Edetic Acid

乙二胺四乙酸
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肿瘤科和重症监护患者通常需要中央血管通路装置(CVAD),这可能使他们容易发生中央管路相关血流感染(CLABSI)和血栓闭塞。根据文献,CLABSI在COVID-19大流行期间猖獗,增加了63%,强调创新干预的必要性。百分之四的乙二胺四乙酸(4%EDTA)是一种抗菌锁定溶液,可减少CLABSI,血栓性闭塞,和生物膜。这项回顾性的事后质量改进项目确定了4%EDTA是否可以通过减少CLABSI和中央导管阻塞来提高患者安全性。这在区域癌症医院和中心的所有成人癌症和重症监护病房中实施。在实施4%EDTA之前,16个月有36例CLABSI病例(年化27例)。实施后,6个月有6例(年化12例),显示每1000个导管天的CLABSI在统计学上显著减少59%。然而,闭塞没有显着差异(使用阿替普酶)。88%的患者有积极或中立的看法,而大多数护士报告说,预充式注射器需要4%的EDTA。大流行和护理短缺可能影响了结果;因此,需要进行随机对照试验以确定4%EDTA和CLABSI与闭塞之间的因果关系.
    Oncology and critical care patients often require central vascular access devices (CVADs), which can make them prone to central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and thrombotic occlusions. According to the literature, CLABSIs are rampant and increased by 63% during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the need for innovative interventions. Four percent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (4% EDTA) is an antimicrobial locking solution that reduces CLABSIs, thrombotic occlusions, and biofilm. This retrospective pre-post quality improvement project determined if 4% EDTA could improve patient safety by decreasing CLABSIs and central catheter occlusions. This was implemented in all adult cancer and critical care units at a regional cancer hospital and center. Before implementing 4% EDTA, there were 36 CLABSI cases in 16 months (27 annualized). After implementation, there were 6 cases in 6 months (12 annualized), showing a statistically significant decrease of 59% in CLABSIs per 1000 catheter days. However, there was no significant difference in occlusions (alteplase use). Eighty-eight percent of patients had either a positive or neutral outlook, while most nurses reported needing 4% EDTA to be available in prefilled syringes. The pandemic and nursing shortages may have influenced the results; hence, randomized controlled trials are needed to establish a causal relationship between 4% EDTA and CLABSIs and occlusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:BNP是一种用于心力衰竭早期诊断的敏感且广泛使用的生物标志物。目前,大多数商业BNP检测产品使用EDTA血浆样品。这项研究的目的是通过使用全血样品与血浆样品比较来评估BNP测试的临床性能,并评价抗凝剂类型对BNP检测结果的影响。
    方法:总共,来自大华医院的106名不同BNP水平的患者自愿参加了这项研究。临床上均匀的样本,包括EDTA抗凝血浆,EDTA全血,和肝素抗凝血浆,通过i-ReaderS自动免疫分析仪及其配套试剂盒进行采集和分析。皮尔逊相关和加权最小二乘线性回归分析,Bland-Altman密谋,采用Kappa检验进行统计学分析。
    结果:相关分析表明,BNP浓度,从EDTA抗凝血浆样品中测量,与全血样本中的BNP具有良好的线性回归关系,斜率为0.9477,r=0.9978,p<0.05。在EDTA抗凝血浆样品和肝素抗凝血浆之间观察到类似的相关性,斜率为0.8413,r=0.9793,p<0.05。从肝素血浆样品测量的BNP浓度低于EDTA血浆样品。评估BNP浓度一致性的Bland-Altman分析显示,在检测系统的范围内,EDTA全血和EDTA血浆之间没有异常比值,以及EDTA抗凝血浆和肝素抗凝血浆之间没有异常值。同系EDTA抗凝血浆和肝素抗凝血血浆BNP浓度Kappa系数为0.8553(p<0.001),EDTA抗凝血浆和同源全血分别为0.8941(p<0.001)。
    结论:EDTA抗凝全血样品的诊断性能与EDTA抗凝血浆样品的BNP测试没有显着差异。这项研究表明,在2小时内,EDTA抗凝血浆和肝素抗凝血浆的测量值之间没有很大的显着差异。如果BNP样品长时间在体外进行BNP测试,则应仔细选择抗凝剂的类型。
    BACKGROUND: BNP is a sensitive and widely used biomarker for an early diagnosis of heart failure. Currently, most commercial BNP detection products use EDTA plasma samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the BNP test by using whole blood samples compared to plasma samples, and to evaluate the effect of the anticoagulant type on the BNP test result.
