Eosinophil-mediated pathophysiology is tissue destructive and tissue altering with proinflammatory, prothrombotic, and profibrotic effects. The distinctive morphology of an eosinophil reveals a cytoplasm chockfull of unique granules, and the granule proteins have numerous toxic effects on cells, tissues, and organs. Eosinophils are not found in most human tissues, and eosinophil involvement in diseased tissues generally is identified by cell infiltration on histopathologic examination. However, eosinophils characteristically lose their structural integrity and deposit granules and granule proteins at sites of inflammation. Hence, their participation in tissue damage may be underrecognized or entirely overlooked. The eosinophil major basic protein 1 is a toxic granule protein and, when deposited, persists in tissues. Major basic protein 1 deposition can be regarded as a footprint of eosinophil activity. Analyses of numerous eosinophil-related diseases have demonstrated clear-cut evidence of major basic protein 1 deposition in affected tissues where eosinophils were not recognized by hematoxylin and eosin tissue staining and light microscopy. Eosinophil granule protein deposition, as exemplified by localization of major basic protein 1, especially when disproportionately greater than cellular infiltration, emerges as a biomarker of hidden eosinophil-related pathophysiology. Consequently, current assessments of recognized eosinophils may vastly underestimate their role in disease.

Eosinophils account for a significant portion of immune cells in the body. It is well known that eosinophils play a role in the pathogenesis of many diseases. In which the interaction between eosinophils and other immune cells is incompletely understood. The aim of this study is to characterize the immune suppressive functions of eosinophils. In this study, an irway allergy mouse model was established. Eosinophils were isolated from the airway tissues using flow cytometry cell sorting. The RAW264.7 cell line was used to test the immune suppressive functions of eosinophils. We observed that eosinophils had immune suppressive functions manifesting inhibiting immune cell proliferation and cytokine release from other immune cells. The eosinophil\'s immune suppressive functions were mediated by eosinophil-derived molecules, such as eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) and major basic protein (MBP). The expression of Ras-like protein in the brain 27a (Rab27a) was detected in eosinophils, which controlled the release of MBP and EPX by eosinophils. Eosinophil mediators had two contrast effects on inducing inflammatory responses or rendering immune suppressive effects, depending on the released amounts. Administration of an inhibitor of Rab27a at proper dosage could alleviate experimental airway allergy. To sum up, eosinophils have immune suppressive functions and are also inflammation inducers. Rab27a governs the release of EPX and MBP from eosinophils, which leads to immune suppression or inflammation. Modulation of Rab27a can alleviate airway allergy responses by modulating eosinophil\'s immune suppressive functions, which has the translational potential for the management of eosinophil-related diseases.

Invasive and costly endoscopic diagnosis is obligatory for the diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of serum biomarkers involved in eosinophil-mediated inflammation in the management of EoE.
A prospective cohort study was conducted in 58 patients with dysphagia. Each participant completed a health questionnaire, underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with esophageal biopsy for histopathological examination and assessment of total, inflammatory and fibrostenotic Eosinophilic Esophagitis Reference Score (EREFS). Serum levels of interleukin 5 (IL-5), interleukin 13 (IL-13), transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), major basic protein (MBP), and eotaxin 3 were determined by enzyme immunoassays. Total of 16 patients meeting the histological criteria for EoE were treated with proton pump inhibitors for 8 weeks, and then the same diagnostics was performed again.
Statistically significantly higher concentrations of MBP and TGF-β1 were demonstrated in the group of patients with EoE, while MBP and eotaxin 3 correlated with the peak eosinophil count (PEC). Baseline MBP levels and eotaxin 3 after treatment significantly positively correlated with EREFS. There was a negative correlation between IL-13 and fibrostenotic EREFS. Additionally, after treatment, a negative correlation TGF-β1 was noted with the inflammatory EREFS and a positive correlation with the fibrostenotic EREFS.
The potential role of MBP in predicting the diagnosis of EoE, eotaxin 3 in predicting the advancement and correlation of IL-13 and TGF-β1 in differentiating the inflammatory and fibrotic course of the disease may facilitate the management and individualization of EoE therapy.

