UNASSIGNED: Due to the low incidence of malignant tracheoesophageal fistula and the paucity of relevant clinical studies, the benefits of stent implantation have not been well documented. It remains unclear which factors may affect fistula closure.
UNASSIGNED: Between January 2015 and January 2021, 344 patients who were diagnosed with malignant tracheoesophageal fistula at Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, were retrospectively enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Risk factors for fistula closure identified by univariate analysis were further analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 288 patients were analyzed in this study, of which 94 were treated conservatively, 170 were treated with an esophageal stent, and 24 were treated with a tracheal stent. Among them, the delta Karnofsky\'s performance status score values (after 2 weeks/before treatment [p = 0.0028], after 1 month/before treatment [p = 0.0103]) were significantly different between conservative and stent treatment. There was a significant reduction of pneumonia incidence in the stenting group (33.53%) compared to the conservative treatment group (77.05%) after one month (p <0.0001). In addition, the closure of fistulas was influenced by four independent risk factors: 1) treatment methods (p < 0.0001), 2) fistula size (p = 0.0003), 3) preoperative white blood cell count (p = 0.0042), and 4) preoperative Karnofsky\'s performance status score (p = 0.0001).
UNASSIGNED: Stent implantation has become an effective method for treating malignant tracheoesophageal fistula compared to conservative treatment. Additionally, stent implantation, smaller fistula size, lower preoperative white blood cell count, and higher preoperative Karnofsky\'s performance status score suggest a better outcome.

UNASSIGNED: Long-term (>30 days) esophageal stenting is controversial. Previous studies have documented complications associated with long-term esophageal stent use. This study\'s objective was to investigate complications associated with long-term esophageal stent use.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of stenting done by thoracic surgery for any reason between 2010-2020 was completed. Patients were included if they had at least 30 days of follow-up after their initial stent placement. Outcomes included stent dwell time, patient outcomes, procedural and stent-related complications.
UNASSIGNED: Fifty-six patients, with 25 having ≥2 stents placed were included; overall, 90 stents were placed. The median length of initial esophageal stent dwell time was 59 [interquartile range (IQR), 21-119] days. Stent migration was the most common complication and occurred more with benign indications (P=0.12). As the length of dwell time increased, prevalence of any complication decreased. Complication rates between short-term (<30 days) and long-term stents were not significantly different (P=0.39). No instances of esophageal perforation or aortoesophageal fistulas related to stents were identified. There was one instance of post-esophagectomy tracheoesophageal fistula which was managed successfully with prolonged stenting.
UNASSIGNED: Over a 10-year period, there were no instances of stent erosion into the aorta or esophageal perforation, and the most frequent stent-related complication was stent migration. Long-term esophageal stenting did not result in increased rates of stent related complications in our cohort. This case series demonstrates that long-term stents may be safely used for many different indications. Randomized controlled studies may be needed to validate these findings.

Secondary aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is defined as a communication between the aorta and the esophagus, occurring after aortic disease treatment or esophageal procedures, associating very high mortality rates with treatment and being fatal without it. Several treatment strategies have been described in the literature, combining open surgery or endovascular aortic repair with surgical or endoscopic management of the esophageal lesion. We present the case of a 53-year-old patient with a history of open aortic surgery for a giant descending thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm complicated with secondary AEF, successfully managed using emergency transiliac TEVAR (thoracic endovascular aortic repair), extensive antibiotic therapy associated with nutritional replenishment, and rehabilitation therapy. Novel endovascular and endoscopic devices have been developed, offering less invasive treatment strategies with improved outcomes, especially for high risk surgical patients. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to personalized medicine to manage such complex situations.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel technique for removal of migrated esophageal stent (MES) under fluoroscopy.
From January 2009 to April 2023, 793 patients with a dysphagia score of 3-4 underwent esophageal stenting at our center, and 25 patients (mean age: 70.06 years old; male/female: 15/10) underwent stent removal using \"loop method\" under fluoroscopy. The primary outcomes were technical success and complications. The secondary outcomes were procedure time, radiation exposure, biochemical indicators [white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (PLT), albumin (ALB), alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin (TB), urea nitrogen (UN) and C-reactive protein] of pre- and post-treatment at 2 weeks.
Technical success was 100% without major complications. The mean procedure time was (39.44 ± 9.28) minutes, which showed no statistical significance between benign (n = 5) and malignant (n = 20) group [(42.40 ± 8.85) vs (38.71 ± 9.46) mins, p > 0.05]. The mean radiation exposure was (332.88 ± 261.47) mGy, which showed no statistical significance between benign and malignant group [(360.74 ± 231.43) vs (325.92 ± 273.54) mGy, p > 0.05]. Pre- and post-procedure Hb [(114.46 ± 11.96) vs. (117.57 ± 13.12) g/L] and ALB [(42.26 ± 3.39) vs. (44.12 ± 3.77) g/L] showed significant difference (p < 0.05), while WBC, PLT, CRP, and ALT showed no significance (p > 0.05).
Fluoroscopy-guided \"Loop method\" for MES removal is an effective and safe alternative technique.

