Economic Competition

经济竞争
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不断上涨的医疗保健费用和随之而来的医疗保险报销费用的增加导致了多年来的许多支付改革。1983年,医院实施了前瞻性支付系统(PPS),这激励了医院购买熟练的护理设施(SNF)或利用其过剩的能力在医院内建立一个护理设施。随着1998年向SNF申请PPS报销,先前对医院拥有SNF的金钱激励措施消失了。然而,尽管数量减少了,许多医院继续经营以医院为基础的专业护理设施(HBSNFs).
    目的:本研究使用组织的种群生态学框架研究了与HBSNFs生存相关的组织和市场层面因素。
    方法:使用美国医院协会的调查数据,所有1998年开放HBSNF的美国急性护理医院的事件历史被绘制,以检查医院是否在22年期间(1998-2020)关闭其HBSNF.主要自变量包括医院规模,所有权,总保证金,市场竞争,和医疗保险优势渗透。自变量和控制变量滞后1年。进行Cox回归以估计捕获HBSNF关闭风险的风险比。
    结果:结果表明,HBSNFs位于大型,非营利性医院和在竞争较弱的市场中运营的医院生存的可能性更大。
    结论:小型的HBSNF管理员,营利性医院和在竞争激烈的市场中运营的医院可以利用这项研究的结果,明智地将闲置资源分配给他们的HBSNF,以保持开放,因为目前监管机构强调护理的连续性。
    Rising health care costs and consequent increases in Medicare reimbursements have led to many payment reforms over the years. Implementation of the prospective payment system (PPS) for hospitals in 1983 incentivized hospitals to either purchase skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or utilize their excess capacity to establish one within the hospital. With PPS reimbursement being applied to SNFs in 1998, prior monetary incentives for hospitals to own an SNF disappeared. However, despite the reduction in numbers, many hospitals continued to operate their hospital-based skilled nursing facilities (HBSNFs).
    This study examines the organizational and market-level factors associated with the survival of HBSNFs using the population ecology of organizations framework.
    Using American Hospital Association survey data, event histories of all U.S. acute care hospitals with an open HBSNF in 1998 were plotted to examine if a hospital closed its HBSNF during a 22-year period (1998-2020). The primary independent variables included hospital size, ownership, total margin, market competition, and Medicare Advantage penetration. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year. Cox regressions were conducted to estimate the hazard ratios capturing the risk of HBSNF closure.
    The results showed that HBSNFs located in large, not-for-profit hospitals and those operating in less competitive markets had greater odds of surviving.
    The HBSNF administrators of small, for-profit hospitals and those operating in highly competitive markets could utilize the findings of this study to judiciously allocate slack resources to their HBSNFs to keep those open given the current emphasis on continuity of care by regulatory bodies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着竞争和市场管理局对家用宠物兽医服务的调查步伐加快,我们将继续捍卫您的利益,并促进兽医护理的价值。
    As the Competition and Markets Authority investigation into veterinary services for household pets presses ahead at pace, we continue to champion your interests and promote the value of veterinary care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在许多基于税收的医疗保健系统中,政策制定者已经推出了促进供应商竞争的改革,旨在提高质量和效率。医疗保健竞争通常是在空间上定义的,当地市场通常被确定为围绕每个提供商的圆圈。我们认为,可以改进现有的本地市场定义,以更好地捕获实际的本地市场。为了促进竞争改革,有可能带来政策制定者所设想的收益,一个关键的条件是竞争性市场的实际出现。然而,对初级保健市场的竞争进行了有限的研究,尽管初级保健是医疗保健系统的重要组成部分。
    目的:该研究旨在促进关于如何在地理上定义本地市场和研究瑞典初级保健提供者竞争的辩论。
    方法:使用瑞典所有个人和所有初级保健提供者的数据进行了一项横断面研究。本地市场被定义为:固定半径(1公里和3公里);可变半径;和可变形状-我们新的本地市场定义,允许市场在大小和形状上都有所不同。竞争是使用Herfindahl-Hirschman指数和当地市场内竞争对手的数量来衡量的。
    结果:固定半径市场无法捕获地理区域内和跨地理区域的变化。可变半径和可变形状市场相似,但并不总是识别相同的竞争对手或竞争水平。此外,瑞典初级保健的竞争水平差异很大。许多供应商在垄断市场经营,而其他人则面临激烈的竞争。
    结论:尽管可变形状方法有可能更好地捕获实际市场并更准确地识别竞争对手,需要进一步分析。此外,建议瑞典决策者决定是否仍然追求竞争,如果是,采取措施改善当地垄断市场条件。
    BACKGROUND: In many tax-based healthcare systems, policymakers have introduced reforms that promote provider competition with the intention of improving the quality and efficiency. Healthcare competition is usually defined spatially, with local markets often being identified as a circle around each provider. We argue that existing local market definitions can be improved to better capture actual local markets. For pro-competition reforms to potentially lead to the gains envisioned by policymakers, a crucial condition is the actual emergence of competitive markets. However, limited research has been conducted on competition in primary care markets, despite primary care constituting a vital part of a healthcare system.
