Electronic health records

电子健康记录
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:射血分数保留或轻度降低的心力衰竭(HF)包括异质组患者。将其重新分类为不同的表型群,以实现有针对性的干预是一个优先事项。这项研究旨在识别不同的表型,并比较表型群特征和结果,来自电子健康记录数据。
    方法:从NIHR健康信息学协作数据库中确定了英国五家医院收治的诊断为HF且左心室射血分数≥40%的2,187例患者。基于分区,基于模型,并应用了基于密度的机器学习聚类技术。Cox比例风险和Fine-Gray竞争风险模型用于比较不同表型组的结果(全因死亡率和HF住院率)。
    结果:确定了三个表型:(1)年轻,主要是心脏代谢和冠状动脉疾病患病率高的女性患者;(2)更虚弱的患者,肺部疾病和心房颤动发生率较高;(3)以全身性炎症和糖尿病及肾功能障碍发生率较高的患者。生存概况是不同的,表型组1至3的全因死亡风险增加(p<0.001)。与传统因素相比,表型组成员显著提高了生存预测。表型群不能预测HF的住院治疗。
    结论:将无监督机器学习应用于常规收集的电子健康记录数据,确定了具有不同临床特征和独特生存概况的表型群。
    BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction includes a heterogenous group of patients. Reclassification into distinct phenogroups to enable targeted interventions is a priority. This study aimed to identify distinct phenogroups, and compare phenogroup characteristics and outcomes, from electronic health record data.
    METHODS: 2,187 patients admitted to five UK hospitals with a diagnosis of HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40% were identified from the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative database. Partition-based, model-based, and density-based machine learning clustering techniques were applied. Cox Proportional Hazards and Fine-Gray competing risks models were used to compare outcomes (all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for HF) across phenogroups.
    RESULTS: Three phenogroups were identified: (1) Younger, predominantly female patients with high prevalence of cardiometabolic and coronary disease; (2) More frail patients, with higher rates of lung disease and atrial fibrillation; (3) Patients characterised by systemic inflammation and high rates of diabetes and renal dysfunction. Survival profiles were distinct, with an increasing risk of all-cause mortality from phenogroups 1 to 3 (p < 0.001). Phenogroup membership significantly improved survival prediction compared to conventional factors. Phenogroups were not predictive of hospitalisation for HF.
    CONCLUSIONS: Applying unsupervised machine learning to routinely collected electronic health record data identified phenogroups with distinct clinical characteristics and unique survival profiles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述我们在电子健康记录中比较患者报告的急性髓性白血病症状和医疗保健提供者的相应文档的方法。
    背景:急性髓系白血病患者会出现许多痛苦的症状,特别是与化疗有关。及时识别和提供循证干预措施来管理这些症状可以改善结果。然而,电子健康记录中缺乏症状文档的标准化格式导致临床医生在访问和理解患者症状信息时面临挑战,因为它主要以叙述形式存在于电子健康记录的各个部分。这种差异引起了人们对症状报告过多或不足的担忧。患者报告的症状和临床医生的症状文档之间的一致性对于以患者为中心的症状管理非常重要。但对患者报告和他们的文档之间的一致程度知之甚少。这是对研究方法的详细描述,程序和设计,以确定患者报告的症状与临床医生记录在电子健康记录中的症状相似或不同。
    方法:探索性,描述性研究。
    方法:将使用改良版本的纪念症状评估量表评估40种症状作为患者报告的结果。研究小组将从电子健康记录(临床笔记和流程图)中注释与40种症状相对应的症状。患者报告和电子健康记录文档之间的一致程度将使用正面和负面协议进行分析,卡帕统计数据和麦克尼玛测试。
    结论:我们提出了创新的方法来全面比较急性髓细胞性白血病患者报告的症状与所有可用的电子健康记录文件,包括临床笔记和流程图,提供临床实践中症状报告的见解。
    结论:这项研究的结果将提供基础理解和令人信服的证据,这表明需要更彻底的努力来评估患者的症状。本文提出的方法适用于其他症状集中的疾病。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe our methods to compare patient-reported symptoms of acute myeloid leukemia and the corresponding documentation by healthcare providers in the electronic health record.
    BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia experience many distressing symptoms, particularly related to chemotherapy. The timely recognition and provision of evidence-based interventions to manage these symptoms can improve outcomes. However, lack of standardized formatting for symptom documentation within electronic health records leads to challenges for clinicians when accessing and comprehending patients\' symptom information, as it primarily exists in narrative forms in various parts of the electronic health record. This variability raises concerns about over- or under-reporting of symptoms. Consistency between patient-reported symptoms and clinician\'s symptom documentation is important for patient-centered symptom management, but little is known about the degree of agreement between patient reports and their documentation. This is a detailed description of the study\'s methodology, procedures and design to determine how patient-reported symptoms are similar or different from symptoms documented in electronic health records by clinicians.
    METHODS: Exploratory, descriptive study.
    METHODS: Forty symptoms will be assessed as patient-reported outcomes using the modified version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. The research team will annotate symptoms from the electronic health record (clinical notes and flowsheets) corresponding to the 40 symptoms. The degree of agreement between patient reports and electronic health record documentation will be analyzed using positive and negative agreement, kappa statistics and McNemar\'s test.
    CONCLUSIONS: We present innovative methods to comprehensively compare the symptoms reported by acute myeloid leukemia patients with all available electronic health record documentation, including clinical notes and flowsheets, providing insights into symptom reporting in clinical practice.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study will provide foundational understanding and compelling evidence, suggesting the need for more thorough efforts to assess patients\' symptoms. Methods presented in this paper are applicable to other symptom-intensive diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医学知识图谱提供了可解释的决策支持,帮助临床医生提供及时的诊断和治疗建议。然而,在现实世界的临床实践中,患者前往不同的医院寻求各种医疗服务,导致不同医院的患者数据分散。由于数据安全问题,数据碎片化限制了知识图的应用,因为单医院数据无法为生成精确的决策支持和全面的解释提供完整的证据。研究知识图谱系统多中心集成的新方法,信息敏感的医疗环境,使用零散的患者记录进行决策支持,同时保持数据隐私和安全性。
    目的:本研究旨在提出一种面向电子健康记录(EHR)的知识图谱系统,用于与多中心零散的患者医疗数据进行协作推理,同时保护数据隐私。
    方法:该研究引入了EHR知识图谱框架和新的协作推理过程,用于利用多中心碎片信息。该系统部署在每个医院中,并使用统一的语义结构和观察医疗结果伙伴关系(OMOP)词汇来标准化本地EHR数据集。该系统将本地EHR数据转换为语义格式并执行语义推理以生成中间推理结果。生成的中间发现使用hypernym概念来分离原始医疗数据。中间发现和哈希加密的患者身份通过区块链网络进行同步。多中心中间发现进行了最终推理和临床决策支持,而无需收集原始EHR数据。
    结果:通过一项应用研究对该系统进行了评估,该研究涉及利用多中心片段化的EHR数据来提醒非肾脏病临床医生注意被忽略的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者。该研究涵盖了3家医院的非肾病科1185名患者。患者至少访问了两家医院。其中,通过使用多中心EHR数据进行协作推理,确定124例患者符合CKD诊断标准,而单独来自个别医院的数据不能促进这些患者CKD的识别.临床医生的评估表明,78/91(86%)患者为CKD阳性。
    结论:所提出的系统能够有效地利用多中心片段化的EHR数据进行临床应用。应用研究显示了该系统具有迅速和全面的决策支持的临床优势。
    BACKGROUND: The medical knowledge graph provides explainable decision support, helping clinicians with prompt diagnosis and treatment suggestions. However, in real-world clinical practice, patients visit different hospitals seeking various medical services, resulting in fragmented patient data across hospitals. With data security issues, data fragmentation limits the application of knowledge graphs because single-hospital data cannot provide complete evidence for generating precise decision support and comprehensive explanations. It is important to study new methods for knowledge graph systems to integrate into multicenter, information-sensitive medical environments, using fragmented patient records for decision support while maintaining data privacy and security.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to propose an electronic health record (EHR)-oriented knowledge graph system for collaborative reasoning with multicenter fragmented patient medical data, all the while preserving data privacy.
