Efficacy

功效
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Eribulin是一种非紫杉烷合成类似物,在许多国家被批准作为治疗转移性乳腺癌患者的三线治疗方法。除了其有丝分裂性质,艾瑞布林具有非有丝分裂特性,包括但不限于,它能够诱导上皮向间充质转化的表型逆转,血管重塑,减少免疫抑制肿瘤微环境。自批准以来,在所有乳腺癌亚型中,有大量的研究调查了艾日布林作为早期治疗的应用,以及与其他药物如免疫疗法和靶向治疗的联合应用,包括激素受体阳性,HER2阳性和三阴性乳腺癌,许多展示有希望的活动。本文将重点介绍艾瑞布林在所有亚型转移性乳腺癌治疗中的应用,包括其作为早期药物的作用。它的毒性特征,和潜在的未来方向。
    Eribulin is a non-taxane synthetic analogue approved in many countries as third-line treatment for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to its mitotic property, eribulin has non-mitotic properties including but not limited to, its ability to induce phenotypic reversal of epithelial to mesenchymal transition, vascular remodelling, reduction in immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Since approval, there has been a surge in studies investigating the application of eribulin as an earlier-line treatment and also in combination with other agents such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy across all breast cancer sub-types, including hormone receptor positive, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer, many demonstrating promising activity. This review will focus on the application of eribulin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer across all subtypes including its role as an earlier-line agent, its toxicity profile, and potential future directions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)迫切需要二线或后期治疗策略。我们旨在分析额外安洛替尼的疗效和安全性,特别是安洛替尼与免疫治疗联合使用,一线治疗失败的PDAC患者。
    病理诊断为PDAC的患者接受安洛替尼治疗,一些患者同时接受抗PD-1药物治疗,可以进行回顾性分析。评估额外安洛替尼的疗效和安全性。
    共纳入23例患者。在接受额外安洛替尼治疗的患者中,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为1.8个月,中位总生存期(OS)为6.3个月,无论抗PD-1药物。在接受额外安洛替尼与抗PD-1药物联合治疗的患者中,中位PFS和OS分别为1.8和6.5个月,分别。16例患者(69.6%)发生不良事件。在接受额外安洛替尼治疗的患者中,大多数AE为1-3级。单变量分析显示,基线红细胞分布宽度(RDW)<14%的患者接受额外的安洛替尼联合抗PD-1药物治疗,其OS明显长于基线RDW≥14%的患者(p=0.025)。使用额外的安洛替尼联合抗PD-1药物作为二线治疗的患者比作为后期治疗的患者具有更长的OS(p=0.012)。多因素分析显示,基线RDW是OS的唯一独立危险因素(p=0.042)。
    安洛替尼和免疫疗法的组合是PDAC患者的一种有效的附加疗法,具有可耐受的不良事件,可作为二线或后期治疗,特别是在基线RDW<14%的患者中。
    UNASSIGNED: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is in urgent need of a second-line or later-line treatment strategy. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of additional anlotinib, specifically anlotinib in combination with immunotherapy, in patients with PDAC who have failed first-line therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with pathological diagnosis of PDAC were additionally treated with anlotinib, and some patients were treated with anti-PD-1 agents at the same time, which could be retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy and safety of additional anlotinib were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 23 patients were included. In patients treated with additional anlotinib, the overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months, regardless of anti-PD-1 agents. Among patients receiving additional anlotinib in combination with anti-PD-1 agents, median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 6.5 months, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were observed in 16 patients (69.6%). In patients treated with additional anlotinib, the majority of AEs were grade 1-3. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with baseline red blood cell distribution width (RDW) <14% treated with additional anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents had significantly longer OS than patients with baseline RDW ≥14% (p = 0.025). Patients with additional anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents as second-line therapy had a longer OS than those treated as later-line therapy (p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis showed that baseline RDW was the only independent risk factor for OS (p = 0.042).
