Endovascular repair

血管内修复术
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在分析1998年至2017年芬兰和瑞典腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的开放(OAR)或腔内修复(EVAR)后的患者预后。完整和破裂的AAAs(rAAAs)均包括在分析中。方法:分析了芬兰和瑞典国家登记处的患者水平数据,完整和破裂AAA修复的配对手术与死亡率数据(死亡日期)。全因死亡率是主要终点。来自这两个国家的匿名患者数据进行汇总,包括总共32,324次操作。破裂和完整的AAAs分别考虑。总的来说,对9619个完整的AAAs和1470个rAAAs进行了EVAR,而OAR是对13,241个完整的AAA和7994个rAAA进行的。病人的年龄,性别和手术日期作为人口统计信息.Cox回归和Kaplan-Meier分析用于评估AAA或rAAA治疗后的长期(10年)生存率。Kaplan-Meier分析在三个不同年龄段(<65岁,65-79岁和≥80岁)。结果:考虑到所有年龄组,1-,EVAR后3年和10年Kaplan-Meier生存率为93.4%,80.5%和35.3%,分别,完整的AAA修复和67.2%,55.9%和22.2%,分别,用于RAAA修复。对于完整AAAs的OAR,1-,3年和10年Kaplan-Meier生存率为92.1%,84.8%和48.7%,分别。rAAAs的OAR率分别为55.4%,49.3%和24.6%。在Cox回归分析中,最近一年的手术与生存率的提高有关,年龄和年龄对完整和破裂的AAA修复的生存率均产生负面影响。如果患者在手术后的前90天存活下来,对于<65岁的患者(一般人群:18.0岁),完整的AAA修复后的生存期为13.5年,≥80岁的人为7.3岁(一般人群:7.9岁)。经过rAAA修复,<65岁患者的平均生存期为13.1年,≥80岁患者的平均生存期为5.5年,分别。结论:80岁或以上接受完整AAA治疗的患者的长期生存率接近普通人群,只要他们在手术中幸存下来。相反,对于年龄小于65岁的患者,其长期生存率明显较差.随着时间的推移,AAA患者的长期生存率有所改善。对于接受完整AAA修复的年轻患者,开放手术仍然是安全有效的选择。我们的结果支持ESVS指南推荐的EVAR作为rAAA患者的一线治疗。
    Objective: We aimed to analyse patient outcomes following open (OAR) or endovascular repair (EVAR) of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in Finland and Sweden from 1998 to 2017. Both intact and ruptured AAAs (rAAAs) were included in the analysis. Methods: Patient-level data from national registries in Finland and Sweden were analysed, pairing operations for intact and ruptured AAA repair with mortality data (date of death). All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Anonymized patient data from both countries were pooled, comprising a total of 32,324 operations. Ruptured and intact AAAs were considered separately. In total, EVAR was performed on 9619 intact AAAs and 1470 rAAAs, while OAR was performed on 13,241 intact AAAs and 7994 rAAAs. The patient\'s age, sex and the date of operation were obtained as demographic information. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to evaluate long-term (10-year) survival after the treatment of AAA or rAAA with either modality. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed in three different age groups (<65 years, 65-79 years and ≥80 years). Results: Considering all age groups together, the 1-, 3- and 10-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates after EVAR were 93.4%, 80.5% and 35.3%, respectively, for intact AAA repair and 67.2%, 55.9% and 22.2%, respectively, for rAAA repair. For OAR of intact AAAs, the 1-, 3- and 10-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 92.1%, 84.8% and 48.7%, respectively. The respective rates for OAR of rAAAs were 55.4%, 49.3% and 24.6%. In a Cox regression analysis, a more recent year of operation was associated with improved survival, and older age affected survival negatively for both intact and ruptured AAA repair. If patients survived the first 90 days after the operation, the survival after intact AAA repair was 13.5 years for those <65 years (general population: 18.0 years), and 7.3 years for those ≥80 years (general population: 7.9 years). After rAAA repair, the mean survival was 13.1 years for patients <65 years and 5.5 years for patients ≥80 years, respectively. Conclusions: The long-term survival of patients undergoing intact AAA treatment at the age of 80 or older is close to that of the general population, provided