OBJECTIVE: To estimate the number needed to treat and cost per additional responder for atogepant and rimegepant versus placebo for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine (EM) in the United States.
BACKGROUND: Migraine has an enormous impact on a person\'s daily activities and quality of life, and results in significant clinical and economic burden to both individuals and society. It is important to understand the comparative efficacy and economic value of oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants) for preventive treatment of EM. Currently, atogepant and rimegepant are US Food and Drug Administration approved for preventive treatment of migraine (rimegepant for EM and atogepant for EM and for chronic migraine). In the absence of head-to-head trials, we utilized an indirect treatment comparison on efficacy data from clinical trials conducted for the preventive treatment of EM. We estimated number needed to treat, a valuable metric used in clinical practice to compare treatment efficacy, and cost per additional responder, which can be used to establish the cost effectiveness of a treatment.
METHODS: An indirect treatment comparison was conducted to compare the efficacy of atogepant 60 mg once daily and rimegepant 75 mg once every other day as preventive treatments for EM using published data from the registrational trials of atogepant (ADVANCE) and rimegepant (BHV3000-305). The efficacy outcome of interest was ≥50% reduction from baseline in mean monthly migraine/headache days (≥50% responder rate), which was variably defined for a base case and two scenario analyses. Number needed to treat and cost per additional responder versus placebo were calculated and compared between both treatments (weeks 9-12 in the base case analysis; weeks 1-12 and 9-12 for atogepant and during weeks 9-12 for rimegepant in the scenario analyses).
RESULTS: In the base case analysis, ≥50% responder rates were 64.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.9-74.5) for atogepant and 51.8% (95% CI, 42.9-60.6) for rimegepant, compared to 44.1% (95% CI, 39.4-49.0) for placebo. The median number needed to treat versus placebo in the base case scenario was 4.8 (95% CI, 3.1-9.0) for atogepant compared to 13.0 (95% CI, 5.9-75.1) for rimegepant. The cost per additional responder versus placebo in the base case scenario was estimated to be $15,823 (95% CI, $11,079-$29,516) for atogepant compared to $73,029 (95% CI, $32,901-$422,104) for rimegepant. Results of the two scenario analyses were consistent with the base case analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Atogepant had substantially lower numbers needed to treat and costs per additional responder versus placebo than rimegepant for the preventive treatment of EM across all evaluated scenarios. These analyses suggest that atogepant may be more cost effective than rimegepant for the preventive treatment of EM. Limitations include differences in inclusion/exclusion criteria and in reporting of the ≥50% responder rates between trials.

OBJECTIVE: To describe exploratory endpoints from a previous phase 2b/3 placebo-controlled trial conducted in Japan and Korea, specifically investigating the effect of fremanezumab or placebo on migraine-associated symptoms and acute headache medication use in patients with episodic migraine (EM).
BACKGROUND: EM is associated with non-head pain symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, photophobia, or phonophobia, which contribute substantially to the disease burden, healthcare resource utilization, and impaired quality of life. Current EM treatments include a mix of nonspecific/migraine-specific acute headache medications, but medication overuse can induce headaches and progression from EM to chronic migraine (CM). In multiple phase 2b/3 trials, the monoclonal antibody fremanezumab significantly reduced the average number of monthly migraine days experienced by patients with EM/CM compared with placebo.
METHODS: This was a prespecified analysis of exploratory endpoints in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial conducted in Japanese and Korean patients with EM (NCT03303092). Patients were randomized to receive fremanezumab, either monthly or quarterly, or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously at 4-week/28-day (\"monthly\") intervals to maintain blinding. Exploratory endpoints reported here were the mean change from baseline in the number of days/month with (i) the use of any acute headache medication, (ii) the use of any migraine-specific acute headache medication, (iii) nausea or vomiting, and (iv) photophobia and phonophobia.
