Enabler

启用器
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:护理人员工作,即使是大流行前,可以面对和危险。随着大流行增加额外的压力,这项研究探索了护理人员的生活经验的障碍,和推动者,对疑似或确诊的2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病例做出反应。
    方法:这项探索性描述性定性研究使用半结构化访谈来调查昆士兰州大都会护理人员对COVID-19大流行期间病例的反应经验。采用专题分析法对访谈笔录进行分析。注册护理人员是通过对经历过COVID-19大流行的现役人员进行标准抽样来招募的。
    结果:9名注册护理人员参加。出现了五个主题:交流,恐惧和风险,与工作相关的保护因素,领导力,和改变。独特的障碍包括由于辅助医疗的移动性质而对有效沟通的影响,不同医疗机构之间的政策/程序不一致,向护理人员发送不正确的信息,帮助人们驾驭不断变化的医疗体系,在炎热的天气里穿着个人防护装备,潮湿的环境。COVID-19的感知风险较低,从COVID-19康复后的同理心增加是独特的推动者。
    结论:这项研究发现了辅助医学特有的疑似或确诊COVID-19病例的障碍和促成因素,通常源于院前护理的流动性,并确定需要进一步研究大流行后的辅助医疗,以更好地了解如何在公共卫生紧急情况下支持辅助医疗,以确保不间断的救护车服务提供。
    BACKGROUND: Paramedics\' work, even pre-pandemic, can be confronting and dangerous. As pandemics add extra stressors, the study explored paramedics\' lived experience of the barriers to, and enablers of, responding to suspected or confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases.
    METHODS: This exploratory-descriptive qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to investigate Queensland metropolitan paramedics\' experiences of responding to cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Registered Paramedics were recruited by criterion sampling of staff who experienced the COVID-19 pandemic as active officers.
    RESULTS: Nine registered paramedics participated. Five themes emerged: communication, fear and risk, work-related protective factors, leadership, and change. Unique barriers included impacts on effective communication due to the mobile nature of paramedicine, inconsistent policies/procedures between different healthcare facilities, dispatch of incorrect information to paramedics, assisting people to navigate the changing healthcare system, and wearing personal protective equipment in hot, humid environments. A lower perceived risk from COVID-19, and increased empathy after recovering from COVID-19 were unique enablers.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study uncovered barriers and enablers to attending suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases unique to paramedicine, often stemming from the mobile nature of prehospital care, and identifies the need for further research in paramedicine post-pandemic to better understand how paramedics can be supported during public health emergencies to ensure uninterrupted ambulance service delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在临床实践中迅速采用新药物有很多好处,然而,以前在心力衰竭(HF)的其他指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)中观察到吸收缓慢.钠葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂是HF中的一种新疗法,被证明是有效的,如果开处方,将具有有益的临床结果。了解医生在HF中处方GDMT的观点可以帮助目标策略弥合指南和实践之间的差距。
    方法:本研究遵循PRISMA范围审查指南和JBI手册范围审查指南。使用EMBASE进行了搜索,Medline和PubMed数据库于2024年4月发布。包括的研究是那些使用定性方法来评估医生对开具任何HF药物的观点的研究。根据CochraneTraining的方法并使用软件MAXQDAAnalysisPro,通过主题综合确定了常见主题。
    结果:在搜索中发现了708项研究,包括23个完整的研究。确定的最相关的障碍是对药物不良反应的关注,不同专科医师之间的角色职责不明确,患者合并症和不愿改变稳定患者的治疗方法。最确定的推动者包括对功效的认识,来自同事的影响和使用多媒体方法进行信息传播。还发现感知随着时间的推移而变化,并且在处方组之间有所不同。
    结论:医生认为在HF中处方GDMT的共同障碍和推动者,尽管处方组和时间段存在差异。所识别的障碍和促成因素可以是有针对性的,以改善GDMT在临床实践中的实施。
    BACKGROUND: The swift uptake of new medications into clinical practice has many benefits; however, slow uptake has been seen previously with other guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) in heart failure (HF). Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are a novel therapy in HF proven to be efficacious and will have beneficial clinical outcomes if prescribed. Understanding physician perspectives on prescribing GDMT in HF can help target strategies to bridge the gap between guidelines and practice.