they survive the operation. Conversely, for patients younger than 65, the long-term survival is markedly worse. The long-term survival of AAA patients has improved over time. Open surgery is still a safe and effective option for young patients undergoing intact AAA repair. Our results support the ESVS guidelines recommendation of EVAR being the first-line treatment for patients with rAAA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系列病例的目的是探讨双开窗内科医生改良内移植物(PMEGs)对远端吻合动脉瘤患者在升主动脉开放修复或近端弓置换后的疗效。
    方法:回顾了2017年至2023年所有连续的开放性升主动脉手术后远端吻合动脉瘤的患者,这些患者使用自制的双开窗支架进行了主动脉弓修复。研究终点包括技术成功,30天,和死亡率的长期随访分析,发病率,重新干预。
    结果:10例患者在升主动脉开放手术后接受双开窗PMEGs治疗吻合动脉瘤。其中,9人为男性,平均年龄58岁。9名患者最初接受急性夹层治疗,两个有机械主动脉瓣。开放手术与假性动脉瘤治疗之间的平均时间为4.15年。技术成功100%。近端着陆区始终位于0区,所有内移植物均通过股骨入路展开。早期结果显示一个内漏(1a型),通过及时重新干预成功治疗。术后早期无死亡或中风发生。在长期随访期间(平均时间35个月),没有发生需要干预的内漏,没有支架骨折或迁移的报告。没有患者死于主动脉相关原因。
    结论:对于开放手术后的远端吻合动脉瘤,采用双开窗的PMEG进行主动脉弓修复是可行的,并且对于不适合进行重做手术的患者是一种有希望的替代方法。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this case series is to investigate the outcomes of double-fenestrated physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) in patients with distal anastomotic aneurysms following open repair of the ascending aorta or proximal arch replacement.
    METHODS: All consecutive patients with a distal anastomotic aneurysm following open ascending aorta surgery who underwent aortic arch repair with a homemade double-fenestrated stent-graft from 2017 to 2023 were reviewed. Study endpoints included technical success, 30-day, and long-term follow-up analysis of mortality, morbidity, and re-interventions.
    RESULTS: 10 patients were treated with double-fenestrated PMEGs for anastomotic aneurysms following open surgery of the ascending aorta. Of these, nine were male with a mean age of 58 years. Nine patients were initially treated for acute dissection, and two had mechanical aortic valves. The mean time between open surgery and the treatment of the pseudoaneurysm was 4.15 years. Technical success was 100%. The proximal landing zone was consistently in zone 0, and all endografts were deployed via femoral access. Early outcomes revealed one endoleak (type 1a), which was successfully treated by prompt reintervention. No deaths or strokes occurred during the early postoperative period. During long-term follow-up (mean time 35 months), no endoleaks requiring intervention occurred, and there were no reports of stent fractures or migrations. No patient died from an aortic-related cause.
    CONCLUSIONS: Aortic arch repair with double-fenestrated PMEGs for distal anastomotic aneurysms after open surgery is feasible and represents a promising alternative in patients ineligible for redo surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项单中心研究旨在评估接受联合单一Perclose(雅培,雅培公园,Illinois)Suture-MediatedClosureDevice+singleAngio-SealVIP8F(Terumo,东京,日本)并将结果与标准DualPerclose技术进行比较。材料和方法:2022年11月至2023年11月连续择期pEVAR患者,股骨入路健康,导管鞘≤20French(F)外径,包括在内。投币随机化确定是否使用了单个Perclose设备+单个Angio-SealVIP8F(混合技术)或标准双Perclose设备(DualPerclose)的组合。在混合技术中,在12点放置一个Perclose装置;去除鞘后放置一个Angio-SealVIP8F。DualPerclose遵循标准程序。主要终点包括立即止血,鞘管直径差异,访问转换率,技术上的成功,和成本分析。