RESULTS: Overall, 357 Japanese and Korean patients with EM received either monthly (n = 121) or quarterly (n = 119) fremanezumab or placebo (n = 117). Compared with placebo, fremanezumab administered monthly or quarterly was associated with a significant reduction from baseline in the average number of days/month with acute headache medication use over three months (difference vs. placebo -2.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.52, -2.11]; p < 0.001 and -2.79 [95% CI -3.50, -2.08]; p < 0.001, respectively). Similar findings were observed in the monthly average number of days with migraine-specific acute headache medications (difference vs. placebo with monthly and quarterly fremanezumab, -2.63 [95% CI -3.31, -1.95] for both; p < 0.001), the average number of days/month with nausea or vomiting (difference vs. placebo -1.09 [95% CI -1.60, -0.58]; p < 0.001 for monthly fremanezumab and -1.37 [95% CI -1.88, -0.86]; p < 0.001 for quarterly fremanezumab), and the average number of days with photophobia and phonophobia (difference vs. placebo -1.22 [95% CI -1.80, -0.65]; p < 0.001 and -1.64 [95% CI -2.22, -1.06]; p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Monthly and quarterly administered fremanezumab effectively prevented EM in Japanese and Korean patients. Fremanezumab also improved other disease aspects including the need for acute headache medications and the frequency of migraine-associated symptoms.

Migraine causes debilitating headaches and significantly impacts quality of life. Effective migraine-specific treatments have been lacking until the advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors, which have expanded therapy options for migraine treatment. This study explores the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine treatment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 criteria guided this systematic review. Five databases - PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Sage Journal - were searched for published, freely accessible, full-text articles in English from the past five years. Eligible patients included those with episodic or chronic migraines who received erenumab intervention. From an initial search yielding 680 relevant studies, 12 prospective observational cohort studies were selected after assessing the risk of bias through the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. All included studies demonstrated a significant reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) by the end of the treatment period, with mild adverse effects observed. No significant short-term or long-term safety concerns were identified.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm a previously reported association of TRPV1 rs8065080 with the risk of transformation from episodic (EM) to chronic migraine (CM) and to extend knowledge about the role of other TRPV1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we first investigated the impact of three TRPV1 SNPs (rs8065080, rs222747 and rs222749) on the risk of migraine chronification in a case-control study. A systematic review and meta-analysis were then conducted to summarize the accumulated findings.
METHODS: Genotyping of the selected TRPV1 SNPs was performed using TaqMan real-time PCR in 167 EM and 182 CM participants. Crude and adjusted odds ratios with associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated in the log-additive, dominant, and recessive genetic models. A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, and OpenGrey until February 2024.
RESULTS: In our case-control study, no association was found between TRPV1 SNPs and the risk of migraine chronification, both in the unadjusted logistic regression models and after adjustment for confounding clinical variables. The results of the meta-analysis with a total of 241 participants with EM and 223 with CM confirmed no association between TRPV1 SNPs and the risk of migraine chronification in any of the genetic models tested.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present case-control study and meta-analysis exclude a major role of TRPV1 rs8065080, rs222747, and rs222749 as risk factors for migraine chronification. However, further research is needed to investigate the gene-gene and gene-environment interactions of TRPV1 SNPs on the risk of transformation from episodic to chronic migraine.

BACKGROUND: Migraine has been associated with functional brain changes including altered connectivity and activity both during and between headache attacks. Recent studies established that the variability of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal is an important attribute of brain activity, which has so far been understudied in migraine. In this study, we investigate how time-varying measures of BOLD variability change interictally in episodic migraine patients.
METHODS: Two independent resting state functional MRI datasets acquired on 3T (discovery cohort) and 1.5T MRI scanners (replication cohort) including 99 episodic migraine patients (n3T = 42, n1.5T=57) and 78 healthy controls (n3T = 46, n1.5T=32) were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. A framework using time-varying measures of BOLD variability was applied to derive BOLD variability states. Descriptors of BOLD variability states such as dwell time and fractional occupancy were calculated, then compared between migraine patients and healthy controls using Mann-Whitney U-tests. Spearman\'s rank correlation was calculated to test associations with clinical parameters.
