The purpose of this study was to investigate whether endothelin-A receptor (ETAR) inhibition in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and White (NHW) young adults depends on biological sex. We recruited females during low hormone (n = 22) and high hormone (n = 22) phases, and males (n = 22). Participants self-identified as NHB (n = 33) or NHW (n = 33). Participants were instrumented with two microdialysis fibers: (1) lactated Ringer\'s (control) and (2) 500 nM BQ-123 (ETAR antagonist). Local heating was used to elicit cutaneous vasodilation, and an infusion of 20 mM L-NAME to quantify NO-dependent vasodilation. At control sites, NO-dependent vasodilation was lowest in NHB males (46 ± 13 %NO) and NHB females during low hormone phases (47 ± 12 %NO) compared to all NHW groups. Inhibition of ETAR increased NO-dependent vasodilation in NHB males (66 ± 13 %NO), in both groups of females during low hormone phases (NHW, control: 64 ± 12 %NO, BQ-123: 85 ± 11 %NO; NHB, BQ-123: 68 ± 13 %NO), and in NHB females during high hormone phases (control: 61 ± 11 %NO, BQ-123: 83 ± 9 %NO). There was no effect for ETAR inhibition in NHW males or females during high hormone phases. These data suggest the effect of ETAR inhibition on NO-dependent vasodilation is influenced by biological sex and racial identity.

Simultaneous inhibition of angiotensin II AT1 and endothelin ETA receptors has emerged as a promising approach for treatment of chronic progressive kidney disease. This therapeutic approach has been advanced by the introduction of sparsentan, the first dual AT1 and ETA receptor antagonist. Sparsentan is a single molecule with high affinity for both receptors. It is US Food and Drug Administration approved for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and is currently being developed as a treatment for rare kidney diseases, such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of sparsentan in these conditions. In parallel with clinical development, studies have been conducted to elucidate the mechanisms of action of sparsentan and its position in the context of published evidence characterizing the nephroprotective effects of dual ETA and AT1 receptor inhibition. This review summarizes this evidence, documenting beneficial anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and hemodynamic actions of sparsentan in the kidney and protective actions in glomerular endothelial cells, mesangial cells, the tubulointerstitium, and podocytes, thus providing the rationale for the use of sparsentan as therapy for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and IgAN and suggesting potential benefits in other renal diseases, such as Alport syndrome.

The endothelin A receptor antagonist zibotentan, combined with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin, is being investigated for the treatment of chronic kidney disease with high proteinuria. To allow women of childbearing potential access to this treatment, highly effective contraception is required and drug interactions compromising contraception reliability must be avoided. This study investigated the risk of pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between zibotentan and the contraceptives ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel. A single-sequence, within-participant comparison study was conducted in 24 healthy women of non-childbearing potential, comparing the PK of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel alone and with zibotentan. Single oral doses of 0.06 mg ethinyl estradiol/0.3 mg levonorgestrel were administered on Days 1 and 15; zibotentan 10 mg was dosed orally, once-daily through Days 6-19. PK profiles were determined and ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel PK was compared between Day 1 and 15 based on geometric least-squares mean ratios of PK parameters, including maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUCinf). Co-administration with zibotentan did not affect ethinyl estradiol PK (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval] Cmax 1.05 [0.99-1.11], AUCinf 1.00 [0.96-1.05]), while a weak interaction (increased exposure) was observed for levonorgestrel (Cmax 1.12 [1.02-1.23], AUCinf 1.30 [1.21-1.39]), which was regarded as without clinical relevance. Plasma exposure of ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel was not reduced by multiple-dose zibotentan. In conclusion, contraception containing ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel is regarded possible under zibotentan-containing treatments. This expands choices for women of childbearing potential, supporting diversity in the ZENITH High Proteinuria trial.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage often leads to poor outcomes owing to vasospasm, even after successful aneurysm treatment. Clazosentan, an endothelin receptor inhibitor, has been proven to be an effective treatment for vasospasms in a Japanese randomized controlled trial. However, its efficacy in older patients (≥ 75 years old) and those with World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade V has not been demonstrated. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of clazosentan in older patients and those with WFNS grade V, using real-world data. Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage treated before and after the introduction of clazosentan were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were categorized into two groups (clazosentan era versus pre-clazosentan era), in which vasospasm management and outcomes were compared. Vasospasms were managed with fasudil hydrochloride-based (pre-clazosentan era) or clazosentan-based treatment (clazosentan era). Seventy-eight patients were included in this study: the clazosentan era (n = 32) and pre-clazosentan era (n = 46). Overall, clazosentan significantly reduced clinical vasospasms (clazosentan era: 31.3% versus pre-clazosentan era: 60.9%, p = 0.01), delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) (9.4% versus 39.1%, p = 0.004), and vasospasm-related morbidity and mortality (M/M) (3.1% versus 19.6%, p = 0.03). In subgroup analysis of older patients or those with WFNS grade V, no significant difference was observed in clinical outcomes, although both DCI and vasospasm-related M/M were lower in the clazosentan era. Clazosentan was more effective than fasudil-based management in preventing DCI and reducing vasospasm-related M/M. Clazosentan could be used safely in older patients and those with WFNS grade V, although clinical outcomes in these patients were comparable to those of conventional treatment.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: About 30% of Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) patients and 40% of Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients were diagnosed with diabetic nephropathy, which has also greatly affected the global end-stage renal disease (ESRD) outcome. Atrasentan is a selective endothelin receptor type A (ETA) antagonist initially studied for the potential treatment of cancer. However, the role of Atrasentan was not sure in the DM.
UNASSIGNED: The machine searches eight databases to find studies examining the impact of Atrasentan in people with diabetic nephropathy both domestically and overseas. Type of Study Design RCTs have been published on Atrasentan\'s effects in patients with chronic kidney disease.Utilizing RevMan 5.3 software, data analysis was carried out following a thorough assessment of the quality of the literature.
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis has included 4 papers for statistics. They were all regarded as being random controlled trials. According to 4 studies, the test group\'s urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) was significantly lower than the control group\'s (standardized mean difference (SMD): -222.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): -367.57, -77.38; P < .01), as were the test group\'s prevalence of cardiovascular disease (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.95; P < .01) and adverse reactions (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 1.00).
UNASSIGNED: Atrasentan improves the UACR in individuals with chronic kidney disease as compared to the control category. However, these findings need to be confirmed by more high-quality research. Further studies could focus on the effect of the Atrasentan on the diabetic nephropathy management,which will shed light on the treatment of diabetic nephropathy.

