Emergency c-section

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较瑞士和厄立特里亚妇女的产科结局,专注于器械或手术干预和镇痛使用。方法:该研究包括在瑞士医院分娩的45,412名瑞士妇女和1,132名厄立特里亚妇女(2019-2022年)的数据。混合效应逻辑回归用于评估国籍对分娩方式和镇痛使用的影响,多项混合效应逻辑回归用于评估国籍对自然阴道分娩妇女分娩方式的影响。结果:与瑞士人相比,厄立特里亚妇女的初次剖腹产率较低(Adj.OR0.73,95%CI[0.60,0.89]),但最初计划的阴道分娩在紧急剖腹产结束的风险较高(RRR1.31,95%CI[1.05,1.63])。厄立特里亚妇女接受硬膜外镇痛的可能性较小(Adj.OR0.53,95%CI[0.45,0.62]),并且更有可能不接受任何镇痛(Adj.或1.73,95%CI[1.52,1.96])。结论:这项研究揭示了产科护理方面的差异,尤其是厄立特里亚妇女的急诊剖腹产率较高,镇痛使用率较低。为了促进公平的医疗保健实践,需要对产科决策有更深入的了解。
    Objectives: This study aims to compare obstetric outcomes between Eritrean and Swiss women in Switzerland, focusing on instrumental or surgical interventions and analgesia use. Methods: The study included data from 45,412 Swiss and 1,132 Eritrean women who gave birth in Swiss hospitals (2019-2022). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery and analgesia use and multinomial mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery in women intended for spontaneous vaginal delivery. Results: Compared with Swiss, Eritrean women had a lower rate of primary C-section (Adj. OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.60, 0.89]) but a higher risk of initially planned vaginal deliveries ending in emergency C-section (RRR 1.31, 95% CI [1.05, 1.63]). Eritrean women were less likely to receive epidural analgesia (Adj. OR 0.53, 95% CI [0.45, 0.62]) and more likely to not receive any analgesia (Adj. OR 1.73, 95% CI [1.52, 1.96]). Conclusion: This study reveals disparities in obstetric care, notably in higher emergency C-section rates and lower analgesia use among Eritrean women. For promoting equitable healthcare practices deeper understanding of obstetrics decision-making is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:羊膜带是一种罕见的疾病,可导致结构性肢体异常,胎儿窘迫和不良产科结局。其病因的主要假设是妊娠早期羊膜破裂,在胎儿周围形成紧密缠绕的链。这些线可以收缩,切斯,随后截肢,颈部或头部。很少,羊膜带可以影响脐带,导致胎儿宫内窘迫或潜在的胎儿死亡。
    目的:我们介绍了一个26周孕妇的独特案例,该孕妇因胎儿运动减少而参加了多临床会诊,并伴有有关心脏造影(CTG)的发现。还对有关脐带羊膜带的文献进行了回顾,为产科医生的实践确定诊断和介入选择。
    方法:这是一个病例报告,以及对文献的评论。
    结果:CTG提示胎儿宫内窘迫,提示紧急剖腹产(剖腹产)。交付时,新生儿表现出羊膜带序列的迹象,右手指骨远端缺损,羊膜束导致脐带严重收缩,后者导致胎儿缺氧。在没有截肢的情况下,直接超声诊断仍然是一个挑战,然而,如远端肢体或脐多普勒血流异常和远端肢体水肿等间接征象可能提示羊膜带。MRI被提议作为辅助诊断工具,但与超声相比,它没有更高的检出率。文献中已经描述了进行羊膜链裂解的胎儿镜手术,结果良好。
    结论:该病例首次报道了因脐带羊膜扎带引起的缺氧窘迫的极度早产胎儿的存活率,罕见的偶然时机。超声诊断仍然是金标准。产科警惕是必要的,胎儿抢救被证明是可行的。
    BACKGROUND: Amniotic banding is a rare condition that can lead to structural limb anomalies, fetal distress and adverse obstetric outcomes. The main hypothesis for its etiology is a rupture of the amniotic membrane in early pregnancy, with the formation of tightly entangling strands around the fetus. These strands can constrict, incise, and subsequently amputate limb parts, the neck or head. More rarely, the amniotic banding can affect the umbilical cord, leading to fetal distress or potential intra-uterine fetal demise.
