Since 2014, sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto®) is widely prescribed for heart failure. Despite neprilysin inhibition\'s benefits in heart failure, concerns about potential amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation and Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) risk have persisted. This narrative review, a decade post-approval, evaluates the risk of amyloid pathology and neurocognitive disorders in long-term sacubitril/valsartan use. Clinical trials, real-world studies, and pharmacovigilance data do not indicate an increased risk of cognitive decline. In patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan blood-based amyloid biomarkers show perturbations, while neuroimaging biomarkers reveal no significant increase in amyloid load. Despite a theoretical risk of amyloid accumulation and AD under treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, current clinical data appears reassuring, and there is no signal indicating an increased risk of cognitive decline, but a perturbation of amyloid blood-based biomarkers, which implies great caution when interpreting biomarkers in this context.

UNASSIGNED: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a common cause of heart failure (HF) in the peripartum. Some medications are considered safe while breastfeeding. However, sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto), while efficacious, is not recommended in breastfeeding women due to concerns about adverse infant development, and no published data suggest otherwise.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to assess the transfer of sacubitril/valsartan into human milk and evaluate the infant\'s risk of drug exposure.
UNASSIGNED: The InfantRisk Human Milk Biorepository released samples and corresponding health information from five breastfeeding maternal-infant dyads exposed to sacubitril/valsartan. Sacubitril, valsartan, and LBQ657 (sacubitril active metabolite) concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) from timed samples 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h following medication administration at steady state conditions.
UNASSIGNED: Valsartan levels were below the detection limit of 0.19 ng/mL in all milk samples. Sacubitril was measurable in all milk samples of the five participants, peaking 1 h after drug administration at a mean concentration of 1.52 ng/mL for a total infant dose of 0.00049 mg/kg/12 h and a relative infant dose (RID) calculated at 0.01%. The maximum concentration of its active metabolite LBQ657 in the milk samples was observed 4 h after medication administration and declined over the remaining 12-h dosing interval, for an average concentration of 9.5 ng/mL. The total infant dose was 0.00071 mg/kg/12 h, and the RID was 0.22%. Two mothers reported continuing to breastfeed while taking sacubitril/valsartan; both mothers stated observing no negative effects in their breastfed infants.
UNASSIGNED: The transfer of sacubitril/valsartan into human milk is minimal. These concentrations are unlikely to pose a significant risk to breastfeeding infants, with a combined calculated RID of <0.25%, which is far lower than the industry safety standards (RID <10%).

BACKGROUND: The first angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor on the market, sacubitril-valsartan, has shown marked improvements in death and hospitalization for heart failure among adults, and is now approved for use in pediatric heart failure. While the ongoing PANORAMA-HF trial is evaluating the effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan for pediatric patients with a failing systemic left ventricle, the enrollment criteria do not include the majority of pediatric heart failure patients. Additional studies are needed.
METHODS: Using the TriNetX database, we performed a propensity score matched, retrospective cohort study to assess the incidence of a composite of all-cause mortality or heart transplant within 1 year. The 519 patients who received sacubitril-valsartan were compared to 519 matched controls who received an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of the composite outcome with sacubitril-valsartan over an ACE/ARB (13.3% vs 13.2%, p = 0.95), or among the components of mortality (5.0% vs 5.8%, p = 0.58) or heart transplantation (8.7% vs 7.5%, p = 0.50). Patients who were receiving full goal-directed medical therapy (14.4% vs 16.0%, p = 0.55) also showed no difference in the composite outcome. We observed a significantly increased incidence of hypotension (10% vs 5.2%, p = 0.006) and a trend toward reduced number of hospitalizations per year (mean (SD) 1.3 (4.4) vs 2.0 (9.1), p = 0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril-valsartan is not associated with a decrease in the composite of all-cause mortality or heart transplantation within 1 year. Future studies should evaluate the possible reduction in hospitalizations and optimal dosing to minimize hypotension.

