End of life care

生命结束护理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去10年中,伊朗加快了对姑息治疗的关注。考虑到老龄化的趋势,增加慢性疾病的负担和增加的卫生费用,未来有必要规划和发展姑息治疗。这项研究的目的是解释伊朗卫生系统中姑息治疗的替代方案,直到2030年。
    这项研究是一种多方法情景规划,采用多方法设计,2018-2020年分3个阶段进行。在第一阶段,使用定性访谈和文献综述提取了驱动力列表.在第二阶段,在不确定度和交叉影响分析方面检查了上一阶段确定的所有因素,并提取了两个关键不确定性。在第三阶段,基于两个关键的不确定性,制定了四种未来的姑息治疗方案,并提出了经过验证的情景策略。
    结果表明两种不确定性,包括“卫生系统中姑息治疗的治理”和“社会接受姑息治疗”,“基于此,四个名为“爬到顶端”的场景,\"\"痛苦的攀登,“深渊的边缘”和“山谷的底部”被编译。
    伊朗卫生系统中姑息治疗的发展面临着严重的不确定性,即有必要将姑息治疗的发展活动集中在社会接受的两个轴上,并需要通过考虑卫生部的所有维度和有影响力的组成部分来进行连贯的治理。本研究结果的应用可以为姑息治疗的受益人提供有效干预和实施此类服务的合理选择。
    UNASSIGNED: Paying attention to palliative care has accelerated in Iran in the last 10 years. Considering the trend of aging, increasing burden of chronic diseases and increasing health costs, planning and development of palliative care is necessary in the future. This study was conducted with the aim of explaining the alternative scenarios of palliative care in the health system of Iran until the horizon of 2030.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was a multi-method scenario planning with a qualitative using multiple methods design, which was conducted in 3 phases in 2018-2020. In the first phase, a list of driving forces was extracted using qualitative interviews and literature review. In the second phase, all factors identified in the previous phase were examined in terms of degree of uncertainty and cross-impact analysis, and two key uncertainties were extracted. In the third phase, based on two key uncertainties, four future scenarios of palliative care were formulated, validated and scenario strategies were presented.
    UNASSIGNED: The results indicate two uncertainties, including \"governance of palliative care in the health system\" and \"acceptance of palliative care by society,\" based on which, four scenarios with the names \"climbing to the top,\" \"excruciating climb,\" \"edge of the abyss\" and \"The bottom of the valley\" were compiled.
    UNASSIGNED: The development of palliative care in health system of Iran is faced with serious uncertainties that it is necessary to focus the developmental activities of palliative care on the two axes of acceptance by society and need for coherent governance by considering all the dimensions and influential components by ministry of health. The application of the results of this research can provide reasonable options for effective interventions and implementation of this category of services to the beneficiaries of palliative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于许多人来说,“临终关怀”是“死亡”的同义词。“即使是临床医生也很难进行区分临终关怀和姑息治疗的对话,因为担心讨论临终关怀可能会减少希望。迄今为止,没有现有的测量工具来评估患者和家庭对临终关怀的看法。
    目的:这项研究旨在开发一种临终关怀感知工具(HPI),以捕获不同患者和家庭中的这些感知。
    方法:基于先前的研究和文献,为该文书起草了79个潜在项目。我们的跨专业团队独立和集体评估这些,结果36个项目以5分的李克特量表进行评级。总体领域包括(1)临终关怀哲学和定义;(2)临终关怀服务;(3)价值;(4)反感知。来自不同专业和角色的16名国家主题专家被邀请参加内容有效性指数,5名临终关怀护理人员被邀请参加面部有效性。
    结果:14位专家回答,十名符合纳入标准:一名医生,四个护士,三名社会工作者,还有两个牧师.十个人中有六个被确定为黑色。三个项目被删除(I-CVI范围从0.5-06),修订了9个项目(I-CVI范围为0.6-07)。总体内容效度指数(CVI)为0.83,表明良好的内容效度。修订后,5名临终关怀护理人员评估了面部有效性,根据反馈未进行任何改变.
    结论:结果显示,与临终关怀有关的专业知识和患者/家属的声音之间存在脱节。该工具的开发可以更好地理解观念,从而为患者/家庭参与带来新的机会。
    BACKGROUND: For many, the perception of \"hospice\" is synonymous with \"death.\" Even clinicians struggle to have conversations that distinguish between hospice and palliative care for fear that discussing hospice may diminish hope. To date, there are no existing measurement tools to evaluate patient and family perceptions of hospice care.
    OBJECTIVE: This research aimed to develop a Hospice Perceptions Instrument (HPI) to capture these perceptions among diverse patients and families.
