Endotracheal intubation

气管内插管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:气管内插管通常与术后并发症有关,例如喉咙痛不适和声音嘶哑,降低患者满意度,延长住院时间。喉罩(LMA)在减少气管插管相关的气道并发症中起着至关重要的作用。这项荟萃分析是为了确定LMA在电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)中的有效性和安全性。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,从开始到2023年10月5日,搜索Medline和WebofScience数据库以寻找合格的研究。使用Cochrane工具(RoB2)评估RCT的可能性偏差。我们进行了敏感性分析和亚组分析以评估结果的稳健性。
    结果:本荟萃分析纳入了7篇文献。与气管插管相比,术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(SMD=-0.47,95%CI=-0.98-0.03,P=0.06),术中最低SpO2(SMD=0.00,95%CI=-0.49-0.49,P=1.00),低氧血症(RR=1.00,95%CI=0.26-3.89,P=1.00),术中最高PetCO2(SMD=0.51,95%CI=-0.12-1.15,P=0.11),手术野满意度(RR=1.01,95%CI=0.98-1.03,P=0.61),麻醉时间(SMD=-0.10,95%CI=-0.30-0.10,P=0.31),LMA组手术时间(SMD=0.06,95%CI=-0.13~0.24,P=0.55)和失血量(SMD=-0.13,95%CI=-0.33~0.07,P=0.21)。然而,LMA与较低的喉部不适发生率(RR=0.28,95%CI=0.17-0.48,P<0.00001)和术后声音嘶哑发生率(RR=0.36,95%CI=0.16-0.81,P=0.01)相关,气管插管与术后清醒时间延长有关(SMD=-2.19,95%CI=-3.49--0.89,P=0.001)。
    结论:与气管插管相比,LMA可有效降低VATS后咽喉不适和声音嘶哑的发生率,并能加速麻醉的恢复.对于某些特定的胸外科手术,LMA似乎是气管插管的替代方法。LMA在VATS中的疗效和安全性有待进一步探讨。
    BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is often associated with postoperative complications such as sore throat discomfort and hoarseness, reducing patient satisfaction and prolonging hospital stays. Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) plays a critical role in reducing airway complications related to endotracheal intubation. This meta-analysis was performed to determine the efficacy and safety of LMA in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
    METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline and Web of Science databases were searched for eligible studies from inception until October 5, 2023. Cochrane\'s tool (RoB 2) was used to evaluate the possibility biases of RCTs. We performed sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis to assess the robustness of the results.
    RESULTS: Seven articles were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with endotracheal intubation, there was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI = -0.98-0.03, P = 0.06), intraoperative minimum SpO2 (SMD = 0.00, 95% CI = -0.49-0.49, P = 1.00), hypoxemia (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.26-3.89, P = 1.00), intraoperative highest PetCO2 (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI = -0.12-1.15, P = 0.11), surgical field satisfaction (RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98-1.03, P = 0.61), anesthesia time (SMD = -0.10, 95% CI = -0.30-0.10, P = 0.31), operation time (SMD = 0.06, 95% CI = -0.13-0.24, P = 0.55) and blood loss (SMD =- 0.13, 95% CI = -0.33-0.07, P = 0.21) in LMA group. However, LMA was associated with a lower incidence of throat discomfort (RR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.17-0.48, P < 0.00001) and postoperative hoarseness (RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.16-0.81, P = 0.01), endotracheal intubation was found in connection with a longer postoperative awake time (SMD = -2.19, 95% CI = -3.49 - -0.89, P = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with endotracheal intubation, LMA can effectively reduce the incidence of throat discomfort and hoarseness post-VATS, and can accelerate the recovery from anesthesia. LMA appears to be an alternative to endotracheal intubation for some specific thoracic surgical procedures, and the efficacy and safety of LMA in VATS need to be further explored in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    气管插管(ETI)前预氧合可维持窒息氧合并降低缺氧引起的不良事件的风险。以前的研究比较了各种预充氧方法。然而,仍然缺乏对预氧合方法进行联合比较的网络荟萃分析(NMA)。
    我们搜索了发表在PubMed上的研究,Embase,WebofScience,Scopus,还有Cochrane图书馆.ReviewManager5.3版用于评估偏倚风险。这项荟萃分析的主要结果是ETI期间的低氧饱和度(SpO2)。次要结局包括SpO2<80%,SpO2<90%,和ETI期间的呼吸暂停时间。使用RStudio中的R4.1.2软件gemtc包进行NMA。
    本研究共纳入15项随机对照试验。关于最低SpO2,具有高流量鼻插管(HFNC)的无创通气(NIV)组的表现优于其他组。对于SpO2<80%,NIV组(0.8603467)的表现优于HFNC(0.1373533)和常规氧疗(COT,0.0023)组,根据曲面下累积排序曲线结果。对于SpO2<90%,NIV组(0.60932667)的表现优于HFNC组(0.37888667)和COT组(0.01178667).关于呼吸暂停时间,HFNC组优于COT组(平均差异:-50.05;95%置信区间:-90.01,-10.09;P=0.01)。