    UNASSIGNED: The combination of anlotinib and immunotherapy represents an effective add-on therapy with tolerable AEs as second- or later-line therapy in patients with PDAC, particularly in patients with baseline RDW <14%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项由内分泌学和肾脏病学专家编写的范围审查旨在解决finenone的重要性,作为一种新颖的治疗选择,糖尿病肾病(DKD),基于非甾体盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)特性的心肾益处的生物学前景,以及Finerenone3期临床试验的最新证据。关于MR过度激活在心肾疾病发病机理中的作用以及当前实践模式中未满足的需求,严格审查了fineterone在减缓DKD进展中的重要性。FinerenoneIII期研究计划的疗效和安全性结果,包括FIDELIO-DKD,介绍了FIGARO-DKD和FIDELITY。具体来说,关于纳入具有保留的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)或高蛋白尿的患者的观点,同时使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)或胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA),基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平和胰岛素治疗,研究了有临床意义的心力衰竭结局和治疗诱导的高钾血症.Finerenone已经成为一种新的治疗剂,可以减缓DKD的进展,降低蛋白尿和心血管并发症的风险,无论基线HbA1c水平和伴随治疗如何(SGLT2i,GLP-1RA,或胰岛素),并具有良好的获益-风险特征。关于SGLT2is和非甾体MRA在减缓或降低心肾风险方面的益处的不断发展的数据似乎为在DKD的管理中使用这些治疗支柱提供了机会。在这个领域长期的治疗稀缺之后。随着人们认识到蛋白尿是检测心肾疾病高危患者的有力标志物,这些重要的发展可能会影响DKD设置中的护理标准选择。
    This scoping review prepared by endocrinology and nephrology experts aimed to address the significance of finerenone, as a novel therapeutic option, in diabetic kidney disease (DKD), based on the biological prospect of cardiorenal benefit due to non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) properties, and the recent evidence from the finerenone phase 3 program clinical trials. The importance of finerenone in slowing DKD progression was critically reviewed in relation to the role of MR overactivation in the pathogenesis of cardiorenal disease and unmet needs in the current practice patterns. The efficacy and safety outcomes of finerenone phase III study program including FIDELIO-DKD, FIGARO-DKD and FIDELITY were presented. Specifically, perspectives on inclusion of patients with preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or high albuminuria, concomitant use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and insulin treatment, clinically meaningful heart failure outcomes and treatment-induced hyperkalemia were addressed. Finerenone has emerged as a new therapeutic agent that slows DKD progression, reduces albuminuria and risk of cardiovascular complications, regardless of the baseline HbA1c levels and concomitant treatments (SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, or insulin) and with a favorable benefit-risk profile. The evolving data on the benefit of SGLT2is and non-steroidal MRAs in slowing or reducing cardiorenal risk seem to provide the opportunity to use these pillars of therapy in the management of DKD, after a long-period of treatment scarcity in this field. Along with recognition of the albuminuria as a powerful marker to detect those patients at high risk of cardiorenal disease, these important developments would likely to impact standard-of-care options in the setting of DKD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    观察和评估多纳非尼联合经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。
    这个前景,单臂,单中心,II期临床研究纳入了36例初次无法切除的HCC患者,这些患者未接受任何系统治疗.患者接受多纳非尼加TACE(n=26)或多纳非尼加TACE加程序性死亡受体1抑制剂(n=10)。主要终点是短期疗效,次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS),响应时间(TTR)疾病控制率(DCR),和不良事件。还测量了肿瘤供血动脉直径。
    对所有36例患者的疗效评估显示6例完全缓解,19的部分反应,8稳定的疾病,和3进行性疾病。6名(16.7%)患者成功接受了转换手术,全部实现R0切除,2例(5.6%)达到完全病理反应。客观有效率(ORR)为69.4%,DCR为91.7%。中位PFS为10.7个月,未达到中位总生存期,TTR中位数为1.4个月.6、12和18个月的中位生存率为85.0%,77.6%,和71.3%,分别。6、12和18个月的中位PFS率为65.3%,45.6%,和34.2%,分别。治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)发生在所有25名受试者中,包括4个(11.3%)3级TRAE。没有发生4级或5级TRAE。治疗后肿瘤供血动脉直径明显下降(P=0.036)。多变量分析显示基线目标病变直径的总和,最佳肿瘤反应,联合免疫疗法是PFS的独立预测因子。
    TACE加多纳非尼可降低不可切除HCC患者的肿瘤供血动脉直径。安全性很好,实现了较高的ORR。
    UNASSIGNED: To observe and assess the efficacy and safety of donafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical study enrolled 36 patients with initial unresectable HCC who had not undergone any systemic treatment. The patients received donafenib plus TACE (n = 26) or donafenib plus TACE plus programmed death receptor 1 inhibitors (n = 10). The primary endpoint was short-term efficacy, with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events. The tumor feeding artery diameter was also measured.
