Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor

Elexacaftor / Tezacaftor / Ivacaftor
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节因子(CFTR)的调节剂可改善囊性纤维化(CF)患者的预后。elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI)组合可安全有效地改善不同CFTR基因型患者的肺功能,包括至少一个F508del突变.然而,报告肝损害病例。我们描述了105例F508del反式杂合的CF患者,具有另一个CFTR突变,用ETI治疗1年。我们分析了肝脏生化指标和胆固醇代谢,包括十二甾醇和植物甾醇,胆固醇从头合成和吸收的替代标记,分别。治疗后显著改善了汗液的氯化物,1s内的体重指数和用力呼气量,而它引起了总胆红素和结合胆红素的显着增加,ALT和GGT,即使没有患者发展CF肝病。与先前在ETI治疗的F508del纯合患者中观察到的那些相比,此类改变的相关性较小。此外,ETI治疗通过增强其吸收(血清胆固醇和植物甾醇之间的相关性)显着增加血清胆固醇。然而,我们观察到从头生物合成的正常化(lathosterolreduction),这在纯合患者中未观察到.这些数据表明,与F508del反式的第二个突变有助于减少肝脏胆固醇积累,肝脏炎症的触发。然而,有和无肝脏脂肪变性的CF患者的生化指标变化无差异,以及F508del反式突变不同的患者之间。这些数据表明进一步研究ETI治疗对肝功能指标和新的预测生物标志物的影响。
    Modulators of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) improved cystic fibrosis (CF) patients\' outcome. The elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) combination was safe and effective improving lung function in patients with different CFTR genotypes, including at least one F508del mutation. However, cases with liver damage were reported. We describe 105 CF patients heterozygous for F508del in trans with another CFTR mutation, treated for 1 year with ETI. We analyzed liver biochemical parameters and cholesterol metabolism, including lathosterol and phytosterols, surrogate markers of cholesterol de-novo synthesis and absorption, respectively. The treatment significantly improved sweat chloride, body mass index and forced expiratory volume in 1 s, whereas it caused a significant increase of total and conjugated bilirubin, ALT and GGT, even if no patients developed CF liver disease. Such alterations were less relevant than those previously observed in ETI-treated F508del homozygous patients. Furthermore, ETI treatment significantly increased serum cholesterol by enhancing its absorption (correlation between serum cholesterol and phytosterols). Whereas, we observed a normalization of de-novo biosynthesis (lathosterol reduction) that was not observed in homozygous patients. These data suggest that the second mutation in trans with the F508del contributes to reduce the liver cholesterol accumulation and thus, the triggering of liver inflammation. However, no differences in the alteration of biochemical indexes were observed between CF patients with and without liver steatosis, and between patients with different mutations in trans with the F508del. Such data suggest to further investigate the effects of ETI therapy on liver function indexes and new predictive biomarkers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于缺乏支持疗效的临床数据,无F508del变异的囊性纤维化(PwCF)患者获得elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI)的途径有限。
    方法:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们检查了来自研究的患者水平数据,这些研究报告了非F508delCFTR变异的PwCF对ETI的临床反应.我们搜索了包括Embase在内的电子数据源,MEDLINE,中央从1月1日起,2019年5月14日2024.
    结果:我们的搜索结果确定了4,795项研究,其中20项符合资格标准。164人中有120人(73%)对ETI有积极的临床反应,定义为汗液氯化物(SwCl)降低≥10mmol/L或预测的FEV1(ppFEV1)改善百分比≥5%。在这120个个体中代表了51个独特的ETI反应性变体,其中27个变体(53%)尚未获得美国FDA的批准。对于迄今为止至少有10个人接受ETI治疗的变体,对于N1303K和G85E,观察到一致的阳性临床应答.对于N1303K(n=48),ppFEV1的中位数增加为16%(IQR:8%,29%),SwCl的中值降低为-9(IQR:-4,-22)mmol/L。对于G85E(n=16),ppFEV1的中位数增加为13.5%(IQR:8%,19%),SwCl的中位数降低为-46(IQR:-39,-66)mmol/L。
    结论:在对无F508del的PwCF中ETI临床应用进行全面审查后,发现了其他ETI反应性变体。CF社区可以使用此数据来扩展标记的适应症或帮助倡导标签外的ETI报销。
    BACKGROUND: Access to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) without a F508del variant is limited due to lack of clinical data supporting efficacy.
    METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined patient-level data from studies reporting the clinical response to ETI for PwCF with non-F508del CFTR variants. We searched electronic data sources including Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL from January 1st, 2019 to May 14th, 2024.
    RESULTS: Our search results identified 4,795 studies and 20 met the eligibility criteria. 120 of 164 (73 %) individuals had a positive clinical response to ETI, defined by a sweat chloride (SwCl) decrease of ≥10 mmol/L or percent-predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) improvement of ≥5 %. 51 unique ETI-responsive variants were represented across these 120 individuals and 27 of these variants (53 %) have not been previously approved by the U.S. FDA. For variants with at least 10 individuals treated with ETI to date, a consistent positive clinical response was observed for N1303K and G85E. For N1303K (n = 48), the median increase in ppFEV1 was 16 % (IQR: 8 %, 29 %), with a median decrease in SwCl of -9 (IQR: -4, -22) mmol/L. For G85E (n = 16), the median increase in ppFEV1 was 13.5 % (IQR: 8 %, 19 %) with a median decrease in SwCl of -46 (IQR: -39, -66) mmol/L.
    CONCLUSIONS: Additional ETI-responsive variants were identified following a comprehensive review of ETI clinical use in PwCF without F508del. This data can be used by the CF community in efforts to expand the labelled indications or to help advocate for off-label ETI reimbursement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据已发表的研究结果,elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI)对CF成年人的心理健康影响仍不确定。系统探讨ETI对成人CF患者焦虑和抑郁症状的影响。在基线评估广泛性焦虑症-7(GAD-7)和患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)评分,6个月,ETI后12个月。总的来说,ETI后6个月,GAD-7和PHQ-9评分有所改善,更大比例的个体经历了临床上显著的改善(与恶化)他们的症状,持续12个月。影响心理健康结果的因素包括预先存在的精神病诊断和精神病药物使用。总之,尽管ETI后焦虑和抑郁症状总体有所改善,约10%的个体经历了临床上显著的恶化.
    The mental health effects of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) on adults with CF are still uncertain with mixed findings from published studies. To systematically investigate the impact of ETI on symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults with CF, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months post-ETI. Overall, GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores improved at 6 months post-ETI, with a greater proportion of individuals experiencing a clinically significant improvement (vs. worsening) of their symptoms, which was sustained at 12 months. Factors influencing mental health outcomes included pre-existing psychiatric diagnoses and psychiatric medication use. In conclusion, although there was overall improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms post-ETI, approximately 10 % of individuals experienced clinically significant worsening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI)对CF(pwCF)患者产生了巨大的积极影响。然而,功效可能有很大的差异,我们缺乏足够的生物标志物来预测个体反应。因此,我们旨在确定鼻呼吸道上皮中预测ETI治疗临床反应的转录组学特征。我们在ETI开始之前从pwCF中获得了鼻上皮样本,并对基线基因表达进行了全转录组分析,以预测FEV1(ΔFEV1)的变化。年度最佳FEV1(ΔybFEV1),和体重指数(ΔBMI)。使用最高差异表达基因(DEGs),我们生成转录组风险评分(TRS)并评估其预测性能.该研究包括年龄≥6岁的40个pwCF(平均27.7[SD=15.1]岁;40%为女性)。ETI启动后,22名(61.1%)参与者FEV1改善≥5%,19名(50%)参与者ybFEV1改善≥5%。使用每个基因的顶部过表达和表达不足的基因构建TRS。将ΔFEV1TRS添加到具有年龄的模型中,性别,和基线FEV1将AUC从0.41增加到0.88;ΔybFEV1TRS将AUC从0.51增加到0.88;ΔBMITRS将AUC从0.46增加到0.92。因此,预测对这三种结果的反应的平均准确率约为85%。在针对F508del接合性和先前使用的CFTR调节剂进一步调整的模型中,结果是相似的。总之,我们确定了有助于准确预测ETI治疗后FEV1和BMI变化的鼻上皮转录组特征.这些新型TRS可以作为pwCF中对调节剂治疗的临床反应的预测性生物标志物。
    Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has made a substantial positive impact for people living with CF (pwCF). However, there can be substantial variability in efficacy, and we lack adequate biomarkers to predict individual response. We thus aimed to identify transcriptomic profiles in nasal respiratory epithelium that predict clinical response to ETI treatment. We obtained nasal epithelial samples from pwCF prior to ETI initiation and performed a transcriptome-wide analysis of baseline gene expression to predict changes in FEV1 (∆FEV1), year\'s best FEV1 (∆ybFEV1), and body mass index (∆BMI). Using the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs), we generated transcriptomic risk scores (TRS) and evaluated their predictive performance. The study included 40 pwCF aged ≥6 years (mean 27.7 [SD=15.1] years; 40% female). After ETI initiation, FEV1 improved ≥5% in 22 (61.1%) participants and ybFEV1 improved ≥5% in 19 (50%). TRS were constructed using top over-expressed and under-expressed genes for each. Adding the ∆FEV1 TRS for to a model with age, sex, and baseline FEV1 increased the AUC from 0.41 to 0.88; the ∆ybFEV1 TRS increased the AUC from 0.51 to 0.88; and the ∆BMI TRS increased the AUC from 0.46 to 0.92. Average accuracy was thus ~85% in predicting the response to the three outcomes. Results were similar in models further adjusted for F508del zygosity and previous CFTR modulator use. In conclusion, we identified nasal epithelial transcriptomic profiles that help accurately predict changes in FEV1 and BMI with ETI treatment. These novel TRS could serve as predictive biomarkers for clinical response to modulator treatment in pwCF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝脏相关的副作用是用elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI)治疗囊性纤维化(CF)的已知并发症。吉尔伯特综合征是由降低酶UDP葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶1多肽A1(UGT1A1)活性的基因突变引起的,导致血液和十二指肠胆汁中未结合胆红素水平升高。Gilbert综合征和CF的存在可能是ETI治疗期间肝脏相关不良事件的附加危险因素。该病例系列描述了6名CF(pwCF)患者,其中先前未知的吉尔伯特综合征在开始ETI治疗后被掩盖。尽管所有患者在开始ETI后都有一定程度的肝功能障碍和/或胆红素水平升高,临床过程各不相同。只有一名患者不得不完全停止ETI治疗,而其他人则能够继续治疗(一些剂量减少,另一些则完全推荐的每日剂量)。所有患者,即使是那些使用较低剂量的人,在ETI治疗期间有经验的临床获益。吉尔伯特综合征不是ETI治疗的禁忌症,但可能被误认为是pwCF中肝脏相关不良事件的危险因素。这是医生在ETI治疗期间显示肝脏不良事件的pwCF中需要注意的事情。
    Liver-related side effects are a known complication of treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) for cystic fibrosis (CF). Gilbert\'s syndrome is caused by a genetic mutation that reduces activity of the enzyme UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1 polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1), causing elevated levels of unconjugated bilirubin in the blood and duodenal bile. The presence of Gilbert\'s syndrome and CF might represent additive risk factors for liver-related adverse events during ETI treatment. This case series describes six people with CF (pwCF) in whom previously unknown Gilbert\'s syndrome was unmasked after initiation of treatment with ETI. Although all patients had some level of hepatic dysfunction and/or elevated levels of bilirubin after initiation of ETI, the clinical course varied. Only one patient had to stop ETI therapy altogether, while the others were able to continue treatment (some at a reduced dosage and others at the full recommended daily dosage). All patients, even those using a lower dosage, experienced clinical benefit during ETI therapy. Gilbert\'s syndrome is not a contraindication for ETI therapy but may be mistaken for a risk factor for liver-related adverse events in pwCF. This is something that physicians need to be aware of in pwCF who show liver adverse events during ETI therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节因子是囊性纤维化的唯一可用治疗方法。尽管elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ELX/TEZ/IVA)耐受性良好,据报道,皮疹非常频繁。