UNASSIGNED: The metabolism of tamoxifen is influenced by various cytochrome p450 enzymes, including CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, leading to variations in the levels of endoxifen, even with the same tamoxifen dosage. However, the clinical significance of endoxifen on the prognosis of breast cancer patients remains controversial. This study aimed to elucidate the relevance of endoxifen level to recurrence-free survival censored with tamoxifen discontinuation (RFSt), representing the RFS for tamoxifen itself, of breast cancer patients and determine a suitable cutoff for prognostication.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 478 breast cancer patients, and tamoxifen and its metabolites, including endoxifen, were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). An optimal cutoff was determined with maximally selected rank statistics. Survival analysis and Cox regression were conducted based on this cutoff.
UNASSIGNED: An endoxifen level of 21.00 ng/mL was the optimal cutoff for prognostication. Survival analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in RFSt between the low endoxifen group (≤ 21.00 ng/mL) and high endoxifen group (> 21.00 ng/mL) (log-rank test, p=0.032). The 10-year probability of RFSt was 83.2% (95% CI, 77.0-89.9%) and 88.3% (95% CI, 83.3-93.5%) in the low and high endoxifen groups, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression indicated endoxifen concentration as a significant factor affecting prognosis, which was adjusted with other clinical characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: Endoxifen could serve as a marker for appropriate tamoxifen treatment, and an endoxifen cutoff of 21.00 ng/mL could be advantageous in prognostication. Based on this cutoff, therapeutic drug monitoring would benefit patients displaying a suboptimal concentration.

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide, and non-adherence to adjuvant hormonotherapy can negatively impact cancer recurrence and relapse. Non-adherence is associated with side effects of hormonotherapy. Pharmacological strategies to mitigate the side effects include coadministration of antidepressants, however patients remain non-adherent. The aim of this work was to develop medicines containing both hormonotherapy, tamoxifen (20 mg), along with anti-depressants, either venlafaxine (37.5 or 75 mg) or duloxetine (30 or 60 mg), to assess the acceptability and efficacy of this personalised approach for mitigating tamoxifen side effects in a clinical trial. A major criterion for the developed medicines was the production rate, specified at minimum 200 dosage units per hour to produce more than 40,000 units required for the clinical trial. A novel capsule filling approach enabled by the pharmaceutical 3D printer M3DIMAKER 2 was developed for this purpose. Firstly, semi-solid extrusion 3D printing enabled the filling of tamoxifen pharma-ink prepared according to French compounding regulation, followed by filling of commercial venlafaxine or duloxetine pellets enabled by the development of an innovative pellet dispensing printhead. The medicines were successfully developed and produced in the clinical pharmacy department of the cancer hospital Gustave Roussy, located in Paris, France. The developed medicines satisfied quality and production rate requirements and were stable for storage up to one year to cover the duration of the trial. This work demonstrates the feasibility of developing and producing combined tamoxifen medicines in a hospital setting through a pharmaceutical 3D printer to enable a clinical trial with a high medicines production rate requirement.

BACKGROUND: Endoxifen, a protein kinase C inhibitor and selective estrogen receptor modulator, primarily used in breast cancer treatment, has recently emerged as a potential therapeutic option for managing manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder (BD). This review aims to assess the existing evidence base for endoxifen in BD treatment and evaluate the strengths and limitations of current research findings.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We included studies published in English that used endoxifen in BD, alongside any relevant studies identified through manual searching and conference papers with full-text availability. Information pertaining to dose, duration, clinical effects, and safety profiles was extracted from the included studies. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias in clinical trials.
RESULTS: The final review included seven case reports (including two conference presentations), two clinical trials, and one prospective study. Most studies administered endoxifen 8 mg and reported an improvement in manic symptoms. Several case reports included patients with comorbid substance use, and most patients received mood stabilizers concurrently. Few reports lacked any structured outcome measures. The clinical trials used divalproex 1000 mg as an active comparator, which was deemed sub-therapeutic. Despite being multicentric, the first trial lacked data on center-wise recruitment, and certain methodological concerns were observed across the included trials. There were no serious adverse effects noted, except for a significant elevation in lipid profile within a 3-week period. Limited data were available regarding endoxifen efficacy and safety in mixed episodes, depressive episodes, and maintenance treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of research on the efficacy and safety of endoxifen in BD. While existing evidence suggests short-term efficacy in manic episodes, significant limitations were identified in most of the included studies. Further research is imperative to establish the efficacy and safety of endoxifen in BD before considering its recommendation as a viable treatment option.