    METHODS: Building on previous studies and literature, 79 potential items were drafted for the instrument. Our interprofessional team independently and collectively evaluated these, resulting in 36 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Overarching domains include (1) hospice philosophy and definitions; (2) hospice services; (3) values; and (4) counter-perceptions. Sixteen national subject matter experts from various professions and roles were invited to participate in the content-validity index and five hospice caregivers were invited to participate in face validity.
    RESULTS: Fourteen experts responded, with ten meeting inclusion criteria: one physician, four nurses, three social workers, and two chaplains. Six of the ten identified as Black. Three items were removed (I-CVI ranged from 0.5-06), and nine items were revised (I-CVI ranged from 0.6-07). The overall Content Validity Index (CVI) was 0.83, indicating excellent content validity. After revisions, five hospice caregivers assessed face validity and no changes were made based on feedback.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results reveal a disconnect between professional expertise and patient/family voices related to hospice perceptions. Development of this instrument invites a better understanding of perceptions leading to new opportunities for patient/family engagement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在医疗保健方面,在复杂的情况下进行有效的沟通,例如生命终结对话,对于提供高质量的护理至关重要。居民是否从与演员的交流培训中学习,取决于他们是否能够从学习情况中选择适当的信息或“预测线索”,以准确反映他们或同龄人的表现,以及他们是否使用这些线索进行随后的判断。本研究旨在探讨提示是否可以帮助医疗居民改善预测线索的使用和沟通技巧的判断。在模拟OSCE评估高级沟通技巧期间,来自8个不同专业的肯尼亚居民(N=41)被随机分配到两个实验组之一。干预组的居民收到纸质预测提示提示,而控制组的居民则收到纸质常规提示以进行自我判断。在前测和后测中,居民对预测性线索的使用和同伴判断的适当性是根据另一名居民的预先评估的视频进行评估的。干预措施改善了预测线索在自我判断和同伴判断中的使用。在前后测试中,同伴判断的准确性仅得到部分改善:未发现干预措施对判断的总体适当性产生影响。然而,在分析参与者对咨询中各种主题的判断的完整性时,干预组的不恰当判断评分降低.总之,预测提示提示可以帮助学习者在评估沟通技巧时专注于相关提示,并部分提高监控准确性。未来的研究应该集中在更频繁地提供提示,以评估这是否会增加对沟通技巧监控准确性的影响。
    In healthcare, effective communication in complex situations such as end of life conversations is critical for delivering high quality care. Whether residents learn from communication training with actors depends on whether they are able to select appropriate information or \'predictive cues\' from that learning situation that accurately reflect their or their peers\' performance and whether they use those cues for ensuing judgement. This study aimed to explore whether prompts can help medical residents improving use of predictive cues and judgement of communication skills. First and third year Kenyan residents (N = 41) from 8 different specialties were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups during a mock OSCE assessing advanced communication skills. Residents in the intervention arm received paper predictive cue prompts while residents in the control arm received paper regular prompts for self-judgement. In a pre- and post- test, residents\' use of predictive cues and the appropriateness of peer-judgements were evaluated against a pre-rated video of another resident. The intervention improved both the use of predictive cues in self-judgement and peer-judgement. Ensuing accuracy of peer-judgements in the pre- to post-test only partly improved: no effect from the intervention was found on overall appropriateness of judgements. However, when analyzing participants\' completeness of judgements over the various themes within the consultation, a reduction in inappropriate judgments scores was seen in the intervention group. In conclusion, predictive cue prompts can help learners to concentrate on relevant cues when evaluating communication skills and partly improve monitoring accuracy. Future research should focus on offering prompts more frequently to evaluate whether this increases the effect on monitoring accuracy in communication skills.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    如何引用这篇文章:MyatraSN,PeterJV,JunejaD,库尔卡尼美联社。在全球范围内思考,适应本地:ISCM指南和立场声明。印度J暴击护理中心2024;28(S2):S1-S3。