    METHODS: In total, 106 patients with different BNP levels from the Dahua Hospital volunteered for this study. Clinically homogenous samples, including EDTA anticoagulant plasma, EDTA whole blood, and heparin anticoagulant plasma, were collected and analyzed by using i-Reader S automatic immuno-analyzer and its supporting reagent kits. Pearson\'s correlation and weighted least squares linear regression analysis, Bland-Altman plotting, and Kappa test were used for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: Correlation analysis showed that BNP concentrations, measured from EDTA anticoagulated plasma samples, had a good linear regression relationship with BNP from whole blood samples, with a slope of 0.9477, r = 0.9978, p < 0.05. A similar correlation was observed between EDTA anticoagulated plasma samples and heparin anticoagulant plasma, with a slope of 0.8413, r = 0.9793, p < 0.05. The BNP concentration measured from the heparin plasma samples were lower than of the EDTA plasma samples. Bland-Altman analysis for assessing BNP concentration agreement showed there was no outlier ratio between EDTA whole blood and EDTA plasma within the range of the detection system, as well as no outlier between EDTA anticoagulated and heparin anticoagulant plasma. Kappa coefficient of BNP concentration between homologous EDTA anticoagulated and heparin anticoagulant plasma was 0.8553 (p < 0.001), and for EDTA anticoagulated plasma and homologous whole blood it was 0.8941 (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of EDTA anticoagulated whole blood samples did not differ significantly from EDTA anticoagulated plasma samples for the BNP test. This study showed no big significant difference between EDTA anticoagulated and heparin anticoagulated plasma measurements within 2 hours. The type of anticoagulant should be carefully chosen when performing the BNP test if BNP samples were in vitro for a long time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用[68Ga]Ga-PSMAPET/CT开发基于放射组学的模型,以预测活检GleasonGradeGroup(GGG)1-2前列腺癌(PCa)患者的术后不良病理(AP),协助选择主动监测(AS)的患者。
    方法:共纳入75例接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的GGG1-2PCa活检的男性。将患者随机分为训练组(70%)和测试组(30%)。从[68Ga]Ga-PSMAPET扫描中提取整个前列腺的影像组学特征,并使用最小冗余最大相关性算法和最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归模型进行选择。采用Logistic回归分析构建预测模型。接收机工作特性(ROC)曲线,决策曲线分析(DCA),和校准曲线用于评估诊断价值,临床效用,以及模型的预测准确性,分别。
    结果:在75例患者中,30例AP经RP确认。临床模型显示训练集中的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.821(0.695-0.947),测试集中为0.795(0.603-0.987)。影像组学模型在训练集中实现了0.830(0.720-0.941)的AUC值,在测试集中实现了0.829(0.624-1.000)的AUC值。组合模型,纳入了Radiomics评分(Radscore)和游离前列腺特异性抗原(FPSA)/总前列腺特异性抗原(TPSA),显示出比临床和影像组学模型更高的诊断功效,训练集中的AUC值为0.875(0.780-0.970),测试集中的AUC值为0.872(0.678-1.000)。DCA表明,组合模型和影像组学模型的净收益超过了临床模型。
    结论:根据最终病理中AP的存在,联合模型显示出对活检GGG1-2PCa的男性进行分层的潜力,并且优于仅基于临床或影像组学特征的模型。有望帮助泌尿科医生更好地选择合适的AS患者。
    OBJECTIVE: To develop a radiomics-based model using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT to predict postoperative adverse pathology (AP) in patients with biopsy Gleason Grade Group (GGG) 1-2 prostate cancer (PCa), assisting in the selection of patients for active surveillance (AS).
    METHODS: A total of 75 men with biopsy GGG 1-2 PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into a training group (70%) and a testing group (30%). Radiomics features of entire prostate were extracted from the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET scans and selected using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to construct the prediction models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curve were employed to evaluate the diagnostic value, clinical utility, and predictive accuracy of the models, respectively.
