BACKGROUND: Recent anatomical studies have reported the feasibility of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the middle fossa. However, its clinical applicability has been discussed in only a few cases. This article describes the case of a middle fossa epidural abscess successfully drained through a fully endoscopic endonasal corridor and discusses the key technical points.
METHODS: The authors describe an 8-year-old boy who presented with worsening headache, fatigue, emesis, and fever and was diagnosed with a left middle fossa epidural abscess associated with sphenoid sinusitis. Following endoscopic sinus surgery performed by a rhinologist, the middle fossa was accessed by removing the maxillary strut through the transmaxillary transpterygoid corridor. Complete drainage of the abscess was confirmed on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. The patient tolerated the surgery without neurological deficit and demonstrated prompt symptom improvement. He was discharged home after completing a 6-week course of antibiotic therapy and remained free from recurrence at 1 year following surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic endonasal approach may be applicable to a middle fossa epidural abscess, resulting in prompt clinical improvement. The maxillary strut is a key structure for entering the middle fossa. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24288.

We present a case of deep surgical site infection (SSI) at a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial implantation site, resulting from an allergic reaction to an unknown agent. A 38-year-old female with complex regional pain syndrome began an SCS trial, noting 100% pain relief for 5 days. Fluid drainage from the surgical site was reported on POD6 and trial leads were removed the following day. The patient was hospitalized with sepsis. Blood cultures revealed Staphylococcus aureus. MRIs showed skin breakdown and cellulitis of the paraspinal musculature extending into the epidural space. The patient was maintained with antibiotics and rigorous wound care for 9 days and the surgical site infection resolved. The patient proceeded to SCS implantation, and reported good pain relief with the implanted device.
This case report describes the treatment of an infection developed during a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial period. SCS are medical devices used to treat pain, they work by applying electrical current to the areas of the spinal cord that cause patients’ pain. Before patients get an SCS device implanted, they often undergo a trial period first. During a trial, the stimulator device stays outside the body, and only the wires carrying electricity to the spinal cord are implanted. Typically, SCS trial and implantation procedures are safe and result in effective pain relief. However, infections are a dangerous potential complication that can result from these procedures. In our case, the patient developed an infection during an SCS trial period, likely resulting from an allergic reaction to their surgical dressings. The infection traveled down the wires and nearly reached the spinal cord. Since the infection was quickly identified and managed, devastating complications were avoided. The patient was able to get a permanent SCS after the infection was resolved, and had effective pain relief. Our report emphasizes the importance of using strict infection prevention techniques, and monitoring patients for signs of infection throughout SCS trials.

UNASSIGNED: Epidural abscess is a rare but serious infection. Although more commonly seen in men over 50, our case is notable for its occurrence in a pediatric patient, highlighting the unusual nature of this abscess at such a young age, particularly in conjunction with septic arthritis of the hip.
METHODS: A 10-year-old child was admitted to pediatrics for investigation of a prolonged fever. The child presented with back pain associated with left hip lameness. An MRI of the spine showed an epidural collection extending from the 4th to the 10th dorsal vertebrae. This collection compressed the spinal cord. An MRI of the left hip showed an appearance consistent with septic arthritis. A left hip arthrotomy was performed, with laminectomy and drainage of the epidural abscess at D7. The patient was treated with antibiotics. The clinical and biological evolution was favorable.
UNASSIGNED: Epidural abscess is a rare but serious infection, now more easily diagnosed by MRI. It is most often caused by hematogenous spread, mainly by Staphylococcus aureus. Symptoms include back pain, neurological signs and fever. Diagnosis is confirmed by MRI. Early diagnosis is essential to prevent neurological complications and death, as the disease can progress to paralysis. Treatment consists of intravenous antibiotics and surgical intervention as indicated.
CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of spinal epidural abscess is important to prevent neurological complications, sepsis and even death. It should be noted that there are no official recommendations or guidelines for the management of epidural spinal abscesses in the pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cervical spinal brucellosis is low, only a few case reports have been published, and case series are not widely reported in the medical literature. Therefore, clinical features, management, and outcomes of cervical spinal brucellosis are relatively unknown. In this series, the authors report 15 cases of patients with cervical spinal brucellosis, including clinical characteristic, imaging findings, management plans, the institution\'s experience, and outcomes at 1 year postoperatively.
METHODS: The study reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 15 patients who received antimicrobial pharmacotherapy, and anterior cervical debridement and fusion for cervical spinal brucellosis. The data collected included patient demographic characteristics, spinal level affected, abscess, neurology, pathological reports, duration and type of antimicrobial regimens, details of orthopedic management, and complications incurred during the procedure.
RESULTS: Neck pain (100%) and limb paralysis (86.7%) were the most common clinical presentations, and the disease had a rapid progression. The C6-7 segment was the most commonly affected segment, followed by C4-5 and C5-6. Imaging commonly revealed epidural or paravertebral abscesses (80%). There was a significant improvement in the VAS, JOA, and NDI scores three months after surgery, and the scores continued to improve until the final follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference between the pre- and postoperative scores (P < 0.05). The ESR and CRP levels returned to normal within three months postoperatively, being 7.7 ± 4.5 mm/h and 7.55 ± 3.48 mg/L, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the pre- and postoperative levels (P < 0.05). The positive rate of bacterial culture testing of pus or lesion tissues was only 40%, but blood cultures revealed an even lower positivity rate (33.3%). The average antimicrobial pharmacotherapy regimen duration was 6.1 ± 1.9 months. All patients achieved intervertebral bone fusion within 8 months (4.8 ± 1.4 months) after surgery and were cured with non-recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Spinal brucellosis rarely affects the cervical region, but its impact is more dangerous due to potential complications such as paraplegia or tetraplegia arising from epidural abscesses that compress the spinal cord. Surgical debridement, along with essential antimicrobial therapy, is an effective strategy and can lead to satisfactory prognosis in managing cervical spinal brucellosis.

