Endovascular intervention

血管内介入
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性威胁肢体缺血的治疗存在很大差异,包括实践范式,血管提供者专业,使用的设备,和先进的开放和/或血管内治疗的经验,在其他因素中。我们独特的实践包括以患者为中心,临床导向的介入放射科医师和血管外科医师,在办公室介入套房(OIS)进行治疗,门诊手术中心(ASC),和医院住院/门诊设置。我们评估我们的结果,集中在主要截肢率,同时将病例复杂性和比率与以前发表的数据进行比较。
    对2015年至2021年在我们的实践中接受治疗的所有卢瑟福4、5和6名患者进行了回顾性审查。基线患者特征,病变的复杂性,并收集主要截肢率。对患有更复杂疾病或需要重新干预的患者进行了多学科公开讨论,以确定该小组的血运重建方法。肢体抢救,临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(TLR),重复干预,随访时间,和死亡率进行了评估。
    对351名女性和478名男性的829条肢体进行了治疗,慢性威胁肢体缺血.在829个案例中,541例至少有1例慢性完全闭塞(CTO),包括115个肢体,2个CTO和24个肢体,3个CTO,63.5%的病例需要多级干预。一年死亡率为6.2%,下肢截肢率为2.3%,平均随访时间为22.3个月。在12个月内重复干预的163例患者中,一年无临床驱动的TLR率为78.7%。在研究过程中,在股pop支架子集内,当采用较新的支架技术如编织镍钛诺和药物洗脱技术时,再介入时间显著增加(p=0.03).1年无截肢生存率(AFS)为91.5。
    手术和血管内治疗的多学科方法可能为患者提供AFS的最佳机会。
    结论:在多学科实践中,严重威胁肢体缺血的真实世界实践表明,在如此庞大的人群中,对于报告最好的一年无截肢生存率的患者,结果良好。基于密切常规随访和动脉双工监测的强大临床实践是一个主要因素,以及利用药物洗脱支架和药物涂层球囊的最新技术,以获得最佳患者预后。我们希望这项研究为其他实践提供指导,以建立或修改其实践以获得最佳的程序和临床结果。
    UNASSIGNED: There is great variability in the treatment of chronic limb-threatening ischemia, including the practice paradigm, vascular provider specialty, devices utilized, and experience with advanced open and/or endovascular treatments, among other factors. Our unique practice consists of patient-centered, clinically oriented Interventional Radiologists and Vascular Surgeons, with treatments being performed in Office Interventional Suites (OIS), Ambulatory surgery center (ASC), and hospital inpatient/outpatient settings. We evaluate our results, centered on major amputation rates while comparing case complexity and rates with previously published data.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review was performed of all Rutherford 4, 5, and 6 patients who underwent treatment in our practice from 2015 to 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, complexity of lesions, and major amputation rates were collected. Patients with more complex diseases or requiring re-interventions were openly discussed in multidisciplinary fashion to determine the group\'s approach to revascularization. Limb salvage, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), repeat interventions, length of follow-up, and mortality were assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment was performed in 829 limbs in 351 females and 478 males, with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Of the 829 cases, 541 cases had at least 1 chronic total occlusion (CTO), including 115 limbs with 2 CTOs and 24 limbs with 3 CTOs with 63.5% of cases requiring multilevel intervention. One year mortality rate was 6.2% with a major lower extremity amputation rate of 2.3% with a mean length of follow-up of 22.3 months. One-year freedom from clinically driven TLR rate was 78.7% with repeat intervention in 163 cases within 12 months. Over the course of the study, within the femoropopliteal stent subset, there was a significant increase in time to reintervention when newer stent technologies were utilized such as woven nitinol and drug-eluting technology (p=0.03). The overall 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS) was 91.5.
