在集约化田地中加强作物多样化具有增加作物产量和减少环境足迹的潜力。然而,在集约化农业中,景观尺度上的这些关系仍然不清楚。解决这个差距,本文旨在阐明作物产量,资源使用效率(RUE),华北平原的环境足迹(EF)随作物多样化水平而变化。管理实践,包括作物模式,字段大小,和农艺投入,使用Sentinel-2和Landsat-8图像和调查收集了1×1km子图的421幅景观。结果表明,在景观尺度上,能源和化肥贡献了53%以上,和37%的碳足迹,分别。氮肥占氮足迹的>98%。磷肥占80%以上,而电力占磷足迹的>13%。与简化的景观相比,多样化的景观表现出几个显著特征:1)冬小麦-夏玉米双作模式(WM)面积比减少56%,2)字段大小显著减小,3)NPK肥料总量减少32%,30%,30%,分别,4)灌溉水投入的增加,柴油,电力,农药和劳动力占21%,19%,21%,77%,92%,分别。尽管将简化景观转变为适度多样化景观时,产量可能会降低33%,随着作物多样化的进一步促进,它们增加了。因此,多元化的景观可以实现产量平衡,RUE,和EF来增强可持续性,而简化的景观同样可以达到平衡,有利于生产力。我们强调多样化景观的可行潜力,通过优化作物组成来促进可持续农业发展。该分析提供了作物多样化的景观尺度农艺和环境表现的开创性证据。
Enhancing crop diversification in intensive fields has the potential to increase crop yield and reduce environmental footprint. However, these relationships at the landscape scale remained unclear in intensive farming. Addressing this gap, this paper aims to elucidate how crop yield, resources use efficiency (RUE), and environmental footprint (EF) vary with crop diversification levels in the North China Plain. Management practices, including crop pattern, field size, and agronomic inputs, were collected for 421 landscapes of 1 × 1 km subplots using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 images and survey. The results showed that, at the landscape scale, energy and fertilizer contributed over 53 %, and 37 % of the carbon footprint, respectively. N fertilizer constituted >98 % of the nitrogen footprint. P fertilizer accounted for over 80 %, while electricity comprised >13 % of the phosphorus footprint. Compared with simplified landscapes, diversified landscapes exhibited several significant features: 1) 56 % reduction of the area ratio of winter wheat-summer maize double crop pattern (WM), 2) a significant decrease in field size, 3) the decreased use of total NPK fertilizers at 32 %, 30 %, and 30 %, respectively, 4) the increased inputs of irrigation water, diesel, electricity, pesticide and labour at 21 %, 19 %, 21 %, 77 %, and 92 %, respectively. Although yield could be reduced at 33 % when transforming simplified landscapes into moderately diversified ones, they increased with the further promotion of crop diversification. Thus, the diversified landscapes could achieve a balance in yield, RUE, and EF to enhance sustainability, whereas simplified landscapes can similarly achieve a balance to benefit productivity. We emphasize the viable potential of diversified landscapes to enhance sustainable agricultural development by optimizing crop composition. This analysis offers pioneering evidence of landscape-scale agronomic and environmental performances of crop diversification.