    OBJECTIVE: We present a unique case of a 26-week pregnant woman who attended a polyclinical consultation due to reduced fetal movements with concerning cardiotocography (CTG) findings. A review of the literature about amniotic banding of the umbilical cord was conducted as well, identifying diagnostic and interventional options for the obstetrician\'s practice.
    METHODS: This is a case report, alongside a review of the literature.
    RESULTS: The CTG indicated fetal distress, prompting an emergency caesarean section (C-section). Upon delivery, the neonate exhibited signs of amniotic band sequence, with distal phalangeal defects on the right hand and severe constriction of the umbilical cord caused by amniotic strands, the latter precipitating fetal hypoxia. Direct ultrasound diagnosis remains a challenge in the absence of limb amputation, yet indirect signs such as distal limb or umbilical doppler flow abnormalities and distal limb edema may be suggestive of amniotic banding. MRI is proposed as an adjuvant diagnostic tool yet does not present a higher detection rate compared to ultrasound. Fetoscopic surgery to perform lysis of the amniotic strands with favorable outcome has been described in literature.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case presents the first reported survival of an extremely preterm fetus in hypoxic distress as a cause of amniotic banding of the umbilical cord, with a rare degree of incidental timing. Ultrasound diagnosis remains the gold standard. Obstetrical vigilance is warranted, with fetal rescue proven to be feasible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究评估了与剖腹产(剖腹产)后手术部位感染(SSI)风险相关的因素。
    方法:在2020年8月1日至2021年12月30日期间,在国家卫生服务医院(萨里,英国)。
    结果:剖腹产时,平均年龄为33.1岁(SD±5.2)。与BMI<30kg/m2的女性相比,BMI≥35kg/m2的女性发生SSI的风险更大。或4.07(95CI2.48-6.69)。有吸烟史的女性比从未吸烟的女性患SSI的风险更大,或1.69(95CI1.05-2.27)。BMI≥30kg/m2且有吸烟史或紧急剖腹产的女性因这些不良后果而增加了3至10倍。少数民族,糖尿病或既往剖腹产与任何结局无关.
    结论:高BMI,吸烟,和急诊剖腹产是剖腹产感染的独立危险因素。计划受孕的妇女应避免超重和吸烟。患有糖尿病和少数族裔背景的女性患SSI的风险没有增加,表明所有患者的护理标准一致。
    The present study assessed factors associated with the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) after a caesarean section (C-section).
    Data were collected in 1682 women undergoing elective (53.9%) and emergency (46.1%) C-sections between 1st August 2020, and 30th December 2021, at a National Health Service hospital (Surrey, UK).
    At the time of C-section, the mean age was 33.1 yr (SD ± 5.2). Compared to women with BMI < 30 kg/m2, those with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 had a greater risk of SSI, OR 4.07 (95%CI 2.48-6.69). Women with a history of smoking had a greater risk of SSI than those who had never smoked, OR 1.69 (95%CI 1.05-2.27). Women with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and had a smoking history or emergency C-section had 3- to tenfold increases for these adverse outcomes. Ethnic minority, diabetes or previous C-section did not associate with any of the outcomes.