    RESULTS: Among the 75 patients, 30 had AP confirmed by RP. The clinical model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821 (0.695-0.947) in the training set and 0.795 (0.603-0.987) in the testing set. The radiomics model achieved AUC values of 0.830 (0.720-0.941) in the training set and 0.829 (0.624-1.000) in the testing set. The combined model, which incorporated the Radiomics score (Radscore) and free prostate-specific antigen (FPSA)/total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA), demonstrated higher diagnostic efficacy than both the clinical and radiomics models, with AUC values of 0.875 (0.780-0.970) in the training set and 0.872 (0.678-1.000) in the testing set. DCA showed that the net benefits of the combined model and radiomics model exceeded those of the clinical model.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combined model shows potential in stratifying men with biopsy GGG 1-2 PCa based on the presence of AP at final pathology and outperforms models based solely on clinical or radiomics features. It may be expected to aid urologists in better selecting suitable patients for AS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用草药代替常规的牙髓冲洗剂可以避免与使用次氯酸钠(NaOCl)相关的并发症。牙髓冲洗剂改变牙本质壁表面的表面粗糙度,这会影响密封剂的机械保留。本研究旨在通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对涂片层评估进行定量3D表面分析,评估实验性草药辣木和橘皮提取物冲洗剂对针状牙本质(IRD)表面粗糙度的影响。将60个人根切片分为四组(n=15):NaOCl与17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)混合;阴性对照(盐水);辣木提取物(MO);和橙油(OO)。SEM图像定量评估了日冕中的表面粗糙度(Ra),中间,和顶端IRD。数据由Kruskal-Wallis分析,弗里德曼,和邓恩的测试。各组差异有统计学意义(P=0.007)。MO在日冕处表现出明显更大的Ra值,中间,根尖水平高于OO(分别为P=0.007、0.009和0.046)。EDTA在P=0.091、0.819、0.819和0.549时,各组内不同根水平的Ra值没有显著变化,盐水,MO,和OO组。相当大的(IRD)表面粗糙度分析使辣木提取物成为NaOCl加EDTA方案的有前途的草药牙髓冲洗剂替代品。
    Replacing the conventional endodontic irrigants with herbal agents could avoid complications associated with using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Endodontic irrigants alter the surface roughness of the dentinal wall surface, which affects sealer mechanical retention. This study aimed to assess the effect of experimental herbal Moringa oleifera and orange peel extract irrigant on intraradicular dentin (IRD) surface roughness using quantitative 3D surface analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) regarding the smear layer assessment. Sixty human root sections were divided into four groups (n = 15): NaOCl combined with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); negative control (saline); moringa extract (MO); and orange oil (OO). SEM images were assessed quantitatively for surface roughness (Ra) in the coronal, middle, and apical IRD. The data were analysed by Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, and Dunn\'s tests. All groups showed statistically significant differences (P = 0.007). MO exhibited significantly greater Ra values at the coronal, middle, and apical root levels than OO (P = 0.007, 0.009, and 0.046, respectively). There was no significant change in Ra values at various root levels within each group at P = 0.091, 0.819, 0.819, and 0.549 for the EDTA, saline, MO, and OO groups. Considerable (IRD) surface roughness analysis makes Moringa extract a promising herbal endodontic irrigant alternative to the NaOCl plus EDTA regimen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与模拟PET/CT相比,数字正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)显示出增强的灵敏度和空间分辨率。本研究比较了数字和模拟PET/CT与[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11在前列腺切除术后发生生化复发(BCR)的前列腺癌患者中的诊断性能。40名经历过BCR的前列腺癌患者,定义为前列腺切除术后血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度超过0.2ng/mL,被前瞻性招募。根据血清PSA水平将这些患者分为三组。[68Ga]将Ga-PSMA-11注入每位患者,使用模拟和数字PET/CT扫描仪采集图像。模拟和数字PET/CT显示病变检出率相当(71.8%vs.74.4%),灵敏度(85.0%vs.90.0%),和阳性预测值(PPV,100.0%vs.100.0%)。然而,数字PET/CT检测到更多的病变(139vs.111),并具有更高的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax,14.3vs.10.3)和更高的卡帕指数(0.657vs.0.502)比模拟PET/CT,无论血清PSA水平。在模拟和数字PET/CT上,病变检出率和评分者间的一致性随着血清PSA水平的增加而增加。与模拟PET/CT相比,在前列腺切除术后发生BCR的前列腺癌患者中,数字PET/CT检测到更多的病灶,SUVmax更高,评估者之间的一致性更好。