There exists a paucity of research data reported by analyses performed on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that encompass quality of life (QOL) and the aftermath for patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been done to evaluate the drug sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with a clear focus on the effect it bestows on measures of physical exercise tolerance and quality of life. A thorough systematic search was done in databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and PubMed from 1 January 2010 to 1 January 2023. The search only included published RCTs on adult patients aged 18 and above, with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Data analysis was performed by using the software RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom). The included studies\' bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration\'s Risk of Bias tool. The quality of evidence for the primary outcome was done using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs yielded 458 studies, of which eight randomized clinical trials were included and analyzed. The meta-analysis of the included trials shows that the I2 value is 61% (i.e., I2 > 50%), demonstrating a substantial heterogeneity within the studies. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) expressed in percentage was reported in the five studies, and thereby, a subgroup analysis that yielded a confidence interval (CI) of 95% had the standard mean difference of 0.02 (-0.02, 0.07). The trials had disparity between the reporting of effect on peak oxygen consumption (VO2), measured through cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) methods, six-minute walking test (6MWT), overall physical activity, and exercise capacity. Sacubitril/valsartan did not exponentially improve peak VO2 or 6MWT in these trials; however, the patient-reported data suggested that the quality of life was modestly influenced by the drug. A subgroup analysis was performed using the pooled effect value by the random effects model. The findings showed that the sacubitril/valsartan group significantly was better than the control group in improving HFrEF-associated health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that evaluated the drug sacubitril/valsartan in treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and focused on its tangible effect on the measures of physical exercise tolerance and quality of life. It depicts that the statistical scrutiny due to the lack of significant data and parity across studies did not impart significant improvement of either LVEF, peak VO2, or 6MWT with the use of sacubitril/valsartan; however, the reported exercise tolerance, including daytime physical activity, had a modest impact with the said drug. The pooled values demonstrated that the sacubitril/valsartan group significantly outperformed the control group in improving HFrEF HRQoL.

This study tested whether combined dapagliflozin and entresto would be superior to mere one therapy on protecting the residual renal function and integrity of kidney parenchyma in hypertensive kidney disease (HKD) rat. In vitro results showed that the protein expressions of oxidative-stress/mitochondrial-damaged (NOX-1/NOX-2/oxidized-protein/cytosolic-cytochrome-C)/apoptotic (mitochondrial-Bax/cleaved caspeases 3, 9)/cell-stress (p-ERK/p-JNK/p-p38) biomarkers were significantly increased in H2O2-treated NRK-52E cells than those of controls that were reversed by dapagliflozin or entresto treatment. Adult-male SD rats (n = 50) were equally categorized into group 1 (sham-operated-control), group 2 (HKD by 5/6 nephrectomy + DOCA-salt/25 mg/kg/subcutaneous injection/twice weekly), group 3 (HKD + dapagliflozin/orally, 20 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks since day 7 after HKD induction), group 4 (HKD + entresto/orally, 100 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks since day 7 after HKD induction), and group 5 (HKD + dapagliflozin + entresto/the procedure and treatment strategy were identical to groups 2/3/4). By day 35, circulatory levels of blood-urine-nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine and urine protein/creatinine ratio were lowest in group 1, highest in group 2, and significantly lower in group 5 than in groups 3/4, but no difference between groups 3/4. Histopathological findings showed the kidney injury score/fibrotic area/cellular expressions of oxidative-stress/kidney-injury-molecule (8-OHdG+/KIM-1+) exhibited an identical trend, whereas the cellular expressions of podocyte components (synaptopodin/ZO-1/E-cadherin) exhibited an opposite pattern of BUN level among the groups. The protein expressions of oxidative stress/mitochondrial-damaged (NOX-1/NOX-2/oxidized protein/cytosolic-cytochrome-C/cyclophilin-D)/apoptotic (mitochondrial-Bax/cleaved-caspase 3)/mitochondrial-fission (PINK1/Parkin/p-DRP1)/autophagic (LC3BII/LC3BI ratio, Atg5/beclin-1)/MAPK-family (p-ERK/p-JNK/p-p38) biomarkers displayed a similar pattern, whereas the protein expression of mitochondria-biogenesis signaling (SIRT1/PGC-1α-Mfn2/complex I-V) displayed an opposite pattern of BUN among the groups. In conclusion, combined dapagliflozin-entresto therapy offered additional benefits on protecting the residual kidney function and architectural integrity in HKD rat.

BACKGROUND: Since sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) has neprilysin inhibition and angiotensin receptor-blocking properties, it is anticipated to have strong antihypertensive effects. However, there is not enough evidence to compare the safety and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan to those of olmesartan in patients with hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus olmesartan in patients with hypertension.
METHODS: This study follows the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant clinical trials. We extracted outcome endpoints regarding mean ambulatory systolic/diastolic blood pressure (maSBP/maDBP), mean sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure (msSBP/msDBP), mean ambulatory/mean sitting pulse pressure (maPP/msPP), the proportion of patients achieving blood pressure control (< 140/90 mmHg), and adverse events. We used Review Manager Software for the conduction of the analysis of this study. The effect estimates of the studies were pooled as Mean difference or risk ratio and 95% confidence interval. We also conducted a subgroup analysis based on the dose of sacubitril/valsartan.
RESULTS: A total of six clinical trials were included. The studies showed an overall low risk of bias. The pooled effect estimate revealed that sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces maSBP, maDBP, maPP, msSBP, and msDBP measurements compared with olmesartan (p < 0.001). A significantly higher portion of patients achieved blood pressure control in the sacubitril/valsartan group (p < 0.001). The test of subgroup difference showed that 400 mg dose is significantly more effective than 200 mg dose in reducing maSBP. Regarding the safety profile, olmesartan was associated with more side effects due to drug discontinuation and more serious side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacubitril/valsartan or LCZ696 is more effective and safer than olmesartan for controlling blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