    METHODS: The study followed the PRISMA guide for scoping reviews. A search was conducted using EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases in April 2024. Studies included were those using qualitative methods to assess physician perspectives towards prescribing any HF medication. Common themes were identified through thematic synthesis following the methods from Cochrane Training and using software MAXQDA Analysis Pro.
    RESULTS: 708 studies were found in the search, with 23 full studies included. The most pertinent barriers identified were concern for medication adverse effects, unclear role responsibilities between physicians of different specialities, patient co-morbidities, and unwillingness to alter therapies of stable patients. The most identified enablers included awareness of efficacy, influence from colleagues, and the use of multi-media approaches for information dissemination. Perceptions were also found to change over time and vary among prescriber groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Physicians perceive common barriers and enablers of prescribing GDMT in HF, despite differences in prescriber groups and time periods. The identified barriers and enablers may be targeted to improve implementation of GDMT into clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现在,在澳大利亚老年人中,痴呆症是任何慢性疾病中最大的疾病负担。农村和偏远社区不成比例地承受着这一影响。需要对医护人员进行额外的培训和教育,以支持痴呆症患者。
    目的:本范围审查的目的是绘制和综合与农村和偏远地区的澳大利亚医护人员获得痴呆症培训的障碍和推动者相关的证据。
    方法:本范围审查在2023年1月系统地搜索了多个数据库,以获取有关该主题的同行评审文献。审稿人使用Covidence来筛选标题和位置来源的摘要,并筛选全文文章。
    结果:从筛选的187篇文章中,7篇同行评审的期刊文章被纳入最终数据分析;全部来自澳大利亚或加拿大.描述的最常见的障碍是人员配备不足,排除了痴呆症培训人员的释放。参与痴呆症培训的参与者是在线培训计划的可用性,以及培训提供商与最终用户合作,以确保培训满足他们的学习需求。
    结论:本综述提供了农村和偏远医疗工作者获得痴呆症培训的障碍和促进因素的证据。它还探讨了在不同环境中成功试用的其他培训方法。
    结论:解决已确定的障碍和促进因素可能有助于开发适合现有员工的培训方法,并满足未来劳动力的培训需求。
    BACKGROUND: Dementia is now responsible for the greatest burden of disease of any chronic illness in older Australians. Rural and remote communities bear the impacts of this disproportionately. Additional training and education for healthcare staff to support people living with dementia is needed.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review was to map and synthesise the evidence related to barriers and enablers of accessing dementia training for Australian healthcare workers located in rural and remote areas.
    METHODS: This scoping review systematically searched multiple databases in January 2023 for peer-reviewed literature on the topic. Reviewers used Covidence to screen titles and abstracts of located sources, and to screen full-text articles.
    RESULTS: From 187 articles screened, seven peer-reviewed journal articles were included in the final data analysis; all were from Australia or Canada. The most common barrier described was low staffing, precluding release of staff for dementia training. Enablers to participation in dementia training were availability of online training programs, as well as training providers collaborating with end users to ensure the training met their learning needs.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence of barriers and enablers specific to rural and remote healthcare workers accessing dementia training. It also explores other approaches to training that have been trialled successfully in different settings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Addressing the identified barriers and enablers may assist in developing training approaches appropriate for existing staff, and in meeting training needs for the future workforce.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:南非劳动关系法,特别是良好实践守则(CGP)主张反对歧视和不公平解雇在工作场所有精神健康状况的个人。然而,对这些国家政策在工作场所的实施知之甚少,特别是从雇主而不是雇员的角度来看。
    目的:本研究的目的是探索人力资源从业人员如何在工作场所适应和支持有心理健康状况的个人的经验和看法。
    方法:11名参与者(人力资源专业人员)参与了研究。研究人员利用半结构化访谈,通过主题分析来分析数据以制定主题。
    结果:出现了三个主题,描述了参与者对影响他们重返工作的障碍和促进者的经历和看法:通过主题分析出现的主题包括:1)人力资源人员感知的挑战影响工作参与;2)工作场所的适应和支持结构对工作参与的影响;3)工作场所中可用的政策和法律的普遍性。
    结论:该研究强调,人力资源专业人员努力解释和实施与劳动相关的政策,以帮助在工作场所雇用有精神健康状况的个人。重要的是要实施战略,以帮助人力资源从业人员了解如何实施此类政策,以成功地适应工作场所精神健康状况的个人。
    UNASSIGNED: The South African Labour Relations Act, specifically the Code of Good Practice (CGP) advocates against the discrimination and unfair dismissal of individuals with mental health conditions in the workplace. However, little is known about the implementation of these national policies within the workplace, especially from the perspective of the employer rather than the employee.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of how human resource practitioners accommodate and support individuals with mental health conditions in the workplace.