    该研究纳入60名符合纳入标准的pEVAR患者(中位年龄=78岁,四分位距[IQR]=72-85岁)。在14例(24%)中,仅研究了1个股骨入路。有106个pEVAR访问,混合技术组58(54.7%),双重Perclose组48(45.3%)。两组在术前特征和鞘管直径方面均表现出均匀性(HybridTechnology-16FvsDualPerclose-18F;p=0.202)。混合技术组的即时止血率为100%,而DualPerclose组的止血率为87.5%(p=0.006)。手术通路转换是不必要的。技术成功100%,DualPerclose术后所有6例股出血病例血管内消退,使用额外的设备。成本分析显示,混合技术组的中位成本为330欧元(IQR=0),而DualPerclose组的中位成本为384欧元(IQR=360-456)(p<0.001)。30天死亡率为3%,在两个脆弱的病人中,没有通路相关的并发症。多变量分析确定DualPerclose通路(比值比[OR]=35.6;95%置信区间[CI]=18.3-36.8;p<0.001)和肥胖(OR=19.7;95%CI=1.4-23.9.5;p<0.001)是立即止血失败的独立危险因素。中位随访时间为134天(IQR=41-227),用1例混合技术(2%)成功地在62天后注射凝血酶治疗了小的股骨假性动脉瘤。
    在选定患者的pEVAR期间,选择性混合技术与单个Perclose装置+单个血管密封VIP8F的组合似乎不劣于标准的DualPerclose程序。它显示了减少立即止血失败和成本的积极趋势。两种程序均获得了技术上的成功,并避免了手术进入转换。
    结论:本研究引入了一种新的选择性混合技术,该技术将单个Perclose装置与单个Angio-SealVIP8Fr相结合,用于经皮血管内腹主动脉介入治疗。混合技术的结果显示100%的技术成功和有效的立即止血,同时成本低于标准的双重Perclose程序。两种手术都不需要手术转换。尽管是单中心研究,它证明了这种混合技术有意应用于微创的潜在好处。肥胖和双重Perclose技术被确定为止血失败的独立危险因素。重申混合技术程序的有效性以及与标准程序的非劣效性。
    UNASSIGNED: This single-center study aimed to assess patients who underwent intentional percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (pEVAR) with Hybrid Technique combining a single Perclose (Abbott, Abbott Park, Illinois) Suture-Mediated Closure Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) and compare outcomes with the standard Dual Perclose technique. Materials and Methods: Consecutive elective pEVAR patients treated from November 2022 to November 2023, with healthy femoral accesses and introducer sheaths ≤20 French (F) outer diameter, were included. Coin-toss randomization determined whether a combination of single Perclose Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F (Hybrid Technique) or the standard double Perclose Devices (Dual Perclose) was used. In Hybrid Technique, a single Perclose device was positioned at 12 o\'clock; a single Angio-Seal VIP 8F was placed after sheaths removal. Dual Perclose followed standard procedure. Primary endpoints included immediate hemostasis, sheath diameter differences, access conversion rate, technical success, and cost analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The study involved 60 pEVAR patients (median age=78, interquartile range [IQR]=72-85 years) within the inclusion criteria. In 14 (24%) cases, only 1 femoral access was studied. There were 106 pEVAR accesses, with 58 (54.7%) in the Hybrid Technique group and 48 (45.3%) in the Dual Perclose group. Both groups exhibited homogeneity in pre-operative characteristics and sheath diameter (Hybrid Technique-16F vs Dual Perclose-18F; p=0.202). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the Hybrid Technique group vs 87.5% for the Dual Perclose group (p=0.006). Surgical access conversion was unnecessary. Technical success was 100%, with all 6 femoral bleeding cases after Dual Perclose resolved endovascularly, using additional devices. Cost analysis showed a median cost of 330 euros (IQR=0) for the Hybrid Technique group vs 384 euros (IQR=360-456) for the Dual Perclose group (p<0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 3%, in 2 fragile patients, without access-related complications. Multivariate analysis identified Dual Perclose access (odds ratio [OR]=35.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]=18.3-36.8; p<0.001) and obesity (OR=19.7; 95% CI=1.4-23.9.5; p<0.001) as independent risk factors for immediate hemostasis failure. Median follow-up was 134 days (IQR=41-227), with 1 Hybrid Technique case (2%) successfully treated with thrombin injection for a small femoral pseudoaneurysm after 62 days.