    METHODS: The study introduced an EHR knowledge graph framework and a novel collaborative reasoning process for utilizing multicenter fragmented information. The system was deployed in each hospital and used a unified semantic structure and Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) vocabulary to standardize the local EHR data set. The system transforms local EHR data into semantic formats and performs semantic reasoning to generate intermediate reasoning findings. The generated intermediate findings used hypernym concepts to isolate original medical data. The intermediate findings and hash-encrypted patient identities were synchronized through a blockchain network. The multicenter intermediate findings were collaborated for final reasoning and clinical decision support without gathering original EHR data.
    RESULTS: The system underwent evaluation through an application study involving the utilization of multicenter fragmented EHR data to alert non-nephrology clinicians about overlooked patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The study covered 1185 patients in nonnephrology departments from 3 hospitals. The patients visited at least two of the hospitals. Of these, 124 patients were identified as meeting CKD diagnosis criteria through collaborative reasoning using multicenter EHR data, whereas the data from individual hospitals alone could not facilitate the identification of CKD in these patients. The assessment by clinicians indicated that 78/91 (86%) patients were CKD positive.
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed system was able to effectively utilize multicenter fragmented EHR data for clinical application. The application study showed the clinical benefits of the system with prompt and comprehensive decision support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电子健康记录(EHR)数据为研究人员和医生提供了通过采用较新的,更复杂的建模技术。与其将预测变量对健康轨迹的影响视为静态的,我们通过使用地标(LM)数据集来探索时间相关变量在动态建模时间到事件数据中的使用。我们比较了文献中使用LM数据集作为方法基础的几种不同的动态模型。这些技术包括使用伪手段,伪生存概率,和传统的Cox模型。这些模型主要与静态对应物进行比较,使用适当的模型区分和校准措施,基于对响应变量采用的汇总措施。
    Electronic health records (EHR) data provides the researcher and physician with the opportunity to improve risk prediction by employing newer, more sophisticated modeling techniques. Rather than treating the impact of predictor variables on health trajectories as static, we explore the use of time-dependent variables in dynamically modeling time-to-event data through the use of landmarking (LM) data sets. We compare several different dynamic models presented in the literature that utilize LM data sets as the basis of their approach. These techniques include using pseudo-means, pseudo-survival probabilities, and the traditional Cox model. The models are primarily compared with their static counterparts using appropriate measures of model discrimination and calibration based on what summary measure is employed for the response variable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据改善对人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抑制状态的预测,我们提出了一个函数多变量逻辑回归模型,它同时解释了纵向二元过程和连续过程。具体来说,通过功能主成分分析对二元变量或连续变量的纵向测量进行建模,并利用其对应的功能主成分得分建立Logistic回归模型进行预测。纵向二进制数据与基础高斯过程相关联。使用纵向连续和二进制数据的惩罚样条进行估计。组套索用于选择纵向过程,并提出了多变量函数主成分分析来修正具有相关性的函数主成分得分。该方法通过综合模拟研究进行评估,然后应用于使用EHR数据预测南卡罗来纳州HIV感染者的病毒抑制。
    Motivated by improving the prediction of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) suppression status using electronic health records (EHR) data, we propose a functional multivariable logistic regression model, which accounts for the longitudinal binary process and continuous process simultaneously. Specifically, the longitudinal measurements for either binary or continuous variables are modeled by functional principal components analysis, and their corresponding functional principal component scores are used to build a logistic regression model for prediction. The longitudinal binary data are linked to underlying Gaussian processes. The estimation is done using penalized spline for the longitudinal continuous and binary data. Group-lasso is used to select longitudinal processes, and the multivariate functional principal components analysis is proposed to revise functional principal component scores with the correlation. The method is evaluated via comprehensive simulation studies and then applied to predict viral suppression using EHR data for people living with HIV in South Carolina.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数据越来越多地用于公共卫生的改进和研究,特别是行政数据,如电子健康记录中收集的数据。患者进入和退出这些典型的开放队列数据集不均匀;这可以使关于发病率和患病率的简单问题耗时并且在分析之间具有不必要的差异。因此,我们开发了在开放队列数据集中自动分析发病率和患病率的方法,为了提高透明度,分析的生产率和可重复性。
    方法:我们提供了一套无代码的发病率和患病率规则,可以应用于任何开放队列,以及这些规则的python命令行界面实现,需要python3.9或更高版本。
    命令行界面用于根据开放队列数据计算发病率和点患病率时间序列。规则集可以用于开发其他实现,也可以重新排列以形成其他分析问题,例如时段流行。
    背景:命令行界面可从https://github.com/THINKINGGroup/alogue_publication免费获得。
    BACKGROUND: Data is increasingly used for improvement and research in public health, especially administrative data such as that collected in electronic health records. Patients enter and exit these typically open-cohort datasets non-uniformly; this can render simple questions about incidence and prevalence time-consuming and with unnecessary variation between analyses. We therefore developed methods to automate analysis of incidence and prevalence in open cohort datasets, to improve transparency, productivity and reproducibility of analyses.
