Endostapler

内窥镜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介急性阑尾炎是急腹症的常见原因,也是世界上最常见的外科急症。自19世纪以来,手术治疗一直是世界上最被接受的治疗方法,腹腔镜阑尾切除术是目前首选的治疗选择,因为它有几个好处。阑尾残端的闭合是阑尾切除术中最关键的步骤,因为其管理不当会导致术后并发症。近年来,已经提出了几种方法来执行这种闭包。进行这项研究是为了比较使用内环和内缝合器装置的术后结果。方法回顾性分析2016-2020年290例18~83岁的腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者的临床资料。人口统计数据,临床病史,层析成像结果,收集了实验室数据,以及附属基地管理技术,入院时阑尾炎的严重程度,术后30天并发症,医院再入院,和住院。统计检验和二元逻辑回归分析用于识别危险因素,显著性水平为p<0.05。结果人口统计数据和临床病史无统计学差异。内缝合器组的术前脓肿的断层摄影术高1.58倍。术后结果显示,使用内缝合器装置代表术后脓肿风险高2.7倍。还发现内缝合器组的术后败血症风险为1.87倍。结论我们的研究表明,使用内循环可将术后脓肿的风险降低16.5%,并可预防术后败血症的发展。
    Introduction Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdomen and the most frequent surgical emergency in the world. Since the nineteenth century, surgical resolution has been the most accepted treatment worldwide, and laparoscopic appendectomy is currently preferred as the treatment of choice because it has several benefits. The closure of the appendiceal stump is the most crucial step during appendectomy since its inadequate management can cause post-surgical complications. Throughout recent years, several methods have been proposed to perform this closure. This study was performed to compare the post-surgical outcomes of the use of endoloop and endostapler devices. Methods This is a retrospective study of 290 patients aged 18 to 83 who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between 2016 and 2020. Demographic data, clinical history, tomographic findings, and laboratory data were collected, as well as appendicular base management technique, severity degree of appendicitis at hospital admission, postoperative complications at 30 days, hospital readmission, and in-hospital stay. Statistical tests and binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors, with a significance level of p<0.05. Results Demographic data and clinical history did not show statistically significant differences. The presence of a pre-surgical abscess with tomography was 1.58 times higher in the endostapler group. Post-surgical results showed that the use of endostapler devices represented a 2.7 times higher risk of post-surgical abscess. The endostapler group was also found to have 1.87 times the risk of post-surgical sepsis. Conclusion Our study shows that the use of an endoloop reduces the risk of postoperative abscess by 16.5% and protects against the development of post-surgical sepsis by 30%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是比较胸外科手术中最常见的血管闭塞方法的耐压性:结扎,夹子,和血管内缝合器。
    在常规胸外科手术中获得肺血管。将球形套管插入侧壁中的开口,并用亚麻结扎线固定以免滑出。随后,盐水注入血管。我们记录了发生泄漏的压力。
    总共65艘船,分成三组,参加了这项研究。在内窥镜组中,动脉和静脉的中位爆裂压为262.5mmHg和300mmHg,分别。在夹子的情况下,这两种类型的血管都超过750mmHg。在连接组中观察到相同的结果。内缝合器闭塞的最小破裂压力为动脉和静脉的187.5mmHg和225mmHg,分别。在夹子的情况下,动脉为600mmHg,静脉为675mmHg。总共525mmHg(动脉)和750mmHg(静脉)是在结扎阻塞的血管中观察到的最小泄漏值。比较分析显示,内缝合器-夹子和内缝合器-结扎对的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。剪辑和结扎之间没有区别。
    所检查的方法能够在生理条件下阻塞肺血管。此外,结扎和夹子对高度超过生理值的压力具有抵抗力。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to compare pressure resistance of the most common methods of vessel occlusion during thoracic surgical procedures: ligations, clips, and vascular endostaplers.
