Breast cancer is a leading cause of female mortality and despite advancements in personalized therapeutics, metastatic disease largely remains incurable due to drug resistance. The estrogen receptor (ER, ESR1) is expressed in two-thirds of all breast cancer, and under endocrine stress, somatic ESR1 mutations arise in approximately 30% of cases that result in endocrine resistance. We and others reported ESR1 fusions as a mechanism of ER-mediated endocrine resistance. ER fusions, which retain the activation function 1- and DNA-binding domains, harbor ESR1 exons 1 to 6 fused to an in-frame gene partner resulting in loss of the ER ligand-binding domain (LBD). We demonstrate that in a no-special type (invasive ductal carcinoma [IDC]-NST) and an invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cell line, ER fusions exhibit robust hyperactivation of canonical ER signaling pathways independent of estradiol or antiendocrine therapies. We employ cell line models stably overexpressing ER fusions with concurrent endogenous ER knockdown to minimize endogenous ER influence. Cell lines exhibited shared transcriptomic enrichment in pathways known to be drivers of metastatic disease, notably MYC signaling. Cells expressing the 3\' fusion partners SOX9 and YAP1 consistently demonstrated enhanced growth and cell survival. ILC cells expressing the DAB2 fusion led to enhanced growth, survival, and migration, phenotypes not appreciated in the IDC-NST DAB2 model. Herein, we report that cell line activity is subtype-, fusion-, and assay-specific, suggesting that LBD loss, the fusion partner, and the cellular landscape all influence fusion activities. Therefore, it will be critical to assess fusion frequency in the context of the clinicopathology.

Acquired resistance to endocrine treatments remains a major clinical challenge. In this study, we found that desmoglein-2 (DSG2) plays a major role in acquired endocrine resistance and cellular plasticity in ER+ breast cancer (BC). By analysing the well-established fulvestrant-resistant ER+ BC model using single-cell RNA-seq, we revealed that ER inhibition leads to a specific increase in DSG2 in cancer cell populations, which in turn enhances desmosome formation in vitro and in vivo and cell phenotypic plasticity that promotes resistance to treatment. DSG2 depletion reduced tumorigenesis and metastasis in fulvestrant-resistant xenograft models and promoted fulvestrant efficiency. Mechanistically, DSG2 forms a desmosome complex with JUP and Vimentin and triggers Wnt/PCP signalling. We showed that elevated DSG2 levels, along with reduced ER levels and an activated Wnt/PCP pathway, predicted poor survival, suggesting that a DSG2high signature could be exploited for therapeutic interventions. Our analysis highlighted the critical role of DSG2-mediated desmosomal junctions following antiestrogen treatment.

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous tumor that has surpassed lung cancer as the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. In clinical practice,the primary approach for treating estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive BC is through endocrine therapy, which involves targeting the ERα using medications like tamoxifen and fulvestrant. However, the problem of de novo or acquired resistance poses a significant clinical challenge, emphasizing the critical need for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. In this regard, we have successfully designed and developed a novel selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) called OBHSA, which specifically targets and degrades ERα, demonstrating remarkable efficacy. Our findings revealed the effectiveness of OBHSA in inhibiting the proliferation of various BC cells, including both tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant BC cells, indicating its great potential to overcome endocrine resistance. In terms of mechanism, we discovered that OBHSA overcame tamoxifen resistance through two distinct pathways. Firstly, OBHSA degraded cyclin D1 in an ERα-dependent manner, thereby blocking the cell cycle. Secondly, OBHSA induced an elevation in intracellular reactive oxygen species, triggering an excessive activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and ultimately leading to apoptotic cell death. In summary, our finding demonstrated that OBHSA exerts anti-tumor effects by inducing cell cycle arrest and UPR-mediated apoptosis. These findings hold promise for the development of novel therapeutic drugs targeting endocrine-resistant BC.