    网络分析显示,与HFNC和COT相比,用于预氧合的NIV获得了更高的SpO2水平,并且在ETI期间维持患者氧合方面具有更显著的优势。患者在HFNC预氧合后经历了更长的呼吸暂停时间。NIV与HFNC的组合被证明明显优于其他方法。鉴于此类研究的稀缺性,需要进一步的研究来评估其有效性。
    标识符CRD42022346013。
    UNASSIGNED: Preoxygenation before endotracheal intubation (ETI) maintains asphyxiated oxygenation and reduces the risk of hypoxia-induced adverse events. Previous studies have compared various preoxygenation methods. However, network meta-analyses (NMAs) of the combined comparison of preoxygenation methods is still lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched for studies published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Review Manager version 5.3 was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was low oxygen saturation (SpO2) during ETI. The secondary outcomes included SpO2 <80%, SpO2 <90%, and apnea time during ETI. NMA was performed using R 4.1.2 software gemtc packages in RStudio.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 15 randomized controlled trials were included in this study. Regarding the lowest SpO2, the noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) group performed better than the other groups. For SpO2 <80%, the NIV group (0.8603467) performed better than the HFNC (0.1373533) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT, 0.0023) groups, according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve results. For SpO2 <90%, the NIV group (0.60932667) performed better than the HFNC (0.37888667) and COT (0.01178667) groups. With regard to apnea time, the HFNC group was superior to the COT group (mean difference: -50.05; 95% confidence interval: -90.01, -10.09; P = 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: Network analysis revealed that NIV for preoxygenation achieved higher SpO2 levels than HFNC and COT and offered a more significant advantage in maintaining patient oxygenation during ETI. Patients experienced a longer apnea time after HFNC preoxygenation. The combination of NIV with HFNC proved to be significantly superior to other methods. Given the scarcity of such studies, further research is needed to evaluate its effectiveness.
    UNASSIGNED: identifier CRD42022346013.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    正确握住气管导管(ETT)对于成功进行气管插管至关重要。该研究的主要目的是比较手指间握把和传统的笔握握把,以测量气管插管所需的尝试次数和使用外部辅助设备。
    根据持有ETT的方法,将三百名在全身麻醉下进行择期手术的患者随机分为C组(常规握把)和M组(改良,在口气管插管期间,手指之间的抓握)。一名指定的麻醉师对所有患者进行了喉镜检查,排除了困难的Cormack-Lehane3b级和4级(n=24)。然后,这个小组被透露给麻醉师,相应地进行了插管;尝试的次数,使用向后向上向右的压力(BURP),并记录了所花费的时间。使用软件G*Power版本3.1.9.2估计样本量。社会科学统计软件包,版本23(SPSS-23、IBM、芝加哥,美国)用于数据分析。
    两组之间的单次插管具有可比性(99.3%对97.2%,P=0.197)。相比之下,外部援助为BURP(0.75%对6.99%,P=0.009),M组插管时间(P=0.008)显着减少。
    手指间的握把似乎与标准握把一样有效,可以在插管期间握住ETT。然而,事实证明,它更好,因为它可以减少对BURP外部援助的需求。
    UNASSIGNED: Correctly holding the endotracheal tube (ETT) is essential for successful tracheal intubation. The study\'s primary objective was to compare the between-the-fingers grip with the conventional pen-holding grip regarding the number of attempts required for orotracheal intubation and usage of external aids.
    UNASSIGNED: Three hundred patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomised according to the method to hold the ETT to Group C (conventional grip) and Group M (modified, between-the-fingers grip) during oro-tracheal intubation. A designated anaesthetist blinded to the groups performed laryngoscopy in all the patients, and difficult Cormack-Lehane grade 3b and 4 (n = 24) were excluded. Then, the group was revealed to the anaesthetist, and intubation was done accordingly; the number of attempts, use of backward upward rightward pressure (BURP), and time taken were noted. The sample size was estimated using the software G*Power version 3.1.9.2. Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 23 (SPSS-23, IBM, Chicago, USA) was used for data analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Single-attempt intubation was comparable between the groups (99.3% versus 97.2%, P = 0.197). In contrast, the external assistance as BURP (0.75% versus 6.99%, P = 0.009) and the time taken for intubation (P = 0.008) were reduced in group M significantly.