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary vessels were obtained during routine thoracic surgeries. A ball-tipped cannula was inserted through an opening in the side wall and secured with a linen ligature from slipping out. Subsequently, saline was infused into the vessel. We recorded the pressure on which a leakage occurred.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 65 vessels, divided between 3 groups, were enrolled in the study. In the endostaplers group, median bursting pressures were 262.5 mmHg and 300 mmHg for arteries and veins, respectively. In the case of clips, it was over 750 mmHg in both types of the vessels. The same results were observed in the ligation group. Minimal bursting pressures in endostapler occlusion were 187.5 mmHg and 225 mmHg in arteries and veins, respectively. In the case of clips, it was 600 mmHg for arteries and 675 mmHg for veins. A total of 525 mmHg (arteries) and 750 mmHg (veins) were the minimal leaking values observed in vessels occluded with ligations. Comparative analysis showed statistically significant differences in endostapler-clips and endostapler-ligations pairs (p < 0.001). There were no differences between clips and ligations.
    UNASSIGNED: The examined methods are capable of occluding pulmonary vessels under physiological conditions. Furthermore, ligations and clips are resistant to pressures highly exceeding physiological values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管一些研究报道了阑尾残端闭合方法与术后并发症之间的关系,此过程没有固定的方法。本研究旨在比较现有程序的治疗结果。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了200例接受紧急腹腔镜手术的患者的记录,并调查了阑尾残端闭合方法的差异是否是手术部位感染的危险因素。将患者分为Endoloop组和内窥镜组,纳入45例倾向评分匹配的患者。比较两组的治疗效果。
    结果:在多变量分析中,高体温患者显示出明显的手术部位感染(P=.036)。阑尾残端方法(Endloopvs.endosstaper)没有显著差异。关于术后并发症,浅切口和深切口手术部位感染,器官/空间手术部位感染,肠梗阻,Clavien-DindoIIIa级或更高的并发症;在倾向评分匹配后,内环组和内缝合器组之间无显著差异(分别为P=.725、1.000、.645和.557)。
    结论:根据炎症的严重程度,正确使用Endloop和内缝合器,在许多情况下可以安全地执行Endoloop。廉价的Endloop作为残端闭合方法的一种选择应该会对医疗成本产生积极影响。
    BACKGROUND: Although some studies have reported on the relationship between appendiceal stump closure methods and postoperative complications, there is no fixed method for this procedure. This study aimed to compare treatment outcomes of the existing procedures.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 200 patients who underwent urgent laparoscopic surgeries and investigated whether the difference in the appendiceal stump closure method was a risk factor for surgical site infection. The patients were divided into the Endoloop and endostapler groups, and 45 propensity score-matched patients were included. The treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared.
    RESULTS: The patients with high body temperature showed significantly developed surgical site infection in multivariate analysis (P = .036). There was no significant difference in the appendix stump methods (Endoloop vs endostapler). Regarding postoperative complications, superficial and deep incisional surgical site infection, organ/space surgical site infection, ileus, and complications of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher; there was no significant difference between the endoloop and endostapler groups after propensity score matching (P = .725, 1.000, .645 and .557, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: By properly using the Endoloop and endostapler according to the severity of inflammation, the Endoloop can be safely performed in many cases. Inexpensive Endoloop as an option for stump closure methods should positively impact medical costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在报道欧洲多机构对先天性肺畸形患儿进行胸腔镜治疗的经验。方法:记录102例患者(49名女孩和53名男孩),手术年龄中位数为1年(范围6个月-1.5岁),他们在五个欧洲小儿外科单位接受了胸腔镜肺叶切除术,是回顾性收集的。手术适应症包括先天性肺气道畸形(CPAM)(n=47),叶内和叶外肺隔离症(n=34),混合病变(CPAM/叶内隔离)(n=2),严重的支气管扩张(n=9),先天性叶性肺气肿(n=8),和其他人(n=2)。77/102(75.5%)无症状,而出现反复肺炎和/或呼吸窘迫等症状的患者为25/102(24.5%).结果:外科手术包括18上,20个中间,下叶切除64次。没有报告要打开的转换。最后48/102例患者(47%)采用了3mm的密封装置和5mm的吻合器。中位手术时间为92.2分钟(范围74-141)。与缝合术(118.9分钟)相比,使用密封装置(75.5分钟)进行血管分割和支气管密封的患者的中位手术时间显着减少(P=0.001)。中位住院时间为3.7天(范围2-6.2)。3/102例患者(2.9%)出现术后并发症,包括需要胸腔引流的漏气(n=1)(ClavienIIIb)和呼吸道感染(n=2)(ClavienII)。一名残留胸膜肺母细胞瘤患者(0.9%)需要再次手术。所有有症状的患者报告术后症状消退。结论:胸腔镜肺叶切除术是一种安全有效的手术,具有良好的美容效果,在专家手中。根据我们的经验,我们强烈建议先天性肺畸形患者在生命的第一年进行手术,为了降低感染的风险并使手术在技术上更容易,尽管病人体型小。外科医生的经验和使用小型化仪器和密封装置仍然是成功的关键因素。