    Digital positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has shown enhanced sensitivity and spatial resolution compared with analog PET/CT. The present study compared the diagnostic performance of digital and analog PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer patients who experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) after prostatectomy. Forty prostate cancer patients who experienced BCR, defined as serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations exceeding 0.2 ng/mL after prostatectomy, were prospectively recruited. These patients were stratified into three groups based on their serum PSA levels. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was injected into each patient, and images were acquired using both analog and digital PET/CT scanners. Analog and digital PET/CT showed comparable lesion detection rate (71.8% vs. 74.4%), sensitivity (85.0% vs. 90.0%), and positive predictive value (PPV, 100.0% vs. 100.0%). However, digital PET/CT detected more lesions (139 vs. 111) and had higher maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax, 14.3 vs. 10.3) and higher kappa index (0.657 vs. 0.502) than analog PET/CT, regardless of serum PSA levels. On both analog and digital PET/CT, lesion detection rates and interrater agreement increased with increasing serum PSA levels. Compared with analog PET/CT, digital PET/CT detected more lesions with a higher SUVmax and better interrater agreement in prostate cancer patients who experienced BCR after prostatectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:[51Cr]CrEDTA用于测量不同临床状况下的肾小球滤过率(GFR)。然而,对于理想的血液样本数量以及在什么时间点测量其清除率没有共识。本研究旨在比较SlopeIntercept(SI)和Single-Sample(SS)方法测量实体瘤患者的GFR。按年龄分层,GFR,身体质量指数(BMI)。
    方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了1,174例癌症患者。GFR通过SI方法使用抽取的血液样本计算2-,4-,和注射[51Cr]CrEDTA(246-GFR)后6小时。还使用SI方法在2和4小时(24-GFR)以及4和6小时(46-GFR)对样品测量GFR。和根据Groth(4Gr-GFR)和Fleming(4Fl-GFR)的SS方法。进行统计分析以评估准确性,精度,和方法的偏差。
    结果:平均246-GFR为79.2±21.9mL/min/1.73m2。ANOVA表明4Gr-GFR和参考246-GFR之间存在显著差异。所有方法的偏差均低于5mL/min/1.73m2,除SS方法外,亚组BMI>40kg/m2;GFR>105或<45。所有方法的精密度都足够,30%的准确度都在98%以上,除SS方法外,GFR<45亚组。
    结论:46-GFR和246-GFR有很高的一致性,可用于评估实体瘤患者的肾功能。在特定情况下可以采用单样本方法,对于预期GFR正常的非肥胖患者。
    OBJECTIVE: [51Cr]CrEDTA is used to measure the Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) in different clinical conditions. However, there is no consensus on the ideal number of blood samples to be taken and at what time points to measure its clearance. This study aimed to compare Slope Intercept (SI) and Single-Sample (SS) methods for measuring GFR in patients with solid tumors, stratified by age, GFR, and Body Mass Index (BMI).
    METHODS: 1,174 patients with cancer were enrolled in this prospective study. GFR was calculated by the SI method using blood samples drawn 2-, 4-, and 6-hours after [51Cr]CrEDTA injection (246-GFR). GFR was also measured using the SI method with samples at 2 and 4 hours (24-GFR) and at 4 and 6 hours (46-GFR), and SS methods according to Groth (4Gr-GFR) and Fleming (4Fl-GFR). Statistical analysis was performed to assess the accuracy, precision, and bias of the methods.
    RESULTS: Mean 246-GFR was 79.2 ± 21.9 mL/min/1.73 m2. ANOVA indicated a significant difference between 4Gr-GFR and the reference 246-GFR. Bias was lower than 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 for all methods, except for SS methods in subgroups BMI > 40 kg/m2; GFR > 105 or < 45. Precision was adequate and accuracy of 30 % was above 98% for all methods, except for SS methods in subgroup GFR < 45.