Although esophageal stenting is one treatment option as a palliative treatment for tracheoesophageal fistulas, serious complications are associated with stent migration. Some reports have described stent fixation using various devices to prevent stent migration. However, these have yet to be sufficiently examined. We performed esophageal stent fixation using the MANTIS Clip (Boston Scientific), a novel re-openable endoclip. An 89-year-old man developed a tracheoesophageal fistula after radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Esophageal stenting was considered because the patient had difficulty with oral intake. However, the patient had a mild stenosis, which suggested stent migration. Therefore, we performed esophageal stent fixation by grasping the mouth side of the stent and the normal mucosa of the esophagus with the MANTIS Clip after placement of the stent. The esophageal stent closed the fistula, and the patient was able to take food orally. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed 3 weeks after stenting showed residual MANTIS Clip and no evidence of stent migration. Esophageal stent fixation with MANTIS clips for tracheoesophageal fistulas may be an option to prevent stent migration.

Carcinoma cuniculatum is a rare variant of well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. To date, there are less than 30 cases of esophageal carcinoma cuniculatum reported. It is frequently a diagnostic challenge: A definitive diagnosis typically cannot be made before esophagectomy. We present a uniquely aggressive case of esophageal carcinoma cuniculatum complicated by a bronchoesophageal fistula and successfully palliated with dual esophageal and endobronchial stenting.

Esophageal cancer is typically identified as squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. There are multiple risk factors that may contribute to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma including smoking, alcohol consumption, and the human papillomavirus. Lesions may appear ulcerated, friable, and circumferential and may obstruct the esophagus. Therefore, patients may complain of non-specific symptoms including dysphagia, weight loss, and retrosternal discomfort. Clinicians often rely on an upper endoscopy with biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. Computed tomography scans and endoscopic ultrasounds are also employed to assess the extent of malignant spread. Management may involve endoscopic resection for superficial lesions or surgical resection for lesions penetrating the submucosa. Esophageal stents may play a role, specifically as a palliative measure for enhancing oral intake. We present an instance of utilizing a self-expandable, metal-covered esophageal stent with balloon dilation in the setting of a newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma lesion in a 73-year-old female. Ultimately, the use of an esophageal stent in this patient helped improve the patient\'s oral intake during her course of hospitalization. Her diet was slowly advanced to clear liquids and progressively to a low-residue diet before being discharged to follow-up with her diagnosis as outpatient with gastroenterology.

This unique case depicts the first published report of a physician using point-of-care ultrasound to diagnose an esophageal stent migration. Discussed in this article are the sonographic findings that clinicians should be familiar with when evaluating patients with abdominal pain or chest pain who have a history of an esophageal stent. When coupled with a high index of suspicion, ultrasound can be one of the most portable, readily available, low-cost, and minimally invasive techniques for making a rapid diagnosis of esophageal stent migration.

