■YouTube等社交平台已成为有关疾病的信息来源,因为它们可以轻松快速地访问。然而,这也有恶意内容和误导性信息的风险。
■评估有关延迟射精治疗的YouTube视频内容的可靠性。
■使用术语“延迟射精”搜索YouTube视频,射精迟缓,\"\"抑制射精,\"和\"射精。\“如果视频不是英语,则将其排除在外,与主题无关,或者没有音频和视频内容。根据科学证明的准确信息,将视频分为可靠视频(第2组,n:112)和不可靠视频(第1组,n:94)。两组在视频特征方面进行了比较,以及在DISCERN-5,全球质量量表中获得的分数,患者教育材料评估工具视听,和《美国医学会杂志》量表。使用组内相关性检验来评估两位研究者之间的一致性水平。
■在1200个视频中,994被排除在外。在第1组和第2组的中位观看次数[1672(4555)与1547(28,559)之间没有显着差异,p=0.63]喜欢[10(42)vs17(255),p=0.07]。第2组的视频数量更多(54.4%),在评分量表上获得的分数明显高于第1组(p<0.001)。来自大学/专业组织/非营利医生/医师组的视频构成了大部分可靠视频(55.3%),不可靠视频有更多与治疗相关的内容(71.4%)(p<0.001)。
■尽管与延迟射精问题有关的可靠视频数量更多,该内容可能具有误导性,患者在未咨询医生的情况下寻求治疗应避免.
UNASSIGNED: Social platforms such as YouTube have become sources of information about diseases as they can be easily and rapidly accessed. However, this also has the risk of ill-intentioned content and misleading information.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the reliability of YouTube video content about delayed ejaculation treatment.
UNASSIGNED: YouTube videos were searched using the terms \"delayed ejaculation,\" \"retarded ejaculation,\" \"inhibited ejaculation,\" and \"anejaculation.\" Videos were excluded if they were not in English, were not related to the subject, or did not have audio and visual content. In accordance with the scientifically proven accurate information, the videos were separated as reliable (Group 2, n: 112) and unreliable videos (Group 1, n: 94). The groups were compared in respect of the video characteristics, and the scores obtained in the DISCERN-5, Global Quality Scale, the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool Audiovisual, and the Journal of the American Medical Association scales. Intraclass correlation test was used to evaluate the level of agreement between the two investigators.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 1200 videos, 994 were excluded. No significant difference was determined between the Group 1 and Group 2 in respect of the median number of views [1672 (4555) vs 1547 (28,559), p = 0.63] and likes [10 (42) vs 17 (255), p = 0.07]. There was a greater number of videos in the Group 2 (54.4%) and the points obtained on the scoring scales were significantly higher than the Group 1 (p < 0.001). The videos originating from universities/professional organizations/non-profit physician/physician group were comprised the majority of the reliable videos (55.3%) and the unreliable videos had more content related to treatment (71.4%) (p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Although there was a greater number of reliable videos related to the problem of delayed ejaculation, the content could be misleading and should be avoided by patients seeking treatment without consulting a physician.