    UNASSIGNED: Efficacy evaluation of all 36 patients revealed 6 cases of complete response, 19 of partial response, 8 of stable disease, and 3 of progressive disease. Six (16.7%) patients successfully underwent conversion surgery, all achieving R0 resection, and 2 (5.6%) achieved a complete pathological response. The objective response rate (ORR) was 69.4% and the DCR was 91.7%. The median PFS was 10.7 months, the median overall survival was not reached, and the median TTR was 1.4 months. The median survival rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 85.0%, 77.6%, and 71.3%, respectively. The median PFS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 65.3%, 45.6%, and 34.2%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all 25 subjects, including 4 (11.3%) grade 3 TRAEs. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs occurred. The tumor feeding artery diameter was significantly decreased following treatment (P = 0.036). Multivariable analysis revealed the sum of baseline target lesion diameters, best tumor response, and combined immunotherapy as independent predictors of PFS.
    UNASSIGNED: TACE plus donafenib reduced the tumor feeding artery diameter in patients with unresectable HCC. The safety profile was good, and a high ORR was achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    白细胞介素-23(IL-23),细胞因子IL-12家族的成员,维持肠道稳态,但也与炎症性肠病(IBD)的发病机理有关。IL-23受体(IL-23R)是由二硫键连接的p19和p23亚基组成的异二聚体。选择性靶向IL-23的p19亚基的人源化单克隆抗体有望成为IBD中的重要药物。在这次审查中,我们讨论了目前可用的IL-23p19抑制剂的药效学和药代动力学特性,并讨论了其治疗效果的机制基础,包括作用机制,表位亲和力,效力,效力和下游信令。此外,我们解决了关于疗效的现有数据,安全,以及IL-23特异性p19抑制剂在IBD治疗中的耐受性,并讨论在其他免疫介导的炎性疾病中进行的重要研究。最后,我们评估了结合不同类别的生物疗法的潜力,并为IBD中IL-23p19抑制剂的精准医学指导定位提供了未来的发展方向.
    Interleukin-23 (IL-23), a member of the IL-12 family of cytokines, maintains intestinal homeostasis but is also implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The IL-23 receptor (IL-23R) is a heterodimer composed of disulfide-linked p19- and p23-subunits. Humanized monoclonal antibodies selectively targeting the p19-subunit of IL-23 are poised to become prominent drugs in IBD. In this review, we discuss pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the currently available IL-23p19 inhibitors and discuss the mechanistic underpinnings of their therapeutic effects, including the mechanism of action, epitope affinity, potency, and downstream signaling. Furthermore, we address available data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of IL-23-specific p19-inhibitors in the treatment of IBD and discuss important studies performed in other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Finally, we evaluate the potential for combining classes of biological therapies and provide future directions on the development of precision medicine-guided positioning of IL-23p19 inhibitors in IBD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:多粘菌素B,以其独特的结构和作用机制,已成为针对革兰氏阴性细菌的关键治疗剂。该研究旨在探索影响其有效性和安全性的潜在因素。
    方法:对96篇文献进行了基于模型的Meta分析(MBMA)。关注剂量等因素,细菌种类,和联合抗生素治疗。该分析评估了死亡率和肾功能不全的发生率,还采用参数生存模型来评估30天生存率。
    结果:在涉及96篇文章和9,716名患者的研究中,多粘菌素B的每日剂量对总死亡率影响最小,高剂量组死亡率为33.57%(95%CI:29.15-38.00),低剂量组为35.44%(95%CI:28.99-41.88),p=0.64。死亡率因细菌种类而异,铜绿假单胞菌感染率为58.50%(95%CI:55.42-63.58)。单一疗法的死亡率最高,为40.25%(95%CI:34.75-45.76),p<0.01。肾功能障碍在大剂量患者中更为常见,为29.75%(95%CI:28.52-30.98),在不同的抗生素治疗方案中没有显著差异,p=0.54。单药治疗的30天总生存率为63.6%(95%CI:59.3-67.5),β-内酰胺类药物联合治疗的30天总生存率为70.2%(95%CI:64.4-76.2)。
    结论:多粘菌素B的剂量没有显著改变死亡率,但其有效性因细菌感染而异。某些细菌如铜绿假单胞菌与较高的死亡率相关。多粘菌素B与其他抗生素联合使用,尤其是β-内酰胺类药物,提高生存率。副作用取决于剂量,低剂量更安全。这些发现强调了定制治疗以平衡有效性和安全性的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: Polymyxin B, with its unique structure and mechanism of action, has emerged as a key therapeutic agent against Gram-negative bacteria. The study aims to explore potential factors to influence its effectiveness and safety.