    Background: This study aimed to report a European multi-institutional experience about thoracoscopic management of children with congenital lung malformations. Methods: The records of 102 patients (49 girls and 53 boys) with median age at surgery of 1 year (range 6 months-1.5 years), who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy in five European Pediatric Surgery units, were retrospectively collected. Indications for surgery included congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) (n = 47), intra- and extralobar pulmonary sequestration (n = 34), hybrid lesion (CPAM/intralobar sequestration) (n = 2), severe bronchiectasis (n = 9), congenital lobar emphysema (n = 8), and others (n = 2). The condition was asymptomatic in 77/102 (75.5%), whereas symptoms such as recurrent pneumonia and/or respiratory distress were present in 25/102 (24.5%). Results: Surgical procedures included 18 upper, 20 middle, and 64 lower lobe resections. No conversions to open were reported. A 3 mm sealing device and 5 mm stapler were adopted in the last 48/102 patients (47%). The median operative time was 92.2 minutes (range 74-141). The median operative time significantly decreased in patients in whom the vessel division and bronchial sealing were performed using sealing devices (75.5 minutes) compared with suture ligations (118.9 minutes) (P = .001). The median hospital stay was 3.7 days (range 2-6.2). Three/102 patients (2.9%) developed postoperative complications, including air leakage requiring pleural drainage (n = 1) (Clavien IIIb) and respiratory infection (n = 2) (Clavien II). A reoperation was required in one patient with residual pleuropulmonary blastoma (0.9%). All symptomatic patients reported resolution of symptoms postoperatively. Conclusions: Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and effective procedure with excellent cosmetic outcome, in expert hands. Based upon our experience, we strongly recommend surgery in patients with congenital lung malformations by the first year of life, to reduce the risk of infection and make the procedure technically easier, despite the small patients\' size. Surgeon\'s experience and use of miniaturized instruments and sealing devices remain key factors for successful outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), closure of the appendiceal stump can be achieved using either an endostapler or endoloop. We compared outcome data from utilizing either technique.
    METHODS: Data was collected for all adult patients who underwent LA for appendicitis at a single institution over a 4-year period. Demographic data, complications, length of stay and hospital charges were compared between both groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 501 patients underwent LA in the 4-year period. There were no differences in age, gender or BMI. Additionally, there were no differences in procedure length, readmission rates, complication rates (including intra-abdominal abscess) or hospital charges. There was a slightly shorter length of stay in the endoloop closure group (1.22 days) vs endostapler (1.38 days), p = 0.002.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neither technique of appendiceal stump closure demonstrated a unique advantage. These findings may have relevance in low resource environments that may not have routine access to surgical staplers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在描述和评估腹腔镜技术,以促进使用同源心包植入物的马的肾脾间隙消融。保存在98%的甘油中,并使用腹腔镜聚二恶烷酮钉固定。在这项实验研究中,使用了六匹阿拉伯马,以前没有相关的腹部疾病。手术操作是在镇静下的站立姿势下使用α-2激动剂和阿片类药物进行的,与门户站点中局部麻醉剂的局部渗透有关。马匹被束缚在股票中,和左边的侧翼被剪切和无菌准备。在左翼创建了三个门户,和同源心包植入物,尺寸为10×5厘米,被引入到覆盖肾脾间隙的腹腔中,位于脾脏背侧和肾周筋膜之间,使用腹腔镜吻合器用聚二恶烷酮钉固定。在术后第0、1、3、7、14、30和60天进行体格检查以及血液和腹膜液样本收集,在第60天进行探查性腹腔镜检查,以评估该技术的有效性和最终的并发症.在手术过程中没有困难或明显的并发症,总平均执行时间为49.83分钟(±10.19)。在术后期间,与术前相比,第7天和第14天的血浆纤维蛋白原浓度显着增加(P<0.05)。在第1、3、7、14和30天,腹膜液中的总有核细胞计数增加(P<0.05)。手术60天后,体检和实验室数据均在正常范围内。第60天进行的探究性腹腔镜检查显示肾脾间隙完全闭塞,无法区分心包植入物和疤痕组织,甚至在对收集的样本进行的组织学评估中也没有。在两匹马中,在植入物固定的区域观察到网膜粘连,在另外两个人中,在植入区和结肠系膜之间观察到粘连,与临床并发症无关.在手术中对动物进行了36个月的随访,在此期间没有观察到绞痛迹象。结论肾脾间隙消融技术,使用保存在98%甘油中的同源心包,通过腹腔镜检查由聚二恶烷酮钉固定,执行起来很简单,有效,在评估期间没有临床并发症,它的使用可能被认为是在临床病例中的一种手术选择与反复肾脾截留的马。
