目的:腹腔镜阑尾切除术后阑尾残端漏发生率极低。使用各种方法来闭合阑尾残端。本研究旨在比较三种阑尾残端闭合方法的结果。
方法:2018年1月至2020年6月进行了一项比较残端闭合方法和术后结局的回顾性研究。患者数据包括人口统计学,术前数据,外科技术,调查结果,术后并发症。
结果:在1021例阑尾切除术患者中,733例采用三种比较的阑尾残端闭合方法之一,对急性阑尾炎进行了腹腔镜阑尾切除术。因此,360个附录与一个内环结扎(1EL组),300个附录有两个内环(2EL组),73个附录与两个内夹结扎(2EC组)。所有组均使用LigaSure进行切除。1EL组术后腹内脓肿的发生率为1%(4例),与2EL组的1%(3例)与2EC组无一例(p=0.43)。没有报告阑尾残端泄漏。总并发症发生率为4%(14例),3%(9例),和0(p=0.15),1EL的平均手术时间为43±21、54±22和43±20分钟,2EL,2EC,分别(p<0.01)。一个内循环的平均成本是110美元,一个内夹墨盒是180美元。
结论:没有发现这些方法在临床上优于其他方法。考虑到低和轻度的并发症发生率,简单地按成本选择一种方法似乎是合理的。使用单个内循环可导致显著的成本降低。医疗中心可能会建议外科医生使用单内环技术。
OBJECTIVE: Appendiceal stump leak rate after laparoscopic appendectomy is extremely low. Various methods are used to close the appendiceal stump. This study aimed to compare the outcome of three appendiceal stump closure methods.
METHODS: A retrospective study comparing stump closure methods and postoperative outcomes was conducted from January 2018 to June 2020. Patient data included demographics, pre-operative data, surgical technique, findings, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Out of 1021 appendectomy patients, 733 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis utilizing one of the three compared appendiceal stump closure methods. Consequently, 360 appendixes were ligated with one endoloop (1EL group), 300 appendixes had two endoloops (2EL group), and 73 appendixes were ligated with two endoclips (2EC group). All groups used a LigaSure for resection. The rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess was 1% (4 patients) in 1EL group vs. 1% (3 patients) in 2EL group vs. none in 2EC group (p = 0.43). There were no reported appendiceal stump leaks. Overall complication rates were 4% (14 patients), 3% (9 patients), and 0 (p = 0.15), and the mean operative length was 43 ± 21, 54 ± 22, and 43 ± 20 mins for the 1EL, 2EL, and 2EC, respectively (p < 0.01). Average cost of one endoloop is 110$, and one
endoclip cartridge is 180$.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the methods were found clinically superior over the others. Considering the low and mild complication rate, it appears reasonable to prefer one method simply by cost. The use of a single endoloop may result in substantial cost reduction. Medical centers may advise surgeons to use a single-endoloop technique.