    UNASSIGNED: Multidisciplinary approach with surgical and endovascular treatment may provide patients with the best chance of AFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Real world practice of critical limb-threatening ischemia in a multidisciplinary practice demonstrates favorable outcomes for patients with the best reported one year major amputation free survival in a population this large. A strong clinical practice based on close routine follow up and arterial duplex monitoring is a major contributing factor, as well as utilization of the latest technology in drug eluting stents and drug coated balloons for best patient outcomes. We hope this study provides other practices with a guideline for establishing or modifying their practice to attain the best procedural and clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    自发性腹腔动脉夹层并不常见。腹痛是常见的临床表现。保守治疗,血管内介入治疗,和开放手术用于治疗自发性腹腔动脉夹层。一名49岁的男性患者到我院就诊,背部和剑突下疼痛持续了11个小时。20年来,他每天抽40支烟。血压为180/100mmHg。主动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)图像显示腹腔动脉夹层,肝总动脉,肝左动脉,肝右动脉,和脾动脉.施用盐酸乌拉地尔和硝酸异山梨酯以将血压降低至约110/70mmHg。然而,背部和剑突下疼痛持续没有缓解。进行了血管造影和血管支架(BARD,生命支架,血管,8×60)植入腹腔动脉,不涉及分支。介入治疗后疼痛立即缓解。患者4天后出院。10个月后,随后的主动脉CTA证实腹腔动脉夹层仍未复发。
    Spontaneous celiac artery dissection is uncommon. Abdominal pain is a common clinical presentation. Conservative medical treatments, endovascular interventions, and open surgery are used to treat spontaneous celiac artery dissection. A 49-year-old male patient visited our hospital, with back and subxiphoid pain that had persisted for 11 hours. He has been smoking 40 cigarettes a day for 20 years. The blood pressure was 180/100mmHg. Aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) images revealed dissection of the celiac artery, common hepatic artery, left hepatic artery, right hepatic artery, and splenic artery. Urapidil hydrochloride and isosorbide dinitrate were administered to lower the blood pressure to approximately 110/70 mmHg. However, the back and subxiphoid pain persisted without relief. Angiography was performed and a vascular stent (BARD, LIFE STENT, VASCULAR, 8 × 60) was implanted into the celiac artery without involving the branches. Pain was immediately relieved after interventional therapy. The patient was discharged after 4 days. A subsequent aortic CTA after 10 months confirmed that the celiac artery dissection had still not reoccurred.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    主动脉夹层是一种危重且危及生命的疾病,可表现为非典型症状,常导致误诊和延误治疗。该报告介绍了一名65岁男性最初表现出发烧的情况,右侧胸痛,和生产性咳嗽,导致肺炎的初步诊断。尽管经验性抗生素治疗,他的症状持续存在,促使进一步调查。计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描最终显示B型主动脉夹层。然后将患者转移到专门的三级护理机构,以成功进行血管内介入治疗。此病例强调了在表现为持续性的患者中考虑主动脉夹层的重要性,对标准治疗没有反应的非典型症状,如不明原因的发烧和胸痛。它强调了先进成像技术的关键作用,比如CT扫描,实现准确及时的诊断。临床医生必须保持较高的怀疑指数,并确保及时转诊到专业中心,以改善这种潜在致命疾病的患者预后。
    Aortic dissection is a critical and life-threatening condition that can present with atypical symptoms, often leading to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. The report presents a case of a 65-year-old male who initially exhibited fever, right-sided chest pain, and a productive cough, resulting in an initial diagnosis of pneumonia. Despite empirical antibiotic therapy, his symptoms persisted, prompting further investigation. A computed tomography (CT) scan ultimately revealed a Type B aortic dissection. The patient was then transferred to a specialized tertiary care facility for successful endovascular intervention. This case underscores the importance of considering aortic dissection in patients presenting with persistent, atypical symptoms that do not respond to standard treatments, such as unexplained fever and chest pain. It highlights the crucial role of advanced imaging techniques, such as CT scans, in achieving an accurate and timely diagnosis. Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion and ensure prompt referral to specialized centers to improve patient outcomes in this potentially fatal condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在基于办公室的导管实验室设置(OBL)中,尚未报道将pop入路(PA)作为常规股骨入路的替代方法,并且可能被认为具有更高的风险。这项研究的目的是评估OBL设置中the动脉闭塞性疾病的血管内治疗的安全性和有效性。
    方法:从2018年10月10日至2023年,我们的OBL共进行了1,408次PAD干预。研究了27例连续入路股动脉和髂动脉闭塞的队列。所有干预措施均在超声引导下使用微穿刺针进行。所有患者在手术完成后1小时出院。pop入路的适应症是存在主动脉支架/移植物,主动脉-双股或主动脉-髂旁路,对侧或顺行股骨入路困难,和冲洗股浅动脉(SFA)闭塞。在目标病变完全解决后,确定程序是成功的,并在围手术期和90天测量安全性。临床上确定了通畅性,通过动脉双工,并且需要长达两年的再干预。
    结果:25例患者进行了27次pop入路手术(21例完全股动脉闭塞,6重度狭窄)。Iliac病存在于9。PA的适应症是现有的主动脉支架移植物11,主动脉双髂旁路4,不可交叉的髂动脉闭塞3,顺行股骨入路失败4,冲洗的SFA闭塞3和排除入路2的双侧常见股动脉疾病。TASC术前为B:4,C:4,D:19。治疗包括斑块切除术/球囊血管成形术(BA)和支架12、BA和支架4、斑块切除术/BA5、单独的BA6。在25/27(92.5%)中成功打开了闭塞。除1例无症状小pop房室瘘外,无并发症或主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生。在25例成功的手术中,3、6和12个月的双重开放率为19/20(95%),11/15(69.3%)和11/13(61%)。卢瑟福分类从24/27的手术前>4(89%)提高到23/23(100%)的手术后<2,19/20的3个月(95%),11/15年6个月(69.3%),11/13年12个月(61%)。在19/20(95%)的3个月内免于重新干预,13/15年6个月(86%),12/13年为12个月(79%)。
    结论:对于复杂的髂股股关节疾病,进入股动脉是安全有效的,在OBL治疗中,应被视为有效的替代选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Popliteal access (PA) as an alternative to conventional femoral access has not been reported in the office-based catheter laboratory setting (OBL) and may be perceived to have higher risks. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of popliteal access for endovascular treatment of iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease in an OBL setting.
    METHODS: From 10/2018 - 10/2023 a total of 1,408 PAD interventions were performed in our OBL. A cohort of 27 popliteal access consecutive procedures for femoral and iliac artery occlusions were studied. All interventions were done using a micro-puncture needle under ultrasound guidance. All patients were discharged 1 hour after completion of the procedure. Indications for popliteal access were presence of aortoiliac stent/grafts, aorto-bifemoral or aortoiliac bypasses, difficult contralateral or antegrade femoral access, and flush superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusions. Procedures were determined to be successful upon complete resolution of the target lesions and safety was measured peri-operatively and at 90-days. Patency was determined clinically, by arterial duplex, and by need for reintervention up to 2 years.
    RESULTS: 27 popliteal access procedures were performed in 25 patients (21 complete femoral artery occlusions, 6 severe stenosis). Iliac disease was present in 9. Indications for PA were existing aortoiliac stent graft 11, aorto-bifem-iliac bypass 4, non-crossable iliac occlusions 3, failed antegrade femoral access 4, flush SFA occlusion 3, and bilateral common femoral artery disease precluding access 2. TASC pre-op was B: 4, C: 4, D:19. Treatments included atherectomy/balloon angioplasty (BA) and stent 12, BA and stenting 4, atherectomy/BA 5, BA alone 6. Successful opening of occlusions occurred in 25/27 (92.5%). No complications or major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred except 1 asymptomatic small popliteal AV fistula. Of the 25 successful procedures