METHODS: This is a narrative review and case report.
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature concerning Grisel syndrome physiopathology, diagnosis, and surgical reports, highlighting the decision-making for treatment and its timing. We describe the role of intraoperative US in the management of 2 cases of GS of the adult.
BACKGROUND: GS is a rare nontraumatic post inflammatory C1-C2 rotatory instability usually affecting children; adult cases are even rarer, and the role of surgical treatment is not well defined.
METHODS: Case 1: A 72-year-old man with upper cervical pain and no neurological deficit; radiologic examination revealed C1-C2 spondylitis and epidural abscess. After antibiotic therapy, the patient developed cervical instability. Hence, surgical decompression and C1-C2 stabilization were performed. Case 2: An 82-year-old woman with progressive right hemiparesis. CT and MRI showed C1-C2 spondylitis with retro-odontoid epidural abscess. Atlanto-axial rotatory instability was evident so surgery was achieved. In both cases, intraoperative US was useful for localizing retro-odontoid abscess and allowing safe puncture of the collection, leading to its remarkable radiologic reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: GS in adults remains a challenge: Patients should be closely monitored concerning neurological and inflammatory status. We describe the successful use of intraoperative US for draining retro-odontoid abscess for the first time, with satisfactory postoperative outcome without need of circumferential approach.

BACKGROUND: Extensive spinal epidural abscess (ESEA) is a rare clinical entity subject to delayed diagnosis, which can be explained by the extension of the epidural collection, thereby delaying the mass effect responsible for its clinical manifestations.
METHODS: We report a rare case of an extensive C7-T10 epidural abscess in a 54-year-old man treated with antibiotics, laminectomy, and abscess drainage. In addition, we conducted a systematic literature search according to the \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews\" guidelines. Relevant studies (1980-2023) reporting patients with ESEA were identified from PubMed databases.
RESULTS: A total of 48 studies reporting 55 patients were included in this study with a mean age of 55.7 ± 14.6 years with a male predominance of 61.8% (n = 34). The median duration of follow-up was 38 months (21.5-64.3). The mortality rate of ESEA was 1.8% for a 21.8% morbidity rate with 76.4% (n = 42) reported to have been improved after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Both single and multilevel laminectomy with abscess drainage for ESEA leads to patient recovery from this devastating condition. Evaluation of the outcome with data on time-to-Nadir and Nadir-to-surgery is needed to codify ESEA management.

UNASSIGNED: Intracranial empyema is a rare but serious and life-threatening infection. It is an accumulation of purulent material in the subdural or extradural space leading to development of subdural empyema or intracranial epidural abscess, respectively. The incidence of morbidity and mortality is high because the diagnosis is often unsuspected. Infections of dental origin could be responsible for such condition.
UNASSIGNED: A 22-year-old female and 30-year-old male patients, both with no significant medical history, presented with subdural empyema and intracranial epidural abscess, respectively, both complicating pan-sinusitis of dental origin. Successful outcomes were achieved with surgical drainage of the lesions, antibiotic therapy, and extraction of affected teeth. Female patient underwent further management for neurological sequelae, while male patient was discharged without neurological complications.
UNASSIGNED: Intracranial suppuration of odontogenic origin is an uncommon but extremely serious complication. The most common dental origins are caries with periapical involvement and periodontitis. Wisdom tooth extraction is the most common preceding dental procedure for this infection. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for the identification and treatment of suspected oral sources. Antibiotic therapy with surgical approach is the gold standard treatment.
UNASSIGNED: This sequel to odontogenic infection is quite rare, but it can be prevented by a good oral hygiene and removal of abscessed teeth.