    UNASSIGNED: The between-the-fingers grip seems as effective as the standard grip to hold the ETT during intubation. However, it proved to be better as it can reduce the requirement for external assistance in BURP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的影响尚有争议。2型糖尿病被怀疑可降低ARDS的风险和并发症。然而,2019年冠状病毒病期间(COVID-19),T2DM易感患者ARDS,尤其是那些在家服用胰岛素的人。
    目的:评估T2DM患者门诊使用胰岛素对非COVID-19ARDS结局的影响。
    方法:我们使用全国住院患者样本数据库进行了回顾性队列分析。诊断为ARDS的成年患者分为胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)和非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)组。在应用排除标准并匹配超过20个变量后,我们比较了队列的死亡率,机械通气的持续时间,急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率,停留时间(LOS)住院费用,和其他临床结果。
    结果:在1:1倾向得分匹配之后,该分析包括每组274例患者.值得注意的是,在死亡率方面,IDDM和NIDDM组之间没有统计学上的显着差异(32.8%vs31.0%,P=0.520),中位医院LOS(10天,P=0.537),机械通风的要求,脓毒症的发病率,肺炎或AKI,住院总费用中位数,或出院时的病人性情。
    结论:与替代抗糖尿病药物相比,在非COVID-19ARDS的糖尿病患者中,门诊胰岛素治疗似乎对院内发病率或死亡率没有独立影响.
    BACKGROUND: The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is debatable. T2DM was suspected to reduce the risk and complications of ARDS. However, during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), T2DM predisposed patients to ARDS, especially those who were on insulin at home.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of outpatient insulin use in T2DM patients on non-COVID-19 ARDS outcomes.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Adult patients diagnosed with ARDS were stratified into insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (DM) (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent DM (NIDDM) groups. After applying exclusion criteria and matching over 20 variables, we compared cohorts for mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and other clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, the analysis included 274 patients in each group. Notably, no statistically significant differences emerged between the IDDM and NIDDM groups in terms of mortality rates (32.8% vs 31.0%, P = 0.520), median hospital LOS (10 d, P = 0.537), requirement for mechanical ventilation, incidence rates of sepsis, pneumonia or AKI, median total hospitalization costs, or patient disposition upon discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to alternative anti-diabetic medications, outpatient insulin treatment does not appear to exert an independent influence on in-hospital morbidity or mortality in diabetic patients with non-COVID-19 ARDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:气管内插管(ETI)是气道管理的基石。ETI的黄金标准装置仍然是直接喉镜(DL)。然而,视频喉镜(VL)现在也广泛可用,并有几个证明的优点。VL技术已包括在主要的气道管理指南中。在COVID-19大流行期间,供应链中断增加了对3D打印医疗设备的需求,包括3D打印的VL。然而,关于绩效的研究只有很少的可用;因此,我们旨在将3D打印的VL与DL和其他采用传统制造技术制造的VL进行比较。方法:招募48名医学生作为新手用户。简短之后,规范化培训,学生用DL执行ETI,KingVision®(KV),VividTrac®(VT),AirAngelBlade®(AAB),在正常和困难的气道情况下,Laerdal®气道管理训练器上的定制3D打印VL(3DVL)。我们评估了成功插管的时间和比例,声门的最佳视野,食管插管,牙齿创伤,和用户满意度。结果:在两种情况下,KV和VT均优于DL(p<0.05)。在两种情况下,与KV和VT相比,3DVL的表现相似(p>0.05)或明显优于DL,并且主要是非劣等(p>0.05)。不管场景如何,在大多数变量中,AAB甚至低于DL(p<0.05)。在困难的气道情况下,设备之间的差异更为明显。用户满意度得分与上述范围的表现一致。结论:根据我们的结果,我们不能推荐DL上的AAB,KV,或VT。然而,正如3DVL所显示的,3D打印确实可以提供有用甚至卓越的VL,但是在临床使用之前,建议进行细致的评估。