    METHODS: We provide both a code-free set of rules for incidence and prevalence that can be applied to any open cohort, and a python Command Line Interface implementation of these rules requiring python 3.9 or later.
    UNASSIGNED: The Command Line Interface is used to calculate incidence and point prevalence time series from open cohort data. The ruleset can be used in developing other implementations or can be rearranged to form other analytical questions such as period prevalence.
    BACKGROUND: The command line interface is freely available from https://github.com/THINKINGGroup/analogy_publication .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从电子健康记录(EHR)中准确识别临床表型可为患者的健康状况提供更多见解,特别是当这些信息在结构化数据中不可用时。这项研究评估了OpenAI的生成预训练变压器(GPT)-4模型在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的EHR文本中识别临床表型的应用。目标是确定疾病阶段,使用GPT-4的治疗和进展,并将其性能与GPT-3.5-turbo进行比较,Flan-T5-xl,Flan-T5-xxl,Llama-3-8B,以及2种基于规则和基于机器学习的方法,即,scispaCy和medspaCy。
    表型,如初始癌症阶段,初始治疗,癌症复发的证据,从圣路易斯华盛顿大学的63例NSCLC患者的13.646临床记录中确定了复发期间受影响的器官,密苏里州。GPT-4模型的性能与GPT-3.5-turbo进行了评估,Flan-T5-xxl,Flan-T5-xl,Llama-3-8B,medspaCy,和scisspaCy通过比较精度,召回,和micro-F1得分。
    GPT-4取得了更高的F1得分,精度,与Flan-T5-xl相比,Flan-T5-xxl,Llama-3-8B,medspaCy,和scispaCy的模型。GPT-3.5-turbo的性能类似于GPT-4。GPT,Flan-T5和Llama模型不受上下文模式识别的明确规则要求的约束。spaCy模型依赖于预定义的模式,导致他们的表现欠佳。
    GPT-4由于其强大的预训练和对嵌入令牌的显着模式识别能力而改善了临床表型识别。它展示了数据驱动的有效性,即使输入中的上下文有限。虽然基于规则的模型对某些任务仍然有用,GPT模型提供了改进的文本上下文理解,和稳健的临床表型提取。
    UNASSIGNED: Accurately identifying clinical phenotypes from Electronic Health Records (EHRs) provides additional insights into patients\' health, especially when such information is unavailable in structured data. This study evaluates the application of OpenAI\'s Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)-4 model to identify clinical phenotypes from EHR text in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The goal was to identify disease stages, treatments and progression utilizing GPT-4, and compare its performance against GPT-3.5-turbo, Flan-T5-xl, Flan-T5-xxl, Llama-3-8B, and 2 rule-based and machine learning-based methods, namely, scispaCy and medspaCy.