    METHODS: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis (MBMA) of 96 articles was conducted, focusing on factors like dosage, bacterial species, and combined antibiotic therapy. The analysis evaluated mortality rates and incidence rate of renal dysfunction, also employing parametric survival models to assess 30-day survival rates.
    RESULTS: In the study involving 96 articles and 9,716 patients, polymyxin B\'s daily dose showed minimal effect on overall mortality, with high-dose group mortality at 33.57% (95% CI: 29.15-38.00) compared to the low-dose group at 35.44% (95% CI: 28.99-41.88), p=0.64. Mortality significantly varied by bacterial species, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections at 58.50% (95% CI: 55.42-63.58). Monotherapy exhibited the highest mortality at 40.25% (95% CI: 34.75-45.76), p<0.01. Renal dysfunction was more common in high-dose patients at 29.75% (95% CI: 28.52-30.98), with no significant difference across antibiotic regimens, p=0.54. The 30-day Overall Survival rate for monotherapy therapy was 63.6% (95% CI: 59.3-67.5) and 70.2% (95% CI: 64.4-76.2) for association therapy with β-lactam drugs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The dosage of Polymyxin B doesn\'t significantly change death rates, but its effectiveness varies based on the bacterial infection. Certain bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa are associated with higher mortality. Combining Polymyxin B with other antibiotics, especially β-lactam drugs, improves survival rates. Side effects depend on the dose, with lower doses being safer. These findings emphasize the importance of customizing treatment to balance effectiveness and safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激技术,用于调节皮质活动和改善神经可塑性。几项研究调查了rTMS的影响,等。,但是结果不一致。这项研究旨在检查rTMS是否应用于左背外侧前额叶皮质(l-DLPFC)对改善SZ的认知缺陷以及早期疗效是否可以预测后续随访的疗效。在基线时使用可重复的神经心理状态评估电池(RBANS)量表评估认知能力,第2、6和24周。我们发现时间(第0、2、6和24周)和对即时记忆和RBANS总分的干预之间存在显著的相互作用(p=0.02和p=0.04)。表明10Hz和20HzrTMS刺激对SZ的即时记忆都有延迟的有益影响。此外,我们发现20赫兹的rTMS刺激,但与假手术组相比,10-HzrTMS在第6周没有改善即时记忆(p=0.029)。更重要的是,第2周即时记忆的改善与第24周的改善呈正相关(β​=0.461,t​=3.322,p​=0.002)。我们的研究表明,活动性rTMS对SZ患者的认知缺陷有益。此外,第2周的疗效可以预测24周随访时的后续疗效.
