背景:几种方法已用于治疗小儿股骨远端骨折,如弹性稳定髓内钉(ESIN),外固定器(EF)和钢板接骨术,但是关于最佳方法还没有达成共识。这项研究的目的是比较EF和ESIN技术在小儿股骨远端干phy端-骨干连接(MDJ)骨折中的临床结果。
方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2022年1月间手术治疗的小儿股骨远端MDJ骨折。对患者图表进行了人口统计,损伤和射线照相数据。所有患者根据手术技巧分为EF组和ESIN组。不对齐被定义为在任一平面中超过5度的角畸形。通过Flynn评分系统测量临床结果。
结果:本研究纳入了38例患者,其中,23例接受EF治疗,15与ESIN。随访时间12~24个月,平均18个月。在最后的后续行动中,所有骨折均愈合。尽管两组在人口统计学数据上没有统计学差异,逗留时间,估计失血量(EBL),开放还原率,骨折愈合时间和Flynn评分,手术时间EF优于ESIN,透视曝光和部分承重时间。EF组皮肤刺激率明显高于对照组,而ESIN的错位率明显较高。
结论:EF和ESIN均是治疗小儿股骨远端MDJ骨折的有效方法。ESIN与较低的皮肤刺激率相关。然而,EF技术具有手术时间短,减少荧光照射,部分承重的时间更短,以及较低的畸形发生率。
方法:三级。
BACKGROUND: Several methods have been used for the treatment of pediatric distal femoral fractures, such as elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), external fixator (EF) and plate osteosynthesis, but there has been no consensus about the optimal method. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between EF and ESIN techniques used in metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures of the pediatric distal femur.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed operatively treated MDJ fractures of pediatric distal femur between January 2015 and January 2022. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, injury and data of radiography. All of the patients were divided into EF and ESIN groups according to the operation techniques. Malalignment was defined as more than 5 degrees of angular deformity in either plane. Clinical outcomes were measured by Flynn scoring system.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, among which, 23 were treated with EF, and 15 with ESIN. The mean follow-up time was 18 months (12-24 months). At the final follow-up, all of the fractures were healed. Although there were no statistical differences between the two groups in demographic data, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), rate of open reduction, time to fracture healing and Flynn score, the EF was superior to ESIN in operative time, fluoroscopic exposure and time to partial weight-bearing. The EF group had a significantly higher rate of skin irritation, while the ESIN had a significantly higher rate of malalignment.
CONCLUSIONS: EF and ESIN are both effective methods in the treatment of MDJ fractures of the pediatric distal femur. ESIN is associated with lower rates of skin irritation. However, EF technique has the advantages of shorter operative time, reduced fluoroscopic exposure, and shorter time to partial weight-bearing, as well as lower incidence of malalignment.
METHODS: Level III.