Endoxifen, a protein kinase C inhibitor, has been approved for use in manic episodes in India. One of the symptom traits that it predominantly targets is impulsivity. Impulsivity can also be a symptom dimension of other mental health conditions, one of which is Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Management of BPD is challenging, with limited pharmacological options that are symptom-directed and psychotherapy sessions that are fraught with early dropouts and lack of compliance. Impulsive behaviors represent a major reason for seeking help in BPD, especially with regard to non-suicidal self-injury, substance abuse, high-risk sexual behavior, aggression, etc. Here, we present a case series comprising five individuals with a diagnosis of BPD whose treatment regimens were changed and endoxifen added at a dose of 8 mg once daily. Clinical improvement was monitored using the Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST). All the subjects improved in the impulsivity domains as well as with regard to attention deficits, mood fluctuations, and overall functioning. Endoxifen is thus potential promising in terms of the management of BPD, but needs more extensive study to fully substantiate its clinical benefits.

Breast cancer prevention only requires local exposure of the breast to active drug. However, oral preventive agents entail systemic exposure, causing adverse effects that limit acceptance by high-risk women. Drug-delivery through the breast skin is an attractive option, but requires demonstration of dermal safety and drug distribution throughout the breast. We formulated the tamoxifen metabolite (E/Z)-endoxifen for transdermal delivery and tested it in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded Phase I trial with dose escalation from 10 to 20 mg daily. The primary endpoint was dermal toxicity. Thirty-two women planning mastectomy were randomized (2:1) to endoxifen-gel or placebo-gel applied to both breasts for 3-5 weeks. Both doses of endoxifen-gel incurred no dermal or systemic toxicity compared to placebo. All endoxifen-treated breasts contained the drug at each of five sampling locations; the median per-person tissue concentration in the treated participants was 0.6 ng/g (IQR 0.4-1.6), significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the median plasma concentration (0.2 ng/mL, IQR 0.2-0.2). The median ratio of the more potent (Z)-isomer to (E)-isomer at each breast location was 1.50 (IQR 0.96-2.54, p < 0.05). No discernible effects of breast size or adiposity on tissue concentrations were observed. At the endoxifen doses and duration used, and the tissue concentration achieved, we observed a non-significant overall reduction of tumor proliferation (Ki67 LI) and significant downregulation of gene signatures known to promote cancer invasion (FN1, SERPINH1, PLOD2, PDGFA, ITGAV) (p = 0.03). Transdermal endoxifen is an important potential breast cancer prevention agent but formulations with better dermal penetration are needed.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen is an effective treatment for primary breast cancer but increases the risk for venous thromboembolism. Tamoxifen decreases anticoagulant proteins, including antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC) and tissue factor (TF) pathway inhibitor, and enhances thrombin generation (TG). However, the relation between plasma concentrations of both tamoxifen and its active metabolite endoxifen and coagulation remains unknown.
METHODS: Tamoxifen and endoxifen were measured in 141 patients from the prospective open-label intervention TOTAM-study after 3 months (m) and 6 m of tamoxifen treatment. Levels of AT and PC, the procoagulant TF, and TG parameters were determined at both timepoints if samples were available (n = 53-135 per analysis). Levels of coagulation proteins and TG parameters were correlated and compared between: 1) quartiles of tamoxifen and endoxifen levels, and 2) 3 m and 6 m of treatment.
RESULTS: At 3 m, levels of AT, PC, TF and TG parameters were not associated with tamoxifen nor endoxifen levels. At 6 m, median TF levels were lower in patients in the 3rd (56.6 [33] pg/mL), and 4th (50.1 [19] pg/mL) endoxifen quartiles compared to the 1st (lowest) quartile (76 [69] pg/mL) (P=0.027 and P=0.018, respectively), but no differences in anticoagulant proteins or TG parameters were observed. An increase in circulating TF levels (3 m: 46.0 [15] versus 6 m: 54.4 [39] pg/mL, P < 0.001) and TG parameters was observed at the 6 m treatment timepoint, while AT and PC levels remained stable.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that higher tamoxifen and endoxifen levels are not correlated with an increased procoagulant state, suggesting tamoxifen dose escalation does not further promote hypercoagulability.

