Empiric antibiotics

经验性抗生素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着多重耐药感染的出现,医疗保健专业人员必须评估经验性抗生素治疗的有效性。
    目的:评估引起肝硬化患者自发性感染的微生物对抗生素的敏感性,并根据主要临床指南评估经验性抗生素治疗的适用性。
    方法:这项横断面研究利用了来自阿根廷和乌拉圭的肝硬化和培养阳性自发性细菌感染患者的前瞻性研究的两个数据集。我们评估了对常用抗生素的敏感性,并根据欧洲和美国的建议评估了覆盖率。
    结果:我们分析了229例患者中238例培养阳性自发性感染。在实施经验性治疗社区获得性自发性感染的建议时,头孢他啶将导致39%的覆盖率,而头孢曲松将达到70%。头孢吡肟,这不包括在建议中,将提供74%的覆盖率。使用厄他培南治疗医院感染只会覆盖这些发作的56%,而美罗培南或亚胺培南覆盖率达到73%。只有美罗培南或亚胺培南加万古霉素的组合在医疗保健相关或医院自发性细菌感染中的覆盖率超过85%。
    结论:我们的研究发现,在坚持建议的情况下,在特定的临床情景中没有足够的覆盖。强调基于当地流行病学数据的指南的必要性。
    BACKGROUND: With the emergence of multidrug-resistant infections, healthcare professionals must evaluate the effectiveness of empiric antibiotic treatments.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of microorganisms causing spontaneous infections in patients with cirrhosis and to evaluate the suitability of empiric antibiotic treatments based on major clinical guidelines.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized two datasets from prospective studies of patients with cirrhosis and culture-positive spontaneous bacterial infections in Argentina and Uruguay. We estimated susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics and assessed coverage following European and American recommendations.
    RESULTS: We analyzed 238 episodes of culture-positive spontaneous infections in 229 patients. When implementing the recommendations for empiric treatment of community-acquired spontaneous infections, ceftazidime would result in 39 % coverage, whereas ceftriaxone would reach 70 %. Cefepime, which is not included in the recommendations, would have provided coverage of 74 %. Using ertapenem for nosocomial infections would have only covered 56 % of these episodes, whereas meropenem or imipenem reached 73 % coverage. Only the combination of meropenem or imipenem plus vancomycin would achieve a coverage surpassing 85 % in healthcare-associated or nosocomial spontaneous bacterial infections.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study uncovers inadequate coverage in specific clinical scenarios when adhering to recommendations, underscoring the necessity of guidelines based on local epidemiological data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    必要脓胸(EN)是一种极为罕见的脓胸并发症。EN是指脓胸从胸腔向皮肤壁的扩张和进展。在这里,我们介绍了一名患有EN的男子的病例,并详细介绍了他的临床过程。一名42岁有药物使用史的男性因发烧三周到急诊科就诊,咳嗽,左前胸壁上的疼痛逐渐加重。头孢吡肟的经验性抗生素方案,甲硝唑,并开始使用万古霉素。胸部X光片,超声,胸部CT显示了一个大的区域,怀疑是一个局部脓胸。在入学的第四天,他接受了电视辅助胸腔镜检查,然后进行了左侧小切口手术,这证实了EN的诊断。患者在第16天出院,临床明显改善,并通过门诊诊所监测了一年。症状没有复发,并且有完整的EN分辨率。在抗生素前时代,随着不受控制的感染的进展,EN在今天不太常见。因此,EN需要高度的临床怀疑才能及时发现和管理。我们的案例说明了早期干预抗生素和手术引流的重要性。
    Empyema necessitatis (EN) is an exceedingly rare complication of empyema. EN refers to the expansion and progression of an empyema beyond the thoracic cavity toward the skin wall. Herein, we present the case of a man with EN and detail his clinical course. A 42-year-old male with a prior history of substance use presented to the emergency department with three weeks of fever, cough, and progressively worsening pain overlying the left anterior chest wall. An empiric antibiotic regimen of cefepime, metronidazole, and vancomycin was initiated. Chest X-ray, ultrasound, and chest CT demonstrated a large region of loculation suspicious for a loculated empyema. On day 4 of admission, he underwent a video-assisted thoracoscopy followed by a left minithoracotomy, which confirmed the diagnosis of EN. The patient was discharged on hospital day 16 with marked clinical improvement and monitored for a year via an outpatient clinic. Symptoms did not recur, and there was complete resolution of EN. More predominant in the pre-antibiotic era with the progression of uncontrolled infections, EN is less commonly seen today. As such, EN requires a high degree of clinical suspicion for timely detection and management. Our case illustrates the importance of early intervention with antibiotics and surgical drainage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于患者特征和临床状态的抗生素非敏感性预测可能支持选择经验性抗生素治疗疑似医院获得性尿路感染(HA-UTIs)。