    This study aimed to describe and evaluate a laparoscopic technique to promote nephrosplenic space ablation in horses using a homologous pericardium implant, preserved in 98% glycerin and fixed using laparoscopic polydioxanone staples. In this experimental study, six Arabian horses without previous related abdominal diseases were used. The surgical procedures were performed in the standing position under sedation with alpha-2 agonists and opioids, associated with local infiltration of the local anesthetic in the portal sites. The horses were restrained in a stock, and the left flanks were clipped and aseptically prepared. Three portals were created on the left flank, and the homologous pericardium implant, measuring 10 × 5 cm, was introduced into the abdominal cavity covering the nephrosplenic space, positioned between the dorsal border of the spleen and perirenal fascia, fixed with polydioxanone staples using a laparoscopic stapler. Physical examination and blood and peritoneal fluid sample collection were performed on days 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 of the postoperative period, and an exploratory laparoscopy was performed on day 60 to assess the effectiveness of the technique and eventual complications. There were no difficulties or significant complications during the surgical procedure, and the total average time to perform was 49.83 minutes (±10.19). In the postoperative period, there was a significant increase (P < .05) in the plasma fibrinogen concentration on days 7 and 14 compared with the preoperative moment. The total nucleated cell count in the peritoneal fluid increased (P < .05) on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 30. After 60 days of the surgical procedure, the physical examination and laboratory data were within the normal range. Exploratory laparoscopy performed on day 60 revealed complete occlusion of the nephrosplenic space, and it was not possible to differentiate the pericardium implant from the scar tissue, not even in the histological evaluation performed on the collected samples. In two horses, omentum adhesion was observed in the region where the implant was fixed, and in two others, a synechia was observed between the implant area and mesocolon without association with clinical complications. The animals were followed up for 36 months at surgery, and no colic signs were observed along this period. It was concluded that the technique of ablation of the nephrosplenic space, using homologous pericardium preserved in 98% glycerin, fixed by polydioxanone staples by laparoscopy, was simple to perform, effective, and free of clinical complications during the period of evaluation, and its use may be indicated as a surgical option in clinical cases of horses with recurrent nephrosplenic entrapment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阑尾切除术是最常见的普通外科手术之一,腹腔镜手术是国际指南认可和推荐的有效选择。阑尾残端的不同闭合技术存在争议,因为它们可能在确定术后感染并发症方面具有重要意义。本荟萃分析的目的是比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术中残端闭合的内缝合器与内窥镜环系。
    方法:这是一项系统评价,对随机试验和队列研究进行了荟萃分析,比较了腔内缝合器与内镜环扎术在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中闭合阑尾贮槽的作用。当数据可用时,对儿科患者和复杂性阑尾炎患者进行亚组分析。复杂的急性阑尾炎定义为坏疽/坏死性阑尾或穿孔阑尾。主要结果是伤口感染率,腹腔感染率,逗留时间,再入院率和再手术率。
    结果:共纳入14项研究的5934例患者纳入分析。内置式腹内脓肿发生率相似(RR0.88,95%C.I.0.54-1.43),但伤口感染发生率较低(RR0.54,95%C.I.0.22-0.97)。再入院率和再手术率相似。在亚组分析中,内缝合器显着降低了儿科患者的伤口感染率;复杂性急性阑尾炎患者的主要结局没有差异。
    结论:在复杂的急性阑尾炎中,残端闭合技术并不影响预后;在非复杂的急性阑尾炎患儿中,使用内窥镜似乎与降低伤口感染率有关。
    BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is amongst the most common general surgical procedures and the laparoscopic approach is recognized and recommended by international guidelines as a valid option. The different closure techniques of the appendicular stump constitute a matter of debate since their possible implication in determining postoperative infectious complications. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare endostapler versus endoscopic loop ties for stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy.