暂无摘要。

Endothelin A receptor antagonists (ETARA) slow chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression but their use is limited due to fluid retention and associated clinical risks. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) cause osmotic diuresis and improve clinical outcomes in CKD and heart failure. We hypothesized that co-administration of the SGLT2i dapagliflozin with the ETARA zibotentan would mitigate the fluid retention risk using hematocrit (Hct) and bodyweight as proxies for fluid retention.
Experiments were performed in 4% salt fed WKY rats. First, we determined the effect of zibotentan (30, 100 or 300 mg/kg/day) on Hct and bodyweight. Second, we assessed the effect of zibotentan (30 or 100 mg/kg/day) alone or in combination with dapagliflozin (3 mg/kg/day) on Hct and bodyweight.
Hct at Day 7 was lower in zibotentan versus vehicle groups [zibotentan 30 mg/kg/day, 43% (standard error 1); 100 mg/kg/day, 42% (1); and 300 mg/kg/day, 42% (1); vs vehicle, 46% (1); P < .05], while bodyweight was numerically higher in all zibotentan groups compared with vehicle. Combining zibotentan with dapagliflozin for 7 days prevented the change in Hct [zibotentan 100 mg/kg/day and dapagliflozin, 45% (1); vs vehicle 46% (1); P = .44] and prevented the zibotentan-driven increase in bodyweight (zibotentan 100 mg/kg/day + dapagliflozin 3 mg/kg/day = -3.65 g baseline corrected bodyweight change; P = .15).
Combining ETARA with SGLT2i prevents ETARA-induced fluid retention, supporting clinical studies to assess the efficacy and safety of combining zibotentan and dapagliflozin in individuals with CKD.

Endothelin (ET) is found to be increased in kidney disease secondary to hyperglycaemia, hypertension, acidosis, and the presence of insulin or proinflammatory cytokines. In this context, ET, via the endothelin receptor type A (ETA) activation, causes sustained vasoconstriction of the afferent arterioles that produces deleterious effects such as hyperfiltration, podocyte damage, proteinuria and, eventually, GFR decline. Therefore, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been proposed as a therapeutic strategy to reduce proteinuria and slow the progression of kidney disease. Preclinical and clinical evidence has revealed that the administration of ERAs reduces kidney fibrosis, inflammation and proteinuria. Currently, the efficacy of many ERAs to treat kidney disease is being tested in randomized controlled trials; however, some of these, such as avosentan and atrasentan, were not commercialized due to the adverse events related to their use. Therefore, to take advantage of the protective properties of the ERAs, the use of ETA receptor-specific antagonists and/or combining them with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been proposed to prevent oedemas, the main ERAs-related deleterious effect. The use of a dual angiotensin-II type 1/endothelin receptor blocker (sparsentan) is also being evaluated to treat kidney disease. Here, we reviewed the main ERAs developed and the preclinical and clinical evidence of their kidney-protective effects. Additionally, we provided an overview of new strategies that have been proposed to integrate ERAs in kidney disease treatment.

BACKGROUND: Association of congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) worsens the patient\'s prognosis and results in poor survival rate. The aim of this study was to examine if addition of endothelin type A (ETA) receptor antagonist to the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) will bring additional beneficial effects in experimental rats.
METHODS: CKD was induced by 5/6 renal mass reduction (5/6 NX) and CHF was elicited by volume overload achieved by creation of aorto-caval fistula (ACF). The follow-up was 24 weeks after the first intervention (5/6 NX). The treatment regimens were initiated 6 weeks after 5/6 NX and 2 weeks after ACF creation.
RESULTS: The final survival in untreated group was 15%. The treatment with ETA receptor antagonist alone or ACEi alone and the combined treatment improved the survival rate to 64%, 71% and 75%, respectively, however, the difference between the combination and either single treatment regimen was not significant. The combined treatment exerted best renoprotection, causing additional reduction in albuminuria and reducing renal glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury as compared with ACE inhibition alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that treatment with ETA receptor antagonist attenuates the CKD- and CHF-related mortality, and addition of ETA receptor antagonist to the standard blockade of RAS by ACEi exhibits additional renoprotective actions.