    UNASSIGNED: Eleven participants (Human Resource Professionals) participated in the study. The researchers utilized semi-structured interviews where the data was analysed by means of thematic analysis to formulate themes.
    UNASSIGNED: Three themes emerged depicting the participants\' experiences and perceptions of barriers and facilitators which influenced their return to work: The themes that emerged through thematic analysis consisted of 1) Challenges perceived by Human Resource personnel that influences work participation; 2) The influence that workplace accommodations and support structures have on the work participation; 3) The prevalence of policies and laws that are available in theworkplace.
    UNASSIGNED: The study highlighted that Human Resource Professionals struggle to interpret and implement labor related polices that aid in employing individuals with mental health conditions in the workplace. It is important to implement strategies that will assist Human Resource practitioners in understanding how to implement such policies to successfully accommodate individuals with mental health conditions in the workplace.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要替代的“医院回避”护理模式来管理对急性住院病床日益增长的需求。目前,关于医院临床医生对障碍和促进者向虚拟护理过渡的观点存在知识差距。我们计划实施一个名为“Back@Home”的虚拟医院护理模型,并使用与利益相关者的定性访谈来开发和完善该模型。
    目的:我们的目标是探索临床医生对虚拟医院背痛护理模式(Back@Home)的看法,并确定成功实施该护理模式的障碍和促成因素。
    方法:我们在3家大都市医院对19名参与提供急性背痛治疗的有目的的临床医生进行了半结构化访谈。采访数据使用理论领域框架进行分析。
    结果:总共10个理论域框架域被确定为在理解肌肉骨骼背痛实施虚拟医院护理的障碍和推动者方面很重要。虚拟医院护理的主要障碍包括患者访问视频会议和可靠的互联网,语言障碍,很难建立融洽的关系。避免入院的障碍包括患者的期望,社会孤立,合并症,和法医学的担忧。相反,实施虚拟医院护理模式的推动者包括提高医疗资源效率,临床医生熟悉远程医疗,以及过度医疗和感染风险的减少。
    结论:Back@Home的成功实施依赖于关键利益相关者的支持。解决实施障碍和建立推动者对于临床医生采用这种护理模式至关重要。根据临床医生的输入,Back@Home护理模式将结合互联网设备的贷款,卫生保健口译员,并将书面资源翻译成社区语言,以促进边缘化群体更公平地获得护理。
    BACKGROUND: Alternate \"hospital avoidance\" models of care are required to manage the increasing demand for acute inpatient beds. There is currently a knowledge gap regarding the perspectives of hospital clinicians on barriers and facilitators to a transition to virtual care for low back pain. We plan to implement a virtual hospital model of care called \"Back@Home\" and use qualitative interviews with stakeholders to develop and refine the model.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to explore clinicians\' perspectives on a virtual hospital model of care for back pain (Back@Home) and identify barriers to and enablers of successful implementation of this model of care.
    METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 19 purposively sampled clinicians involved in the delivery of acute back pain care at 3 metropolitan hospitals. Interview data were analyzed using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
    RESULTS: A total of 10 Theoretical Domains Framework domains were identified as important in understanding barriers and enablers to implementing virtual hospital care for musculoskeletal back pain. Key barriers to virtual hospital care included patient access to videoconferencing and reliable internet, language barriers, and difficulty building rapport. Barriers to avoiding admission included patient expectations, social isolation, comorbidities, and medicolegal concerns. Conversely, enablers of implementing a virtual hospital model of care included increased health care resource efficiency, clinician familiarity with telehealth, as well as a perceived reduction in overmedicalization and infection risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: The successful implementation of Back@Home relies on key stakeholder buy-in. Addressing barriers to implementation and building on enablers is crucial to clinicians\' adoption of this model of care. Based on clinicians\' input, the Back@Home model of care will incorporate the loan of internet-enabled devices, health care interpreters, and written resources translated into community languages to facilitate more equitable access to care for marginalized groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:1990年代初,英国(UK)政府的医疗保健政策为采用技术混合开发和实施X射线诊断技师报告服务铺平了道路。英国公共医疗保健系统内的当前临床实践反映了与1990年代一样的患者影像学需求增加和报告劳动力(放射技师和放射科医师)能力有限的压力。本研究旨在确定,定义和评估纵向宏观,meso,以及在英格兰国家医疗保健系统(NHS)中实施放射诊断技师肌肉骨骼X射线报告服务的微障碍和推动者。
    方法:搜索了多个独立数据库,包括PubMed,OvidMEDLINE;Embase;CINAHL,和谷歌学者,以及期刊数据库(Scopus,Wiley),医疗保健数据库(NHS证据数据库;Cochrane图书馆)和灰色文献数据库(OpenGrey,GreyNetInternational,和大英图书馆EthOS存放处),并记录在PRISMA流程图中。关键词的组合,布尔逻辑,截断,括号和通配符包含/排除标准,时间范围为1995-2022年.这些文献是根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评估清单进行评估的。通过元聚合来合成每篇论文,并使用NVivo编码,将上下文分组为宏,meso,和微观层面的来源,并分类为推动者和障碍的子组。
    结果:广泛多样的数据(n=241篇论文)确定了实施的障碍和促成因素,被归类为宏观的衡量标准,meso,微观层面,和主题类别的背景,文化,环境,和领导力。
    结论:自1995年以来的文献重新讨论了关于实施放射技师报告角色的争论,并在塑造临床实践中发挥了重要作用。对中观(专业机构)和宏观(政府/卫生服务)政策和指导都有明显的影响,这在微观层面的NHS信托组织中形成了变化。有证据表明,围绕技能混合接受度和角色边界,不同中观专业机构内部和之间的文化根深蒂固的传统观点发生了转变。这有助于塑造报告队伍的能力建设。所有这些都有助于对现代放射学服务中的技能组合劳动力的概念理解。
    BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom (UK) government\'s healthcare policy in the early 1990s paved the way adoption of the skills mix development and implementation of diagnostic radiographers\' X-ray reporting service. Current clinical practice within the public UK healthcare system reflects the same pressures of increased demand in patient imaging and limited capacity of the reporting workforce (radiographers and radiologists) as in the 1990s. This study aimed to identify, define and assess the longitudinal macro, meso, and micro barriers and enablers to the implementation of the diagnostic radiographer musculoskeletal X-ray reporting service in the National Healthcare System (NHS) in England.
    METHODS: Multiple independent databases were searched, including PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE; Embase; CINAHL, and Google Scholar, as well as journal databases (Scopus, Wiley), healthcare databases (NHS Evidence Database; Cochrane Library) and grey literature databases (OpenGrey, GreyNet International, and the British Library EthOS depository) and recorded in a PRISMA flow chart. A combination of keywords, Boolean logic, truncation, parentheses and wildcards with inclusion/exclusion criteria and a time frame of 1995-2022 was applied. The literature was assessed against Joanna Briggs Institute\'s critical appraisal checklists. With meta-aggregation to synthesize each paper, and coded using NVivo, with context grouped into macro, meso, and micro-level sources and categorised into subgroups of enablers and barriers.
    RESULTS: The wide and diverse range of data (n = 241 papers) identified barriers and enablers of implementation, which were categorised into measures of macro, meso, and micro levels, and thematic categories of context, culture, environment, and leadership.