duplex patency at 3, 6 & 12 months was 19/20 (95%), 11/15 (69.3%) & 11/13 (61%). Rutherford Classification improved from pre-op > 4 in 24/27 (89%) to post-op < 2 at 1 month in 23/23 (100%), 3 months in 19/20 (95%), 6 months in 11/15 (69.3%), 12 months in 11/13 (61%). Freedom from re-intervention at 3 months in 19/20 (95%), 6 months in 13/15 (86%), and 12 months in 12/13 (79%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Popliteal artery access for complex iliofemoral disease is safe and effective and should be considered as a valid alternative option in the OBL setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有症状的慢性颈内动脉闭塞(ICAO)患者尽管接受了积极的药物治疗,但仍面临复发性卒中的高风险。本研究旨在评估杂交手术治疗有症状的慢性ICAO的有效性和安全性。
    方法:本回顾性病例系列在一个中心进行。从2019年1月至2022年12月,纳入接受混合手术的有症状的慢性ICAO患者。我们收集了基线数据,病变特征,血运重建率,围手术期并发症,和后续结果。
    结果:该研究招募了27名患者,包括22名男性和5名女性,有症状的慢性ICAO。杂交手术实现了100%的血运重建技术成功率(n=27),围手术期并发症发生率为14.8%(n=4)。在中位随访6.0个月后(IQR,4-10),21例患者接受DSA或CT血管造影复查,确认血管通畅率为90.5%(n=19)。一名患者需要手术治疗严重的支架内再狭窄,和另一个经历无症状闭塞。对所有26例患者进行了临床随访;在合格的动脉区域没有新的中风报告,13例患者的mRS评分为0,12例评分为1,1例评分为2。
    结论:尽管混合手术是治疗慢性ICAO的一种有希望的选择,它们还与治疗相关并发症的发生率相对较高有关.复合手术的应用应基于标准化的技术指南,并仔细选择真正处于复发性中风高风险的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (ICAO) face a high risk of recurrent stroke despite receiving aggressive medical therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of hybrid surgery in treating symptomatic chronic ICAO.
    METHODS: This retrospective case series was conducted at a single center. From January 2019 to December 2022, patients with symptomatic chronic ICAO who underwent hybrid surgery were included. We collected baseline data, lesion characteristics, revascularization rates, perioperative complications, and follow-up outcomes.
    RESULTS: The study enrolled 27 patients, comprising 22 males and 5 females, with symptomatic chronic ICAO. The hybrid surgery achieved a technical success rate of 100% for revascularization (n = 27), with a perioperative complication rate of 14.8% (n = 4). Following a median follow-up of 6.0 months (IQR, 4-10), 21 patients underwent a DSA or CT angiography reexamination, confirming a vascular patency rate of 90.5% (n = 19). One patient required surgery for severe in-stent restenosis, and another experienced asymptomatic occlusion. Clinical follow-ups were conducted for all 26 patients; no new strokes were reported in the qualifying artery territory, with 13 patients scoring 0, 12 scoring 1, and 1 scoring 2 on the mRS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although hybrid surgery represent a promising option for treating chronic ICAO, they are also associated with a relatively high incidence of treatment-related complications. The application of composite surgery should be based on standardized technical guidelines and the careful selection of patients who are genuinely at high risk for recurrent strokes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目的:慢性下肢缺血是一种外周动脉疾病(PAD),通常由外周血管系统中的动脉粥样硬化斑块引起。本文报道了一例下肢慢性缺血的独特病例,以独特的方式表现为真菌脚趾甲感染。
    方法:一名82岁虚弱的女性,患有多种疾病,其右脚出现脚趾甲症状。虽然初步检查显示甲癣,进一步的研究出乎意料地与下肢慢性缺血相一致.我们探索了临床表现,遇到的诊断挑战,以及随后在患者的多发病背景下对这种独特表现的管理。
    结论:本病例报告强调,当没有发现其他原因或易感因素时,需要将慢性肢体缺血作为趾甲感染的鉴别诊断。
    OBJECTIVE: Chronic lower limb ischaemia is a peripheral arterial disease (PAD) which is typically instigated by atherosclerotic plaques in the peripheral vasculature. This article reports on a unique case of chronic ischaemia in the lower limb, presenting in a distinctive manner as a fungal toenail infection.