OBJECTIVE: A high rate of interindividual variability in response to tamoxifen (TAM) in breast cancer patients with CYP2D6 polymorphism has been reported, which affects the patient\'s therapeutic outcome. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacogenomics of CYP2D6 genotyping in Iranian patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant TAM.
METHODS: A peripheral blood sample was obtained to determine the steady-state plasma concentrations of TAM and its metabolites (Endoxifen (EN) and 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT)) using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLU) assay. We detected CYP2D6 * 3, * 4, * 10, and * 17 single nucleotide polymorphisms via polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method.
RESULTS: A total of 84 Iranian estrogen receptor‑positive breast cancer patients receiving the daily dose of 20 mg tamoxifen were recruited. Although a consequent decrease in the median EN and 4-OHT concentrations was observed by comparing poor or intermediate metabolizer patients with an extensive metabolizer population, this difference did not reach a significant level. The mean plasma EN concentrations in poor and intermediate metabolizers were 46.1% (95% CI, 7.4-27.8%) and 59.4% (95% CI, 11.9-37.3%) of extensive metabolizer subjects, respectively. Poor and intermediate metabolizers had the mean plasma 4-OHT concentrations that were 46.6% (95% CI, 0.9-61.7%) and 73.2% (95% CI, 2.7-93.1%) of those of subjects who were extensive metabolizer, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The possible role of genotyping in Iranian patients\' response to treatment may explain inter-individual differences in the plasma concentrations of active metabolites of TAM.

Region-specific genetic manipulation of glial cells remains challenging due to the lack of anatomically selective transgenic models. Although local transduction is achievable with viral vectors, uniform recombination can be challenging in larger brain regions. We investigated the efficacy of intraparenchymal delivery of the tamoxifen metabolite endoxifen using inducible cre reporter mice. After observing localized reporter induction following stereotaxic injections of endoxifen in CX3CR1creERT2 mice, we carried out chronic delivery via osmotic pumps attached to bilateral cannulas made of stainless steel or microfluidic polymer fibers. Analysis of reporter expression in sections or iDISCO-cleared brains from TMEM119creERT2 mice revealed widespread induction following chronic infusion. Neuronal damage and gliosis were more prevalent around steel cannulas than polymer fibers, and glial reactivity was further attenuated when devices were implanted two months before drug delivery. In summary, region-specific recombination is achievable in glia with minimal tissue damage after endoxifen delivery via microfluidic polymer implants.

The selective estrogen receptor modifier tamoxifen (TAM) is widely used for the treatment of women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+ ) breast cancer. Endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent, active metabolite of TAM and is important for TAM\'s clinical activity. While multiple papers have been published regarding TAM metabolism, few studies have examined or quantified the metabolism of ENDX. To quantify ENDX and its metabolites in patient plasma samples, we have developed and validated a rapid, sensitive, and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantitative determination of the E- and Z-isomers of ENDX (0.5-500 ng/ml) and the ENDX metabolites norendoxifen (1-500 and 0.5-500 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully), ENDX catechol (3.075-307.5 and 1.92-192 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully), 4\'-hydroxy ENDX (0.33-166.5 and 0.33-333.5 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully), ENDX methoxycatechol (0.3-300 and 0.2-200 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully), and ENDX glucuronide (2-200 and 3-300 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully) in human plasma. Chromatographic separation was accomplished on a HSS T3 precolumn attached to an Poroshell 120 EC-C18 analytical column using 0.1 % formic acid/water and 0.1 % formic acid/methanol as eluents followed by MS/MS detection. The analytical run time was 6.5 min. Standard curves were linear (R2 ≥ 0.98) over the concentration ranges. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy, determined at high-, middle-, and low-quality control concentrations for all analytes, were within the acceptable range of 85 % and 115 %. The average percent recoveries were all above 90 %. The method was successfully applied to clinical plasma samples from a Phase I study of daily oral Z-ENDX.

Aggressive estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer is frequently tamoxifen-resistant; alternative endocrine approaches exist for therapy, but not for prevention, particularly in premenopausal women. We examined the efficacy of the selective ER modulator (Z-endoxifen) as monotherapy and in combination with the selective progesterone receptor modulators (onapristone and ulipristal acetate) in the tamoxifen-insensitive C3(1)/SV40TAg mouse mammary tumorigenesis model. Unlike tamoxifen at human equivalent dose (HED) 101 mg/day, endoxifen at HED 24 mg/day significantly increased latency and reduced tumor growth relative to untreated controls. Ulipristal acetate (UPA) at HED 81 mg/day also significantly increased latency however failed to inhibit tumor growth, while onapristone (HED 98 mg/day) had no tumor prevention efficacy in this model. Addition of UPA to endoxifen did not enhance preventive efficacy over endoxifen alone. The expression of genes associated with cell cycle, cell proliferation and extracellular matrix remodeling was similarly repressed by endoxifen and UPA however only endoxifen significantly downregulated prominent genes associated with poor prognosis (Col11a1, Il17b, Pdgfa, Tnfrsf11a). Our results indicate that endoxifen can prevent breast cancers, even when tamoxifen-resistant, through its role in favorable tissue remodeling and immunomodulation.