    UNASSIGNED: Phenotypes such as initial cancer stage, initial treatment, evidence of cancer recurrence, and affected organs during recurrence were identified from 13 646 clinical notes for 63 NSCLC patients from Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. The performance of the GPT-4 model is evaluated against GPT-3.5-turbo, Flan-T5-xxl, Flan-T5-xl, Llama-3-8B, medspaCy, and scispaCy by comparing precision, recall, and micro-F1 scores.
    UNASSIGNED: GPT-4 achieved higher F1 score, precision, and recall compared to Flan-T5-xl, Flan-T5-xxl, Llama-3-8B, medspaCy, and scispaCy\'s models. GPT-3.5-turbo performed similarly to that of GPT-4. GPT, Flan-T5, and Llama models were not constrained by explicit rule requirements for contextual pattern recognition. spaCy models relied on predefined patterns, leading to their suboptimal performance.
    UNASSIGNED: GPT-4 improves clinical phenotype identification due to its robust pre-training and remarkable pattern recognition capability on the embedded tokens. It demonstrates data-driven effectiveness even with limited context in the input. While rule-based models remain useful for some tasks, GPT models offer improved contextual understanding of the text, and robust clinical phenotype extraction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:没有常规推荐的心血管疾病(CVD)风险预测公式对其衍生队列中随访(治疗下降)期间开始的CVD预防性药物进行调整。如果治疗下降是常见的,当在临床实践中应用方程时,这将导致风险低估。我们旨在量化当代大型国家队列中的治疗下降,以确定方程式是否可能需要调整。
    方法:2006年,将新西兰奥特罗阿的8个去识别的个人层面的国家卫生管理数据集联系起来,建立了一个几乎所有没有心血管疾病且年龄在30-74岁的新西兰人的队列。2006年7月1日至2006年12月31日期间发放降血压和/或降脂药物的个人(基线发放),在截至2018年12月31日的12年随访期间的每6个月期间(随访分配),已确定。确定了个人年的治疗下降。
    结果:在1746695名受试者中,共有1399348人(80%)在基线时未分配CVD药物。在基线未治疗组中,降压和/或降脂治疗下降占随访时间的14%,并且随着预测的基线5年CVD风险的增加而显着增加(12%,31%,34%和37%在<5%,5-9%,10-14%和≥15%的风险组,分别)和年龄增长(30-44岁的8%到60-74岁的30%)。
    结论:在通常符合预防性治疗资格的参与者中,CVD预防性治疗下降约占随访时间的三分之一(5年预测风险≥5%)。从具有长期随访的队列中得出的不适应治疗下降效果的方程式将低估高风险个体的CVD风险并导致治疗不足。未来的CVD风险预测研究需要解决这一潜在的缺陷。
    BACKGROUND: No routinely recommended cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction equations have adjusted for CVD preventive medications initiated during follow-up (treatment drop-in) in their derivation cohorts. This will lead to underestimation of risk when equations are applied in clinical practice if treatment drop-in is common. We aimed to quantify the treatment drop-in in a large contemporary national cohort to determine whether equations are likely to require adjustment.
    METHODS: Eight de-identified individual-level national health administrative datasets in Aotearoa New Zealand were linked to establish a cohort of almost all New Zealanders without CVD and aged 30-74 years in 2006. Individuals dispensing blood-pressure-lowering and/or lipid-lowering medications between 1 July 2006 and 31 December 2006 (baseline dispensing), and in each 6-month period during 12 years\' follow-up to 31 December 2018 (follow-up dispensing), were identified. Person-years of treatment drop-in were determined.
    RESULTS: A total of 1 399 348 (80%) out of the 1 746 695 individuals in the cohort were not dispensed CVD medications at baseline. Blood-pressure-lowering and/or lipid-lowering treatment drop-in accounted for 14% of follow-up time in the group untreated at baseline and increased significantly with increasing predicted baseline 5-year CVD risk (12%, 31%, 34% and 37% in <5%, 5-9%, 10-14% and ≥15% risk groups, respectively) and with increasing age (8% in 30-44 year-olds to 30% in 60-74 year-olds).