    METHODS: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials and cohort studies comparing endostapler with endoscopic loop ties for the closure of appendicular sump in laparoscopy appendectomy. Subgroup analysis of pediatric patients and patients with complicated appendicitis were performed when data were available. Complicated acute appendicitis was defined as in case of gangrenous/necrotic appendix or perforated appendix. Main outcomes were wound infection rate, intra-abdominal infection rate, length of stay, readmission and reoperation rates.
    RESULTS: a total of 5934 patients from 14 studies were included in the analysis. Endostapler was associated with a similar intra-abdominal abscess rate (RR 0.88, 95%C.I. 0.54-1.43) but a lower incidence of wound infection (RR 0.54, 95%C.I. 0.22-0.97) Length of stay, readmission and reoperation rates were similar. In subgroups analysis endostapler reduces significantly the wound infection rate in pediatric patients; no differences in main outcomes were observed in patients with complicated acute appendicitis.
    CONCLUSIONS: In complicated acute appendicitis the stump closure technique did not affect outcomes; the use of endostapler seems to be associated to a reduction of wound infection rate in pediatric patients with non-complicated acute appendicitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性胰腺炎(CP)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,导致严重的疼痛,胰腺功能逐渐恶化。\“热带\”胰腺炎代表疾病的一个变种,广泛扩张的管道,众多的微积分,和一些狭窄。传统上,改良的Puestow手术是胰腺导管系统扩张的首选治疗方法。然而,它直到最近才适应腹腔镜方法,这是一项技术要求很高的程序,主要是由于需要广泛的体内缝合。
    选择在我们中心出现的CP症状病例,其身体和头部的平均导管直径最小为8mm,用于腹腔镜改良的Puestow手术。那些有胰腺手术的人,胰头肿块,内镜下胰腺支架置入术,并排除门静脉高压。符合选择标准的28例患者接受了腹腔镜手术。
    7例患者(25%)接受了胰肠吻合术,17人(60.7%)接受了缝合吻合。由于无法通过经皮穿刺穿刺定位胰管,四名患者(14.3%)被转换为开放手术。在那些成功进行腹腔镜手术的患者中,1例患者出现胰瘘,可自行缓解;另1例患者因长期重症监护,术后病程困难.我们在该系列中没有死亡,也没有患者有任何长期残疾。到术后第三个月,吻合口通畅率为100%。
    胰肠外侧吻合术是导管系统扩张的CP的有效外科治疗方法。腹腔镜手术是合理的下一步手术。它允许有效的导管减压,死亡率和发病率低。该程序需要先进的手术技能,重点是体内缝合。那些患有热带CP且宽导管扩张大于12毫米的患者适合于内吻合吻合,这有助于显着减少手术时间而不会对结果产生任何腐蚀。
    Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a debilitating condition resulting in severe pain with progressive deterioration of pancreatic function. \"Tropical\" pancreatitis represents a variant of the disease with widely dilated ducts, numerous calculi, and few strictures. Traditionally, modified Puestow\'s procedure has been the treatment of choice for a dilated pancreatic ductal system. However, it has only recently been adapted to laparoscopic approach which is a technically demanding procedure primarily due to need for extensive intra-corporeal suturing.
    Symptomatic cases of CP presenting at our center with minimum 8 mm mean ductal diameter at body and head were selected for laparoscopic modified Puestow\'s procedure. Those with prior pancreatic surgery, pancreatic head masses, endoscopic pancreatic stenting, and portal hypertension were excluded. Twenty-eight cases meeting selection criteria underwent a laparoscopic procedure.
