目的:良性前列腺增生(BPH)是影响全球老年男性的常见泌尿系统疾病。在BPH可用的治疗方案中,经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)是侵入性干预的金标准.为了降低与TURP相关的不可忽视的发病率,射精丢失率,住院治疗,失血和插管时间已经开发了几种激光技术,例如前列腺的Thulium激光摘除术(ThuLEP)。为了研究ThuLEP作为良性前列腺增生(BPH)治疗选择的疗效,我们在MoriggiaPelascini医院(Como,意大利)2015年1月至2018年9月。
方法:我们纳入了265例患者,这些患者在特定的医院在确定的日期之间接受了ThuLEP。各种参数的数据,包括后空隙残留物体积,尿流率峰值(Qmax),排尿症状的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),IPSS生活质量(QoL)评分,勃起功能障碍的国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)评分,在基线和随访时收集。
结果:分析显示排尿效率显着提高,尿流,泌尿症状,生活质量,和勃起功能后ThuLEP。此外,某些基线特征,比如后空隙残留物,尿流率峰值,年龄,前列腺体积,和阿司匹林的使用,被发现影响治疗结果。
结论:尽管研究有局限性,这些发现有助于了解ThuLEP在治疗BPH方面的有效性,并有助于为患者护理做出明智的临床决策.建议进行具有较长随访期的前瞻性研究以验证和扩展这些结果。
OBJECTIVE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common urological condition affecting aging men worldwide. Among the treatment options available for BPH, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold-standard invasive intervention. To reduce the TURP-related non-negligible morbidity, loss-of-ejaculation rate, hospitalization, blood loss and catheterization time several laser techniques have been developed, such as the Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP). To investigate the efficacy outcomes of the ThuLEP as a treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) we performed a retrospective observational study at Moriggia Pelascini Hospital (Como, Italy) between January 2015 and September 2018.
METHODS: We included 265 patients who underwent ThuLEP at a specific hospital between defined dates. Data on various parameters, including post-void residue volume, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for urinary symptoms, IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) score, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score for erectile dysfunction, were collected at baseline and follow-up.
RESULTS: The analysis revealed significant improvements in voiding efficiency, urinary flow, urinary symptoms, quality of life, and erectile function following ThuLEP. Furthermore, certain baseline characteristics, such as post-void residue, peak urinary flow rate, age, prostate volume, and aspirin usage, were found to influence treatment outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the study\'s limitations, these findings contribute to understanding ThuLEP\'s effectiveness in managing BPH and can aid in making informed clinical decisions for patient care. Prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are recommended to validate and extend these results.