    方法:建立了预测模型来预测针对疑似HA-UTI订购的8种抗生素药敏试验的非敏感结果。符合条件的患者是2010年至2021年入院48小时后尿培养和药敏试验结果的患者。我们利用了病人的人口统计,诊断,处方,暴露于多重耐药生物,转移历史,和每日计算的抗生素图作为预测因子。我们使用Lasso逻辑回归(LLR),极端梯度增强(XGB),随机森林(RF),以及用于开发的堆叠集成方法。还开发了用于临床用途的简约模型。使用接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估辨别。
    结果:在10474例疑似HA-UTI病例中,平均年龄为62.1±16.2岁,男性占48.1%。氨苄西林/舒巴坦的非敏感性预测,头孢吡肟,环丙沙星,亚胺培南,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦,和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑使用堆叠的集合表现最好(AUROC分别为76.9、76.1、77.0、80.6、76.1和76.5)。使用LLR的氨苄青霉素模型表现最好(AUROC=73.4)。仅对于庆大霉素,XGB表现最佳(AUROC=66.9)。在简约的模型中,LLR对氨苄青霉素的AUROC最高,氨苄西林/舒巴坦,头孢吡肟,庆大霉素,和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(AUROC分别为70.6、71.8、73.0、65.9和73.0)。环丙沙星的模型在XGB(AUROC=70.3)下表现最好,而亚胺培南模型在堆叠集合中表现最好(AUROC=71.3)。公开发布了使用简约模型的个性化应用程序。
    结论:我们开发了抗生素非敏感性预测模型,以支持HA-UTI的经验性抗生素选择。
    BACKGROUND: Prediction of antibiotic non-susceptibility based on patient characteristics and clinical status may support selection of empiric antibiotics for suspected hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (HA-UTIs).
    METHODS: Prediction models were developed to predict non-susceptible results of eight antibiotic susceptibility tests ordered for suspected HA-UTI. Eligible patients were those with urine culture and susceptibility test results after 48 hours of admission between 2010-2021. Patient demographics, diagnosis, prescriptions, exposure to multidrug-resistant organisms, transfer history, and a daily calculated antibiogram were used as predictors. Lasso logistic regression (LLR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), random forest, and stacked ensemble methods were used for development. Parsimonious models were also developed for clinical utility. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
    RESULTS: In 10 474 suspected HA-UTI cases, the mean age was 62.1 ± 16.2 years and 48.1% were male. Non-susceptibility prediction for ampicillin/sulbactam, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole performed best using the stacked ensemble (AUROC 76.9, 76.1, 77.0, 80.6, 76.1, and 76.5, respectively). The model for ampicillin performed best with LLR (AUROC 73.4). Extreme gradient boosting only performed best for gentamicin (AUROC 66.9). In the parsimonious models, the LLR yielded the highest AUROC for ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefepime, gentamicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (AUROC 70.6, 71.8, 73.0, 65.9, and 73.0, respectively). The model for ciprofloxacin performed best with XGB (AUROC 70.3), while the model for imipenem performed best in the stacked ensemble (AUROC 71.3). A personalised application using the parsimonious models was publicly released.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prediction models for antibiotic non-susceptibility were developed to support empiric antibiotic selection for HA-UTI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脊柱手术后,包括非脓性引流在内的术后切口问题相对常见。缺乏基于证据的管理协议。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定非化脓性伤口引流处方经验性口服抗生素是否有利于预防慢性感染或再次手术。
    方法:回顾性图表回顾患者样本:因手术后伤口而打电话到办公室的患者关注结果指标:不适用方法:在大型,多外科医生,脊柱外科实践,通讯日志的审查显示,298名患者致电或致电办公室,关注术后非脓性伤口引流。根据外科医生的偏好,患者被处方经验性口服抗生素。根据性别,接受经验性口服抗生素治疗(AbxTx)的患者与未接受(无AbxTx)的患者的倾向相匹配,年龄,BMI,ASA等级,吸烟状况,之前的脊柱手术,解剖位置,和手术级别的数量。确定了需要手术干预(清创术)和/或发展为慢性感染的患者人数。
    结果:有非脓性引流报告的298例患者中有112例(38%)使用口服抗生素。两个匹配队列的人口统计学和手术特征相似。尽管与NoAbxTx组(n=9,9%)相比,AbxTx组中需要手术干预的患者更多(n=17,17%),这一差异无统计学意义(p=0.139).术中培养结果显示AbxTx组94%(16/17)与无AbxTx组67%(6/9)无生长(p=0.103)。每组中的一名患者需要在初次手术清创后的一年内返回手术室以管理慢性感染。
    结论:在这项大型系列(n=298)脊柱手术后发生非化脓性伤口引流的患者中,87%的患者无需手术干预即可解决。经验性口服抗生素并没有减少手术干预的需要或慢性感染的发展。除了增加成本,潜在的不良反应,抗性生物的发展,和手术部位感染的标签不准确;经验性口服抗生素可能导致那些需要手术干预的患者的术中培养阴性,从而影响开出特定抗生素方案的能力。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative incisional concerns including nonpurulent drainage are relatively common following spine surgery. Evidence-based management protocols are lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine if prescribing empiric oral antibiotics for nonpurulent wound drainage is beneficial for the prevention of chronic infection or reoperation.