    CONCLUSIONS: 46-GFR and 246-GFR have high agreement and may be used to evaluate kidney function in patients with solid tumors. Single-sample methods can be adopted in specific situations, for non-obese patients with expected normal GFR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    假性血小板减少症是在通过自动化机器分析猫血小板(PLT)计数时通常获得的假阴性结果。它与乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)有关,一种广泛用于采血管的抗凝剂,导致EDTA依赖性假性血小板减少症(EDTA-PTCP)。
    为了研究用卡那霉素处理是否增加了使用EDTA-PTCP收集的猫科动物血液样本中PLT聚集的量。
    使用EDTA管获得31个血液样品。使用自动化的MindrayBC-5000Vet分析全血细胞计数。进行手动细胞计数和稀薄血液涂片以估计红细胞的数量,白细胞,和PLT以及评估PLT聚集的严重程度评分,分别。在EDTA管中进行预处理的那些和用卡那霉素处理的那些之间进行比较。
    在用卡那霉素处理之前和之后,样品的平均PLT计数显着不同,两者都是自动的(156.6±76.4vs.260.3±115.5;p<0.001)和手动(168.5±92.1与262.8±119.6;p<0.001)读数,95%置信区间为0.19(0.022-0.365)。
    这项研究表明,在临床实验室实践中,应将卡那霉素与EDTA-PTCP一起添加到猫科动物的血液样本中。
    UNASSIGNED: Pseudothrombocytopenia is a commonly obtained false negative result when analyzing feline platelet (PLT) count by an automated machine. It is related to ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), a widely utilized anticoagulant in blood collection tubes, resulting in EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia (EDTA-PTCP).
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate whether treated with kanamycin enhanced the quantity of PLT aggregations in feline blood specimens collected using EDTA-PTCP.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-one blood samples were obtained using EDTA tubes. The complete blood count was analyzed using an automated Mindray BC-5000Vet. Both Manual cell counts and thin blood smears were performed to estimate the amount of red blood cell, white blood cell, and PLTs as well as to evaluate the severity scores of PLT clumping, respectively. Comparisons were made between those pre-treated and those treated with kanamycin in the EDTA tube.
    UNASSIGNED: There were significantly different mean PLT counts in the samples before and after they were treated with kanamycin, both on automated (156.6 ± 76.4 vs. 260.3 ± 115.5; p < 0.001) and manual (168.5 ± 92.1 vs. 262.8 ± 119.6; p < 0.001) readings, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.19 (0.022-0.365).
    UNASSIGNED: This study suggests that in clinical laboratory practice, kanamycin should be added to feline blood specimens with EDTA-PTCP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:前列腺内病变的勾画对于前列腺癌(PC)患者正确实施局灶性放疗增强至关重要。勾画中的错误可以转化为降低的肿瘤控制并潜在地增加副作用。这项研究的目的是比较基于PET的勾画方法与组织病理学。
    方法:研究人群由15例确诊高危PC患者组成,拟进行前列腺切除术。[68Ga]-PSMA-PET/MR在手术前进行。将组织病理学中鉴定的前列腺病变转移到体内[68Ga]-PSMA-PET/MR坐标系中。四名放射肿瘤学家根据PET数据手动描绘了前列腺内病变。采用了各种半自动分割方法,包括绝对阈值和相对阈值,自适应阈值,和多级Otsu阈值。
    结果:肿瘤学家描绘的总肿瘤体积(GTT)显示出适度的观察者间一致性,Dice相似系数(DSC)为0.68。与组织病理学相比,在所有方法中,人工勾画的DSC中位数最高,而错误发现率(FDR)最低.在半自动方法中,使用超过4(SUV>4)的标准化摄取值(SUV)阈值生成的GTV显示最高的中值DSC(0.41),中位病变覆盖率为0.51,FDR为0.66,Hausdorff距离的第95百分位数(HD95%)为8.22mm。
    结论:人工描述显示,观察者之间的协议处于中等水平。与组织病理学相比,手动描绘和SUV>4表现出最高的DSC和最低的HD95%值。导致高病变覆盖率的方法与对病变大小的过度估计有关。
    BACKGROUND: The delineation of intraprostatic lesions is vital for correct delivery of focal radiotherapy boost in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Errors in the delineation could translate into reduced tumour control and potentially increase the side effects. The purpose of this study is to compare PET-based delineation methods with histopathology.
