BACKGROUND: The cancer risk for each length of Barrett\'s esophagus (BE) in Japanese is unknown. This nationwide, multi-institutional study aims to clarify the cancer risk by length of BE in the general Japanese population.
METHODS: Consecutive subjects who underwent upper endoscopic screening at 17 centers between 2013 and 2017 and had at least one follow-up endoscopy by December 2022 were included. The presence/absence of BE and, if present, its length were retrospectively assessed using the retrieved endoscopic images recorded at baseline. Information on the subsequent occurrence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and other upper gastrointestinal cancers was also collected. Cancer incidence was calculated and expressed as %/year.
RESULTS: A total of 33,478 subjects were enrolled, and 17,884 (53.4%), 10,641 (31.8%), 4889 (14.6%), and 64 (0.2%) were diagnosed as absent BE, BE < 1 cm, 1-3 cm, and ≥ 3 cm, respectively. During a median follow-up of 80 months, 11 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma developed. The annual incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is 0%/year for absent BE, 0.0032 (0.00066-0.013)%/year for BE < 1 cm, 0.026 (0.011-0.054)%/year for 1-3 cm, and 0.58 (0.042-2.11)%/year for ≥ 3 cm, respectively. Meanwhile, the incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cancer were 0.039 (0.031-0.049)%/year and 0.16 (0.14-0.18)%/year, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: By enrolling a large number of subjects with long-term follow-up, this study demonstrated that the risk of cancer increased steadily with increasing length of BE in the Japanese population. Therefore, it is important to consider the length of BE when determining the management strategy for BE.

UNASSIGNED: Barrett\'s esophagus (BE) screening is not highly utilized in the United States, and there are few data describing providers\' approach to screening. To fill this gap and guide the implementation of future BE screening strategies, we studied evaluation practice patterns for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by nongastroenterologists.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic GERD using health claims data from the United States between 2005 and 2019. We used up to 5 years of data after the diagnosis of chronic GERD to determine patient factors associated with completion of a gastroenterology encounter. We also identified patient factors associated with whether the first gastroenterology encounter was a direct-access upper endoscopy or an office visit.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 484,023 patients diagnosed with chronic GERD by a nongastroenterology provider. The cumulative incidence of completing a gastroenterology encounter within 5 years was 38.7%. Gastrointestinal symptoms, such as dysphagia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.94-2.30), abdominal pain (aHR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.85-1.94), and melena (aHR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.65-1.82), were strongly associated with completion of a gastroenterology encounter. The patient factors strongly associated with direct-access upper endoscopy included dysphagia (aHR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.52-1.85), weight loss (aHR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.28-1.63), and melena (aHR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.28-1.56).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 38.7% of patients with chronic GERD complete a gastroenterology encounter within 5 years of diagnosis, and gastrointestinal alarm symptoms are the most strongly associated factors for receiving gastroenterology care. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating primary care providers in the development of new BE screening programs.

UNASSIGNED: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence has risen dramatically in the Western countries over the past decades. The underlying reasons are incompletely understood, and shifts in the esophageal microbiome have been postulated to increase predisposition to disease development. Multiple factors including medications, lifestyle, and diet could influence microbiome composition and disease progression. The aim of this study was (1) to identify a feasible method to characterize the tissue-associated microbiome, and (2) to investigate differences in the microbiome of saliva, esophageal tissue, and fecal samples by disease state and validate with 2 external cohorts.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-eight patients (15 Barrett\'s esophagus [BE], 4 dysplasia, 15 EAC, and 14 healthy) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study (Munich cohort). Demographics, epidemiologic and clinical data, medications, smoking, and alcohol consumption were assessed. 16S rRNA Gene sequencing was performed on saliva, tissue biopsy and fecal samples. PAXgene fixation was used as a novel methodology. Microbial community alpha- and beta-diversity, as well as microbial composition at phylum and genus level, were characterized for this cohort and compared with 2 external cohorts: New York cohort and Cooperative Health Research in the Augsburg Region cohort.
UNASSIGNED: We first established PAXgene fixation is a feasible method for microbiome analysis and utilized it to identify a distinct microbial shift in tissue biopsies from patients with EAC, whereas overall microbial diversity in salivary and fecal samples did not differ significantly between disease states. Our findings were similar in a reanalysis to those from a US cohort that used a standardized fresh frozen biopsy collection protocol (New York cohort, N = 75 biopsies). Nevertheless, we could not distinguish German Munich cohort patients from a German population-based cohort (Cooperative Health Research in the Augsburg Region cohort, N = 2140 individuals) when fecal bacterial profiles were compared between both cohorts. In addition, we used data integration of diagnosis and risk factors of patients and found associations with microbiome alterations.
UNASSIGNED: Sample collection and microbiome analysis are indeed feasible and can be implemented into clinical routine by an easy-to-use biopsy protocol. The presence of BE and EAC together with epidemiologic factors can be associated with alterations of the salivary, tissue, and fecal microbial community in an easy-to-use data integration concept. Given a possible role of the microbiome in BE and EAC, it will be important in future studies to take tissue-specific microbial communities and individual taxa into account in larger prospective studies.