    Seven patients (25%) underwent a stapled pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, 17 (60.7%) received a sutured anastomosis. Four patients (14.3%) were converted to open surgery due to failure to localize the pancreatic duct with percutaneous needle aspiration. Of those patients who underwent a successful laparoscopic procedure, a single patient developed a pancreatic fistula which resolved spontaneously; another patient had a difficult post-operative course with prolonged intensive care. We suffered no mortality within the series and no patient had any long-term disability. Anastomotic patency rates of 100% were achieved by the third post-operative month.
    Lateral pancreaticojejunostomy is an effective surgical management for CP with a dilated ductal system. Its laparoscopic adoption is the rational next surgical step. It allows effective duct decompression with low mortality and morbidity. The procedure demands an advanced surgical skill set with an emphasis on intra-corporeal suturing. Those patients suffering from tropical CP with wide ductal dilatation greater than 12 mm are suited to an endostapled anastomosis which helps significantly reduce operative time without any corrosion of outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    关于腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)中阑尾残端闭合的最合适方法的证据有限且相互矛盾。我们旨在比较内循环(EL)和内缝合器(ES)在儿童复杂的穿孔性阑尾炎的LA期间的残端闭合。
    我们回顾性分析了在5个国际儿科外科中心(2011年1月至2016年12月)因复杂性阑尾炎行LA的708例患者(463名男孩和245名女孩,平均年龄9.8岁)的记录。阑尾穿孔伴局限性腹膜炎470例,弥漫性腹膜炎238例。374例(G1)使用EL,334例(G2)采用ES。
    两组均未发生术中并发症,但在G1(1.3%)和G2(1.1%)中报告了5例转换为开放手术(OR1.1;95%CI0.30-4.19)。使用EL与较高的腹内脓肿发生率显着相关(OR1.36;95%CI0.84-2.18),术后肠梗阻(OR3.61;95%CI0.76-17.11),与ES相比,再手术/再入院(OR6.46;95%CI1.46-28.62)。与G1(578.36欧元)相比,G2(915.60欧元)洛杉矶的平均用品成本高得多(p=0.0001)。与G2(2.127,88)相比,G1(4.091,39欧元)的平均再手术/再入院成本显着提高(p=0.0001)(OR1.72;95%CI1.47-2.01)。
    我们的研究首次在儿科人群中证明用于阑尾残端闭合的方法可能会影响LA在复杂性阑尾炎中的预后。虽然ES比EL贵,我们的结果表明,对于复杂的穿孔性阑尾炎,应使用ES而非EL进行阑尾残端封堵,因为它的使用与术后腹内脓肿和术后肠梗阻的发生率较低以及再次手术和再入院率和费用较低相关.
    There is a limited and conflicting evidence about the most appropriate method for appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). We aimed to compare endoloop (EL) versus endostapler (ES) for stump closure during LA for complicated perforated appendicitis in children.
    We retrospectively reviewed the records of 708 patients (463 boys and 245 girls with an average age of 9.8 years) who underwent LA for complicated appendicitis in 5 international centers of Pediatric Surgery over a 5-years period (January 2011-December 2016). The appendix was perforated with localized peritonitis in 470 cases and diffuse peritonitis in 238 patients. EL was used in 374 cases (G1), whereas ES was adopted in 334 cases (G2).
    No intra-operative complication occurred in both groups but 5 conversions to open surgery were reported in G1 (1.3%) and 4 in G2 (1.1%) (OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.30-4.19). Use of EL was significantly associated with higher incidence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.84-2.18), postoperative ileus (OR 3.61; 95% CI 0.76-17.11), and re-operations/readmissions (OR 6.46; 95% CI 1.46-28.62) compared to ES. The average cost of supplies for LA was significantly higher in G2 (€ 915.60) compared to G1 (€ 578.36) (p = 0.0001). The average cost of re-operations/readmissions was significantly higher in G1 (€ 4.091,39) compared to G2 (€ 2.127,88) (p = 0.0001) (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.47-2.01).
    Our study is the first in the pediatric population to demonstrate that the method used for appendiceal stump closure may influence the outcome of LA in complicated appendicitis. Although ES is more expensive compared to EL, our results demonstrated that appendix stump closure should be performed using ES rather than EL in complicated perforated appendicitis since its use was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and postoperative ileus and lower re-operations and readmissions rates and costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号