    METHODS: Retrospective chart review.
    METHODS: Patients calling the office with postsurgical wound concerns.
    METHODS: Not applicable.
    METHODS: In a large, multisurgeon, spine surgery practice, a review of the communications log showed that 298 patients called or messaged the office with a concern regarding postoperative nonpurulent wound drainage. Patients were prescribed empiric oral antibiotics based on surgeon preference. Patients who received empiric oral antibiotic treatment (AbxTx) were propensity matched to patients who did not (No AbxTx) based on sex, age, BMI, ASA grade, smoking status, prior spine surgery, anatomic location, and number of surgical levels. The number of patients requiring surgical intervention (debridement) and/or developing a chronic infection was determined.
    RESULTS: Oral antibiotics were prescribed for 112 of the 298 (38%) patients with reports of nonpurulent drainage. Demographic and surgical characteristics of the two matched cohorts were similar. Although there were more patients in the AbxTx group who required surgical intervention (n=17, 17%) compared to the No AbxTx group (n=9, 9%), this difference was not statistically significant (p=.139). The intra-operative culture results showed no growth in 94% (16/17) of the AbxTx group vs 67% (6/9) of the No AbxTx group (p=.103). One patient in each group required a return to the operating room within the year after the initial surgical debridement for management of chronic infection.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this large series (n=298) of patients with nonpurulent wound drainage following spine surgery, 87% resolved without the need for surgical intervention. Empiric oral antibiotics did not reduce the need for surgical intervention or the development of a chronic infection. In addition to the added cost, potential adverse reactions, development of resistant organisms, and inaccurate labeling of surgical site infection; empiric oral antibiotics may lead to a negative intraoperative culture for those requiring surgical intervention impacting the ability to prescribe a specific antibiotic regimen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:咽旁脓肿(PPA)的许多问题,如病因,诱发因素,和治疗方法,仍然有争议。我们旨在研究PPA的特征,以更好地了解该疾病的治疗效果。方法:我们回顾性整理了49例PPA患者的病历回顾,这些患者在住院并诊断为PPA时被视为PPA住院患者,并使用经验性抗生素。只有在药物治疗无效的情况下,脓肿很大,或者疾病继续发展,并采取手术治疗。结果:总的来说,49名符合研究标准的患者被确定。链球菌是PPA患者中最常见的生物。PPA患者中糖尿病的发病率高于整体人群中糖尿病的患病率。有趣的是,单用抗生素组住院时间短于手术组(P<0.05)。此外,单用抗生素组的从发病到治疗的持续时间短于手术组.结论:我们的治疗方案是有效的。对于PPA,也建议使用纯抗生素方法,该方法对经验性抗生素和局部抗生素有效。PPA的早期诊断和治疗可最终降低PPA的严重程度。
    Objective:Many problems of parapharyngeal abscess (PPA), such as etiology, predisposing factors, and therapeutic methods, are still controversial. We aim to investigate the characteristics of PPA to better understand the therapeutic effects of the disease. Methods: We retrospectively collated the medical record reviews of 49 PPA patients who were treated as PPA inpatients when a patient was hospitalized and diagnosed with PPA, and empiric antibiotics were used. Only if the drug treatment was ineffective, the abscess was large, or the disease continued to progress, and surgical treatment was adopted. Results: In total, 49 patients who met the research criteria were identified. Streptococcus was the most common organism in PPA patients. The morbidity of diabetes in PPA patients was higher than the prevalence of diabetes in the overall population. Interestingly, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the antibiotic-only group than in the surgery group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the duration from onset to treatment in the antibiotic-only group was shorter than in the surgery group. Conclusion: Our treatment protocol is effective. Antibiotic-only method is also recommended for the PPA which was effective for the empiric antibiotics and localized. Early diagnosis and treatment of PPA could ultimately reduce the severity of PPA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的研究表明,接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与急性肾损伤的发展以及接受抗假单胞菌头孢菌素和神经毒性之间存在关联。我们比较了接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和抗假头孢菌素的危重患者的临床相关肾脏和神经系统结局。方法:我们对等渗溶液和主要不良肾脏事件试验的数据进行了二次分析,检查了在重症监护病房入院24小时内接受哌拉西林-他唑巴坦或抗伪头孢菌素的患者。我们使用比例赔率模型进行了多变量分析,以检查在30天内(MAKE30)以及在第28天无谵妄和昏迷的存活天数内接受的第一种抗生素与主要不良肾脏事件之间的关系。结果:研究中包括3199;2375(74%)接受哌拉西林他唑巴坦,824(26%)接受抗假单胞菌头孢菌素。在调整了预先指定的混杂因素后,首次收到哌拉西林他唑巴坦,与抗假头孢菌素相比,与MAKE30的较高发病率无关(调整后的比值比,1.03;95%CI,0.83-1.27;P=.80),但与更多的存活天数相关,没有谵妄和昏迷(调整后的比值比,1.18;95%CI,1.00-1.38;P=0.04)。在调整可能影响神经功能的药物基线接收的敏感性分析中,这一发现并不重要。结论:在危重患者中,接受哌拉西林他唑巴坦与死亡率增加无关,肾脏替代疗法,或持续性肾功能不全或存活天数较长,无谵妄和昏迷。需要进行随机试验,以告知重症成人经验性治疗感染的抗生素的选择。