Esophageal cancer is a highly lethal malignancy, representing 5% of all cancer-related deaths. The two main subtypes are esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). While most research has focused on ESCC, few studies have analyzed EAC for transcriptional signatures linked to diagnosis or prognosis. In this study, we utilized single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing to identify specific immune cell types that contribute to anti-tumor responses, as well as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We have characterized transcriptional signatures, validated against a wide cohort of TCGA patients, that are capable of predicting clinical outcomes and the prognosis of EAC post-surgery with efficacy comparable to the currently accepted prognostic factors. In conclusion, our findings provide insights into the immune landscape and therapeutic targets of EAC, proposing novel immunological biomarkers for predicting prognosis, aiding in patient stratification for post-surgical outcomes, follow-up, and personalized adjuvant therapy decisions.

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has surged by 600% in recent decades, with a dismal 5-year survival rate of just 15%. Barrett\'s esophagus (BE), affecting about 2% of the population, raises the risk of EAC by 40-fold. Despite this, the transcriptomic changes during the BE to EAC progression remain unclear. Our study addresses this gap through comprehensive transcriptomic profiling to identify key mRNA signatures and genomic alterations, such as gene fusions. We performed RNA-sequencing on BE and EAC tissues from 8 individuals, followed by differential gene expression, pathway and network analysis, and gene fusion prediction. We identified mRNA changes during the BE-to-EAC transition and validated our results with single-cell RNA-seq datasets. We observed upregulation of keratin family members in EAC and confirmed increased levels of keratin 14 (KRT14) using immunofluorescence. More differentiated BE marker genes are downregulated during progression to EAC, suggesting undifferentiated BE subpopulations contribute to EAC. We also identified several gene fusions absent in paired BE and normal esophagus but present in EAC. Our findings are critical for the BE-to-EAC transition and have the potential to promote early diagnosis, prevention, and improved treatment strategies for EAC.

OBJECTIVE: Paneth cells and Paneth cell metaplasia are well-known in pathology as foundational components in the gastrointestinal system. When within malignant cells (Paneth cell differentiation [PCD]), however, the function and significance of these cells is less well understood. Here, we present findings from the first study focused on PCD in postneoadjuvant esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) resection specimens.
METHODS: Patients with EAC treated with neoadjuvant chemoradioation and followed by esophagectomy between 2012 and 2018 in our institution were retrospectively evaluated. A tissue microarray was constructed, and special and immunohistochemical stains were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 64 cases were collected, of which 8 had PCD, as highlighted by periodic acid-Schiff with diastase staining. Adenocarcinomas with PCD were more commonly seen in patients 60 to 70 years of age and typically had a poorly differentiated morphology, observationally fewer stromal mucinous changes, and less lymph node metastasis. β-catenin activation induced by neoadjuvant therapy was more frequent in the PCD-positive cases. Patients with PCD-positive disease had low programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 levels, no positive or equivocal ERBB2 (HER2) expression, and low CD8-positive T-cell infiltration; they were also mismatch repair proficient. Patients with PCD-positive disease showed a survival pattern inferior to that of patients with PCD-negative disease.
CONCLUSIONS: When induced by neoadjuvant therapy in EAC, PCD is associated with high β-catenin activation, less expression of targetable biomarkers, and a potentially worse clinical prognosis.

