Effluent-receiving river

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为地表水和地下水之间的重要纽带,hyporheic区(HZ)在改善水质和维护生态安全方面起着重要作用。在干旱或半干旱地区,废水处理设施的废水排放可能占接收河流总基础流量的主要部分。尽管如此,微生物活性之间的关系,污水接收河流HZ中的丰度和环境因素似乎很少得到解决。在这项研究中,在西安两个代表性的以污水为主的接收河流中进行了时空实地研究,中国。土地利用数据,地表水和地下水的物理和化学水质参数被用作预测变量,而微生物呼吸电子传递系统活动(ETSA),总微生物群落Chao1和Shannon指数,以及反硝化细菌群落的Chao1和Shannon指数作为响应变量,而ETSA用作指示生态过程的响应变量,而Shannon和Chao1用作指示微生物多样性的参数。利用两个机器学习模型来提供基于证据的信息,说明环境因素如何在可变深度下相互作用并驱动HZ中的微生物活动和丰度。以Chao1和Shannon为响应变量的模型表现出出色的预测性能(R2:0.754-0.81和0.783-0.839)。溶解性有机氮(DON)是影响微生物功能的重要因素,观察到一个明显的阈值~2mg/L。检测到以Chao1和Shannon指数为响应变量的模型的可靠预测(R2:0.484-0.624和0.567-0.638),可溶性活性磷(SRP)是关键影响因素。Fe(Ⅱ)有利于预测反硝化细菌群落。ESTA模型强调了全氮在HZ生态健康监测中的重要性。这些发现为预测受影响严重地区的微生物活性和丰度提供了新的见解,例如以污水为主的接收河流的HZ。
    Serving as a vital linkage between surface water and groundwater, the hyporheic zone (HZ) plays a fundamental role in improving water quality and maintaining ecological security. In arid or semi-arid areas, effluent discharge from wastewater treatment facilities could occupy a predominant proportion of the total base flow of receiving rivers. Nonetheless the relationship between microbial activity, abundance and environmental factors in the HZ of effluent-receiving rivers appear to be rarely addressed. In this study, a spatiotemporal field study was performed in two representative effluent-dominated receiving rivers in Xi\'an, China. Land use data, physical and chemical water quality parameters of surface and subsurface water were used as predictive variables, while the microbial respiratory electron transport system activity (ETSA), the Chao1 and Shannon index of total microbial community, as well as the Chao1 and Shannon index of denitrifying bacteria community were used as response variables, while ETSA was used as response variables indicating ecological processes and Shannon and Chao1 were utilized as parameters indicating microbial diversity. Two machine learning models were utilized to provide evidence-based information on how environmental factors interact and drive microbial activity and abundance in the HZ at variable depths. The models with Chao1 and Shannon as response variables exhibited excellent predictive performances (R2: 0.754-0.81 and 0.783-0.839). Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) was the most important factor affecting the microbial functions, and an obvious threshold value of ∼2 mg/L was observed. Credible predictions of models with Chao1 and Shannon index of denitrifying bacteria community as response variables were detected (R2: 0.484-0.624 and 0.567-0.638), with soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) being the key influencing factor. Fe (Ⅱ) was favorable in predicting denitrifying bacteria community. The ESTA model highlighted the importance of total nitrogen in the ecological health monitoring in HZ. These findings provide novel insights in predicting microbial activity and abundance in highly-impacted areas such as the HZ of effluent-dominated receiving rivers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从污水处理厂(WWTP)排放到城市河流的废水增加,引起了人们对病原体风险的潜在影响的担忧。这项研究利用宏基因组测序结合流式细胞术分析了典型的污水接收河流中的病原体浓度和抗生素抗性。采用定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)评估病原体的微生物风险。结果表明明显的时空差异(即,夏天vs.冬季和污水vs.河流)在微生物组成中。微囊藻是导致这些变异的关键物种。发现河流中的病原体浓度高于废水中的病原体浓度,与夏季相比,冬季表现出更高的浓度。污水排放在夏季略微增加了河流中的病原体浓度,但在冬季却大大降低了病原体浓度。蓝藻水华和高温的综合作用被认为是抑制夏季病原体浓度的关键因素。此外,河流中病原体对抗生素的耐药性低于废水中的耐药性,冬季比夏季高。三种高浓度病原体(大肠杆菌,肺炎克雷伯菌,和铜绿假单胞菌)被选择用于QMRA。结果表明,病原体的风险超过了建议的阈值。大肠杆菌构成最高的风险。而钓鱼场景的风险明显高于步行场景。重要的是,污水排放有助于减少冬季接收河流中的微生物风险。该研究有助于有关污水接收河流中微生物风险的管理和决策。
