BACKGROUND: Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are most likely to respond to the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor baricitinib (BARI) are known to have an impacted body surface area (BSA) ≤ 40% and severe itch (numerical rating scale [NRS] ≥ 7], collectively termed \'BARI itch-dominant\' patients. Our objective is to build on our previous work by providing a body region-specific, clinical characterization of the BARI itch-dominant patient at baseline and their response to BARI 4 mg.
METHODS: BREEZE-AD7 was a phase 3 trial in adults with moderate-to-severe AD receiving placebo or 2 mg or 4 mg BARI in combination with topical corticosteroids. Assessing only data from BARI itch-dominant patients, we summarized the baseline characteristics and conducted body region-specific analyses on Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) data in order to report the response to placebo versus BARI 4 mg within this patient subtype.
RESULTS: BARI 4 mg was highly effective across all body regions; at week 16, 75% improvement was seen in EASI scores (EASI75), and response rates with BARI 4 mg (head/neck, 58.3%; trunk, 69.2%; upper extremities, 61.5%; lower extremities, 87.5%) all exceeded those with placebo (head/neck: 37.5%; trunk, 40.6%; upper extremities, 18.8%; lower extremities, 40.6%) as well as the overall EASI75 rates of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (BARI, 48.0%; placebo, 23.0%). At baseline, most BARI itch-dominant patients presented with involvement of all regions (mean regional BSA 22.7%-40.3%), highest in the head and neck, mean EASI region scores of 15.7-24.0, and considerably severe sign ratings (mean EASI sub-scores: 1.4-2.3, out of 3), especially for erythema.
CONCLUSIONS: BARI itch-dominant patients exhibit AD involvement across all body regions and considerable sign severity, especially erythema. In response to BARI 4 mg, EASI quickly improved across regions, substantially more so in this subtype than in the ITT population.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic immuno-inflammatory skin disease. Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. This post hoc analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in Chinese patients aged ≥ 2 years with mild to moderate AD.
METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of crisaborole in Chinese patients from the vehicle-controlled, phase 3 CrisADe CLEAR study. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive crisaborole or vehicle twice daily, respectively, for 28 days. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) total score at day 29. Key secondary endpoints were improvement in Investigator\'s Static Global Assessment (ISGA), ISGA success, and change from baseline in weekly average Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score. Adverse events were documented.
RESULTS: Of 391 patients in the overall study, 237 were from China, 157 assigned to crisaborole and 80 assigned to vehicle. A greater reduction in percent change from baseline in EASI total score at day 29 was shown in the crisaborole vs. vehicle group (least squares mean [LSM]: -66.34 [95% (confidence interval) CI -71.55 to -61.12] vs. -50.18 [95% CI -58.02 to -42.34]). Response rates for achievement of ISGA improvement (43.2% [95% CI 35.4-51.1] vs. 33.4% [95% CI 22.5-44.2]) and ISGA success (31.7% [95% CI 24.3-39.0] vs. 21.5% [95% CI 12.1-30.9]) at day 29 were higher in the crisaborole vs. vehicle group. A greater reduction in change from baseline in weekly average PP-NRS score at week 4 was observed in the crisaborole vs. vehicle group (LSM: -1.98 [95% CI -2.34 to -1.62] vs. -1.08 [95% CI -1.63 to -0.53]). No new safety signals were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Crisaborole was effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients aged ≥ 2 years with mild to moderate AD.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04360187.

UNASSIGNED: The role of upadacitinib in the management of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis seems promising, but more data on its efficacy and safety are needed. This study endeavors to assess the practical impact and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, focusing on analyzing patient responses to the treatment.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, adult patients diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis received upadacitinib at daily doses of 15 mg or 30 mg, as prescribed by their attending physicians. The therapeutic efficacy of upadacitinib was meticulously assessed using established clinical metrics. Simultaneously, a comprehensive safety assessment was conducted through monthly monitoring, including the evaluation of potential effects of upadacitinib intake on hepatic function, lipid profile, and hematopoiesis using the pertinent laboratory tests.
UNASSIGNED: Sixteen participants were enrolled in the study. At 1month follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score to 18.8 points, which further increased to 24 points at the 4-month mark. Additionally, 9 participants (56%) demonstrated an EASI-50 response after 1 month of treatment, with this response increasing to 9 participants (90%) after 4 months. Furthermore, enhanced therapeutic responses were observed at 4 months, with 6 patients (38%) achieving an EASI-75 response at 1month and 8 patients (80%) achieving this milestone at the 4-month follow-up. This study highlights the potential of upadacitinib as an effective treatment option for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. While it demonstrates improved symptom management, close monitoring for potential adverse events, particularly infections and the known risks of Janus kinase inhibitors, is essential. Further research is essential to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib.

