Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于其产生的高度经济和生态影响,入侵物种的引入已成为淡水生态系统中日益严重的环境问题。本系统综述涵盖2010年至2020年的出版物,重点是非本地侵入性淡水双壳类动物,淡水中一个特别相关和广泛引入的分类群。我们收集了研究最多的物种的信息,研究的主要目标,他们的地理位置,研究持续时间,和研究类型。此外,我们专注于评估所提供的生态证据的水平,非天然双壳类与其他生物相互作用的类型及其影响的分类。共检索到397份出版物。这些研究涉及总共17种非本地淡水双壳类动物;然而,大多数出版物都集中在种Corbiculafluminia和Dreissenapolymorpha上,因其广泛分布和广泛的负面影响而得到认可。许多其他非天然侵入性双壳类动物物种的研究很少。还存在高度的地理偏见,在发展中国家相当缺乏研究。最常见的研究时间较短,较小的空间范围,和更多的观测数据,是基于现场的,并通常在个人和人口层面评估可能的生态影响。根据《外来分类群环境影响分类》(EICAT),有94份出版物记录了可辨别的影响。然而,这些出版物中有41篇没有提供足够的数据来确定影响。侵入性双壳类动物对生态系统最常见的影响是结构改变,以及化学和物理变化,由于他们作为生态系统工程师的角色而被预期。尽管在过去十年中,在该领域进行了大量研究,并且我们对某些物种的理解有所进步,仍然需要长期数据和大规模研究来更好地了解影响,特别是在社区和生态系统层面以及研究较少的地理区域。几种非本地淡水双壳类动物的广泛分布,他们正在进行的介绍,和高生态和经济影响需要继续研究。像这样的系统评价对于识别知识差距和指导未来的研究是必不可少的,以便更全面地了解侵入性双壳类动物的生态影响。并制定有效的管理策略。
    The introduction of invasive species has become an increasing environmental problem in freshwater ecosystems due to the high economic and ecological impacts it has generated. This systematic review covers publications from 2010 to 2020, focusing on non-native invasive freshwater bivalves, a particularly relevant and widespread introduced taxonomic group in fresh waters. We collected information on the most studied species, the main objectives of the studies, their geographical location, study duration, and type of research. Furthermore, we focused on assessing the levels of ecological evidence presented, the type of interactions of non-native bivalves with other organisms and the classification of their impacts. A total of 397 publications were retrieved. The studies addressed a total of 17 species of non-native freshwater bivalves; however, most publications focused on the species Corbicula fluminea and Dreissena polymorpha, which are recognised for their widespread distribution and extensive negative impacts. Many other non-native invasive bivalve species have been poorly studied. A high geographical bias was also present, with a considerable lack of studies in developing countries. The most frequent studies had shorter temporal periods, smaller spatial extents, and more observational data, were field-based, and usually evaluated possible ecological impacts at the individual and population levels. There were 94 publications documenting discernible impacts according to the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT). However, 41 of these publications did not provide sufficient data to determine an impact. The most common effects of invasive bivalves on ecosystems were structural alterations, and chemical and physical changes, which are anticipated due to their role as ecosystem engineers. Despite a considerable number of studies in the field and advances in our understanding of some species over the past decade, long-term data and large-scale studies are still needed to understand better the impacts, particularly at the community and ecosystem levels and in less-studied geographic regions. The widespread distribution of several non-native freshwater bivalves, their ongoing introductions, and high ecological and economic impacts demand continued research. Systematic reviews such as this are essential for identifying knowledge gaps and guiding future research to enable a more complete understanding of the ecological implications of invasive bivalves, and the development of effective management strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外来腹足类对全球农业和园艺等生物多样性和社会经济系统造成了广泛的危害。出于保护和管理目的,关于影响的信息需要易于解释和比较,以及确定影响的因素。这项研究旨在评估南非的腹足类动物,以比较物种之间的影响严重程度,并了解它们在栖息地和机制之间的差异。此外,我们探索环境和社会经济影响之间的关系,以及两种具有生活史特征的影响措施。我们使用了外来分类群的环境影响分类(EICAT)和外来分类群的社会经济影响分类(SEICAT)来评估34个腹足动物对南非的影响,包括其整个外来范围的影响的证据。我们测试了每个物种的环境和社会经济影响之间的相关性,并使用Kendall的tau测试具有繁殖力和本地纬度范围。Kruskal-Wallis测试用于比较机制和栖息地之间的影响大小,分别。这项研究提出了EICAT和SEICAT在无脊椎动物中的首次应用。环境影响和社会经济影响之间没有相关性。栖息地在记录的影响严重程度方面没有差异,但通过疾病传播的影响低于其他机制。繁殖力和自然范围纬度均与影响大小无关。尽管腹足动物是全球农业和园艺害虫,社会经济系统的复原力使得高影响并不常见。环境系统可能容易受到栖息地腹足动物的影响,经历了多次当地湿地岛屿蜗牛动物群的灭绝。南非是唯一遵循这一趋势的大陆国家。获得的关于腹足动物影响的严重程度和性质的知识在风险评估中很有用,这可以帮助保护管理。为了使影响评估更加现实,我们建议报告在EICAT和SEICAT下分类的影响的替代方法。
    Alien gastropods have caused extensive harm to biodiversity and socioeconomic systems like agriculture and horticulture worldwide. For conservation and management purposes, information on impacts needs to be easily interpretable and comparable, and the factors that determine impacts understood. This study aimed to assess gastropods alien to South Africa to compare impact severity between species and understand how they vary between habitats and mechanisms. Furthermore, we explore the relationship between environmental and socioeconomic impacts, and both impact measures with life-history traits. We used the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) and Socio-Economic Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (SEICAT) to assess impacts of 34 gastropods alien to South Africa including evidence of impact from their entire alien range. We tested for correlations between environmental and socioeconomic impacts per species, and with fecundity and native latitude range using Kendall\'s tau tests. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare impact magnitude among mechanisms and habitats, respectively. This study presents the first application of EICAT and SEICAT for invertebrates. There was no correlation between environmental impacts and socioeconomic impacts. Habitats did not differ regarding the severity of impacts recorded, but impacts via disease transmission were lower than other mechanisms. Neither fecundity nor native range latitude was correlated with impact magnitude. Despite gastropods being agricultural and horticultural pests globally, resilience of socioeconomic systems makes high impacts uncommon. Environmental systems may be vulnerable to gastropod impacts across habitats, having experienced multiple local extinctions of wetland island snail fauna. South Africa stands out as the only continental country that follows this trend. The knowledge gained on severity and nature of gastropod impacts is useful in risk assessment, which can aid conservation management. To make impact assessments more realistic, we suggest alternative ways of reporting impacts classified under EICAT and SEICAT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号