UNASSIGNED: Cholelithiasis or cholecystectomy may contribute to the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett\'s esophagus (BE), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) through bile reflux; however, current observational studies yield inconsistent findings. We utilized a novel approach combining meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, to assess the association between them.
UNASSIGNED: The literature search was done using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, up to 3 November 2023. A meta-analysis of observational studies assessing the correlations between cholelithiasis or cholecystectomy, and the risk factors for GERD, BE, and EACwas conducted. In addition, the MR analysis was employed to assess the causative impact of genetic pre-disposition for cholelithiasis or cholecystectomy on these esophageal diseases.
UNASSIGNED: The results of the meta-analysis indicated that cholelithiasis was significantly linked to an elevated risk in the incidence of BE (RR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.37-2.29; p < 0.001) and cholecystectomy was a risk factor for GERD (RR, 1.37; 95%CI, 1.09-1.72; p = 0.008). We observed significant genetic associations between cholelithiasis and both GERD (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10; p < 0.001) and BE (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.32; p < 0.001), and a correlation between cholecystectomy and both GERD (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; p < 0.001) and BE (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19; p < 0.001). After adjusting for common risk factors, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and BMI in multivariate analysis, the risk of GERD and BE still persisted.
UNASSIGNED: Our study revealed that both cholelithiasis and cholecystectomy elevate the risk of GERD and BE. However, there is no observed increase in the risk of EAC, despite GERD and BE being the primary pathophysiological pathways leading to EAC. Therefore, patients with cholelithiasis and cholecystectomy should be vigilant regarding esophageal symptoms; however, invasive EAC cytology may not be necessary.

The z-line refers to the squamocolumnar junction which marks the transition between the normal stratified squamous epithelium of the distal esophagus and the columnar epithelium of the gastric cardia. An \"irregular\" z-line refers to an irregular appearing squamocolumnar junction characterized by the presence of columnar mucosa less than 1 cm in length that extends above the gastroesophageal junction. In contrast, Barrett\'s esophagus is diagnosed when columnar mucosa of at least 1 cm is seen in the distal esophagus extending above the gastroesophageal junction with biopsies demonstrating specialized intestinal metaplasia. Current guidelines recommend against taking routine biopsies from a normal or irregular z-line in the absence of visible abnormalities and advise against endoscopic surveillance in this patient population, in large part due to multiple studies demonstrating lack of progression to advanced neoplasia such as high-grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with an irregular z-line. Despite these recommendations, a sizable number of patients without Barrett\'s esophagus undergo biopsies from the z-line and are subsequently recommended to have surveillance endoscopies. Furthermore, patients with an irregular z-line are often mislabelled as Barrett\'s esophagus resulting in significant downstream consequences including higher healthcare costs and reduced health-related quality of life. In this review, we highlight the importance of landmark identification of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction at the time of endoscopy, share recommendations from current guidelines related to the z-line, examine rates of neoplastic progression in those with an irregular z-line, discuss consequences of routinely biopsying an irregular z-line, and highlight strategies on how to approach an irregular z-line if seen on endoscopy. A careful, high-quality endoscopic examination can help to identify visible abnormalities at the z-line, which, if present, should be targeted for biopsies to rule out dysplasia and neoplasia.

Prognostic assessment is of great significance for individualized treatment and care of cancer patients. Although the TNM staging system is widely used as the primary prognostic classifier for solid tumors in clinical practice, the complexity of tumor occurrence and development requires more personalized probability prediction models than an ordered staging system. By integrating clinical, pathological, and molecular factors into digital models through LASSO and Cox regression, a nomogram could provide more accurate personalized survival estimates, helping clinicians and patients develop more appropriate treatment and care plans. Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a common pathological subtype of esophageal cancer with poor prognosis. Here, we screened and comprehensively reviewed the studies on EAC nomograms for prognostic prediction, focusing on performance evaluation and potential prognostic factors affecting survival. By analyzing the strengths and limitations of the existing nomograms, this study aims to provide assistance in constructing high-quality prognostic models for EAC patients.

UNASSIGNED: Over the past several decades, Europe and the United States have experienced a rapid increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Research and countermeasures against Barrett\'s esophagus, its precancerous lesion, are progressing. Because esophageal adenocarcinoma has an extremely poor prognosis when diagnosed in an advanced stage, recommendations for early cancer detection have been made based on the various proven etiological factors of Barrett\'s esophagus and the actual cancer risk of Barrett\'s esophagus. In recent years, there have been indications of an increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma in Japan, and a similar trend of cancer will occur shortly in other Asian countries. Consequently, Asian countries must implement similar countermeasures against Barrett\'s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, referencing the knowledge gained thus far in Europe and the United States.
UNASSIGNED: This review summarizes the latest findings on the etiologic factors of Barrett\'s esophagus and discusses the differences between Westerners and Asians. The current status of Barrett\'s esophagus in Japan and other Asian countries is also summarized.
UNASSIGNED: The etiological factors and cancer incidence of Barrett\'s esophagus in Asia diverge somewhat from those observed in Europe and America. Therefore, it is imperative to implement measures that are tailored to the actual circumstances of Asian people.