UNASSIGNED: Reliable assessment of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity is necessary for clinical practice and research. Valid and reliable remote assessment is essential to facilitate remote care and research.
UNASSIGNED: Assess the validity and reliability of the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) based on images and patient-assessed severity based on the Self-Administered EASI (SA-EASI).
UNASSIGNED: Whole-body clinical images were taken during consultation from children with AD. After consultations, caregivers completed the SA-EASI and provided images from home. Four raters assessed all images twice using EASI.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1534 clinical images and 425 patient-provided images were collected from 87 and 32 children. Excellent (0.90) validity, good inter (0.77) and intrarater reliability (0.91), and standard error of measurement (4.31) was found for the EASI based on clinical images. Feasibility of patient-provided images showed limitations with missing images (43.8%) and quality issues (23.1%). However, good validity (0.86), inter (0.74) and intrarater reliability (0.94) were found when assessment was possible. Moderate correlation (0.60) between SA-EASI and EASI was found.
UNASSIGNED: Low portion patient-provided images.
UNASSIGNED: AD severity assessment based on images strongly correlates with in-person AD assessment. Good measurement properties confirm the potential of remote assessment. Moderate correlation between SA-EASI and in-person EASI suggest limited value of self-assessment.

UNASSIGNED: Upadacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor approved in Japan for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), and it provides a high therapeutic efficacy.
UNASSIGNED: We compared the therapeutic effects of upadacitinib on skin rashes of individual anatomical sites, head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk in patients with AD.
UNASSIGNED: From August 2021 to December 2022, 65 Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe AD (aged ≥ 12 years) were treated with oral once daily upadacitinib 15 mg plus twice daily topical corticosteroids of moderate-to-strongest classes.
UNASSIGNED: The eczema area and severity indexes (EASIs) of individual sites decreased significantly at weeks 4, 12, and 24 compared to those at week 0 in parallel to total (whole body) EASI. The achievement rates of EASI 75 at week 24 and of EASI 90 at week 12 of lower limbs were significantly higher than those of trunk. The percent reductions of EASI of lower limbs at weeks 12 and 24 were significantly higher than those of head and neck and of trunk.
UNASSIGNED: Among the four anatomical sites, the treatment responsiveness to upadacitinib in lower limbs appeared the highest, while those in trunk and in head and neck appeared relatively lower.

暂无摘要。

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with severe itch. The eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (ELR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are reported to reflect itch or the severity of AD. We examined if these parameters may act as indicators for therapeutic effects of the Janus kinase 1 inhibitor upadacitinib for patients with AD in real-world clinical practice. Between August 2021 and September 2023, 65 Japanese patients (aged ≥ 12 years) with moderate to severe AD were treated with 15 mg/day of oral upadacitinib, plus twice daily topical corticosteroids. Before treatment, the baseline ELR, NLR, MLR, and PLR levels positively correlated with the eczema area and severity index (EASI), while the baseline NLR and PLR levels positively correlated with the peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS). After upadacitinib treatment, ELR and NLR remarkably decreased at week 4 and the reduced levels were maintained until week 24, in parallel with EASI and PP-NRS, while MLR and PLR transiently reduced at week 4, but returned to baseline levels after week 12. The percent reduction of ELR significantly correlated with the percent reductions of EASI and PP-NRS at weeks 4, 12, and 24 of upadacitinib treatment. ELR may act as an indicator for the improvement of clinical signs and itch by upadacitinib treatment in AD.