    UNASSIGNED: The elective Hybrid Technique with combination of single Perclose Device + single Angio-Seal VIP 8F during pEVAR in selected patients appears to be non-inferior to the standard Dual Perclose procedure. It demonstrates a positive trend in reducing immediate hemostasis failure and costs. Both procedures achieved technical success and avoiding surgical access conversions.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces a novel elective hybrid technique combining a single Perclose device with a single Angio-Seal VIP 8Fr for percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic interventions. Results for hybrid technique showed 100% technical success and efficient immediate hemostasis, while costing less than standard dual Perclose procedure. Both procedures did not require surgical conversions. Despite being a single-center study, it demonstrates potential benefits of the intentional application of this hybrid technique towards minimally invasiveness. Obesity and dual Perclose technique were identified as independent risk factors for hemostasis failure, reaffirming the hybrid technique procedure\'s efficacy as well as and non-inferiority to standard procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    报告用于治疗胸腹动脉瘤(TAAA)患者的新型支架移植物设计的应用结果,是一位血管外科医生共同发明的.这是一项回顾性观察研究。
    柯尔特是一种自扩张支架移植物,由镍钛诺金属支架形成一个特殊的外骨骼不对称弹簧覆盖聚酯材料。Colt装置提供优于现有支架移植物选项的一些优点。主体两端有两种不同的直径和三种不同的长度。它有四个分支向下指向,并从主支架移植物在两个水平。它为医生提供了决定为目标血管选择哪个分支的机会。它可以单独植入或向近侧和远侧延伸。球囊可扩张和/或自扩张支架移植物用于产生内脏分支。在复杂的广泛动脉瘤中,该过程分为两个或三个阶段,以尽量减少脊髓缺血的风险。
    在2015年8月至2021年12月之间,在20名男性和2名女性(年龄56-81岁)的TAAA中植入了22个Colt支架移植物(8个II型;12个III型;2个IV型)。平均动脉瘤直径为73.4mm(范围64-83)。所有患者均无症状。使用自扩张或球囊可扩张的支架移植物重建了85个目标血管。十四个分叉,6个定制管和2个主动脉髂(AUI)支架移植物用作Colt装置的远端延伸部分.完成血管造影未发现I型内漏。五名患者患有II型内漏,经保守治疗。术中无死亡病例。1例患者术后第7天死于多器官功能衰竭。我们在植入后30天内没有观察到任何其他并发症。一名患者在出院两个月后死于新冠肺炎。随访3~75个月。对接站或近端和远端延伸没有迁移或脱位。所有柯尔特装置假体仍然是专利,然而,在进行12个月的CTA时,发现通向腹腔干的两个分支闭塞,没有任何症状。在两个病人中,三个肾桥接支架移植物出现晚期问题.其中一个II型内漏在一年后自发解决,另外四人仍在观察中。没有患者的囊直径增加。
    当前系列的结果很有希望。Colt支架移植物可应用于多种TAAA解剖结构,这可能有助于未来开发新的“现成”设备。
    UNASSIGNED: To report results of application a new stent graft design for the treatment of patients with thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAAAs), which was co-invented by a vascular surgeon. This is a retrospective observational study.
    UNASSIGNED: The Colt is a self-expanding stent graft, composed of nitinol metal stents creating a special exoskeleton with asymmetric springs covered with polyester material. The Colt device offers some advantages over existing stent graft options. The main body is available in two different diameters on both ends and in three different lengths. It has four branches pointing downward and coming from the main stent graft at two levels. It offers the physician an opportunity to decide which branch to choose for the target vessel. It may be implanted alone or extended proximally and distally. Balloon expandable and/or self-expanding stent grafts are used to create the visceral branches. In complex extensive aneurysms, the procedure is divided into two or three stages to minimize the risks of spinal cord ischemia.
    UNASSIGNED: Between August 2015 and December 2021, twenty-two Colt stent grafts were implanted in twenty males and two females (aged 56-81) with TAAAs (eight Type II; twelve Type III; two Type IV). The mean aneurysm diameter was 73.4 mm (range 64-83). All patients were asymptomatic. Eighty-five target vessels were reconstructed using either self-expanding or balloon-expandable stent grafts. Fourteen bifurcated, six custom-made tubes and two aortouniiliac (AUI) stent grafts were used as distal extensions to the Colt device. Completion angiography revealed no type I endoleaks. Five patients had Type II endoleaks which were treated conservatively. There were no intraoperative deaths. One patient died on the 7th postoperative day from multiorgan failure. We did not observe any other complications within 30 days after implantation. One patient died from Covid-19 two months after discharge. Follow-up ranged from three to 75 months. There was no migration or dislocation of the docking station or proximal and distal extensions. All Colt device prostheses remained patent, however, two branches leading to the coeliac trunk were found occluded at the time of the 12-month CTA, without any symptoms. In two patients, there were late problems with three renal bridging stent grafts. One of the Type II endoleaks resolved spontaneously after one year, while four others remain under observation. No patient had an increase in sac diameter.