RESULTS: Resting-state activity was characterized by states of high and low BOLD signal variability. Migraine patients in the discovery cohort spent more time in the low variability state (mean dwell time: p = 0.014, median dwell time: p = 0.022, maximum dwell time: p = 0.013, fractional occupancy: p = 0.013) and less time in the high variability state (mean dwell time: p = 0.021, median dwell time: p = 0.021, maximum dwell time: p = 0.025, fractional occupancy: p = 0.013). Higher uptime of the low variability state was associated with greater disability as measured by MIDAS scores (maximum dwell time: R = 0.45, p = 0.007; fractional occupancy: R = 0.36, p = 0.035). Similar results were observed in the replication cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Episodic migraine patients spend more time in a state of low BOLD variability during rest in headache-free periods, which is associated with greater disability. BOLD variability states show potential as a replicable functional imaging marker in episodic migraine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for migraine prevention.
METHODS: Retrospective, single-center, real-world study.
METHODS: Regional tertiary headache center in Japan.
METHODS: Adult individuals with migraine (n = 165, male = 17, female = 148; average age = 45.5 ± 16.0 years) who received fremanezumab between September 2021 and August 2022.
METHODS: Fremanezumab was administered subcutaneously at a monthly dose of 225 mg or quarterly dose of 675 mg based on patient preferences. Patients received fremanezumab treatment for up to 1 year unless it was discontinued. Monthly data were collected on migraine days, headache days, and days requiring acute medication.
RESULTS: Of the 165 patients, 125 (75.7%) received fremanezumab as their first anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide-related antibody drug. Significant reductions in monthly migraine days, headache days, and days requiring acute medication were observed in those with episodic and chronic migraines. The baseline monthly headache days was 8.1 ± 4.0 in the episodic migraine group, which reduced to 6.1 ± 4.8, 5.8 ± 4.4, 4.7 ± 3.6, and 4.6 ± 3.3 days at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; in the chronic migraine group, the baseline monthly headache days was 20.9 ± 6.1, which reduced to 17.0 ± 8.9, 15.0 ± 9.2, 13.0 ± 7.7, and 12.0 ± 9.1 days at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Treatment benefits were enhanced after 6 months of administering fremanezumab in the chronic migraine group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study of patients with migraine, fremanezumab appears to be effective and safe. Further studies are required to identify additional predictors of treatment success and failure with fremanezumab.

Migraine is a complex neurological condition characterized by recurrent headaches, which is often accompanied by various neurological symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful tool for investigating whole-brain connectivity patterns; however, systematic assessment of structural connectome organization has rarely been performed. In the present study, we aimed to examine the changes in structural connectivity in patients with episodic migraines using diffusion MRI. First, we computed structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography, after which we applied dimensionality reduction techniques to the structural connectivity and generated three low-dimensional eigenvectors. We subsequently calculated the manifold eccentricity, defined as the Euclidean distance between each data point and the center of the data in the manifold space. We then compared the manifold eccentricity between patients with migraines and healthy controls, revealing significant between-group differences in the orbitofrontal cortex, temporal pole, and sensory/motor regions. Between-group differences in subcortico-cortical connectivity further revealed significant changes in the amygdala, accumbens, and caudate nuclei. Finally, supervised machine learning effectively classified patients with migraines and healthy controls using cortical and subcortical structural connectivity features, highlighting the importance of the orbitofrontal and sensory cortices, in addition to the caudate, in distinguishing between the groups. Our findings confirmed that episodic migraine is related to the structural connectome changes in the limbic and sensory systems, suggesting its potential utility as a diagnostic marker for migraine.

The main aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a dual task protocol in people with episodic migraine with respect to both active exercises only and cognitive task only treatments, concerning some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes. A randomized control trial was adopted in people with episodic migraine without aura. Some neurophysiological and clinical outcomes were collected (t0): resting motor threshold (rMT), short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (ICF), pressure pain threshold (PPT), trail making test (TMT), frontal assessment battery (FAB), headache-related disability (MIDAS) and headache parameters. Then, participants were randomized into three groups: active exercise only (n = 10), cognitive task only (n = 10) and dual task protocol (n = 10). After 3 months of each treatment and after 1-month follow-up the same neurophysiological and clinical outcomes were revaluated. A significant time x group effect was only found for the trapezius muscle (p = 0.012, pη2 = 0.210), suggesting that PPT increased significantly only in active exercise and dual task protocol groups. A significant time effect was found for rMT (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.473), MIDAS (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.426), TMT (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.338) and FAB (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.462). A repeated measures ANOVA for SICI at 3 ms highlighted a statistically significant time effect for the dual task group (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.629), but not for the active exercises group (p = 0.565, pη2 = 0.061), and for the cognitive training (p = 0.357, pη2 = 0.108). The dual task protocol seems to have a more evident effect on both habituation and sensitization outcomes than the two monotherapies taken alone in people with migraine.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent and disabling primary headache disorder worldwide, causing significant years lost due to disability (YLD) and impacting various aspects of everyday life. Despite its high prevalence and substantial burden, there is a lack of comprehensive data on clinical patterns and management trends, in places like Tamil Nadu, India. This study aims and also fill gaps by investigating and analyzing the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and illness burden among patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) in the state of Tamil Nadu.