    METHODS: An 82-year-old frail woman with multimorbidity presented with toenail symptoms in her right foot. While initial examination had shown onychomycosis, further investigation was unexpectedly consistent with chronic ischaemia in the lower limb. We explored the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges encountered, and the subsequent management of this unique manifestation in the context of the patient\'s multimorbidity.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case report highlights the need to consider chronic limb ischemia as a differential diagnosis in toenail infections when no alternative causes or predisposing factors are identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    动脉粥样硬化切除术在治疗股pop疾病中的作用正在迅速发展。然而,经皮球囊成形术(BA)(普通球囊和药物涂层BA)的辅助斑块切除术的临床疗效和安全性仍存在争议。我们试图进行一项荟萃分析,比较斑块切除术加球囊血管成形术(ABA)与单用BA治疗股pop疾病。
    我们搜索了PubMed,Cochrane临床试验中央注册中心,EMBASE,和ClinicalTrials.gov(从开始到2022年1月10日),用于比较ABA和BA治疗股pop疾病的研究。我们使用随机效应模型计算95%CI的风险比(RR)。靶病变血运重建(TLR),初级通畅,救助支架是主要结果。
    纳入了9项研究,共699名患者(4项随机研究和5项回顾性研究)。与单独的BA相比,ABA组显示出由非随机研究(RR0.59;95%CI,0.40-0.85;P=0.005)和救助支架(RR,0.32;95%CI,0.21-0.48;P<0.0001)。进行分析时,TLR没有显着差异,仅包括随机试验。两组之间的主要通畅性没有显着差异(RR,1.04;95%CI,0.95-1.14;P=.37)。
    来自随机试验的数据表明,与单独的BA相比,斑块切除和BA联合显示TLR或原发通畅性无差异.在观察性研究中,ABA组TLR和救助支架降低,但原发通畅性无差异。需要进一步的研究来研究与单用BA相比,动脉粥样硬化切除联合BA在股pop病变中的临床效果。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of atherectomy in treating femoropopliteal disease has been evolving rapidly. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of adjunctive atherectomy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty (BA) (plain balloon and drug-coated BA) remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (ABA) versus BA alone in treating femoropopliteal disease.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception through January 10, 2022) for studies comparing ABA versus BA for femoropopliteal disease. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, and bailout stenting were the primary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine studies with 699 patients were included (4 randomized and 5 retrospective studies). Compared to BA alone, the ABA group showed a significant decrease in TLR driven by nonrandomized studies (RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P = .005) and bailout stenting (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in TLR when the analysis was performed including only randomized trials. There was no significant difference in the primary patency between the 2 groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14; P = .37).
    UNASSIGNED: Data from randomized trials suggest that compared with BA alone, the combination of atherectomy and BA showed no difference in TLR or primary patency. In observational studies, TLR and bailout stenting were reduced in ABA group but there was no difference in primary patency. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA in femoropopliteal lesions compared with BA alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈内动脉(ICA)动脉瘤很少见,但可导致高发病率和死亡率。虽然这些动脉瘤通常无症状,它们可以达到巨大的尺寸并压缩周围的神经血管结构。患者通常由于颅神经压迫而出现神经系统症状。如果它们破裂,它们会导致大量鼻出血和自救。在体检中,可以看到中耳或鼻腔的搏动性肿块。如果临床怀疑ICA动脉瘤,应在外科手术或活检前进行诊断放射成像。应进行脑数字减影血管造影(DSA)以明确诊断。诊断后,应进行适当的血管内或开放式介入治疗.在这个案例报告中,我们介绍了一名48岁女性患者,因ICA动脉瘤而出现严重鼻出血主诉.本报告旨在介绍此案并回顾当前文献。
    İnternal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms are rare but they can cause high morbidity and mortality. Although these aneurysms are usually asymptomatic, they can reach huge sizes and compress the surrounding neurovascular structures. Patients typically present with neurologic symptoms due to cranial nerve compression. If they rupture, they can lead to massive epistaxis and autorage. In physical examination, pulsatile mass in the middle ear or nasal cavity can be seen. If there is a clinical suspicion of an ICA aneurysms, diagnostic radiological imaging should be performed before the surgical procedure or biopsy. Cerebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) should be performed for definitive diagnosis. After diagnosis, appropriate endovascular or open intervention should be performed. In this case report, we present a 48-year-old female patient with severe epistaxis complaint due to an ICA aneurysm. This report aims to present this case and review the current literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号