    CONCLUSIONS: The literature since 1995 has reframed the debates on implementation of the radiographer reporting role and has been instrumental in shaping clinical practice. There has been clear influence upon both meso (professional body) and macro-level (governmental/health service) policies and guidance, that have shaped change at micro-level NHS Trust organisations. There is evidence of a shift in culturally intrenched legacy perspectives within and between different meso-level professional bodies around skills mix acceptance and role boundaries. This has helped shape capacity building of the reporting workforce. All of which have contributed to conceptual understandings of the skills mix workforce within modern radiology services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本范围审查的目的是确定能够或阻碍外行人进行复苏教育机会的因素。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,OvidEmbase,CINAHL,和Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(CENTRAL),以确定1966年1月1日至2022年12月31日发表的研究,包括可能影响外行人进行复苏教育的因素。有关参与者特征的数据,干预措施,并提取纳入研究的设计和结果。
    结果:在最初确定的6627项研究中,最终纳入23项研究(20项横断面研究和3项队列研究)。其中,确定了各种各样的促成因素和障碍。观察到研究之间的高度异质性。我们将因素分为三个主题:个人因素(年龄,性别,种族,家庭状况,语言,先前的复苏经验,和移民身份),社会经济和教育因素(收入,社会地位,职业和立法,和教育程度),和地理因素(出生地和居住地)。确定了影响非专业人员参加复苏培训的几个障碍,比如高龄等个人因素,较低的社会经济和教育地位,以及由于种族或语言障碍而成为边缘化群体的一部分。另一方面,研究中确定的几个推动者包括目睹某人倒塌的先前经验,在公共场所对自动体外除颤器的认识,某些职业,或培训的法律要求。
    结论:发现各种障碍和促成因素影响外行人参加复苏培训。为了增强外行人对心脏骤停的反应,需要发起旨在消除障碍的有针对性的倡议,需要进一步研究以探索与有特殊需要的人群有关的因素。
    The aim of this scoping review was to identify factors that would enable or hinder the opportunity for laypersons to undertake resuscitation education.
    We searched PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify studies published from January 1, 1966 to December 31, 2022 including factors that could influence laypersons to undertake resuscitation education. Data regarding participant characteristics, interventions, and design and outcomes of included studies were extracted.
    Of the initially identified 6627 studies, 23 studies (20 cross-sectional and 3 cohort studies) were finally included. Among them, a wide variety of enablers and barriers were identified. High heterogeneity among studies was observed. We categorized factors into three themes: personal factors (age, sex, race, family status, language, prior experience of resuscitation, and immigration status), socioeconomic and educational factors (income, societal status, occupation and legislation, and educational attainment), and geographic factors (birthplace and habitancy). Several barriers were identified that affect laypersons from participating in resuscitation training, such as personal factors like advanced age, lower socioeconomic and educational status, as well as being part of marginalized groups due to race or language barriers. On the other hand, several enablers identified in the study included prior experiences of witnessing someone collapsing, awareness of automated external defibrillators in public locations, certain occupations, or legal requirements for training.
    Various barriers and enablers were found to influence laypersons to participate in resuscitation training. To enhance layperson response to cardiac arrest, targeted initiatives that aim to eliminate barriers need to be initiated, and further research is required to explore factors relating to populations with special needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于数字技术在改善获取,确保医疗保健的连续性和质量,加强卫生系统。一些研究报告了远程医学的成本效益,其远程牙科筛查的可靠性,诊断,协商,和治疗计划。尽管如此,目前的证据表明,远程医疗的实施面临许多挑战,并且尚未被牙科保健提供者(DHCP)采用.制定改善远程技术采用的战略需要了解促进或阻碍其成功实施的因素。
    目的:本系统综述旨在确定和综合DHCP在其临床实践中认为的实施远程医学的障碍和促进因素,使用理论域框架(TDF)和容量,机会,和动机行为(COM-B)模型。
    方法:本方案遵循PRISMA-P(方案的系统评价和Meta分析扩展的首选报告项目)清单。文献将在以下数据库中搜索:PubMed,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,CINAHL,Embase,和PsycINFO。我们将在Google上执行其他搜索,谷歌学者,和ProQuest学位论文和论文全球,筛选纳入研究的参考文献,以获取其他相关研究,如果我们需要更多细节,请联系研究作者。我们将考虑使用定性的研究,定量,混合方法。对出版日期和牙科设置没有限制。我们将包括用法语发表的研究,英语,和葡萄牙语。两名独立审核员将选择这项研究,提取数据,并使用混合方法评估工具的检查表评估方法质量。数据分析将包括描述性和主题内容分析。我们将使用TDF和COM-B模型对障碍和推动者进行综合和分类,并使用表格对我们的结果进行叙述性综合,数字,和报价。