Patients with asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) do not exhibit clinical symptoms because of esophageal dysfunction, although they have endoscopic and histological findings similar to those of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The cause of the symptoms and the differences between aEE and EoE are unclear. The aim of this study is to determine whether aEE and EoE are same disease entities by comparing immune-related tissue biomarkers using immunohistological staining. Esophageal biopsy specimens from 61 patients, including 18 with aEE and 43 with EoE, were analyzed. Immunofluorescence staining was performed to quantify the immune-related tissue biomarkers such as major basic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, eotaxin-3, and immunoglobulin G4. Data are presented as median (interquartile range). There were no significant differences in clinical, endoscopic, or histological features, between patients with aEE and EoE, with the exception of body mass index. There were no significant differences in all immune-related tissue biomarkers between both groups. In conclusions, EoE and aEE displayed similar immunohistological profiles. Hence, they may be similar disease entities with some common pathogenic mechanisms. Our findings suggest that patients with aEE also have histopathological esophageal inflammation.

During eosinophil differentiation, the granule eosinophil major basic protein 1 (eMBP1) is synthesized as a 32-kDa precursor form, referred to as proMBP1, which is processed into the 14-kDa mature form of eMBP1. The prevalence of these two forms of MBP1 in most pathological conditions remains unknown.
To develop the immunoassays that differentiate mature eMBP1 and proMBP1 and apply them to analyze their levels in biological fluids from patients with eosinophilia and hematologic disorders.
We produced a series of monoclonal antibodies and selected pairs capable of discriminating between the two molecular forms of eMBP1. Radioimmunoassay (RIA) was performed to simultaneously quantitate the levels of mature eMBP1 and proMBP1 in secretions from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and sera from patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and other myeloproliferative disorders.
The novel immunoassays possessed less than 1% crossreactivity between mature eMBP1 and proMBP1. Mature eMBP1, but not proMBP1, was found in nasal secretions of CRS patients. In contrast, elevated serum levels of mature eMBP1 and proMBP1 were observed in approximately 60% and 90% of HES patients, respectively, with proMBP1 present in greater quantities than mature eMBP1. Patients with several myeloproliferative disorders also showed high serum levels of proMBP1 while mature eMBP1 remained at basal levels.
The novel immunoassays successfully differentiated mature eMBP1 and proMBP1 in human biological fluids. Further studies addressing the clinical correlates of these assays will help to develop biomarkers to diagnose and monitor patients with eosinophilia and myeloproliferative disorders.

The aim of this study was to explore potential predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets of post-infarct heart failure (HF) using bioinformatics analyses.CEL raw data of GSE59867 and GSE62646 were downloaded from the GEO database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and those with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) at admission and DEGs between admission and 6 months after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with STEMI were analyzed. A gene ontology (GO) analysis and a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed, and a protein-protein interaction network was constructed. Critical genes were further analyzed.In total, 147 DEGs were screened between STEMI and CAD at admission, and 62 DEGs were identified in patients with STEMI between admission and 6 months after MI. The results of GO and GSEA indicate that neutrophils, neutrophil-related immunity responses, and monocytes/macrophages play important roles in MI pathogenesis. SLED1 expression was higher in patients with HF than in those without HF at admission and 1 month after MI. GSEA indicates that mTORC1 activation, E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, and MYC targets v1 inhibition may play key roles in the development of post-infarct HF. Furthermore, SLED1 may be involved in the development of post-infarct HF by activating mTORC1 and inhibiting E2F targets, G2M checkpoint, and MYC targets v1.SLED1 may be a novel biomarker of post-infarct HF and may serve as a potential therapeutic target in this disease.