    Background: Prior studies suggest associations between receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam and development of acute kidney injury and receipt of anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins and neurotoxicity. We compared clinically-relevant renal and neurologic outcomes in critically ill patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam versus anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial examining patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam or an anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin within 24 h of intensive care unit admission. We performed multivariable analysis using a proportional odds model to examine the association between the first antibiotic received and the outcomes of Major Adverse Kidney Events within 30 days (MAKE30) and days alive and free of delirium and coma to day 28. Results: 3199 were included in the study; 2375 (74%) receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and 824 (26%) receiving anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin. After adjustment for prespecified confounders, initial receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam, compared to anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins, was not associated with higher incidence of MAKE30 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.83-1.27; P = .80) but was associated with a greater number of days alive and free of delirium and coma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.38; P = .04). In a sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline receipt of medications which may impact neuro function, this finding was not significant. Conclusion: Among critically ill adults, receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam was not associated with an increased incidence of death, renal replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction or a greater number of days alive and free of delirium and coma. Randomized trials are needed to inform the choice of antibiotics for empiric treatment infection in critically ill adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新生儿败血症是低收入和中等收入国家死亡率和发病率的重要原因。为了提供高质量的数据研究并为未来的试验提供信息,了解管理全球多中心研究时遇到的挑战,并确定在这些环境中可行的解决方案,至关重要。本文概述了不同国家和地区的不同研究团队所面临的复杂性,以及为实现新生儿败血症的大型多中心观察性研究的务实研究管理而采取的行动。我们讨论了注册具有不同批准流程和不同研究经验的网站的具体考虑因素,结构,和训练。实施灵活的招聘战略和提供持续的培训对于克服这些挑战是必要的。我们强调必须注意设计数据库和监测计划。广泛的数据收集工具,复杂的数据库,紧迫的时间表,严格的监测安排可能会有问题,并可能使研究面临风险。最后,我们讨论了收集和运输分离品时增加的复杂性,以及拥有一个强大的中央管理团队和跨学科合作者的重要性,该团队能够轻松适应并做出迅速的决策,以按时完成研究并达到目标。通过务实的方法,适当的培训,良好的沟通,通过合作研究网络,在具有挑战性的环境中,从复杂的研究中提供高质量的数据,可以克服这些挑战.
    Neonatal sepsis is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries. To deliver high-quality data studies and inform future trials, it is crucial to understand the challenges encountered when managing global multi-centre research studies and to identify solutions that can feasibly be implemented in these settings. This paper provides an overview of the complexities faced by diverse research teams in different countries and regions, together with actions implemented to achieve pragmatic study management of a large multi-centre observational study of neonatal sepsis. We discuss specific considerations for enrolling sites with different approval processes and varied research experience, structures, and training. Implementing a flexible recruitment strategy and providing ongoing training were necessary to overcome these challenges. We emphasize the attention that must be given to designing the database and monitoring plans. Extensive data collection tools, complex databases, tight timelines, and stringent monitoring arrangements can be problematic and might put the study at risk. Finally, we discuss the complexities added when collecting and shipping isolates and the importance of having a robust central management team and interdisciplinary collaborators able to adapt easily and make swift decisions to deliver the study on time and to target. With pragmatic approaches, appropriate training, and good communication, these challenges can be overcome to deliver high-quality data from a complex study in challenging settings through a collaborative research network.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号