UNASSIGNED: Cervical spondylodiscitis is a rare pathology, with an incidence of 0.5-2.5 per 100,000 population, posing significant potential risks. This type of infection can lead to neurological impairment in up to 29% of patients. Radical surgical debridement of the infected segment, fusion, and an intravenous antibiotic regimen remains the gold standard in most spine centers. This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcome in a tertiary spine center based on disease severity.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, we retrospectively included all patients diagnosed with cervical spondylodiscitis and treated at the University Hospital Augsburg between January 2017 and May 2022. We collected and analyzed baseline parameters on clinical presentation with symptoms, laboratory parameters, radiological appearance, and surgical parameters such as type of approach and implant, as well as neurological and radiological outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS, and relevant correlations were examined using the t-test for independent samples and the chi-square test.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-four patients (9%) with cervical spondylodiscitis were identified. Twenty-two (92%) surgically treated patients were subdivided into the complicated discitis group (n = 14, 64%) and the uncomplicated discitis group (n = 8, 36%). Seventeen patients (71%) presented with sepsis on admission, 17 patients (71%) were diagnosed with epidural abscess on primary imaging, and 5 patients (21%) had more than one discitis lesion at a distant spinal segment. The presence of epidural abscess was significantly associated with systemic sepsis (OR = 6.2; p = 0.03) and myelopathy symptoms (OR = 14.4; p = 0.00). The most frequently detected specimen was a multisensitive Staphylococcus aureus (10 patients, 42%). Six patients (25%) died after a median of 20 days despite antibiogram-accurate therapy, five of whom were diagnosed with a complicated type of discitis. The follow-up data of 15 patients (63%) revealed permanent neurological damage in 9 patients (38%). Notably, the surgical approach was a significant factor for revision surgery (p = 0.008), as three out of five (60%) ventrodorsal cases with complicated discitis were revised.
UNASSIGNED: Cervical spondylodiscitis represents a severe infectious disease that is often associated with permanent neurological damage or a fatal outcome, despite adequate surgical and antibiotic treatments. Complicated types of discitis may require a more challenging surgical and clinical course.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: De novo spinal infections are an increasing medical problem. The decision-making for surgical or nonsurgical treatment for de novo spinal infections is often a non-evidence-based process and commonly a case-by-case decision by single physicians. A scoring system based on the latest evidence might help improve the decision-making process compared with other purely radiology-based scoring systems or the judgment of a single senior physician.
METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with an infection of the spine who underwent nonsurgical or surgical treatment between 2019 and 2021 were identified. Clinical data for neurological status, pain, and existing comorbidities were gathered and transferred to an anonymous spreadsheet. Patients without an MR image and a CT scan of the affected spine region were excluded from the investigation. A multidisciplinary expert panel used the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), Spinal Instability Spondylodiscitis Score (SISS), and Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation Score (SITE Score), previously developed by the authors\' group, on every clinical case. Each physician of the expert panel gave an individual treatment recommendation for surgical or nonsurgical treatment for each patient. Treatment recommendations formed the expert panel opinion, which was used to calculate predictive validities for each score.
RESULTS: A total of 263 patients with spinal infections were identified. After the exclusion of doubled patients, patients without de novo infections, or those without CT and MRI scans, 123 patients remained for the investigation. Overall, 70.70% of patients were treated surgically and 29.30% were treated nonoperatively. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the SITE Score, SINS, and SISS were 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.95, p < 0.01), 0.65 (95% CI 0.91-0.83, p < 0.01), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.91-0.89, p < 0.01). In comparison with the expert panel decision, the SITE Score reached a sensitivity of 96.97% and a specificity of 81.90% for all included patients. For potentially unstable and unstable lesions, the SISS and the SINS yielded sensitivities of 84.42% and 64.07%, respectively, and specificities of 31.16% and 56.52%, respectively. The SITE Score showed higher overall sensitivity with 97.53% and a higher specificity for patients with epidural abscesses (75.00%) compared with potentially unstable and unstable lesions for the SINS and the SISS. The SITE Score showed a significantly higher agreement for the definitive treatment decision regarding the expert panel decision, compared with the decision by a single physician for patients with spondylodiscitis, discitis, or spinal osteomyelitis.
CONCLUSIONS: The SITE Score shows high sensitivity and specificity regarding the treatment recommendation by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The SITE Score shows higher predictive validity compared with radiology-based scoring systems or a single physician and demonstrates a high validity for patients with epidural abscesses.