    UNASSIGNED: Results from the current series are promising. The Colt stent graft can be applied to a large variety of TAAA anatomies, which may facilitate the development of new \"off-the-shelf\" devices in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估复杂动脉瘤血管内手术修复过程中与上肢导管插入术相关的疗效和并发症。
    方法:遵循PRISMA指南进行了系统评价,涉及在PubMed上进行搜索,科克伦中部,和WebofScience。主要终点是30天的卒中。次要终点是目标血管技术成功,30天死亡率,局部通路相关并发症。使用随机效应模型进行Meta分析。
    结果:纳入了16项观察性研究,包括4,137名患者。上肢通道的30天中风发生率为1.4%(95%CI1.0%-1.8%),略高于下肢,尽管没有统计学意义。死亡率在0-6.8%之间变化,局部通路相关并发症发生率为3.2%(95%CI1.9%-4.4%).靶血管导管插入术的技术成功率为99.2%(95%CI98.4%-100.0%)。
    结论:这项系统评价和荟萃分析证明了f/b-EVAR上肢通路的安全性和有效性,中风风险低,死亡率,和最小的局部并发症。尽管存在偏见的风险,研究结果表明,上肢通道可能是有益的,尤其是在股骨通路失败的救助情况下,为临床决策提供有价值的见解。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the efficacy and complications associated with upper limb catheterization during complex aneurysm endovascular surgery repair.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, involving a search across PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Primary endpoint was represented by 30-day stroke. Secondary endpoints were target vessels technical success, 30-day mortality, local access-related complications. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
    RESULTS: Sixteen observational studies encompassing 4,137 patients were included. The 30-day stroke incidence for upper limb access was 1.4% (95% CI 1.0%-1.8%), slightly higher than lower limb, despite not statistically significant. Mortality varied between 0-6.8%, and local access-related complications occurred in 3.2% (95% CI 1.9%-4.4%). Technical success in target vessel catheterization was 99.2% (95% CI 98.4%-100.0%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the safety and efficacy of upper limb access for f/b-EVAR, with low stroke risk, mortality rates, and minimal local complications. Despite the risk of bias, the findings suggest that upper limb access may be beneficial, especially in bailout situations when femoral access fails, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具有主动脉侵犯但无远处转移的T4b食管癌的发病率估计在所有食管癌病例的3.8%至4.6%之间。在这种情况下,主动脉食管瘘的发展是一种罕见但并非不太可能的事件,导致灾难性后果。这项系统评价的目的是评估主动脉支架置入术(胸血管内主动脉修复-TEVAR)的重要性及其在局部晚期食管癌治疗中的最佳时机。MEDLINE的系统文献检索,Scopus,谷歌学者数据库致力于确定截至2024年3月发表的相关研究。通过形成具有选择性和挽救性TEVAR亚组的患者队列来进行个体患者数据分析,取决于支架置入的时间。研究池由25项研究组成,包括101例局部晚期食道癌,年龄中位数为64岁(范围45-87岁)。其中,50例患者接受了选择性TEVAR,而在急性抢救环境中接受TEVAR的患者为51例。发现选择性或预防性TEVAR可显着提高食管切除率(65.6%vs.救助亚组的16.7%,P<0.001),同时降低并发症发生率(8.3%vs.36.1%,P<0.001)。选择性亚组的总生存期也延长(8.3vs.4个月,P=0.001),选择性支架置入术是提高生存率的唯一独立预测因素。总之,对高危患者进行主动脉支架置入治疗可以减少大出血的灾难性后果,尽量减少并发症,提高生存率。
    The incidence of T4b esophageal cancer with aortic invasion but without distant metastasis is estimated to be between 3.8% and 4.6% of all esophageal cancer cases. Development of an aortoesophageal fistula in such cases is a rare but not unlikely event, leading to catastrophic consequences. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the importance of aortic stenting (Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair-TEVAR) and its optimal timing in the management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was undertaken to identify relevant studies published up to March 2024. An individual patient data analysis was performed by forming a patient cohort with elective and salvage TEVAR subgroups, depending on the timing of the stenting. The study pool consisted of 25 studies incorporating 101 cases of locally advanced esophageal cancer, with a median age of 64 years (range 45-87 years). Of them, 50 patients underwent elective TEVAR compared with 51 