the post-ESD mucosal defect was < 3/4 and ≥ 1/2 (40% versus 8%, P = .039). As for the patients with a post-ESD mucosal defect of ≥ 3/4 (n = 13), local steroid injection was performed for all the patients, and 6 patients (46%) developed stricture.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent ≥ 1/2 circumferential resection were at high risk of cervical esophageal stricture. Steroid injection had a stricture-prevention effect in patients with < 3/4 and ≥ 1/2 circumferential resection, but seemed to be insufficient in preventing stricture in patients with ≥ 3/4 circumferential resection.

UNASSIGNED: Pediatric upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy is an important procedure in the management of gastrointestinal pathologies. Conventionally, it has been the forte of medical gastroenterologists. However, unlike adults, the availability of pediatric gastroenterologists is limited, especially during emergency hours. We present our early experience of UGI endoscopy done by the department of pediatric surgery.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to study the feasibility and benefits of UGI endoscopy by pediatric surgeons.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective descriptive study was carried out by the department of pediatric surgery of a tertiary-level medical college, from January 2017 to January 2022. Data were collected from electronic and physical medical records. Parameters included age, gender, indication for endoscopy, and procedures done endoscopically or based on endoscopic findings and complications.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred and thirty endoscopies were done in 95 patients aged 1-16 years, from January 2017 to January 2022. The most common indication for UGI endoscopy was esophageal stricture (71 procedures in 41 patients), followed by UGI foreign body (18 cases). All other indications were mostly diagnostic, other than four patients with achalasia. Thirty of these patients underwent UGI endoscopy as an emergency procedure. Seventeen patients were followed through or had added procedures, with UGI endoscopy. There was one perforation when dilating an esophageal stricture who responded to conservative management.
UNASSIGNED: UGI endoscopy is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic procedure, which can be performed by pediatric surgeons after necessary training. It supplements decision-making in management, avoids waste of time in referring, avoids additional anesthesia, and is valuable in emergencies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with benign esophageal strictures may not maintain a response to endoscopic dilation, stenting, incisional or injectional therapies. For patients with these refractory esophageal strictures, esophageal self-dilation therapy (ESDT), performed to maintain luminal patency, may provide persistent symptomatic benefit while reducing patients\' reliance on healthcare services and the risk associated with repeated endoscopic procedures.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDST in a randomized controlled trial and prospective observational study.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with refractory benign esophageal strictures were recruited at two esophageal clinics between November 2018 and June 2021. Twelve patients participated in the randomized trial and 13 in the prospective observational study. The number of endoscopic dilations, impact of therapy on dysphagia, adverse events, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: In the randomized study, 50% of patients performing ESDT and 100% of controls required endoscopic dilation during follow-up (P = 0.02). In the observational study, the median (IQR) number of endoscopic dilations fell from 7 [7-10] in the 6 months prior to commencing ESDT to 1 [0-2] in the 6 months after (P < 0.0001). Most patients (22/25) were able to learn self-dilation. Few serious adverse events were noted. Dysphagia severity remained unchanged or improved.
CONCLUSIONS: ESDT appears to be a safe effective therapy for benign esophageal strictures refractory to endoscopic treatment.
BACKGROUND: NCT03738566.