    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique for modulating cortical activities and improving neural plasticity. Several studies investigated the effects of rTMS, etc., but the results are inconsistent. This study was designed to examine whether rTMS applied on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC) showed an effect on improving cognitive deficits in SZ and whether the early efficacy could predict efficacy at subsequent follow-ups. Cognitive ability was assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) scale at baseline, weeks 2, 6, and 24. We found a significant interaction between time (weeks 0, 2, 6, and 24) and intervention on immediate memory and RBANS total scores (p ​= ​0.02 and p ​= ​0.04), indicating that both 10-Hz and 20-Hz rTMS stimulations had a delayed beneficial effect on immediate memory in SZ. Moreover, we found that 20-Hz rTMS stimulation, but not 10-Hz rTMS improved immediate memory at week 6 compared to the sham group (p ​= ​0.029). More importantly, improvements in immediate memory at week 2 were positively correlated with improvements at week 24 (β ​= ​0.461, t ​= ​3.322, p ​= ​0.002). Our study suggests that active rTMS was beneficial for cognitive deficits in patients with SZ. Furthermore, efficacy at week 2 could predict the subsequent efficacy at 24-week follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    主动脉夹层通常采用介入治疗,保守治疗,和手术来抑制疾病进展和改善预后。然而,治疗过程中缺乏细致有效的护理大大增加了并发症的发生率,这对患者的康复是不利的。
    本研究旨在探讨预见性疼痛干预在主动脉夹层患者护理过程中的应用效果。
    本研究观察了2018年12月至2020年12月我院收治的60例主动脉夹层患者。具体来说,将这些患者随机平均分为A组(给予常规护理干预的患者)和B组(给予预见性疼痛干预的患者).随后,疼痛评分,并发症发生率,对比分析两组患者的护理满意度。
    与A组患者相比,B组患者疼痛评分显著降低(P<0.05);B组并发症发生率显著低于A组(6.67%vs.23.33%,P<0.05);B组患者对护理的满意度明显优于A组(96.67%vs.73.33%,P<0.05)。
    预见性疼痛干预在主动脉夹层患者的治疗中被广泛认为是有用的。它可以在很大程度上减轻疼痛,对患者相对安全,具有重要的临床应用价值。
    UNASSIGNED: Aortic dissection is usually managed with interventional therapy, conservative therapy, and surgery to inhibit disease progression and improve prognoses. Nevertheless, the absence of meticulous and effective nursing during the treatment greatly increases the complication rates, which is detrimental to the recovery of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to explore the efficacy of predictive pain intervention in the nursing process of patients with aortic dissection.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty patients with aortic dissection who were admitted to our hospital from December 2018 to December 2020 were observed in this study. Specifically, these patients were randomly and equally classified into Group A (patients who were given conventional nursing intervention) and Group B (patients who were given predictive pain intervention). Subsequently, the pain score, complication rates, and nursing satisfaction in the two groups were compared and analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with patients in Group A, patients in Group B had significantly lower pain scores (P< 0.05); complication rates were significantly lower in Group B than in Group A (6.67% vs. 23.33%, P< 0.05); patient satisfaction with care was significantly better in Group B compared to Group A (96.67% vs. 73.33%, P< 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Predictive pain intervention is widely recognized as useful in the treatment of patients with aortic dissection. It has significant clinical application value as it can largely alleviate pain and is relatively safe for patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的评价贝利木单抗联合标准方案治疗儿童活动性狼疮性肾炎的疗效和安全性。这个单一中心,回顾性队列研究使用2004年12月至2023年2月期间在肾内科住院的新活动性狼疮性肾炎患儿的临床资料.根据患者是否接受贝利木单抗,将患者分为贝利木单抗组或传统治疗组。比较两组的肾脏缓解率和复发率以及糖皮质激素剂量。纳入47名儿童(平均年龄11岁),包括传统治疗和贝利木单抗组的30和17名儿童,分别。belimumab组儿童系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数-2000(SLEDAI-2000)评分(23.59±7.78)高于传统治疗组(19.13±6.10)(P=0.035)。两组出现脓尿的频率差异无统计学意义,肉眼血尿,以及24小时蛋白尿水平和估计的肾小球滤过率。贝利木单抗组补体C3/C4较传统治疗组恢复快(P<0.05)。6个月或12个月时肾脏完全缓解率无组间差异(P=0.442,P=0.759)。组间1年复发率无差异(P=0.303)。此外,治疗后6个月和12个月,贝利木单抗的糖皮质激素剂量低于传统治疗组(17.87±6.96mg/dvs.27.33±8.40mg/d,P=0.000;10.00(5.3)mg/dvs.13.75(10.0)mg/d,P=0.007),分别。
    结论:在肾脏缓解率相等的情况下,贝利木单抗联合标准传统方案可能促进糖皮质激素的减量,不良事件发生率较低。
    背景:•Belimumab被证明是对系统性红斑狼疮(c-SLE)LN具有疗效的辅助治疗。•由于缺乏研究,其在儿童LN中的作用和副作用尚不清楚。
    背景:•这种单中心,回顾性队列研究评估了贝利木单抗联合标准方案治疗儿童增殖性LN的疗效和安全性.•Belimumab与标准传统治疗相结合可能会促进糖皮质激素的逐渐减少,同时表现出不良事件的低发生率。