Endoscopic palliation of dysphagia for patients with inoperable esophageal cancer is complex, highly dependent on local expertise, and best done in a multidisciplinary fashion. Systemic therapy is the standard of care because it has been shown to improve survival. Esophageal stenting has traditionally been the most used endoscopic modality. Some modalities such as laser and photodynamic therapy are rarely used. There has been an increasing amount of data on cryotherapy, especially for patients with mild-to-moderate dysphagia on systemic chemotherapy. This article will discuss the latest evidence guiding the palliation of esophageal cancer.

UNASSIGNED: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a dangerous complication in the early postoperative period after total gastrectomy or esophagectomy being associated with high mortality. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) play a significant role in AL management. Only one case report described the use of Mega-Stent in AL setting. The authors report a two-case series with different applications of a Niti-S esophageal Mega-Stent in AL management.
UNASSIGNED: Case 1 is a 67-year-old male who underwent an esophagectomy due to a squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus. The early postoperative period was complicated with AL and gastropleural fistula. Initially, an OTSC was deployed in the dehiscence but failed to resolve AL. The esophageal Mega-Stent was further placed in-between the esophagus and the bulbus. Post-stenting contrast studies confirmed no further AL.Case 2 is an 86-year-old woman who underwent total gastrectomy with roux-en-y esophagojejunostomy due to a gastric adenocarcinoma, complicated with AL. A partially covered metal stent (PCMS) was placed to cover the anastomosis. Computed tomography confirmed leakage persistence and a second PCMS was deployed, resolving the AL. Several weeks later, both PCMSs presented ingrowth from granulation tissue. An esophageal Mega-Stent was placed (stent-in-stent technique) and 2 weeks later, all stents were removed, with no AL recurrence.
UNASSIGNED: SEMS placement for AL is a safe, well-established therapeutic technique. Limitations include stent migration and incomplete cover of large AL. Mega-Stent can be an emerging tool for endoscopic AL management.
UNASSIGNED: A deiscência anastomótica (DA) é uma complicação grave no pós-operatório precoce da esofagectomia e gastrectomia total, pela sua elevada mortalidade. As próteses metálicas autoexpansíveis (PMAE) desempenham um papel fundamental no tratamento das DA. Na literatura, há apenas um caso descrito sobre a utilização de um Mega-Stent no contexto de DA, que não complicação bariátrica. Os autores reportam uma série de dois casos com diferente aplicação do Mega-Stent esofágico no tratamento de DA.
UNASSIGNED: Caso 1: Homem de 67 anos, submetido a esofagectomia por carcinoma epidermóide do esófago distal. O período pós-operatório precoce foi complicado de DA com fístula gastro-pleural. Inicialmente foi colocado um clip OTSC no orifício da deiscência com insucesso técnico e clínico, sendo posteriormente utilizado o Mega-Stent, posicionado desde o esófago até ao bulbo duodenal. Estudos contrastados posteriores confirmaram resolução da DA. Caso 2: Mulher de 86 anos, submetida a gastrectomia total com reconstrução em Y-Roux e esofagojejunostomia por adenocarcinoma gástrico, complicada de DA. Neste contexto foi colocada uma PMAE parcialmente coberta (PMAE-PC) sobre a área da anastomose. A tomografia computorizada subsequente demonstrou persistência de extravasamento. Foi colocada uma segunda PMAE-PC, com posterior resolução da DA. Semanas depois, ambas as PMAE-PC apresentavam tecido de granulação nos topos, tendo sido colocado o Mega-Stent (técnica stent-in-stent) e decorridas duas semanas, todas as próteses foram facilmente extraídas, confirmando-se sucesso no tratamento da DA.
UNASSIGNED: A utilização de PMAE nas DA constitui uma técnica terapêutica segura e bem estabelecida, contudo passível de apresentar limitações tais como a migração ou incapacidade de cobrir totalmente DA de maiores dimensões. O Mega-Stent esofágico pode constituir uma ferramenta útil na terapêutica endoscópica destes doentes.