    The increase in effluent discharge from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) into urban rivers has raised concerns about the potential effects on pathogen risks. This study utilized metagenomic sequencing combined with flow cytometry to analyze pathogen concentrations and antibiotic resistance in a typical effluent-receiving river. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) was employed to assess the microbial risks of pathogens. The results indicated obvious spatial-temporal differences (i.e., summer vs. winter and effluent vs. river) in microbial composition. Microcystis emerged as a crucial species contributing to these variations. Pathogen concentrations were found to be higher in the river than in the effluent, with the winter exhibiting higher concentrations compared to the summer. The effluent discharge slightly increased the pathogen concentrations in the river in summer but dramatically reduced them in winter. The combined effects of cyanobacterial bloom and high temperature were considered key factors suppressing pathogen concentrations in summer. Moreover, the prevalence of antibiotic resistance of pathogens in the river was inferior to that in the effluent, with higher levels in winter than in summer. Three high-concentration pathogens (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were selected for QMRA. The results showed that the risks of pathogens exceeded the recommended threshold value. Escherichia coli posed the highest risks. And the fishing scenario posed significantly higher risks than the walking scenario. Importantly, the effluent discharge helped reduce the microbial risks in the receiving river in winter. The study contributes to the management and decision-making regarding microbial risks in the effluent-receiving river.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    工业废水被认为是我们宝贵的水生态中最严重的污染者之一。然而,工业废水处理厂(IWTPs)废水中存在的污染物类型尚不清楚。在这项研究中,建立了一种简单有效的化学指纹分析方法,用于检查不同工业废水及其污水接收河流之间的源汇关系。从电子产品废水中筛选出107、228、155和337种化学品,钢,纺织品,和印染厂,分别。对检测到的化学物质进行化学指纹识别,结果表明,芳香族化合物在污染物类别中最普遍(即,56、189和168在电子产品中,钢铁,和印染厂,分别)。对废水中选择的化学品进行可追溯性分析,确定了不同工业企业的特征污染物。在四种IWTPs的废水的不同工艺阶段中,68种化合物被确定为特征污染物。在84个污水接收河水特征污染物中,在来自四个IWTPs的流出物中也检测到47.6%(n=40)。有效筛选工业废水中的有机污染物并确定其来源将有助于加快工业废水处理技术的改进。
    Industry wastewater is considered one of the worst polluters of our precious water ecologies. However, the types of pollutants present in wastewater from industrial wastewater treatment plants (IWTPs) are still unclear. In this study, a simple and effective chemical fingerprinting method for checking the source-sink relationships among different industrial wastewaters and their effluent-receiving river was established. 107, 228, 155, and 337 chemicals were screened out in wastewater from electronics, steel, textile, and printing and dyeing plants, respectively. Chemical fingerprinting of the detected chemicals was performed, and results showed that aromatic compounds were the most prevalent among the pollutant categories (i.e., 56, 189, and 168 in electronics, iron and steel, and printing and dyeing plants, respectively). The traceability analysis of the chemicals selected in the effluent determined the characteristic pollutants of different industrial enterprises. Sixty-eight compounds were identified as the characteristic pollutants in the different process stages of wastewater of the four IWTPs. Of the 84 effluent-receiving river water signature pollutants, 47.6% (n = 40) were also detected in the effluent from the four IWTPs. Effective screening of organic pollutants in industrial wastewater and determining their sources will help accelerate the improvement of industrial wastewater treatment technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号