BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that the International Normalized Ratio (INR) be less than 1.5 prior to spine intervention. Recent studies have shown that an INR > 1.25 is associated worse outcomes following anterior cervical surgery. We sought to determine the risk of complications associated with an INR > 1.25 following elective posterior cervical surgery.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried. Patients undergoing elective posterior cervical surgery from 2012 to 2016 with an INR level within 24 h of surgery were included. Primary outcomes were hematoma requiring surgery, 30-day mortality, and transfusions within 72-hours. There were 815 patients in the INR ≤ 1 cohort (Cohort A), 410 patients in the 1 < INR ≤ 1.25 cohort (Cohort B), and 33 patients in the 1.25 < INR ≤ 1.5 cohort (Cohort C).
RESULTS: Cohort C had a higher rate of transfusion (4% Cohort A; 6% Cohort B; 12% Cohort C; p = 0.028) and the rate of mortality within 30 days postoperatively trended toward significance (0.4% Cohort A; 0.5% Cohort B; 3% Cohort C; p = 0.094). There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative hematoma formation requiring surgery (0.2% Cohort A; 0% Cohort B; 0% Cohort C; p = 0.58). On multivariate analysis, increasing INR was not associated with an increased risk of developing a major complication.
CONCLUSIONS: An INR > 1.25 but ≤ 1.5 may be safe for posterior cervical surgery. An INR > 1.25 but ≤ 1.5 was associated with a significantly higher rate of transfusions. However, increasing INR was not significantly associated with increased risk of any of the major complications.

Postoperative stoma education is an essential aspect of care for all types of stoma formation because having a stoma impacts on every aspect of a person\'s life. This critical review of the literature explores stoma patients\' needs and wants; postoperative education care guidelines; the role of ward link nurses; and care pathways. The findings from this review demonstrate that there is no national standard postoperative stoma care pathway, yet such pathways are a cost-effective means to improve patient outcomes and care. The review also identified that structured care pathways are not a new concept, but there is a lack of formal research to determine best practice in postoperative stoma education. In the UK, there is wide variation in practice and outcomes, which means that effectiveness cannot be accurately measured. The author has developed and implemented a multidisciplinary postoperative education pathway in line with a national need to further refine postoperative stoma care services to meet stoma patients\' needs.

UNASSIGNED: surgical site infection is associated with longer postoperative hospital stays. We explored factors associated with longer postoperative hospital stays among patients in the surgical ward of a primary rural hospital in Ethiopia, where laboratory facilities for microbiological confirmation of surgical site infections were not available.
UNASSIGNED: an observational study was performed for patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent elective or emergency surgery from 22nd June 2017 to 19th July 2018. Data were taken from paper-based medical records and patient interviews. The primary outcome was postoperative length of hospital stay. Data were analyzed by multivariable linear regression using Stata software, version 13.
UNASSIGNED: seventy-five patients were enrolled, sociodemographic data was obtained from 14 of these patients by interview, and 44 patients had complete outcome and covariate data and were included in regression analysis. Median length of preoperative hospital stay was 3.0 (interquartile range 2.0) days. Postoperative length of hospital stay was longer by 3.8 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-6.55; p=0.008), 4.7 days (95% CI 1.64-7.66; p=0.004), and 5.9 days (95% CI 2.70-9.02; p=0.001), for patients 35-54 years, 55-64 years and the 65+ years respectively, compared to patients who were 18-34 years of age. Patients who received preoperative antibiotics stayed 5.3 days longer (95% CI 1.67-8.87; p=0.005) compared to those who were not given preoperative antibiotics.
UNASSIGNED: age and improper use of preoperative antibiotics compound the risk for postoperative length of stay. Infection prevention protocols, including staff training, and surveillance for surgical site infections are critical for improving hospital outcomes.

Postoperative fluid overload (FO) after cardiac surgery is common and affects recovery. Predicting FO could help optimize fluid management. This post-hoc analysis of the HERACLES randomized controlled trial evaluated the predictive value of MR-proADM for FO post-cardiac surgery. MR-proADM levels were measured at four different timepoints in 33 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Patients were divided into FO (> 5% weight gain) and no-FO at ICU discharge. The primary outcome was the predictive power of MR-proADM at ICU admission for FO at discharge. Secondary outcomes included the predictive value of MR-proADM for FO on day 6 post-surgery and changes over time. The association between MR-proADM and FO at ICU discharge or day 6 post-surgery was not significant (crude odds ratio (cOR): 4.3 (95% CI 0.5-40.9, p = 0.201) and cOR 1.1 (95% CI 0.04-28.3, p = 0.954)). MR-proADM levels over time did not differ significantly between patients with and without FO at ICU discharge (p = 0.803). MR-proADM at ICU admission was not associated with fluid overload at ICU discharge in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. MR-proADM levels over time were not significantly different between groups, although elevated levels were observed in patients with FO.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Drains are used to reduce abdominal collections after procedures where such risk exists. Using abdominal drains after cholecystectomy has been controversial since the open surgery era. Universally accepted indications and agreement exist that routine drainage is unnecessary but the role of selective drainage remains undetermined. This study evaluates the indications and benefits of sub-hepatic drainage in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and bile duct exploration (BDE) in a specialist unit with a large biliary emergency workload.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 6,140 LCs with a 46.6% emergency workload over 30 years was reviewed. Demographic factors, pre-operative presentations, imaging and operative details in patients with and without drains were compared. Sub-hepatic drains were inserted after all transductal explorations, subtotal cholecystectomies, almost all open conversions and 94% of LC for empyemas. Adverse or beneficial postoperative drain-related outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS: Abdominal drains were utilised in 3225/6140 (52.5%). Patients were significantly older with more males. 59.4% were emergency admissions. Preoperative imaging showed thick-walled gallbladders in 25.2% and bile duct stones or dilatation in 36.2%. At operation they had cystic duct stones in 19.8%, acute cholecystitis, empyema or mucocele in 28.4% and operative difficulty grades III or higher in 59%. 38% underwent BDE, 5.4% had fundus-first dissection and the operating times were longer ( 80 vs.45 min). Drain related complications were rare; 3 abdominal pains after anaesthetic recovery settling when drains were removed, 2 drain site infections and one re-laparoscopy to retrieve a retracted drain. 55.8% of 43 bile leaks and 35% of 20 other collections in patients with drains resolved spontaneously.
CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation of drains in this study was relatively high due to the high emergency workload and interest in BDE. While drains allowed early detection of bile leakage, avoiding some complications and monitoring conservative management to allow early reinterventions, the study has identified operative criteria that could potentially limit drain insertion through a selective policy.