METHODS: This cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, over a three-month period starting from January 2024 to March 2024. The study included migraine patients aged 18 years and above who met the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 criteria and took treatment at the department. Data were collected using patient interviews, medical records, and counseling sessions and using a pre-designed questionnaire. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, symptom prevalence, prescription patterns, and illness burden were analyzed accordingly. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire was used to measure the burden of illness.
RESULTS: The analysis involved 400 migraine patients, 92.5% of them having EM and 7.5% of them having CM. The mean age of patients was 37.5 years, with a predominance of females (73.5%). Patients with CM had having significantly higher average number of headache days per month when compared to those with EM. Tension-type headache (TTH) and medication-overuse headache (MOH) were more prevalent in those CM patients. Trigger factors include lack of sleep, bright light exposure, and stress. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, and depression were significantly higher in CM patients. Acute treatment included NSAIDs and Triptans, while preventive therapy was more commonly used in CM patients. The mean MIDAS score was significantly higher in CM patients, which indicates greater disability.
CONCLUSIONS: The study provides valuable insights into the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and burden of illness among migraine patients in Tamil Nadu, India. Significant differences were observed between EM and CM patients, which highlights the need for comprehensive management strategies. Preventive therapy, lifestyle modifications, and comprehensive assessment of disability are all important in addressing the variable needs of migraine patients and also reducing the burden of illness. Further research is necessary to explore additional factors influencing migraine outcomes in this population.

BACKGROUND: Eptinezumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP mAb) and is used for migraine prophylaxis. Efficacy data are mainly from clinical trials, real-world data are hardly available yet. Reimbursement policy in Germany leads to eptinezumab mainly being used in patients having failed pre-treatment with other CGRP mAb. To date, it is unclear whether eptinezumab is efficacious and well tolerated in this population and how the treatment response differs from patients who are naive to CGRP mAbs.
METHODS: We analysed clinical routine data of 79 patients (episodic migraine (EM): n = 19; chronic migraine (CM): n = 60) from four different centres in Germany. All patients were treated with eptinezumab (100mg). Differences in monthly headache (MHD), migraine (MMD) and acute medication days (AMD) after three months were analysed. The correlation of response with the number of CGRP mAb failures was evaluated. Significance level has been corrected (alpha = 0.017).
RESULTS: After three months MHD, MMD and AMD were significantly reduced. In EM, the median reduction for MHD was 4.0 days (IQR: -6.5 to -1.0; p = 0.001), for MMD 3.0 days (IQR: -5.5 to -1.5; p < 0.001) and for AMD 2.0 days (IQR: -5.0 to -0.5; p = 0.006). In CM, median reduction of MHD was 4 days (IQR: -8.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001), 3.0 days (IQR: -6.0 to-1.0; p < 0.001) for MMD and 1.0 day (IQR: -5.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001) for AMD. All patients were resistant to conventional preventive therapies and most to CGRP mAbs. Fourteen patients had never received a CGRP mAb and 65 patients had received at least one mAb without sufficient effectiveness and/or intolerability (one: n = 20, two: n = 28, three: n = 17). There was a significant association between the number of prior therapies and the 30% MHD responder rate (none: 78.6%, one: 45.0%, two: 32.1%, three: 23.5%, p = 0.010). Regarding tolerability, 10.4% (8/77) reported mild side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of eptinezumab is significantly reduced in patients who have not previously responded to other CGRP mAbs. However, limitations such as the retrospective nature of the analysis, the small sample size and the short treatment period with only the lower dose of eptinezumab must be considered when interpreting the results.