    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab combined with the standard regimen in treating children with active lupus nephritis. This single-center, retrospective cohort study used clinical data of children with newly active lupus nephritis hospitalized in the Department of Nephrology between December 2004 and February 2023. Patients were divided into a belimumab or traditional treatment group according to whether or not they received belimumab. Renal remission and recurrence rates and glucocorticoid dose were compared between groups. Forty-seven children (median age 11 years) were enrolled, including 30 and 17 children in the traditional treatment and belimumab groups, respectively. The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2000) score of children in the belimumab group (23.59 ± 7.78) was higher than that in the traditional treatment group (19.13 ± 6.10) (P = 0.035). The two groups showed no significant difference in the frequency of pyuria, gross hematuria, and the levels of 24-h proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The complement C3/C4 in the belimumab group recovered faster than that in the traditional treatment group (P < 0.05). There were no between-group differences in the complete renal remission rate at 6 or 12 months (P = 0.442, P = 0.759). There were no between-group differences in 1-year recurrence rate (P = 0.303). Furthermore, 6 and 12 months after treatment, glucocorticoid doses were lower in the belimumab than the traditional treatment group (17.87 ± 6.96 mg/d vs. 27.33 ± 8.40 mg/d, P = 0.000; 10.00 (5.3) mg/d vs. 13.75 (10.0) mg/d, P = 0.007), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: With an equivalent renal remission rate, belimumab combined with the standard traditional regimen might promote the tapering of glucocorticoids, and the incidence of adverse events is low.
    BACKGROUND: • Belimumab is documented as an adjunctive treatment with systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE) LN with efficacy. • Due to the paucity of studies, its effects and side effects in children with LN remain unclear.
    BACKGROUND: • This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of belimumab combined with the standard regimen in treating children with proliferative LN. • Belimumab combined with the standard traditional treatment might promote the tapering of glucocorticoids, while exhibiting a low occurrence of adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管人们越来越关注动机,对国际学生对学术写作的激励信念和态度知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨影响国际学生在美国西部一所大型公立研究型大学学术英语课程中表现的动机因素。具体来说,我们检查了学生的自我效能感,目标导向,信仰,对写作的影响,连同它们的延展性,以及他们在学术英语写作课程中对学术成就的贡献。样本包括97名学生,主要来自中国,注册在线学术英语课程。探索性因子分析倾向于提取比主成分分析更复杂的动机结构模型。从10周学期开始到结束,学生的自我效能感和写作乐趣显着增加,暗示了动机因素的延展性。分层线性模型显示,学生在学期开始时的自我效能感正向预测他们的最终成绩。然而,逻辑混合模型显示,对写作作为探索和表达思想的手段抱有更强信念的学生通过的几率较低。我们的发现有助于理解国际学生在高等教育学术英语环境中的动机,并提供潜在的教学干预措施,以提高他们的学术成功。
    Despite the growing attention to motivation, less is known about international students\' motivational beliefs and attitudes about academic writing. In this study, we aimed to explore the motivational factors influencing international students\' performance in academic English classes at a large public research university in the western United States. Specifically, we examined students\' self-efficacy, goal orientation, beliefs, and affect for writing, along with their malleability, and their contributions to academic achievement in academic English writing classes. The sample comprised 97 students, predominantly from China, enrolled in online academic English courses. Exploratory factor analysis tended to extract more complex models of the motivational constructs than principal component analysis. Students\' self-efficacy and enjoyment of writing significantly increased from the beginning to the end of the 10-week term, suggesting motivational factors\' malleability. Hierarchical linear modeling revealed that students\' self-efficacy at the beginning of the term positively predicted their final grades. However, logistic mixed modeling revealed that students who held stronger beliefs about writing as a means of exploring and expressing ideas had lower odds of passing. Our findings contribute to the understanding of international students\' motivation in academic English settings in higher education and offers potential pedagogical interventions to enhance their academic success.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号