在严重的皮疹中,ELX/TEZ/IVA退出是必要的,导致临床恶化。该研究的目的是增加ELX/TEZ/IVA脱敏的经验。方法:纳入2021年12月至2023年2月期间出现ELX/TEZ/IVA迟发性过敏性皮疹并因无效抢救药物而需要停药的成年患者。进行ELX/TEZ/IVA和IVA皮肤测试以建立超敏机制。选择BalijepallyELX/TEZ/IVA脱敏方案。在因皮疹而不得不停止脱敏的情况下,提出了扩展脱敏。在ELX/TEZ/IVA脱敏前和脱敏后收集临床和健康相关生活质量参数。结果:162例患者(81例女性,31.2[23.8-42.5]年)开始ELX/TEZ/IVA,出现皮疹的其中12人(7.4%,六个女人)。6名患者(5名女性)需要停止ELX/TEZ/IVA,并选择进行脱敏。皮肤测试表明一名患者有IV型迟发型超敏反应。两名患者对脱敏表现出足够的耐受性;而,四名患者出现皮疹。其中三个病人,成功结束延长脱敏(1例患者拒绝参与).在脱敏过程中没有观察到明显的临床恶化或生活质量恶化;事实上,几乎所有测量参数都有改善。所有5名恢复ELX/TEZ/IVA的患者目前正在接受耐受性良好的治疗。结论:ELX/TEZ/IVA脱敏可能是一种成功且安全的策略,可以在迟发型超敏反应皮疹的情况下重新引入这种基本治疗方法。
    Background: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators are the only available treatment for cystic fibrosis. Although elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) is well-tolerated, rash has been reported as very frequent. In severe rashes, ELX/TEZ/IVA withdrawal is necessary, leading to clinical deterioration. The objective of the study is to increment the experience of ELX/TEZ/IVA desensitization. Methods: Adult patients who developed a delayed hypersensitivity rash to ELX/TEZ/IVA between December 2021 and February 2023 and required withdrawal due to ineffective rescue medication were included. Skins test for ELX/TEZ/IVA and IVA were conducted to establish hypersensitivity mechanism. Balijepally ELX/TEZ/IVA desensitization protocol was selected. In cases where desensitization had to be discontinued due to rash, an extended desensitization was proposed. Clinical and health-related quality of life parameters were collected before ELX/TEZ/IVA and after desensitization. Results: 162 patients (81 women, 31.2 [23.8-42.5] years) started ELX/TEZ/IVA, developing rash 12 of them (7.4%, six women). Six patients (five women) required stopping ELX/TEZ/IVA and were selected for desensitization. Skin tests indicated delayed type-IV hypersensitivity in one patient. Two patients presented adequate tolerance to desensitization; while, four patients developed rash. Three of these patients, successfully concluded extended desensitization (one patient declined participation). No significant clinical deterioration or quality of life worsening was observed during desensitization; in fact, there was an improvement in practically all mesured parameters. All five patients who resumed ELX/TEZ/IVA are currently receiving therapy with good tolerance. Conclusion: Desensitization to ELX/TEZ/IVA could be a successful and safe strategy for reintroducing this essential treatment in cases of a delayed hypersensitivity rash.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:体力活动是囊性纤维化治疗管理的关键需求。摄氧量的最高值(VO2peak)是评估这些患者身体活动的适当工具。然而,还有几个其他有价值的CPET参数描述运动耐量(Wpeak,VO2VT1,VO2VT2,VO2/HRpeak,等。),并帮助更好地了解特定治疗的效果(VE,VT,VD/VT等).有限的数据显示CFTR调节剂处理后这种改善的结果不明确。Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor药物可改善肺功能和生活质量,而其对CPET的影响尚未得到充分证明。
    方法:我们在2019年1月至2023年2月期间完成了两次CPET测量的10例青少年囊性纤维化患者进行了单组前瞻性观察研究。在此期间,elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor治疗开始在所有这些。药物开始后至少一年,在基线时进行第一次CPET,然后进行受控CPET。我们专注于解释新疗法对其影响的数据。我们假设治疗后心肺适应性改善。我们应用了Wilcoxon符号秩检验。在进行CPET时,对数据进行了年龄调整,以消除青少年患者的年龄偏倚。
    结果:我们观察到峰值工作量的显着改善,VO2峰值,VO2VT1,VO2VT2,VE/VCO2斜率,VE,VT,RQ,VO2/HR峰值和RR峰值。VO2峰的平均变化为5.7mL/kg/min,或参考值的15.9%(SD±16.6;p=0.014)。VO2VT1提高了参考值的15%(SD±0.1;p=0.014),VO2VT2提高了0.5(SD±0.4;p=0.01)。其他参数没有差异。