    Background: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a cornerstone of airway management. The gold standard device for ETI is still the direct laryngoscope (DL). However, video laryngoscopes (VLs) are now also widely available and have several proven advantages. The VL technique has been included in the major airway management guidelines. During the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruption has raised demand for 3D-printed medical equipment, including 3D-printed VLs. However, studies on performance are only sparsely available; thus, we aimed to compare 3D-printed VLs to the DL and other VLs made with conventional manufacturing technology. Methods: Forty-eight medical students were recruited to serve as novice users. Following brief, standardized training, students executed ETI with the DL, the King Vision® (KV), the VividTrac® (VT), the AirAngel Blade® (AAB), and a custom-made 3D-printed VL (3DVL) on the Laerdal® airway management trainer in normal and difficult airway scenarios. We evaluated the time to and proportion of successful intubation, the best view of the glottis, esophageal intubation, dental trauma, and user satisfaction. Results: The KV and VT are proved to be superior (p < 0.05) to the DL in both scenarios. The 3DVL\'s performance was similar (p > 0.05) or significantly better than that of the DL and mainly non-inferior (p > 0.05) compared to the KV and VT in both scenarios. Regardless of the scenario, the AAB proved to be inferior (p < 0.05) even to the DL in the majority of the variables. The differences between the devices were more pronounced in the difficult airway scenario. The user satisfaction scores were in concordance with the aforementioned performance of the scopes. Conclusions: Based upon our results, we cannot recommend the AAB over the DL, KV, or VT. However, as the 3DVL showed, 3D printing indeed can provide useful or even superior VLs, but prior to clinical use, meticulous evaluation might be recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    氯丙嗪,最古老的抗精神病药物之一,仍然广泛使用,并且仍然服用过量。我们旨在研究氯丙嗪过量的临床效果,并确定所报告的剂量与重症监护病房入院或气管插管之间是否存在关系。
    我们对1987年至2023年期间因氯丙嗪过量(报告剂量超过300mg)而进入我们毒理学三级转诊医院的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们提取了人口统计信息,摄入的细节,临床效果和并发症(格拉斯哥昏迷量表,低血压[收缩压低于90mmHg],谵妄,心律失常),逗留时间,重症监护室入院,和气管插管.
    有218例氯丙嗪过量,在过去的36年里,演讲的频率在下降。演示时的平均年龄为32岁(四分位距:25-40岁),女性为143岁(61%)。报告的中位剂量为1,250mg(四分位距;700-2,500mg)。大多数报告(135;62%)涉及报告的其他药物的共同摄入,通常是苯二氮卓类药物,扑热息痛或抗精神病药。与报告的共同摄入组相比,有76(35%)氯丙嗪单独摄入,其中报告的中位剂量为1,650mg(四分位距:763-3,000mg)略高,报告的中位剂量为1,200mg(四分位距:700-2,100mg)。在所有的演讲中,36人(27%)的格拉斯哥昏迷评分低于9,50人(23%)被送入重症监护室,32例(15%)接受气管内插管。插管的患者(2,000mg;四分位距:1,388-3,375mg)和未插管的患者(1,200mg;四分位距:644-2,050mg;P<0.001)之间的中位报告剂量存在显着差异,以及入住重症监护病房和未入住重症监护病房的患者(P<0.0001)。插管的七个单独的氯丙嗪的中位报告剂量为2,500mg(四分位范围:2,000-8,000mg,范围:1,800-20,000毫克)。十八名(百分之八)病人出现谵妄,八人(4%)有低血压,三个人癫痫发作,有一次死亡.