OBJECTIVE: Despite mobilization is highly recommended in the ERAS® colorectal guideline, studies suggest that more than half of patients don\'t reach the daily goal of 360 min out of bed. However, data used to quantify mobilization are predominantly based on self-assessments, for which the accuracy is uncertain. This study aims to accurately measure postoperative mobilization in ERAS®-patients by validated motion data from body sensors.
METHODS: ERAS®-patients with elective bowel resections were eligible. Self-assessments and motion sensors (movisens: ECG-Move 4 and Move 4; Garmin: Vivosmart4) were used to record mobilization parameter from surgery to postoperative day 3 (POD3): Time out of bed, time on feet and step count.
RESULTS: 97 patients were screened and 60 included for study participation. Self-assessment showed a median out of bed duration of 215 min/day (POD1: 135 min, POD2: 225 min, POD3: 225 min). The goal of 360 min was achieved by 16.67% at POD1, 21.28% at POD2 and 20.45% at POD3. Median time on feet objectively measured by Move 4 was 109 min/day. During self-assessment, patients significantly underestimated their \"time on feet\"-duration with 85 min/day (p = 0.008). Median number of steps was 933/day (Move 4).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed with objectively supported data, that most patients don\'t reach the daily mobilization goal of 360 min despite being treated by an ERAS®-pathway with ERAS®-nurse. Even considering an empirically approximated underestimation, the ERAS®-target isn\'t achieved by more than 75% of patients. Therefore, we propose an adjustment of the general ERAS®-goals into more patient-centered, individualized and achievable goals.
BACKGROUND: This study is part of the MINT-ERAS-project and was registered prospectively in the German Clinical Trials Register on 25.02.2022. Trial registration number is \"DRKS00027863\".

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Around 6,000 revision knee replacement procedures are performed in the United Kingdom each year. Three-quarters of procedures are for aseptic, elective reasons, such as progressive osteoarthritis, prosthesis loosening/wear, or instability. Our understanding of how we can best support these patients undergoing revision knee replacement procedures is limited. This study aimed to explore patients\' experiences of having a problematic knee replacement and the impact of undergoing knee revision surgery for aseptic, elective reasons.
METHODS: Qualitative semi structured interviews with 15 patients (8 women, 7 men; mean age 70 years: range 54-81) who had undergone revision knee surgery for a range of aseptic, elective indications in the last 12 months at an NHS Major Revision Knee Centre. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, de-identified and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: We developed six themes: Soldiering on; The challenge of navigating the health system; I am the expert in my own knee; Shift in what I expected from surgery; I am not the person I used to be; Lingering uncertainty.
CONCLUSIONS: Living with a problematic knee replacement and undergoing knee revision surgery has significant impact on all aspects of patients\' lives. Our findings highlight the need for patients with problematic knee replacements to be supported to access care and assessment, and for long-term psychological and rehabilitation support before and after revision surgery.

Background Subarachnoid block is one of the commonly used techniques of regional anesthesia and accurate placement of spinal needle is crucial. A conventional spinal needle may be too long for a lean patient or too short in obese patients leading to multiple attempts, inadvertent nerve injuries and patient discomfort. So a pre-procedural estimation of the skin to subarachnoid space depth may be beneficial. Objective To estimate the skin to subarachnoid space depth using ultrasound and correlate it with the length of spinal needle to be inserted during subarachnoid block. Method This was a prospective, observational study conducted at Bir Hospital, Kathmandu in patients undergoing elective surgeries under subarachnoid block. A pre-procedural ultrasound of lumbo-sacral spine using 2-5 Hz curvilinear probe was done to measure skin to subarachnoid space depth (SSD) at the level of L3-L4 interspace. Then under all aseptic precautions, subarachnoid block was performed and the length of spinal needle outside the skin was measured and that length was subtracted from the standard length of needle to get the inserted length of spinal needle. These two measurements were compared. Result In the fifty patients included in the study, ultrasound estimated skin to subarachnoid space depth was found to be 4.24 ± 0.48 cm and the inserted length of spinal needle was 4.24 ± 0.46 cm. A significant correlation r=0.96 (p < 0.05) was found between the two measurements in the study population. Conclusion Ultrasound estimated skin to subarachnoid depth in the study population was found to be 4.24 ± 0.48 cm which correlated with the inserted length of spinal needle. So, use of ultrasound can be very helpful in performing subarachnoid block.