    High BMI, smoking, and emergency C-section are independent risk factors for SSI from C-section. Women planning conception should avoid excess body weight and smoking. Women with diabetes and from ethnic minority backgrounds did not have increased risks of SSI, indicating a consistent standard of care for all patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多年来,在孟加拉国,不必要的剖腹产(剖腹产)分娩的趋势日益增加,这引起了人们的关注。到目前为止,许多研究报道了孟加拉国剖腹产的危险因素.然而,这些研究中的大多数都没有估计这两个剖腹产程序的预测因子(即,急诊和选修)分别基于剖腹产决策的时机。这项研究仅提出了社会人口和经济因素的作用,这些因素可能与紧急和选择性剖腹产不同。
    方法:该研究的数据来自2017-18孟加拉国人口和健康调查,调查了5,299名15-49岁的妇女,她们在调查前三年在医疗机构分娩。使用描述性统计和双变量分析来实现研究目标。Further,对择期/急诊剖腹产的二元结局变量进行多变量逻辑回归分析。
    结果:育龄妇女中约有三分之一选择剖腹产。在他们当中,18.7%的女性有选择性剖腹产,14.1%有紧急剖腹产。与没有接触的女性相比,有大众媒体接触的女性通过选择性剖腹产的可能性高32%[AOR:1.32;CI:1.02-1.72]。受过高等教育的妇女通过紧急剖腹产的可能性比没有受过教育的妇女低56%[AOR:0.44;CI:0.24-0.83]。第三或更高出生顺序的孩子比第一出生顺序的孩子更有可能通过选择性剖腹产分娩[AOR:2.67;CI:1.75-4.05]。相比之下,出生顺序较高的儿童的紧急剖腹产机会比首次出生的儿童少[AOR:0.29;CI:0.18-0.45].私人医疗机构的选择性剖腹产和紧急剖腹产均显着较高。
    结论:尽管剖腹产已成为一种挽救生命的干预措施,这种做法的过度使用给母亲和未出生的孩子带来了有利可图的风险。对母亲和家庭的适当宣传可以增强对不必要的剖腹产的不安全性质的认识。在过度使用选择性剖腹产和紧急剖腹产的情况下,应遵守授权,以尽量减少不必要的剖腹产和相关并发症,并增加孟加拉国的正常机构分娩。
    BACKGROUND: Over the years, an increasing trend of unnecessary caesarean section (c-section) deliveries has raised concerns in Bangladesh. So far, many studies have reported the risk factors of c-section delivery in Bangladesh. However, most of these studies did not estimate the predictors of the two c-section procedures (i.e., emergency and elective) separately based on the timing of the c-section decision. This study solely brings forward the role of socio-demographic and economic factors that may be associated differently with emergency and elective c-section deliveries.
    METHODS: Data for the study were drawn from the 2017-18 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey with 5,299 women aged 15-49 years who gave birth at a health facility during three years preceding the survey. Descriptive statistics along with bivariate analysis were used to fulfill the study objectives. Further, multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted on binary outcome variables of elective/emergency c-section deliveries.
    RESULTS: Approximately one-third of women in the reproductive-age group opted for delivery through c-section. Out of them, 18.7% of women had elective c-sections, and 14.1% had emergency c-sections. Women who had mass media exposure were 32% more likely to deliver through elective c-sections than women who had no exposure [AOR: 1.32; CI: 1.02-1.72]. Women with higher education had a 56% lower likelihood of delivering through emergency c-section than women with no educational status [AOR: 0.44; CI: 0.24-0.83]. Children from the third or higher birth order were significantly more likely to be delivered through elective c-sections than those from the first birth order [AOR: 2.67; CI: 1.75-4.05]. In contrast, children with higher birth order had fewer chances of emergency c-section than children with first birth order [AOR: 0.29; CI: 0.18 -0.45]. Both elective and emergency c-section deliveries were significantly higher among private health facilities.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although c-section delivery has emerged as a life-saving intervention, the overuse of such practice has created lucrative risks for the mother and unborn child. Proper sensitization of mothers and families can enhance the knowledge of the unsafe nature of unnecessary c-section deliveries. Authorizations in case of over-use of elective and emergency c-sections should be observed to minimize the unnecessary c-sections and related complications and to increase normal institutional deliveries in Bangladesh.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号