    近四分之一的病例被送进重症监护病房,其中超过一半的病例被插管。虽然病人入院或插管的决定是基于临床需要,报告的摄入剂量与气管插管的要求之间存在显著关联.2013年后,出现频率和报告剂量均有所下降。该研究的主要局限性是回顾性设计,没有对摄入的分析确认。
    我们发现氯丙嗪过量最常见的作用是中枢神经系统抑制,气管插管与更大的报告剂量有关,特别是在单次服用氯丙嗪时。
    UNASSIGNED: Chlorpromazine, one of the oldest antipsychotic medications, remains widely available and is still taken in overdose. We aimed to investigate the clinical effects of chlorpromazine overdose and determine if there is a relationship between the reported dose ingested and intensive care unit admission or endotracheal intubation.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our toxicology tertiary referral hospital with chlorpromazine overdose (reported dose ingested greater than 300 mg) between 1987 and 2023. We extracted demographic information, details of ingestion, clinical effects and complications (Glasgow Coma Scale, hypotension [systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg], delirium, dysrhythmias), length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and endotracheal intubation.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 218 chlorpromazine overdose cases, with presentations decreasing in frequency over the 36 years. The median age at presentation was 32 years (interquartile range: 25-40 years) and 143 (61 per cent) were female. The median reported dose ingested was 1,250 mg (interquartile range; 700-2,500 mg). The majority of presentations (135; 62 per cent) involved reported co-ingestion of other medications, typically benzodiazepines, paracetamol or antipsychotics. There were 76 (35 per cent) chlorpromazine alone ingestions in which there was a slightly higher median reported dose ingested of 1,650 mg (interquartile range: 763-3,000 mg) compared to the reported co-ingestion group, median reported dose ingested of 1,200 mg (interquartile range: 700-2,100 mg). Of all presentations, 36 (27 per cent) had a Glasgow Coma Scale less than 9, 50 (23 per cent) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 32 (15 per cent) were endotracheally intubated. There was a significant difference in the median reported dose ingested between patients intubated (2,000 mg; interquartile range: 1,388-3,375 mg) and those not intubated (1,200 mg; interquartile range: 644-2,050mg; P < 0.001), and between those admitted to the intensive care unit and not admitted to the intensive care unit (P < 0.0001). The median reported dose ingested in seven chlorpromazine alone presentations who were intubated was 2,500 mg (interquartile range: 2,000-8,000 mg, range: 1,800-20,000 mg). Eighteen (8 per cent) patients developed delirium, eight (4 per cent) had hypotension, three had seizures, and there was one death.
    UNASSIGNED: Almost one quarter of cases were admitted to the intensive care unit and over half of these were intubated. Whist the decision to admit to an intensive care unit or intubate a patient is based on clinical need, there was a significant association between reported dose ingested and requirement for endotracheal intubation. Both the frequency of presentation and reported dose ingested declined after 2013. The major limitations of the study were a retrospective design and no analytical confirmation of ingestion.
    UNASSIGNED: We found that the most common effect of chlorpromazine overdose was central nervous system depression and that endotracheal intubation was associated with larger reported doses ingested, particularly in single chlorpromazine ingestions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    气道中的异物可导致显著的发病率和死亡率。如果急救人员无法清除气道阻塞,通常会导致心脏骤停。
    一名78岁男子饮酒后出现持续性咳嗽和呼吸困难。进行了纤维支气管镜检查,发现鱼完全阻塞了两侧的主要气道。
    气管内异物。
    在纤维支气管镜的引导下用气管内导管去除异物。
    气道异物已成功取出,该男子恢复顺利。
    当反复尝试在支气管镜引导下取出气道异物失败时,在紧急情况下,气管插管可以被认为是一种可行的替代方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Foreign bodies in the airways can cause significant morbidity and mortality. If emergency personnel are unable to clear an airway obstruction frequently results in cardiac arrest.
    UNASSIGNED: A 78-year-old man developed a persistent cough and dyspnoea after consuming alcohol. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed, revealing complete blockage of the main airways on both sides by fish.
    UNASSIGNED: Endotracheal foreign body.
    UNASSIGNED: The foreign body was removed with an endotracheal tube under the guidance of a fiberoptic bronchoscope.
    UNASSIGNED: The airway foreign body had been successfully removed and the man recovered uneventfully.
    UNASSIGNED: When repeated attempts to extract airway foreign bodies under the guidance of bronchoscopy have failed, endotracheal intubation can be considered as a viable alternative in emergency situations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在家中发生院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的情况下,日本紧急医疗服务人员根据他们的判断决定是在现场还是在运输过程中提供治疗。这项研究旨在评估高级生命支持(ALS)时间之间的关联(即,气管内插管[ETI]或肾上腺素给药)在家中用于OHCA和预后。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了来自日本Utstein注册中心的数据以及从2016年至2019年接受院前ETI(n=6806)和接受肾上腺素(n=22,636)的患者收集的紧急转运数据。ETI或肾上腺素给药的时间被确定为“在现场”或“在救护车中”。“使用多元逻辑回归分析来估计ALS实施时间之间的关联,院前自发循环恢复(ROSC),和存活1个月。
    结果:现场的ETI与院前ROSC呈显著正相关(调整后的比值比[AOR],1.81;95%置信区间[CI],1.57-2.09)和1个月时的生存率(AOR,1.81;95%CI,1.47-2.23)。现场使用肾上腺素与院前ROSC显着正相关(AOR,2.51;95%CI,2.33-2.70)和1个月生存率(AOR,2.13;95%CI,1.89-2.40)。
    结论:我们的分析表明,在现场进行ALS与院前ROSC和1个月时的生存率相关。需要进一步努力,以提高紧急救生技术人员在现场实施ALS的速度。
    OBJECTIVE: In cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) occurring at home, Japanese emergency medical services personnel decide whether to provide treatment on the scene or during transport based on their judgment. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of advanced life support (ALS) (i.e., endotracheal intubation [ETI] or adrenaline administration) for OHCA at home and prognosis.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Japan Utstein Registry and emergency transport data collected from patients who underwent pre-hospital ETI (n = 6806) and received adrenaline (n = 22,636) between 2016 and 2019. The timing of ETI or adrenaline administration was determined as \"on the scene\" or \"in the ambulance.\" Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association among the timing of ALS implementation, pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival at 1 month.
