End-expiratory transpulmonary pressure

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺纤维化急性加重伴普通间质性肺炎(EUIP)模式的患者暴露于机械通气(MV)时,呼吸机诱发的肺损伤(VILI)和死亡率的风险增加。然而,缺乏描述MV期间UIP-肺变形的力学模型代表了研究空白。本研究的目的是根据EUIP患者的应力应变行为和特定弹性,与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和健康肺相比,建立肺保护性MV期间UIP肺变形的本构数学模型。在插管后24小时内进行的PEEP试验中,评估了EUIP和原发性ARDS患者的肺和胸壁力学(根据体重指数和PaO2/FiO2比率为1:1匹配)。计算患者的应力-应变曲线和肺比弹性,并与健康肺进行比较。来源于文学。呼吸力学用于拟合描述机械膨胀引起的肺实质变形的新型肺数学模型,区分弹性蛋白和胶原蛋白的贡献,肺细胞外基质的主要成分。纳入5例EUIP患者和5例原发性ARDS患者并进行分析。在低PEEP的情况下,两组之间的整体应变没有差异。与ARDS相比,EUIP的总体特定弹性明显更高(28.9[22.8-33.2]cmH2O与11.4[10.3-14.6]cmH2O,分别)。与ARDS和健康的肺相比,EUIP的应力/应变曲线显示出更陡的增加,对于应变值大于0.55的VILI阈值应力风险。弹性蛋白的贡献在较低的菌株中普遍存在,而胶原蛋白的贡献在大菌株中普遍存在。胶原蛋白的应力/应变曲线显示从ARDS和健康肺向上移动到EUIP肺。在MV期间,EUIP患者表现出不同的呼吸力学,与ARDS患者和健康受试者相比,应力-应变曲线和特定弹性,即使应用保护性MV也可能会出现VILI。根据我们的机械充气过程中肺部变形的数学模型,UIP-肺的弹性反应是独特的,不同于ARDS。我们的数据表明,EUIP患者经历VILI和通气设置,这对ARDS患者具有肺保护作用。
    Patients with acute exacerbation of lung fibrosis with usual interstitial pneumonia (EUIP) pattern are at increased risk for ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and mortality when exposed to mechanical ventilation (MV). Yet, lack of a mechanical model describing UIP-lung deformation during MV represents a research gap. Aim of this study was to develop a constitutive mathematical model for UIP-lung deformation during lung protective MV based on the stress-strain behavior and the specific elastance of patients with EUIP as compared to that of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and healthy lung. Partitioned lung and chest wall mechanics were assessed for patients with EUIP and primary ARDS (1:1 matched based on body mass index and PaO2/FiO2 ratio) during a PEEP trial performed within 24 h from intubation. Patient\'s stress-strain curve and the lung specific elastance were computed and compared with those of healthy lungs, derived from literature. Respiratory mechanics were used to fit a novel mathematical model of the lung describing mechanical-inflation-induced lung parenchyma deformation, differentiating the contributions of elastin and collagen, the main components of lung extracellular matrix. Five patients with EUIP and 5 matched with primary ARDS were included and analyzed. Global strain was not different at low PEEP between the groups. Overall specific elastance was significantly higher in EUIP as compared to ARDS (28.9 [22.8-33.2] cmH2O versus 11.4 [10.3-14.6] cmH2O, respectively). Compared to ARDS and healthy lung, the stress/strain curve of EUIP showed a steeper increase, crossing the VILI threshold stress risk for strain values greater than 0.55. The contribution of elastin was prevalent at lower strains, while the contribution of collagen was prevalent at large strains. The stress/strain curve for collagen showed an upward shift passing from ARDS and healthy lungs to EUIP lungs. During MV, patients with EUIP showed different respiratory mechanics, stress-strain curve and specific elastance as compared to ARDS patients and healthy subjects and may experience VILI even when protective MV is applied. According to our mathematical model of lung deformation during mechanical inflation, the elastic response of UIP-lung is peculiar and different from ARDS. Our data suggest that patients with EUIP experience VILI with ventilatory setting that are lung-protective for patients with ARDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管间质性肺炎(ILD-UIP)和急性加重(AE)导致严重急性呼吸衰竭的患者可能需要有创机械通气(MV),缺乏MV期间肺力学的生理数据。我们旨在描述与原发性ARDS相比,AE-ILD-UIP患者肺保护性通气的生理作用。
    方法:在一系列AE-ILD-UIP患者中以1:1匹配的原发性ARDS作为对照(基于BMI和PaO2/FiO2比率)中,对肺和胸壁力学进行了评估。三个PEEP等级(零=ZEEP,4-8cmH2O=PEEPLOW,并滴定以达到呼气末正压PL,EE=PEPECTITRATED)用于测量。
    结果:包括10例AE-ILD-UIP患者和10例匹配的ARDS患者。在AE-ILD-UIP中,在ZEEP时的EE为-4.3[-7.6--2.3]cmH2O和肺弹性(EL)44[40-51]cmH2O/L。在PEEPLOW,PL,EE保持阴性,EL与ZEEP相比没有变化(p=0.995)。在PEPTATRATED,PL,EE增加到0.8[0.3-1.5]cmH2O,EL增加到49[43-59](p=0.004,p<0.001,与ZEEP和PEEPLOW相比,分别)。ΔPL在PEEPLOW时降低(p=0.018),在PEETTATED时升高(p=0.003)。在匹配的ARDS对照PEEP滴定以获得阳性PL,EE没有导致EL和ΔPL的显著变化。
    结论:在机械通气的AE-ILD-UIP患者中,与原发性ARDS患者不同,滴定PEEP以获得阳性PL,EE显着恶化了肺力学。
    Although patients with interstitial pneumonia pattern (ILD-UIP) and acute exacerbation (AE) leading to severe acute respiratory failure may require invasive mechanical ventilation (MV), physiological data on lung mechanics during MV are lacking. We aimed at describing the physiological effect of lung-protective ventilation in patients with AE-ILD-UIP compared with primary ARDS.
    Partitioned lung and chest wall mechanics were assessed in a series of AE-ILD-UIP patients matched 1:1 with primary ARDS as controls (based on BMI and PaO2/FiO2 ratio). Three PEEP levels (zero = ZEEP, 4-8 cmH2O = PEEPLOW, and titrated to achieve positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure PL,EE = PEEPTITRATED) were used for measurements.
    Ten AE-ILD-UIP patients and 10 matched ARDS were included. In AE-ILD-UIP median PL,EE at ZEEP was - 4.3 [- 7.6- - 2.3] cmH2O and lung elastance (EL) 44 [40-51] cmH2O/L. At PEEPLOW, PL,EE remained negative and EL did not change (p = 0.995) versus ZEEP. At PEEPTITRATED, PL,EE increased to 0.8 [0.3-1.5] cmH2O and EL to 49 [43-59] (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001 compared to ZEEP and PEEPLOW, respectively). ΔPL decreased at PEEPLOW (p = 0.018) and increased at PEEPTITRATED (p = 0.003). In matched ARDS control PEEP titration to obtain a positive PL,EE did not result in significant changes in EL and ΔPL.
    In mechanically ventilated AE-ILD-UIP patients, differently than in patients with primary ARDS, PEEP titrated to obtain a positive PL,EE significantly worsened lung mechanics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号