    结果:到2023年3月,文献检索已检索到7355篇出版物。我们将通过DHCP的观点确定实施远程医学的障碍和促成因素的范围。考虑到迫切需要基于理论的实施干预措施,以改善循证实践的使用,我们将根据COM-B模型,基于TDF域和预测行为变化的3个基本条件,综合影响远程医学采用的因素。根据需要,如果不包括在TDF中,我们将包括其他决定因素。如果研究足够,我们将进行一些亚组分析。我们预计到2024年7月完成审查。
    结论:这篇综述将提供一些关于牙科环境中DHCP感知的远程医疗实施的决定因素的见解。这些发现将迎合患者,家庭,DHCP,研究人员,学术和专业决策者,和政策制定者。系统评价的结果可用于开发以理论为主导的干预措施,以改善远程医疗的实施。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42021293376;https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=293376。
    PRR1-10.2196/44218。
    BACKGROUND: There is growing literature on the potential of digital technologies for improving access to, ensuring continuity and quality of health care, and to strengthen health systems. Some studies have reported the cost-effectiveness of teledentistry, its reliability for remote dental screening, diagnosis, consultation, and treatment planning. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that teledentistry implementation faces many challenges and is not yet adopted by dental health care providers (DHCPs). Developing strategies to improve teledentistry adoption requires an understanding of the factors that promote or hinder its successful implementation.
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to identify and synthetize barriers and enablers to implementing teledentistry as perceived by DHCPs in their clinical practices, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capacity, Opportunity, and Motivation Behavior (COM-B) model.
    METHODS: This protocol follows the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Protocols) checklist. Literature will be searched in the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO. We will perform additional searches on Google, Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, screen the references of the included studies to capture additional relevant studies, and contact the authors of studies if we need more details. We will consider studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. There will be no restrictions on the publication date and dental setting. We will include studies published in French, English, and Portuguese. Two independent reviewers will select the study, extract data, and assess methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool\'s checklist. Data analysis will include a descriptive and a thematic content analysis. We will synthetize and categorize the barriers and enablers using the TDF and COM-B model and present a narrative synthesis of our results using tables, figures, and quotes.
    RESULTS: By March 2023, the literature search has retrieved 7355 publications. We will identify the range of barriers and enablers to implementing teledentistry through DHCPs\' perspectives. Considering the critical need for theory-based implementation interventions to improve the use of evidence-informed practices, we will synthesize the factors influencing the adoption of teledentistry based on the TDF domains and the 3 essential conditions predicting behavior change in accordance with the COM-B model. As needed, we will include additional determinants if not included in the TDF. We will conduct some subgroups analyses if studies are sufficient. We expect to complete the review by July 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review will provide some insights on the determinants of teledentistry implementation as perceived by DHCPs in dental settings. These findings will cater to patients, families, DHCPs, researchers, academic and professional decision-makers, and policy makers. The results of the systematic review could be used to develop theory-led interventions in improving teledentistry implementation.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42021293376; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=293376.