patients receiving TEVAR in an acute salvage setting. Elective or prophylactic TEVAR was found to significantly increase esophageal resection rates (65.6% vs. 16.7% in the salvage subgroup, P < 0.001), concurrently reducing complication rates (8.3% vs. 36.1%, P < 0.001). Overall survival was also prolonged in the elective subgroup (8.3 vs. 4 months, P = 0.001), with elective stenting being the only independent predictor of improved survival. In conclusion, management with aortic stenting in high-risk patients may reduce the catastrophic consequences of massive bleeding, minimize complications, and enhance survival rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管肾动脉动脉瘤(RAAs)很少见,并且通常无症状且生长缓慢,他们的自然进程和最佳管理还没有得到很好的理解。确实存在针对RAA的治疗建议;但是,它们由有限的数据支持。
    方法:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以探索从1月1日起在我们机构诊断为RAA的患者的管理。2013年12月31日,2020年。通过搜索我们的放射学数据库确定了患者,然后是全面的图表审查,以便进一步评估。数据收集包括患者和动脉瘤特征,初始成像的基本原理,治疗,监视,和全因死亡率。
    结果:在此期间,我们中心有一百八十五名患者被诊断为RAA或接受RAA治疗,大多数动脉瘤都是偶然发现的。平均动脉瘤大小为1.40cm(±0.05)。在接受治疗的人中,平均大小为2.38cm(±0.24)。在大小大于3厘米的动脉瘤中,占总病例的3.24%,83.3%接受了治疗程序。只有20%的育龄妇女接受了动脉瘤治疗。有一次动脉瘤破裂,没有相关的死亡率或显著的发病率。
    结论:我们机构在研究期间对RAAs的管理总体上与指南一致。一个潜在的改进领域是对育龄妇女进行更积极的干预。
    BACKGROUND: Although renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) are rare and often asymptomatic with slow growth, their natural progression and optimal management are not well understood. Treatment recommendations for RAAs do exist; however, they are supported by limited data.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to explore the management of patients diagnosed with an RAA at our institution from January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2020. Patients were identified through a search of our radiological database, followed by a comprehensive chart review for further assessment. Data collection encompassed patient and aneurysm characteristics, the rationale for initial imaging, treatment, surveillance, and all-cause mortality.
    RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five patients were diagnosed with or treated for RAAs at our center during this timeframe, with most aneurysms having been discovered incidentally. Average aneurysm size was 1.40 cm (±0.05). Of those treated, the mean size was 2.38 cm (±0.24). Among aneurysms larger than 3 cm in size, comprising 3.24% of the total cases, 83.3% underwent treatment procedures. Only 20% of women of childbearing age received treatment for their aneurysms. There was one instance of aneurysm rupture, with no associated mortality or significant morbidity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our institution\'s management of RAAs over the period of the study generally aligned with guidelines. One potential area of improvement is more proactive intervention for women of childbearing age.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:无名动脉瘤(IAAs)很少见,可能会导致破裂,远端动脉栓塞,或局部压迫不及时治疗。破裂是这些并发症中最危险的。本文报告1例无名动脉分叉假性动脉瘤。
    方法:患者是一名45岁的男性,因胸部不适而进入急诊科。CT血管造影(CTA)显示无名动脉分叉处存在3.6*2.4cm囊状动脉瘤,涉及右锁骨下动脉和颈总动脉。病人的生命体征正常,上臂血压相等,未观察到神经功能障碍.钆增强磁共振血管造影显示Willis环是完整的。治疗包括开放手术结合血管内治疗。首先将颈外动脉转移到右锁骨下动脉(RSA),并在中间插入8毫米编织的涤纶移植物。然后将覆盖的支架移植物放置在无名动脉的近端部分以封闭动脉瘤的入口。最后,在RSA的起源植入了封堵器。无围手术期及术后并发症。在1年的随访中,在CTA上未观察到动脉瘤,右侧椎动脉通畅.
    结论:本研究表明,联合使用血管内治疗和开放修复手术是治疗无名动脉分叉假性动脉瘤的有效策略。
    BACKGROUND: Innominate artery aneurysms (IAAs) are rare and may result in rupture, distal arterial embolization, or local compression without timely treatment. Rupture is the most dangerous of these complications. This article reports a case of innominate artery bifurcation pseudoaneurysm.