Eosinophils are rare white blood cells that are recruited from circulation to accumulate in the lung in mouse models of allergic respiratory inflammation. In hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained lungs, eosinophils may be difficult to detect despite their bright eosin staining in the secondary granules. For this reason, antibody-mediated detection of eosinophils is preferable for specific and clearer identification of these cells. Moreover, eosinophils may degranulate, releasing their granule proteins into surrounding tissue, and remnants of cytolysed cells cannot be detected by HE staining. The methods here demonstrate the use of eosinophil-specific anti-mouse antibodies to detect eosinophil granule proteins in formalin-fixed cells both in situ in paraffin-embedded lungs, as well as in cytospin preparations from the lung. These antibody staining techniques enable either colorimetric or fluorescence imaging of eosinophils or their granule proteins with the potential for additional antibodies to be added for detection of multiple molecules.

[No Abstract Available].

Inflammatory factors in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), including major basic protein (MBP), eotaxin-3 (EOT3) and mast cell tryptase (TRP), may predict treatment response to topical corticosteroids (tCS). We aimed to determine whether baseline levels of these markers predict response to tCS for EoE. To do this, we analyzed data from a randomized trial comparing two topical steroids for treatment of newly diagnosed EoE (NCT02019758). A pretreatment esophageal biopsy was stained for MBP, EOT3, and TRP to quantify tissue biomarker levels (cells/mm2). Levels were compared between histologic responders (<15 eos/hpf) and nonresponders (the primary outcome), and endoscopic responders (EREFS<2) and nonresponders. Complete histologic response (<1 eos/hpf) was also assessed, and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated. We also evaluated whether baseline staining predicted symptom relapse in the trial\'s off-treatment observation phase. Baseline samples were evaluable in 110/111 subjects who completed the randomized trial. MBP levels were higher in nonresponders (n = 36) than responders (704 vs. 373 cells/mm2; P = 0.007), but EOT3 and TRP levels were not statistically different. The combination of all three stains had an AUC of 0.66 to predict response. For complete histologic response, baseline TRP levels were higher in nonresponders (n = 69) than responders (370 vs. 268 mast cells/mm2; P = 0.01), with an AUC of 0.65. The AUC for endoscopic response was 0.68. Baseline staining did not predict symptom recurrence after remission. Pretreatment MBP, EOT3, and TRP levels were not strongly or consistently associated with histologic or endoscopic response to topical steroids. While elevated TRP levels may be associated with nonresponse compared with complete response, the magnitude and predictive utilities were modest. Novel methods for predicting steroid response are still required.

Advanced age alters many physiological processes in the body, including both innate and adaptive immune responses, affecting burn wound healing. Previous findings in our lab led us to look more closely at eosinophil infiltration of burn tissues. We hypothesize that burn wounds within the older population present with an increased population of eosinophils than those in the younger population.
A pilot study was performed utilizing samples collected from male and female patients 30-years-old and younger and 65-years-old and older. Samples were collected at day (PBD) 2-6 after burn. Deep partial-thickness burn tissues were collected during surgery, formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE), and assessed by H&E to confirm deep partial-thickness injury. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was then performed for Major Basic Protein (MBP) to identify eosinophils. Eosinophils/mm burn were calculated. Welch\'s Test was used to determine statistical significance of eosinophil measurements between young and old groups.
Thirteen samples, were divided into two groups, Young (n=10) and Old (n=3). The mean and median age for Young was 23yo (Max 30yo; Min. 17yo). The mean age was 81yo and the median 84yo for the Old (Max. 93yo; Min. 67yo). Other demographics included race. It was found that the Young and Old groups had a mean of 0.171 Eos/mm and 0.910 Eos/mm, respectively, which was statistically significant (p=0.017).
Older patients do present with increased eosinophil infiltration in the early stages of burn wound healing within our small sample set. Increased sample numbers will be required to confirm this discovery.