    How to cite this article: Myatra SN, Peter JV, Juneja D, Kulkarni AP. Think Globally, Adapt Locally: The ISCCM Guidelines and Position Statements. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S1-S3.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经过3年的研究项目,收集了146个观点,包括姑息治疗患者,家庭成员,医务人员,管理员,建筑师和政府代表,本文探讨了推动这项工作的假设;一种预感,即在高度脆弱的时期,建筑环境对我们影响最大。这146人中,只有一小部分人可以提供有关在亲人接近生命终结时占用医院空间的经验的见解。本文介绍了这些故事,并结合我自己的观察和经验进行了讨论。因此,这篇文章是部分观察,部分参与者面试,部分人种学。从更广泛的研究中已经发表的调查结果已经说明了新鲜空气的重要性,进入大自然,与家人共度时光的空间,以及孤独,并确保人们在医院内制定家庭仪式感到舒适。然而,这里讨论的账户是不同的。他们谈到了医院环境在情感原始时进行沟通的微妙方式,人们已经筋疲力尽了。他们谈论美学的感觉方式;并表明,在生命的尽头,家庭的观念必须包含更多。欢迎感不是一种礼貌,而是一种需要,就像安慰一样,以及所谓的“富有想象力的喘息”——建筑环境可能会以某种方式缓解对无法忍受现实的关注。这些叙述说明了导航悲伤的困难,以及一个充满希望的期望,即建筑环境可能会以某种方式软化这种体验的边缘。在关注这些故事时,这篇文章有助于更深入地了解我们设计姑息治疗时真正的利害关系。
    Following a 3-year long research project that gathered 146 views, including those of palliative care patients, family members, medical staff, administrators, architects and government representatives, this paper explores the hypothesis that motivated this work; a hunch that the built environment affects us most during times of intense vulnerability. Of these 146 people, only a small handful could provide insight relative to the experience of occupying hospital spaces as a loved one nears the end of life. This article honours these stories and discusses them in relation to my own observations and experiences. The article is thus part observation, part participant interview, part autoethnography. Findings already published from the broader study have spoken to the importance of fresh air, access to nature, spaces for spending time with family, as well as alone, and ensuring people feel comfortable to enact rituals of home within the hospital. Yet the accounts discussed here are different. They speak to the subtle ways that hospital environments communicate when emotions are raw, and people are at their most exhausted. They speak to the ways that aesthetics are felt; and make evident that notions of homeliness must encompass far more at the end of life. A sense of welcome is not a nicety but a need, as is comfort, and what might be termed \'imaginative respite\'-the idea that the built environment might somehow alleviate the focus on an unbearable reality. These accounts speak to the difficulty of navigating grief, and a hopeful expectation that the built environment might somehow soften the edges of this experience. In focusing on these stories, this article contributes a deeper understanding of what is really at stake when we design for palliative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:针对痴呆症的创新小规模设施专注于提供生活质量和维持居民的功能能力,同时为居民提供生活之家。为了实现以生活为家的原则,姑息治疗方法对于维持这些设施的生活质量是必要的。很少有研究报道如何在小规模设施中向居民提供姑息治疗。我们审查的目的是确定在小规模设施中报告姑息治疗方法的程度。
    方法:使用JoannaBriggs研究所推荐的方法对文献进行范围审查。四个数据库,CINAHL,PubMed,PsycINFO,和WebofScience,搜索了1995年至2023年发表的研究。一位审阅者完成了标题,摘要和全文筛选和数据提取;另外两名团队成员对筛选和提取过程进行了试点,并与主要审查人员会面,以做出有关文章纳入的决定,并确保审查过程的一致性和准确性。提取的数据是开放编码的,并使用主题分析进行分析。然后使用痴呆症的姑息治疗领域将数据合成为主题。
    结果:在搜索中获得的800篇文章中,只有10人符合纳入标准:6人来自日本,两个来自荷兰,奥地利和美国各有一人。在大多数小规模设施中,姑息治疗很重要,设施优先考虑家庭参与和以人为本的护理,最大限度地减少居民的不适,提高居民的剩余能力,直到生命结束。纳入的研究没有深入讨论姑息治疗政策或专业人员培训。
    结论:本研究提供了关于针对痴呆症患者的小规模机构的姑息治疗的文献综述。大多数设施都集中在居民生活结束时的愿望,以提高舒适度并提供类似家庭的环境。然而,需要更多的研究来进一步了解这些家庭的姑息治疗方法的质量。
    BACKGROUND: Innovative small-scale facilities for dementia focus on providing quality of life and maintaining the functional abilities of residents while offering residents a home for life. To fulfill the home-for-life principle, palliative care approaches are necessary to maintain quality of life in these facilities. Few studies have reported on how palliative care is provided to residents in small-scale facilities. The aim of our review is to determine the extent to which palliative care approaches are reported in small-scale facilities.
    METHODS: A scoping review of the literature using recommended methods from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Four databases, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, were searched for studies published from 1995 to 2023. One reviewer completed the title, abstract and full-text screening and data extraction; two additional team members piloted the screening and extraction process and met with the main reviewer to make decisions about article inclusion and ensure consistency and accuracy in the review process. The extracted data was open-coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. The data was then synthesized into themes using palliative care domains for dementia.