    METHODS: The patient was a 45-year-old man who was admitted to the emergency department due to chest discomfort. The computed tomographic angiography (CTA) imaging indicated the presence of a 3.6*2.4 cm saccular aneurysm in the bifurcation of the innominate artery, involving both the right proximal subclavian and common carotid arteries. The patient\'s vital signs were normal, there was equal blood pressure in the upper arms and no neurological dysfunction was observed. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography indicated that the circle of Willis was intact. The treatment involved open surgery combined with endovascular therapy. The external carotid artery was first transposed to the right subclavian artery (RSA) and an 8-mm woven Dacron graft was inserted in the middle. The covered stent graft was then placed in the proximal part of the innominate artery to close the entrance of the aneurysm. Lastly, an occluder was implanted at the origin of the RSA. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. At 1-year follow-up, no aneurysm was observed on CTA and the right vertebral artery was patent.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that the combined use of endovascular therapy and open repair surgery is an effective strategy to treat innominate artery bifurcation pseudoaneurysm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:钝性创伤性主动脉损伤(BTAI)是年轻患者因创伤导致死亡的第二大原因。主要表现可能是胸部或肩胛骨间疼痛,呼吸困难,and,在严重的情况下,低血压。考虑到这些患者的临床状况迅速恶化,及时诊断和开始治疗至关重要。在这些伤害中,主动脉受累最多的部分是峡部(左锁骨下动脉远端)和胸腔的降部。因此,主要的诊断策略包括经胸超声心动图,CT血管造影,和血管内诊断方法。病例介绍患者是一名19岁男性,有胸痛症状,呼吸困难,汽车周转后四肢极度疼痛。初步评估显示,除了双侧血胸,没有异常的心血管发现。用胸管处理。十二小时后,当病人接受骨科手术观察时,他开始胸痛和呼吸困难,TTE和CTA显示主动脉瓣三降动脉瘤。患者立即接受了支架植入的血管内手术治疗。还进行了延迟脱支手术,这导致了理想的结果和顺利的后续行动。
    结论:尽管开胸手术是治疗血流动力学不稳定患者主动脉瘤的主要且几乎是唯一的选择,在具有适当解剖结构的选定患者中,血管内手术显示出优异的结局。脱支手术,可以在初始程序之后同时或延迟进行,已证明对血栓栓塞性脑事件有保护作用。
    主动脉瘤患者应与多学科小组一起送往医疗中心进行紧急评估和治疗。最初的复苏和诊断具有挑战性,考虑到这些伤害的致命性质,治疗方法的选择是基于患者的临床状况和心血管影像学的解剖学评估。
    BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is the second leading cause of death due to traumas in young patients. The primary presentation might be chest or interscapular pain, difficulty in breathing, and, in severe cases, hypotension. Considering the rapid deterioration of these patients\' clinical conditions, prompt diagnosis and treatment initiation are crucial. In these injuries, the most involved parts of the aorta are the isthmus (distal to the left subclavian artery) and the descending part in the thorax. Therefore, the main diagnostic strategies include transthoracic echocardiography, CT angiography, and endovascular diagnostic approaches. Case presentation The patient was a 19-year-old male presenting with the symptoms of chest pain, dyspnea, and extremities excruciating pain after a car turnover. The initial evaluation showed no abnormal cardiovascular finding except bilateral hemothorax, addressed with chest tubes. Twelve hours later, when the patient was under observation for orthopedic surgeries, his chest pain and dyspnea started, and TTE and CTA showed a grade three descending aneurysm of the aorta. The patient was treated immediately with an endovascular procedure of stent implantation. A delayed debranching surgery was also performed, which resulted in desirable outcomes and uneventful follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although open thoracic surgery is the main and almost the only option for treating aneurysms of the aorta in hemodynamically unstable patients, the endovascular procedure has shown superior outcomes in selected patients with appropriate anatomy. Debranching surgery, which can be done simultaneously or with delay after the initial procedure, has proven protective against thromboembolic cerebral events.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with an aneurysm of the aorta should be transported to a medical center with a multidisciplinary team for an urgent evaluation and treatment. The initial resuscitation and diagnosis are challenging, considering the fatal nature of these injuries, and the selection of the treatment is based on the patient\'s clinical condition and evaluated anatomy in cardiovascular imaging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号