    METHODS: The study population consisted of 15 patients with confirmed high-risk PC intended for prostatectomy. [68Ga]-PSMA-PET/MR was performed prior to surgery. Prostate lesions identified in histopathology were transferred to the in vivo [68Ga]-PSMA-PET/MR coordinate system. Four radiation oncologists manually delineated intraprostatic lesions based on PET data. Various semi-automatic segmentation methods were employed, including absolute and relative thresholds, adaptive threshold, and multi-level Otsu threshold.
    RESULTS: The gross tumour volumes (GTVs) delineated by the oncologists showed a moderate level of interobserver agreement with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.68. In comparison with histopathology, manual delineations exhibited the highest median DSC and the lowest false discovery rate (FDR) among all approaches. Among semi-automatic approaches, GTVs generated using standardized uptake value (SUV) thresholds above 4 (SUV > 4) demonstrated the highest median DSC (0.41), with 0.51 median lesion coverage ratio, FDR of 0.66 and the 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance (HD95%) of 8.22 mm.
    CONCLUSIONS: Manual delineations showed a moderate level of interobserver agreement. Compared to histopathology, manual delineations and SUV > 4 exhibited the highest DSC and the lowest HD95% values. The methods that resulted in a high lesion coverage were associated with a large overestimation of the size of the lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在这项研究中,我们旨在比较各种螯合剂的有效性,乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA),柠檬酸(CA),和依替膦酸(HEDP)以两种不同的形式混合,去除涂抹层并促进牙髓封闭剂渗透到拔出的单根牙齿的牙本质小管中。
    方法:该研究使用75颗牙齿,分为五组:17%EDTA,10%CA,9%HEDP+NaOCl,9%HEDP+蒸馏水(DW),和对照(DW)组。扫描电子显微镜用于评估涂抹层的去除,共聚焦激光显微镜用于评估从根尖不同深度的管状密封剂渗透。
    结果:与其他试剂相比,使用17%EDTA和10%CA的密封剂渗透率最高(p<0.001)。在子宫颈第三,EDTA的密封剂渗透,HEDP+NaOCl,HEDP+DW组与DW组相比差异有统计学意义(p=0.020)。对于中间的三分之一,EDTA,CA,HEDP+NaOCl组明显高于DW组(p<0.001)。HEDP+NaOCl的宫颈水平值显著高于根尖水平值,HEDP+DW,和DW(p<0.001)。在所有深度处,9%HEDP+DW的涂抹层去除低于17%EDTA和10%CA的涂抹层去除(p<0.001)。在10%CA和对照(p=0.015)之间,在中等深度观察到涂抹层去除显着。
    结论:在本研究的局限性内,就密封剂渗透和涂抹层去除而言,EDTA和CA的值最高。根据这些发现,与双重冲洗或单一HEDP冲洗相比,使用强螯合剂突出了更好的临床效率。
    BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of various chelating agents, ethilenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid (CA), and etidronic acid (HEDP) mixed in two different forms, in removing the smear layer and promoting the penetration of an endodontic sealer into the dentinal tubules of extracted single-rooted teeth.
    METHODS: The study used 75 teeth divided into five groups: 17% EDTA, 10% CA, 9% HEDP + NaOCl, 9% HEDP + distilled water (DW), and a control (DW) group. Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess smear layer removal and confocal laser microscopy was used to evaluate tubular sealer penetration at different depths from the apical tip.
    RESULTS: Sealer penetration was highest with 17% EDTA and 10% CA as compared with the other agents (p<0.001). At the cervical third, the sealer penetration for EDTA, HEDP + NaOCl, and HEDP + DW groups were significantly different than those in DW (p = 0.020). For the middle third, EDTA, CA, and HEDP + NaOCl groups were significantly higher than those of the DW group (p<0.001). Cervical-level values were significantly higher than apical-level values for HEDP + NaOCl, HEDP + DW, and DW (p<0.001). Smear layer removal was lower with 9% HEDP + DW than with 17% EDTA and 10% CA at all depths (p<0.001). A significancy in smear layer removal was observed between 10% CA and control (p = 0.015) in middle depth.
    CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, highest values were seen in EDTA and CA in terms of sealer penetration and smear layer removal. In the light of these findings, the use of strong chelating agents highlights better clinical efficiency than dual-rinse or single HEDP irrigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:表面张力和接触角特性,在确定冲洗溶液穿透牙本质表面和牙本质小管的有效性方面起着至关重要的作用,对于开发新的灌溉解决方案及其偏好非常重要。本研究的目的是比较牙髓中使用的不同灌溉溶液的表面张力和接触角特性,在牙本质表面和牙本质小管内。
    方法:在本研究中,5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)的接触角和表面张力,17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA),2%氯己定(CHX),5%硼酸(BA),0.02%次氯酸(HOCl),0.2%二氧化氯(ClO2),BiopureMTAD,QMix解决方案,和蒸馏水(对照组)进行测量。使用测角器装置(AttensionThetaLite张力计,BiolinScientific,美国),采用固着滴法在预先准备好的牙本质表面上测量接触角,和表面张力的吊滴法。
    结果:接触角测量显示,MTAD的接触角值之间没有统计学上的显着差异,ClO2和CHX或NaOCl之间,QMix,BA,和HOCl(p>0.05)。然而,EDTA的接触角明显大于MTAD,ClO2,CHX,NaOCl,QMix,BA,和HOCl(p<0.05)。此外,牙质与蒸馏水的接触角大于所有其他测试溶液的接触角(p<0.05)。表面张力测量显示QMix和MTAD的表面张力值在统计学上相似(p>0.05)。CHX的表面张力低于蒸馏水和HOCl(p<0.05)。它的表面张力也低于ClO2,NaOCl,和BA(p<0.05)。此外,用EDTA处理的样品的表面张力大于所有其他测试溶液的表面张力(p<0.05)。
    结论:液体的表面张力与不同表面的接触角之间的直接线性关系可能并不总是成立,和这些值应该独立考虑每个解决方案在不同的表面。考虑到根管牙本质冲洗液的接触角和表面张力特性,可以建议临床使用ClO2可以推荐超过NaOCl,同样,BA可以推荐超过EDTA。
    BACKGROUND: Surface tension and contact angle properties, which play a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of irrigation solutions in penetrating dentin surfaces and dentin tubules, are highly important for the development of new irrigation solutions and their preferences. The aim of the current study was to compare the surface tension and contact angle properties of different irrigation solutions used in endodontics, both on the dentin surface and within dentin tubules.
    METHODS: In this study, the contact angles and surface tensions of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 5% boric acid (BA), 0.02% hypochlorous acid (HOCl), 0.2% chlorine dioxide (ClO2), Biopure MTAD, QMix solutions, and distilled water (control group) were measured. Measurements were conducted using a goniometer device (Attension Theta Lite Tensiometer, Biolin Scientific, USA), employing the sessile drop method for contact angle measurements on pre-prepared dentin surfaces, and the pendant drop method for surface tension.
    RESULTS: Contact angle measurements revealed no statistically significant differences between the contact angle values of MTAD, ClO2, and CHX or between NaOCl, QMix, BA, and HOCl (p > 0.05). However, EDTA exhibited a significantly greater contact angle than did MTAD, ClO2, CHX, NaOCl, QMix, BA, and HOCl (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the contact angle of dentin with distilled water was greater than that with all other solutions tested (p < 0.05). Surface tension measurements revealed that the surface tension values of QMix and MTAD were statistically similar (p > 0.05). CHX exhibited lower surface tension than distilled water and HOCl (p < 0.05), and it also had lower surface tension than ClO2, NaOCl, and BA (p < 0.05). Additionally, the surface tension of the samples treated with EDTA was greater than that of all other solutions tested (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The direct linear relationship between the surface tension of liquids and contact angles on different surfaces may not always hold true, and these values should be considered independently for each solution on various surfaces. Considering the contact angles and surface tension properties of irrigation solutions with root canal dentin, it can be suggested for clinical use that ClO2 could be recommended over NaOCl, and similarly, BA could be recommended over EDTA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号