    结论:开始elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor治疗后,运动耐量得到改善。我们建议仅CFTR调制器不足以恢复物理解构,但应该辅以身体活动和呼吸理疗。需要进一步的研究来检查CFTR调节剂和物理治疗对心肺运动耐量的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a crucial demand on cystic fibrosis treatment management. The highest value of oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is an appropriate tool to evaluate the physical activity in these patients. However, there are several other valuable CPET parameters describing exercise tolerance (Wpeak, VO2VT1, VO2VT2, VO2/HRpeak, etc.), and helping to better understand the effect of specific treatment (VE, VT, VD/VT etc.). Limited data showed ambiguous results of this improvement after CFTR modulator treatment. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor medication improves pulmonary function and quality of life, whereas its effect on CPET has yet to be sufficiently demonstrated.
    METHODS: We performed a single group prospective observational study of 10 adolescent patients with cystic fibrosis who completed two CPET measurements between January 2019 and February 2023. During this period, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor treatment was initiated in all of them. The first CPET at the baseline was followed by controlled CPET at least one year after medication commencement. We focused on interpreting the data on their influence by the novel therapy. We hypothesized improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness following treatment. We applied the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The data were adjusted for age at the time of CPET to eliminate bias of aging in adolescent patients.
    RESULTS: We observed significant improvement in peak workload, VO2 peak, VO2VT1, VO2VT2, VE/VCO2 slope, VE, VT, RQ, VO2/HR peak and RR peak. The mean change in VO2 peak was 5.7 mL/kg/min, or 15.9% of the reference value (SD ± 16.6; p= 0.014). VO2VT1 improved by 15% of the reference value (SD ± 0.1; p= 0.014), VO2VT2 improved by 0.5 (SD ± 0.4; p= 0.01). There were no differences in other parameters.
    CONCLUSIONS: Exercise tolerance improved after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor treatment initiation. We suggest that the CFTR modulator alone is not enough for recovering physical decondition, but should be supplemented with physical activity and respiratory physiotherapy. Further studies are needed to examine the effect of CFTR modulators and physical therapy on cardiopulmonary exercise tolerance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor(ETI)是一种CFTR调节剂疗法,极大地改善了许多囊性纤维化(pwCF)患者的健康结果。对CFTR调节剂在预防和治疗pwCF中的呼吸道感染中的作用越来越感兴趣。一名患有F508del纯合性囊性纤维化的男性患者出现了空洞性分枝杆菌脓肿,亚种bolletii和massiliense呼吸道感染。没有给予抗细菌治疗,与病人的家人讨论,由于患者患有自闭症谱系障碍,因此认为患者不太可能耐受强化治疗方案。ETI启动后,该患者的空洞性肺病在临床和放射学上有了迅速的改善。这个案例增加了CFTR调节剂的证据基础,尤其是ETI,可能恢复先天免疫功能,从而改善pwCF肺部感染的预后。
    Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) is a CFTR modulator therapy that has dramatically improved the health outcomes for many people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). There is increasing interest in the role of CFTR modulators in the prevention and treatment of respiratory infections in pwCF. A male patient with F508del homozygous cystic fibrosis developed cavitary Mycobacteroides abscessus subspecies bolletii & massiliense respiratory infection. Antimycobacterial treatment was not given as, in discussion with the patient\'s family, it was deemed unlikely that the intensive regimen would be tolerated by the patient on account of his autism spectrum disorder. Following initiation of ETI, there was a rapid clinical and radiological improvement in this patient\'s cavitary lung disease. This case adds to the evidence base that suggests CFTR modulators, particularly ETI, may restore innate immune function leading to improved outcomes for pulmonary infection in pwCF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号