    UNASSIGNED: PRR1-10.2196/44218.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:许多国家和机构已采取政策,在各种环境中促进更健康的食品和饮料的供应,包括公共部门的工作场所。
    目的:本综述的目的是系统地综合有关在公共部门工作场所针对普通成年人实施和遵守健康食品和饮料政策的障碍和促进因素的证据。
    方法:九个科学数据库,9个灰色文献来源,和主要英语国家的政府网站以及参考清单。
    方法:对所有确定的记录(N=8559)进行合格性评估。无论使用何种研究设计和方法,都包括有关障碍和促进因素的研究报告,但如果在2000年之前出版或非英语语言,则将其排除在外。
    方法:41项研究符合纳入条件,主要来自澳大利亚,美国,和加拿大。最常见的工作场所是医疗机构,体育和娱乐中心,和政府机构。访谈和调查是数据收集的主要方法。方法方面通过关键评估技能计划定性研究清单进行评估。一般来说,数据收集和分析方法报告不佳.专题综合确定了4个主题:(1)批准的政策是成功实施计划的基础;(2)食品供应商对实施的接受植根于积极的利益相关者关系,认识到机会,并拥有所有权;(3)为更健康的选择创造客户需求可能会缓解政策目标和业务目标之间的紧张关系;(4)食品供应可能会限制食品供应商实施政策的能力。
    结论:研究结果表明,尽管供应商遇到了挑战,还有一些因素支持公共部门工作场所实施健康食品和饮料政策。了解成功实施政策的障碍和促进者将大大有利于对健康食品和饮料政策制定和实施感兴趣或参与其中的利益相关者。
    背景:PROSPERO注册号。CRD42021246340。
    BACKGROUND: Many countries and institutions have adopted policies to promote healthier food and drink availability in various settings, including public sector workplaces.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to systematically synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to implementation of and compliance with healthy food and drink policies aimed at the general adult population in public sector workplaces.
    METHODS: Nine scientific databases, 9 grey literature sources, and government websites in key English-speaking countries along with reference lists.
    METHODS: All identified records (N = 8559) were assessed for eligibility. Studies reporting on barriers and facilitators were included irrespective of study design and methods used but were excluded if they were published before 2000 or in a non-English language.
    METHODS: Forty-one studies were eligible for inclusion, mainly from Australia, the United States, and Canada. The most common workplace settings were healthcare facilities, sports and recreation centers, and government agencies. Interviews and surveys were the predominant methods of data collection. Methodological aspects were assessed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program Qualitative Studies Checklist. Generally, there was poor reporting of data collection and analysis methods. Thematic synthesis identified 4 themes: (1) a ratified policy as the foundation of a successful implementation plan; (2) food providers\' acceptance of implementation is rooted in positive stakeholder relationships, recognizing opportunities, and taking ownership; (3) creating customer demand for healthier options may relieve tension between policy objectives and business goals; and (4) food supply may limit the ability of food providers to implement the policy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that although vendors encounter challenges, there are also factors that support healthy food and drink policy implementation in public sector workplaces. Understanding barriers and facilitators to successful policy implementation will significantly benefit stakeholders interested or engaging in healthy food and drink policy development and implementation.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021246340.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创新的最终目标不是创新本身,而是提高利润或销售额。完成理论创新,需要表明创新是否有助于改善业务绩效。本文的另一个重点是ICT和研发在创新过程中的作用。ICT在从公司外部吸收信息方面起着至关重要的作用,而研发对于利用现有资源吸收获得的信息以创造新颖的东西至关重要。本文的重点在于这两个身分的联合感化。该估计基于两阶段probit工具变量(IV)面板模型和作者自己的2012年和2018年的调查数据。因变量是第一个方程中的创新和第二个方程中的销售额。获得的结果表明,(i)创新促进了销售;(ii)研发对创新具有重要意义;(iii)ICT对任一方程式都不重要;(iv)研发和ICT的交叉项对创新具有重要意义,这意味着ICT是创新的推动者。这些都是新颖的结果。
    The final aim of innovation is not innovation itself but enhancing profits or sales. To complete the theory of innovation, it is required to show whether innovation contributed to improvements in business performance. A further focus of this paper is on the role of ICT and R&D in the innovation process. ICT plays a vital role in absorbing information from outside the firm, while R&D is essential for assimilating obtained information with existing resources to create something novel. The focus of this paper is on the joint effect of these two factors. The estimation is based on a two-stage probit instrumental variable (IV) panel model and the authors\' own survey data of 2012 and 2018. The dependent variables are innovation in the first equation and sales in the second. The results obtained show that (i) innovation enhances sales; (ii) R&D is significant for innovation; (iii) ICT is not significant for either of the equations; and (iv) the cross term of R&D and ICT is significant for innovation, implying that ICT is an enabler of innovation. These are novel results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号