    RESULTS: Of the 800 articles obtained in the search, only ten met the inclusion criteria: six from Japan, two from the Netherlands, and one each from Austria and the United States. In most small-scale facilities, palliative care is important, with facilities prioritizing family involvement and person-centred care, minimizing resident discomfort and enhancing residents\' remaining abilities until the end of life. The included studies did not discuss palliative care policies or professional staff training in depth.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of the literature on palliative care in small-scale facilities for individuals with dementia. Most facilities focus on residents\' wishes at the end of life to enhance comfort and provide a home-like environment. However, more research is needed to further understand the quality of palliative care approaches in these homes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项定性研究旨在探讨护士对在地区医院提供围产期/新生儿临终期护理的挑战的看法。
    这项探索性定性研究是对在土耳其工作的20名护士进行的。研究数据是通过深入和半结构化的个人访谈收集的。然后将访谈提交给专题分析。
    对访谈的分析得出了三个主题:(1)对姑息治疗的支持不足,(2)对家庭准备的看法,(3)向家庭提供信息/教育。护士遇到的最突出的困难是单位和设备不足以及缺乏训练有素的人员。另一个突出的重要问题是家庭不接受胎儿或新生儿的临终关怀决定,他们有不切实际的期望。
    研究结果为区域孤立的新生儿和围产期单位提供了重要的考虑因素,它们将用于指导临床实践的改进,员工教育支持,政策/程序,家庭支持,以及与为最脆弱的婴儿及其家庭提供临终关怀有关的进一步研究。
    UNASSIGNED: This qualitative study aimed to explore nurses\' perspectives regarding the challenges of providing perinatal/neonatal end-of-life care in a regional hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: This exploratory qualitative study was conducted with 20 nurses working in Turkey. Study data were collected through in-depth and semi-structured individual interviews. The interviews were then submitted to thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Three themes emerged from analyses of the interviews: (1) inadequate support for delivery of palliative care, (2) perceptions of family readiness, and (3) providing information/education to the family. The most prominent difficulties experienced by nurses were inadequacy of unit and equipment and lack of trained personnel. Another important issue that stood out was families\' not accepting the end-of-life care decision for the fetus or the neonate and their having unrealistic expectations.
    UNASSIGNED: Study results have provided important considerations for regional isolated neonatal and perinatal units, and they will be used to inform clinical practice improvements, staff education support, policies/procedures, family support, and further research relating to end-of-life care provision for the most vulnerable babies and their families.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:姑息治疗旨在改善患有限制生命的疾病患者的生活质量。建立患者对护理的愿望和偏好的提前护理计划对话是以人为本方法的一部分。国际上,电子健康记录系统是数字干预措施,用于记录和共享跨医疗服务和设置的患者预先护理计划。它们旨在提供支持电子信息共享和护理协调的工具。在英国,电子姑息治疗协调系统(EPaCCS)就是一个例子。尽管十多年来在全国范围内推广EPaCCS的政策,实施有限,卫生专业人员的使用水平一直很低。
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨影响在英格兰两个主要地区的不同护理服务和环境中,将EPaCCS纳入常规临床实践的因素。
    方法:采用定性访谈研究设计,以规范化过程理论(NPT)为指导。《不扩散条约》探讨了影响实施复杂干预措施的因素,包括4个主要组成部分(一致性,认知参与,集体行动,和自反监测)。根据其职业角色和工作环境,有目的地对医疗保健和社会护理从业人员进行采样。进行了个人基于网络的半结构化访谈。使用主题框架分析对数据进行了分析,以探索影响个人不同环境下EPaCCS实施的问题,团队,组织,和技术水平。
    结果:代表一系列专业角色的参与者(N=52)在6个护理机构(临终关怀,初级保健,疗养院,医院,走动,和社区)。总的来说,制定了6个主题,这些主题映射到《不扩散核武器条约》的4个主要组成部分,并代表了影响执行的多层次影响。在个人层面,这些措施包括(1)EPaCCS提供了一个清晰和独特的工作方式和(2)集体贡献和支持。在团队和组织层面,其中包括(3)将EPaCCS嵌入日常实践中,以及(4)倡导驾驶实施。在技术层面,这些包括(5)电子功能,互操作性,和访问。在不同级别的实施中的故障导致了(6)在记录准确性和访问可用性方面对EPaCCS的信心和信任的变化。
    结论:EPaCCS实施受个人影响,组织,和技术因素。主要挑战包括访问问题以及整个护理环境的使用和参与不一致。EPaCCS,以其目前的格式,作为数字预先护理计划系统,并不能始终如一地促进电子信息共享和护理协调。EPaCCS的重新设计可能是必要的,以确定其跨不同设置和位置的最佳实施的配置。这包括支持卫生保健从业人员记录,access,使用,并在多个护理环境中共享信息。吸取的经验教训与国际上正在开发的其他形式的数字预先护理计划方法有关。
    BACKGROUND: Palliative care aims to improve the quality of life for people with life-limiting illnesses. Advance care planning conversations that establish a patient\'s wishes and preferences for care are part of a person-centered approach. Internationally, electronic health record systems are digital interventions used to record and share patients\' advance care plans across health care services and settings. They aim to provide tools that support electronic information sharing and care coordination. Within the United Kingdom, Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are an example of this. Despite over a decade of policy promoting EPaCCS nationally, there has been limited implementation and consistently low levels of use by health professionals.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore the factors that influence the implementation of EPaCCS into routine clinical practice across different care services and settings in 2 major regions of England.
