Efficacy; safety

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:总结左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统(LNG-IUS)治疗子宫腺肌病(AM)的证据,并找出潜在的研究空白。
    方法:在MEDLINE中进行搜索,科克伦图书馆,EMBASE,CBM,CNKI,还有万方。我们纳入了调查接受LNG-IUS联合保守治疗的AM患者的研究。
    结果:39项研究比较了LNG-IUS与其他保守治疗药物。最常见的比较是GnRH-a+LNG-IUS与仅液化天然气-IUS,其次是LNG-IUSvs.米非司酮,预期治疗,和GnRH-a.在6个月的随访中,GnRH-aLNG-IUS比单独使用LNG-IUS更有利于减轻子宫增大和中度至重度痛经的患者的痛经强度。需要大型且精心设计的研究来确认LNG-IUS和GnRH-a在6个月随访时减少子宫体积的功效。32项研究调查了LNG-IUS作为术后管理。最常见的比较是手术切除+LNG-IUS与手术切除。结果显示,在1年随访时,手术切除+LNG-IUS组的VAS评分低于手术切除组。子宫内膜厚度的证据,生活质量,需要3年和5年的不良事件和有益效果。
    结论:对于子宫增大和中度至重度痛经的患者,GnRH-a和LNG-IUS联合治疗比单独使用LNG-IUS更有效。此外,LNG-IUS似乎在术后治疗中显示出潜在的长期益处,需要进一步的荟萃分析以进行确认。
    OBJECTIVE: To summarize evidence on levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in the treatment of adenomyosis (AM) and to identify potential research gaps.
    METHODS: Search was conducted in MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang. We included studies investigating patients with AM treated with LNG-IUS combined with conservative therapy.
    RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies compared LNG-IUS with other conservative therapeutic drugs. The most common comparison was GnRH-a + LNG-IUS vs. LNG-IUS alone, followed by LNG-IUS vs. mifepristone, expected treatment, and GnRH-a. GnRH-a + LNG-IUS was more beneficial in reducing the intensity of dysmenorrhea than LNG-IUS alone at the 6-month follow-up in patients with an enlarged uterus and moderate to severe dysmenorrhea. Large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of LNG-IUS and GnRH-a on reducing uterine volume at 6-month follow-up. Thirty-two studies investigated LNG-IUS as the postoperative management. The most common comparison was surgical excision + LNG-IUS vs. surgical excision. Results showed VAS scores were lower in the surgical excision + LNG-IUS group than in the surgical excision group at the 1-year follow-up. Evidence on endometrial thickness, quality of life, adverse events and beneficial effect at 3 and 5 years are needed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combined GnRH-a and LNG-IUS treatment was more efficacious than LNG-IUS alone for patients with an enlarged uterus and moderate to severe dysmenorrhea. Moreover, LNG-IUS seemed to show potential long-term benefits in postoperative therapy, warranting further meta-analysis for confirmation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The mainstream treatments for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) include photodynamic therapy (PDT), surgery excision (SE), cryotherapy (CT), imiquimod (IM), radiotherapy (RT), 5-fluorouracil (FU), and vehicle (VE). Our network meta-analysis (NMA) was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of these seven treatments and providing superior ones. After searching the trials from Embase and PubMed and screening with our criteria, we conducted the NMA with software R 3.2.3 and STATA 13.0. Complete lesion response (CLR), complete lesion clearance (CLC), cumulative recurrence probabilities (CRP), and adverse effects (AEs) were considered as outcomes and displayed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrI). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank each treatment on each index. The consistency of direct and indirect evidence was also assessed by node-splitting and heat plot methods. Data from 18 trials with 3706 patients were included. Both IM and SE were demonstrated significantly higher CLR rate than VE (OR = 9.12, 95% CrI = 1.92-47.5; OR = 26.1, 95% CrI = 1.92-347; respectively), while only IM was proved to be statistically better than VE in CLC rate (OR = 7.03, 95% CrI = 1.51-32.8). No significant difference was observed concerning CRP, and IM was more likely to induce AEs than VE (OR = 4.44, 95% CrI = 1.58-13.9). The SUCRA results indicated that SE was the treatment with best ranking in the entire three efficacy indexes and a relatively high safety. Taking efficacy and safety into account, our study recommended SE as the optimal regimen for NMSC with high efficacy considering CLR, CLC, and CRP and moderate AEs when compared with other interventions. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 3686-3695, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号