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) play a significant role in Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer by contributing to tumorigenesis and endocrine resistance. This review explores the structure, signaling pathways, and implications of FGFRs, particularly FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, and FGFR4, in ER+ breast cancer. FGFR1 is frequently amplified, especially in aggressive Luminal B-like tumors, and its amplification is associated with poor prognosis and treatment resistance. The co-amplification of FGFR1 with oncogenes like EIF4EBP1 and NSD3 complicates its role as a standalone oncogenic driver. FGFR2 amplification, though less common, is critical in hormone receptor regulation, driving proliferation and treatment resistance. FGFR3 and FGFR4 also contribute to endocrine resistance through various mechanisms, including the activation of alternate signaling pathways like PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK. Endocrine resistance remains a major clinical challenge, with around 70% of breast cancers initially hormone receptor positive. Despite the success of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy (ET), resistance often develops, necessitating new treatment strategies. FGFR inhibitors have shown potential in preclinical studies, but clinical trials have yielded limited success due to off-target toxicities and lack of predictive biomarkers. Current clinical trials, including those evaluating FGFR inhibitors like erdafitinib, lucitanib, and dovitinib, have demonstrated mixed outcomes, underscoring the complexity of FGFR signaling in breast cancer. The interplay between FGFR and other signaling pathways highlights the need for comprehensive molecular profiling and personalized treatment approaches. Future research should focus on identifying robust biomarkers and developing combination therapies to enhance the efficacy of FGFR-targeted treatments. In conclusion, targeting FGFR signaling in ER+ breast cancer presents both challenges and opportunities. A deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms and resistance pathways is crucial for the successful integration of FGFR inhibitors into clinical practice, aiming to improve outcomes for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Endocrine therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) are the cornerstone to treat ER-positive breast cancers patients, but resistance often limits their effectiveness. Understanding the molecular mechanisms is thus key to optimize the existing drugs and to develop new ER-modulators. Notable progress has been made although the fragmented way data is reported has reduced their potential impact. Here, we introduce EstroGene2.0, an expanded database of its precursor 1.0 version. EstroGene2.0 focusses on response and resistance to endocrine therapies in breast cancer models. Incorporating multi-omic profiling of 361 experiments from 212 studies across 28 cell lines, a user-friendly browser offers comprehensive data visualization and metadata mining capabilities (https://estrogeneii.web.app/). Taking advantage of the harmonized data collection, our follow-up meta-analysis revealed substantial diversity in response to different classes of ER-modulators including SERMs, SERDs, SERCA and LDD/PROTAC. Notably, endocrine resistant models exhibit a spectrum of transcriptomic alterations including a contra-directional shift in ER and interferon signaling, which is recapitulated clinically. Furthermore, dissecting multiple ESR1-mutant cell models revealed the different clinical relevance of genome-edited versus ectopic overexpression model engineering and identified high-confidence mutant-ER targets, such as NPY1R. These examples demonstrate how EstroGene2.0 helps investigate breast cancer\'s response to endocrine therapies and explore resistance mechanisms.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of endocrine resistance in a cohort of Hispanic Mexican breast cancer (BC) patients receiving care at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan). Additionally, the clinical-pathological factors associated with endocrine resistance were identified, and their impact on patient survival was explored.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis of 200 BC patients who attended INCan between 2012 and 2016 with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive tumors was made. Endocrine resistance was defined according to the International Consensus Guidelines for Advance Breast Cancer 2 definition. Their clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed to determine the association with endocrine resistance presence. We used sensitivity analyses and multivariate-adjusted logistic regressions, Kaplan-Meier curves, and multivariate-adjusted Cox regressions. P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: Endocrine resistance was observed in 32.5% of patients included in this study. The distinction between hormone resistance and sensitivity was influenced by tumor size and node status. It had a mean diameter of 7.15 cm in endocrine resistance cases compared to 5.71 cm in non-endocrine, with N3 status present in 20% of endocrine resistance cases versus only 2.2% in non-endocrine (p-value < 0.001). The clinical stage exhibited a strong association with endocrine resistance (Risk Ratio [RR] 4.39, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.50, 11.43). Furthermore, endocrine resistance significantly impacted mortality during the follow-up, with a Hazard Ratio [HR] of 23.7 (95%CI 5.20, 108.42) in multivariable-adjusted models. However, a complete pathological response reduced the endocrine resistance risk, as demonstrated by a Risk Ratio (RR) of 0.15 (95% CI 0.03, 0.75).