    METHODS: A qualitative interview study design was used, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT explores factors affecting the implementation of complex interventions and consists of 4 primary components (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring). Health care and social care practitioners were purposively sampled based on their professional role and work setting. Individual web-based semistructured interviews were conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis to explore issues which affected the implementation of EPaCCS across different settings at individual, team, organizational, and technical levels.
    RESULTS: Participants (N=52) representing a range of professional roles were recruited across 6 care settings (hospice, primary care, care home, hospital, ambulatory, and community). In total, 6 themes were developed which mapped onto the 4 primary components of NPT and represented the multilevel influences affecting implementation. At an individual level, these included (1) EPaCCS providing a clear and distinct way of working and (2) collective contributions and buy-in. At a team and organizational level, these included (3) embedding EPaCCS into everyday practice and (4) championing driving implementation. At a technical level, these included (5) electronic functionality, interoperability, and access. Breakdowns in implementation at different levels led to variations in (6) confidence and trust in EPaCCS in terms of record accuracy and availability of access.
    CONCLUSIONS: EPaCCS implementation is influenced by individual, organizational, and technical factors. Key challenges include problems with access alongside inconsistent use and engagement across care settings. EPaCCS, in their current format as digital advance care planning systems are not consistently facilitating electronic information sharing and care coordination. A redesign of EPaCCS is likely to be necessary to determine configurations for their optimal implementation across different settings and locations. This includes supporting health care practitioners to document, access, use, and share information across multiple care settings. Lessons learned are relevant to other forms of digital advance care planning approaches being developed internationally.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2008年,在英国重新引入了循环系统死亡后的受控器官捐赠(DCD),以努力提高器官移植率。在重新引入之后,有关于DCD伦理的争论,包括潜在的DCD捐赠者是否获得最符合他们利益的临终关怀。从这次开始,DCD已成为NHS中的常规供体途径。在这篇文章中,我们提供了一项人种学研究的结果,该研究研究了两个英国信托基金中DCD的日常实践。借鉴死亡经纪的概念和Bea\'s(2020)呼吁将器官捐赠视为医疗保健中的嵌入式和常规做法,我们来看看DCD是如何整合到重症监护病房的临终关怀中的。我们展示了如何通过卫生专业人员的做法使DCD在生命结束时成为常规,这些专业人员在关于死亡和捐赠的讨论之间建立了积极的分离;在生命结束护理中重现通常的做事方式;并尊重患者/捐赠者之间的区别,死亡和死亡。在这样做的时候,我们认为这些功能是为了保护潜在捐赠者的耐心,确保DCD作为一个整体部分运作,和文化上接受的形式,为潜在的捐赠者提供良好的临终关怀,他们的亲戚,和健康专业人士一样。
    Controlled organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) was re-introduced in the UK in 2008, in efforts to increase rates of organs for transplant. Following reintroduction, there were debates about the ethics of DCD, including whether potential DCD donors receive end-of-life care which is in their best interests. Since this time, DCD has become a routine donor pathway in the NHS. In this article, we present findings from an ethnographic study examining the everyday practices of DCD in two English Trusts. Drawing on the concept of death brokering and Bea\'s (2020) call to consider organ donation as embedded and routine practice within health care, we look at how DCD is integrated into end-of-life care in intensive care units. We show how DCD is made routine at the end-of-life via the practices of health professionals who create an active separation between discussions about death and donation; reproduce usual ways of doing things in end-of-life care; and respect the distinction between patient/donor, dying and death. In doing so, we argue these function to preserve the patienthood of the potential donor, ensuring DCD operates as an integrated part, and culturally accepted form of, good end-of-life care for potential donors, their relatives, and health professionals alike.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号