    RESULTS: ETI on the scene was significantly positively associated with pre-hospital ROSC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-2.09) and survival at 1 month (AOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.47-2.23). Adrenaline administration on the scene was significantly positively associated with pre-hospital ROSC (AOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.33-2.70) and survival at 1 month (AOR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.89-2.40).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests performing ALS on the scene was associated with pre-hospital ROSC and survival at 1 month. Further efforts are needed to increase the rate of ALS implementation on the scene by emergency life-saving technicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在气管插管全身麻醉下使用机械血栓切除术治疗急性颅内血管闭塞是一种安全有效的方法。然而,手术后拔管的过程对某些患者提出了挑战。这项回顾性研究评估了机械通气与高流量吸氧相结合作为临时策略的安全性和有效性。同时检查其对长期临床结局的影响。
    方法:这项研究纳入了119例急性颅内大血管闭塞患者,这些患者在2020年1月至2023年11月期间在气管插管的全身麻醉下接受了机械血栓切除术。参与者分为两组:第1组(n=55),拔管后接受高流量氧气(HFO),和第2组(n=64),用常规氧气补充(RO)治疗。该研究比较了这些组之间的再插管和气管切开率,以确定安全性和有效性。此外,通过比较治疗前和90天随访时的NIHSS和mRS评分,分析了长期临床结局.
    结果:HFO组拔管后再插管率显着降低(12.7%,n=7)与RO组(31.2%,n=20,p=0.016)。与RO组相比,HFO组7天内气管切开的发生率也降低了(7.3%,n=4vs20.3%,n=13,p=0.043)。此外,HFO组的患者在卒中后90天达到0-2mRS评分的比例高于RO组(60%,n=33vs40.6%,n=26,p=0.035)。HFO组90天的NIHSS中位数评分比RO组更有利(6,IQR[1-18]vs8,IQR[1-20],p=0.005)。
    结论:研究表明,气管插管全身麻醉下机械血栓切除术后的高流量氧疗可能会减少再插管和气管切开术的需要,可能导致改善长期预后。
    BACKGROUND: The use of mechanical thrombectomy for acute intracranial vascular occlusion under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation is well-established as a safe and effective method. However, the process of extubation post-surgery presents challenges for certain patients. This retrospective study assesses the safety and efficacy of combining mechanical ventilation with high-flow oxygen inhalation as an interim strategy, while also examining its impact on long-term clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: This research enrolled 119 patients with acute intracranial large vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation between January 2020 and November 2023. Participants were categorized into two groups: Group 1 (n=55), which received high-flow oxygen (HFO) post-extubation, and Group 2 (n=64), which was treated with routine oxygen supplementation (RO). The study compared reintubation and tracheotomy rates between these groups to determine safety and effectiveness. Additionally, it analyzed long-term clinical outcomes by comparing NIHSS and mRS scores before treatment and at 90-day follow-up.
    RESULTS: The reintubation rate post-extubation was significantly lower in the HFO group (12.7 %, n=7) compared to the RO group (31.2 %, n=20, p=0.016). The incidence of tracheotomy within 7 days was also reduced in the HFO group compared to the RO group (7.3 %, n=4 vs 20.3 %, n=13, p=0.043). Moreover, a greater proportion of patients in the HFO group achieved mRS scores of 0-2 at 90 days post-stroke than those in the RO group (60 %, n=33 vs 40.6 %, n=26, p=0.035). The median NIHSS score at 90 days was more favorable in the HFO group than in the RO group (6, IQR [1-18] vs 8, IQR [1-20], p=0.005).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that high-flow oxygen therapy after mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation may lessen the need for reintubation and tracheotomy, potentially leading to improved long-term prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号