This study evaluated the effect of sacubtril/valsartan on cardiac remodeling, molecular and cellular adaptations in experimental (rat) model of hypertension-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Thirty Wistar Kyoto rats, 10 healthy (control) and 20 rats with confirmed hypertension-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HpCM), were used for this study. The HpCM group was further subdivided into untreated and sacubitril/valsartan-treated groups. Myocardial structure and function were assessed using echocardiography, Langendorff\'s isolated heart experiment, blood sampling and qualitative polymerase chain reaction. Echocardiographic examinations revealed protective effects of sacubitril/valsartan by improving left ventricular internal diameter in systole and diastole and fractional shortening. Additionally, sacubitril/valsartan treatment decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressures in comparison with untreated hypertensive rats. Moreover, sacubitril/valsartan treatment reduced oxidative stress and apoptosis (reduced expression of Bax and Cas9 genes) compared to untreated rats. There was a regular histomorphology of cardiomyocytes, interstitium, and blood vessels in treated rats compared to untreated HpCM rats which expressed hypertrophic cardiomyocytes, with polymorphic nuclei, prominent nucleoli and moderately dilated interstitium. In experimental model of hypertension-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, sacubitril/valsartan treatment led to improved cardiac structure, haemodynamic performance, and reduced oxidative stress and apoptosis. Sacubitril/valsartan thus presents as a potential therapeutic strategy resulted in hypertension-induced hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Sacubitril/valsartan has been approved for the management of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction in adults. PANORAMA-HF trial (Prospective Trial to Assess the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor LCZ696 Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor for the Medical Treatment of Pediatric HF) investigated its effects on clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with HF.
PANORAMA-HF is a multicenter, Phase II/III study using an adaptive, seamless, 2-part design. The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of sacubitril/valsartan (Part 1), and the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril administered twice daily for 52 weeks (Part 2) in pediatric patients with HF due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction with biventricular heart physiology. An innovative trial design using a novel global rank assessment of severity was employed. For analysis, eligible patients were stratified into 3 age groups (Group 1, 6 to <18 years; Group 2a, 2 to <6 years; and Group 3a, 1 month to <2 years) and functional classification (New York Heart Association/Ross class I/II and III/IV).
We report the key demographic, baseline, and clinical characteristics of 375 pediatric patients randomized to receive the study medication. The mean age for patients in Groups 1, 2a, and 3a was 12.2, 3.2, and 1.3 years, respectively. About 70% of patients had a prior HF hospitalization, 85% had New York Heart Association/Ross class I/II HF, and ≈8% were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker naïve.
Compared to other pediatric HF studies, PANORAMA-HF recruited a relatively homogeneous pediatric HF population across 3 age groups, enabling a more robust evaluation of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and efficacy/safety of sacubitril/valsartan. Most patients had mildly symptomatic HF at baseline.
URL: https://www.
gov; Unique identifier: NCT02678312.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with nearly half of all HF-related deaths resulting from sudden cardiac death (SCD), most often from an arrhythmic event. The pathophysiologic changes that occur in response to the hemodynamic stress of HF may lead to increased arrhythmogenesis. Theoretically, medications that block these arrhythmogenic substrates would decrease the risk of SCD. The combined angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi; tradename Entresto) is the newest commercially available medication for the treatment of heart failure.
RESULTS: We reviewed and synthesized the available literature regarding sacubitril/valsartan and its effects on cardiac rhythm. ARNi has been shown to decrease cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Emerging evidence suggests that ARNi also may play a role in reducing arrhythmogenesis and thereby SCD.
CONCLUSIONS: This review summarizes the current data regarding this ARNi and its potential antiarrhythmic effects.

Cardiovascular diseases have become a major clinical burden globally. Heart failure is one of the diseases that commonly emanates from progressive uncontrolled hypertension. This gives rise to the need for a new treatment for the disease. Sacubitril/valsartan is a new drug combination that has been approved for patients with heart failure. This review aims to detail the mechanism of action for sacubitril/valsartan in cardiac remodeling, a cellular and molecular process that occurs during the development of heart failure. Accumulating evidence has unveiled the cardioprotective effects of sacubitril/valsartan on cellular and molecular modulation in cardiac remodeling, with recent large-scale randomized clinical trials confirming its supremacy over other traditional heart failure treatments. However, its molecular mechanism of action in cardiac remodeling remains obscure. Therefore, comprehending the molecular mechanism of action of sacubitril/valsartan could help future research to study the drug\'s potential therapy to reduce the severity of heart failure.