The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, a Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, for atopic dermatitis (AD) in real-world practice. From August 2021 to September 2022, 36 patients aged ≥15 years with moderate to severe AD were treated with oral baricitinib 4 mg/day plus topical corticosteroids. Baricitinib improved clinical indexes; the percent reduction at weeks 4 and 12 was a median of 69.19% and 69.98% for the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), 84.52% and 76.33% for the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool, and 76.39% and 64.58% for Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Score, respectively. The achievement rate of EASI 75 was 38.89% and 33.33% at weeks 4 and 12, respectively. The percent reduction of EASI in the head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk was 56.9%, 68.3%, 80.7%, and 62.5% at week 12, respectively, with a significant difference between the head and neck versus the lower limbs. Baricitinib decreased thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, lactate dehydrogenase, and total eosinophil count at week 4. Baseline EASI of the head and neck negatively correlated with percent reduction of EASI at week 4, while baseline EASI of the lower limbs positively correlated with percent reduction of EASI at week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events included elevation of creatine phosphokinase (11.1%), herpes labialis (5.6%), furuncle (8.3%), and exacerbation of AD (1%), without serious treatment-emergent adverse events. In this real-world study, baricitinib was well tolerated for patients with AD and achieved therapeutic effects comparable to those in clinical trials. High baseline EASI of the lower limbs might predict good treatment response at week 12, while high baseline EASI of the head and neck might predict poor treatment response at week 4 in baricitinib treatment for AD.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, janus kinase 1 inhibitor for atopic dermatitis (AD) in real-world practice. From September 2021 to March 2022, 31 patients with moderate-to-severe AD, aged ≥12 years were treated with oral upadacitinib 15 mg/day plus topical corticosteroids. Upadacitinib reduced clinical indexes compared to baseline levels: percent reduction at week 4 and 12 (median) was 73.6% and 85.6% in eczema area and severity index (EASI); 81.3% and 81.3% in AD control tool (ADCT); and 70% and 75% in peak pruritus numerical rating score (PP-NRS), respectively. The achievement rate of EASI 75 was 51.6% and 67.7% at week 4 and 12, respectively. Upadacitinib reduced serum lactate dehydrogenase and total eosinophil count (TEC) at week 4 and 12, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and immunoglobulin E at week 4, compared to baseline levels. Percent reduction of TEC was correlated with that of EASI at week 4 and 12. Baseline TEC was positively correlated with the percent reduction of EASI at week 4. Percent reduction of EASI in female patients was higher than that in male patients at week 4 and 12. Linear multivariate regression analyses revealed that high percent reduction of EASI at week 4 or 12 was associated with high baseline TEC or female gender, respectively. There were no serious treatment-emergent adverse events. Adverse events include acne (5%), elevation of creatine phosphokinase (9.7%), herpes zoster (1%), and AD (1%). Upadacitinib plus topical corticosteroids for patients with AD in the real-world practice was well tolerated and gave therapeutic effects comparable with those in previous clinical trials. The ADCT and PP-NRS rapidly reduced at week 4 while EASI gradually reduced until week 12. The TEC might act both as a predictive factor of response at week 4 and as a biomarker reflecting therapeutic effects in upadacitinib treatment for AD.

UNASSIGNED: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a long-term, pruritic, recurrent, systemic, inflammatory skin disorder. In the Middle East region, the burden of AD is understudied, and there is a dearth of AD guideline documents for practitioners.
UNASSIGNED: An expert panel meeting, encompassing 12 dermatologists from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), was congregated to develop evidence- and experience-based consensus recommendations for AD management, especially in adults in KSA. They completed a questionnaire with seven clinical statements, and a consensus was defined when the responses of ≥75% of participants coincided.
UNASSIGNED: The expert recommendations were as follows: American Association of Dermatology guidelines are to be followed for defining AD; Eczema Area and Severity Index or SCORing atopic dermatitis index may be used to quantify the disease severity; Dermatology Life Quality Index may be used to determine the impact of AD on patients\' quality of life; Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool may be used to assess long-term disease control in AD patients; and the European guidelines are to be followed for the management of AD. In AD patients who are inadequately controlled with topical or systemic therapies, the preferred systemic agent for use either alone or in combination with topical treatments is dupilumab, cyclosporine, methotrexate, phototherapy, or other available systemic treatments that may include mycophenolate mofetil or oral corticosteroids.
UNASSIGNED: These expert recommendations assist physicians by providing a reference framework for optimal care of adult AD patients.