    CONCLUSIONS: CVD preventive treatment drop-in accounted for approximately one-third of follow-up time among participants typically eligible for preventive treatment (≥5% 5-year predicted risk). Equations derived from cohorts with long-term follow-up that do not adjust for treatment drop-in effect will underestimate CVD risk in higher risk individuals and lead to undertreatment. Future CVD risk prediction studies need to address this potential flaw.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19扰乱了咨询行为,医疗保健服务和癌症诊断服务。这项研究量化了英国全科电子健康记录中编码的癌症发病率,以及2020年3月全国封锁后与历史趋势的偏差。为了比较,我们研究了2型糖尿病的编码发病率,几乎完全在初级保健中被诊断出来。
    方法:泊松中断时间序列模型调查了首次封锁之前(2017年01月03日-2020年02月29日)和之后(2020年01月03日-2022年02月28日)临床实践研究数据链中≥18岁成年人的诊断编码发生率。数据集按年龄分层,性别,和一般做法每28天汇总期。模型捕获了与锁定相关的发生率变化,根据历史趋势,立即和随着时间的推移。
    结果:我们研究了在52,374,197人年风险的1480个一般实践中的189,457例癌症和191,915例糖尿病记录。在2020/01/03-2022/28/02期间,癌症事件记录较少(n=22,199,10.49%,10.44-10.53%)和糖尿病(n=15,709,7.57%,7.53-7.61%)比预期。在癌症中,影响范围从无影响(例如,未知的初级,胰腺,和卵巢),对肺的影响小(n=773,3.11%,记录减少3.09-3.13%)和女性乳房(n=2686,6.77%,6.73-6.81%),对膀胱的影响最大(n=2874,31.15%,31.00-31.31%)。在2021年7月和2021年5月,糖尿病和癌症记录分别最大恢复至86%(95CI80.3-92.7%)和74%(95CI70.3-78.6%)。他们的期望值,再次下降,直到研究结束。
    结论:初级保健中的“缺失”癌症和糖尿病诊断可能包括延迟或漏诊,与COVID-19过量死亡相关的发病率降低,诊断的非编码记录可能增加。未来的验证研究必须量化大流行时代初级保健与国家癌症登记数据和医院事件统计之间的一致性。
    BACKGROUND: COVID-19 disrupted consulting behaviour, healthcare delivery and cancer diagnostic services. This study quantifies the cancer incidence coded in UK general practice electronic health records and deviations from historical trends after the March 2020 national lockdown. For comparison, we study the coded incidence of type-2 diabetes mellitus, which is diagnosed almost entirely within primary care.
    METHODS: Poisson interrupted time series models investigated the coded incidence of diagnoses in adults aged ≥ 18 years in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink before (01/03/2017-29/02/2020) and after (01/03/2020-28/02/2022) the first lockdown. Datasets were stratified by age, sex, and general practice per 28-day aggregation period. Models captured incidence changes associated with lockdown, both immediately and over time based on historical trends.
    RESULTS: We studied 189,457 incident cancer and 191,915 incident diabetes records in 1480 general practices over 52,374,197 person-years at risk. During 01/03/2020-28/02/2022, there were fewer incident records of cancer (n = 22,199, 10.49 %, 10.44-10.53 %) and diabetes (n = 15,709, 7.57 %, 7.53-7.61 %) than expected. Within cancers, impacts ranged from no effect (e.g. unknown primary, pancreas, and ovary), to small effects for lung (n = 773, 3.11 %, 3.09-3.13 % fewer records) and female breast (n = 2686, 6.77 %, 6.73-6.81 %), to the greatest effect for bladder (n = 2874, 31.15 %, 31.00-31.31 %). Diabetes and cancer records recovered maximally to 86 % (95 %CI 80.3-92.7 %) and 74 % (95 %CI 70.3-78.6 %) in July 2021 and May 2021, respectively, of their expected values, declining again until the study end.
    CONCLUSIONS: The \"missing\" cancer and diabetes diagnoses in primary care may comprise delayed or missed diagnoses, reduced incidence associated with excess deaths from COVID-19, and potentially increased non-coded recording of diagnoses. Future validation studies must quantify the concordance between primary care and National Cancer Registration Data and Hospital Episode Statistics over the pandemic era.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号