UNASSIGNED: Advanced clinical stage at diagnosis predicted endocrine resistance in Hispanic Mexican BC patients. Complete pathologic response in locally advanced disease patients was also a key predictor of endocrine resistance. These results indicated that endocrine resistance was a critical factor in BC during follow-up.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare ovarian malignancy primarily affecting younger women and is characterized by an indolent growth pattern. It exhibits indolent growth and high estrogen/progesterone receptor expression, suggesting potential responsiveness to endocrine therapy. However, treatment efficacy remains limited due to the development of endocrine resistance. The mechanisms of resistance, whether primary or acquired, are still largely unknown and present a significant hurdle in achieving favorable treatment outcomes with endocrine therapy in these patients. In estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, mechanisms of endocrine resistance have been largely explored and novel treatment strategies to overcome resistance have emerged. Considering the shared estrogen receptor positivity in LGSOC and breast cancer, we wanted to explore whether there are any parallel mechanisms of resistance and whether we can extend endocrine breast cancer treatments to LGSOC. This review aims to highlight the underlying molecular mechanisms possibly driving endocrine resistance in ovarian cancer, while also exploring the available therapeutic opportunities to overcome this resistance. By unraveling the potential pathways involved and examining emerging strategies, this review explores valuable insights for advancing treatment options and improving patient outcomes in LGSOC, which has limited therapeutic options available.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women. The vast majority of breast cancer patients have hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors. In advanced HR+ breast cancer, the combination of endocrine therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors is considered the standard of care in the front-line setting. Nevertheless, resistance to hormonal therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors eventually occurs, leading to progression of the disease. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) comprise a promising therapeutic choice with significant efficacy in patients with HR+ breast cancer, which is resistant to endocrine treatment. ADCs typically consist of a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker to a monoclonal antibody that targets a specific tumor-associated antigen, offering the advantage of a more selective delivery of chemotherapy to cancer cells. In this review, we focus on the ADC mechanisms of action, their toxicity profile and therapeutic uses as well as on related biomarkers and future perspectives in advanced HR+ breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Update on the most recent clinical evidence on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative breast cancer.
RESULTS: Over the past decade, CDK4/6i have become part of the standard of care treatment of patients with both metastatic and high-risk early HR + /HER2- breast cancers. The three available CDK4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) have been extensively studied in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with consistent prolongation of progression free survival; however, ribociclib has emerged as the preferred first line agent in mBC given overall survival benefit over endocrine monotherapy. In early BC, abemaciclib is the only currently approved agent while ribociclib has early positive clinical trial data. Toxicities and financial burden limit the use of CDK4/6i in all patients and resource-poor settings, and optimal timing of their use in mBC remains unclear. There is considerable evidence for the use of CDK4/6i in metastatic and early HR + /HER2- breast cancer, but knowledge gaps remain, and further research is necessary to better define their optimal use.

Endocrine therapy (ET) with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is currently the first-line standard treatment for most patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic or advanced breast cancer. However, the majority of tumors response to and eventually develop resistance to CDK4/6is. The mechanisms of resistance are poorly understood, and the optimal postprogression treatment regimens and their sequences continue to evolve in the rapidly changing treatment landscape. In this review, we generally summarize the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6is and ET, and describe the findings from clinical trials using small molecule inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapy, providing insights into how these novel strategies may reverse treatment resistance, and discussing how some have not translated into clinical benefit. Finally, we provide rational treatment strategies based on the current emerging evidence.