    OBJECTIVE: The study aims to contribute to the debate on how to define local markets geographically and to examine provider competition in Swedish primary care.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data on all individuals and all primary care providers in Sweden. Local markets were defined as: fixed radius (1 km and 3 km); variable radius; and variable shape-our new local market definition that allows markets to vary in both size and shape. Competition was measured using the Herfindahl-Hirschman index and a count of the number of competitors within the local market.
    RESULTS: Fixed radius markets fail to capture variation within and across geographical areas. The variable radius and variable shape markets are similar but do not always identify the same competitors or level of competition. Furthermore, competition levels vary significantly in Swedish primary care. Many providers operate in monopoly markets, whereas others face high competition.
    CONCLUSIONS: While the variable shape approach has the potential to better capture actual markets and more accurately identify competitors, further analyses are needed. Moreover, Swedish policymakers are advised to decide whether to still pursue competition and if so, take measures to improve local market conditions in monopolies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:原始药物制造商使用几种策略来延迟美国的仿制药竞争,但目前尚不清楚这是否会导致与其他国家相比更长的市场独占性。
    目的:我们试图了解美国和两个可比国家的药品市场独占权长度如何变化。
    方法:我们专注于在美国2年内获得批准的药物,法国,和澳大利亚从1995年到2005年,我们使用Kaplan-Meier分析比较了从营销批准到第一次通用竞争或2023年6月的独家长度。
    结果:在美国和法国共有的165种药物中,法国的独占长度中位数稍长(15.0年,四分位数间距[IQR]:13.0-19.6)比美国(14.5年,IQR:11.7-17.6)。在美国和澳大利亚共有的100种药物中,澳大利亚的独占时间中位数更长(16.3年,IQR:13.9-22.4)比美国(14.4年,IQR:12.0-17.1)。
    结论:美国的市场独占长度不长于法国和澳大利亚。潜在的原因包括更大的美国市场和激励措施,这些激励措施为成功挑战鼻祖市场排他性的制造商在美国提供短暂的高仿制药价格。
    BACKGROUND: Originator drug manufacturers use several strategies to delay generic competition in the USA, but it remains unclear whether this results in longer market exclusivity compared to other countries.
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand how drug market exclusivity lengths vary between the USA and two comparable countries.
    METHODS: We focused on drugs approved within 2 years of each other in the USA, France, and Australia from 1995 to 2005, and we compared the lengths of exclusivity from marketing approval through first generic competition or June 2023 using Kaplan-Meier analyses.
    RESULTS: Among 165 drugs in common between the USA and France, the median length of exclusivity was slightly longer in France (15.0 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 13.0-19.6) than the USA (14.5 years, IQR: 11.7-17.6). Among 100 drugs in common between the USA and Australia, the median length of exclusivity was longer in Australia (16.3 years, IQR: 13.9-22.4) than in the USA (14.4 years, IQR: 12.0-17.1).
    CONCLUSIONS: Market exclusivity lengths in the USA are not longer than in France and Australia. Potential reasons include the larger US market and incentives that offer transient high generic drug prices in the USA for manufacturers that successfully challenge originator market exclusivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: News
    AnnaJudson报告了BVA最近围绕竞争和市场管理局市场调查的活动。
    Anna Judson reports on BVA\'s recent activities around the Competition and Markets Authority\'s market investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在本文中,我们估计了通过澳大利亚药品福利计划报销的仿制药进入对基准药品价格的初始和时间影响,以及在当前监管框架下进一步的仿制药竞争对这些价格的影响程度.
    方法:我们构建了一个面板数据集,该数据集由781个药物福利计划在95个月的时间段内列出的药物组成,并使用固定效应回归。通过实施面板方法研究了通用竞争的动态价格效应。
    结果:我们的结果表明,仿制药进入澳大利亚医药市场会导致初始价格大幅降低约31%,并且连续的仿制药进入者也会进一步降低药品价格。通过亚组分析,我们发现,仿制药竞争的效果根据药物的治疗组和给药方式而显著变化,动态分析表明,即使在初始大幅下降后,仿制药进入也会导致价格持续下降。
    结论:与以前的研究所确定的相比,通用竞争在更大程度上降低了澳大利亚的报销药品价格,虽然平均价格的影响可能会有很大差异,这取决于药物的治疗组或给药方式。在价格披露机制下,随着时间的推移,价格总体上继续大幅下跌。
    OBJECTIVE: In this article, we estimate the initial and temporal impacts of generic entry on benchmark drug prices as reimbursed through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme of Australia and the degree to which further generic competition affects these prices under the current regulatory framework.
    METHODS: We construct a panel data set consisting of 781 Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listed drugs over a 95-month time period and use fixed-effect regressions. The dynamic price effects of generic competition are investigated by implementing panel methods.
    RESULTS: Our results suggest that generic entry into the Australian pharmaceutical market causes significant initial price reductions of approximately 31% and that successive generic entrants also act to further reduce drug prices. Through subgroup analyses, we identify that the effect of generic competition varies significantly according to the drug\'s therapeutic group and mode of drug administration and the dynamic analysis indicates that generic entry results in continuous price reductions even after large initial drops.
    CONCLUSIONS: Generic competition reduces reimbursed drug prices in Australia to a greater extent than previous research has identified, although the average price effects can vary significantly depending on a drug\'s therapeutic group or mode of drug administration. Prices generally continue to fall significantly over time under the price disclosure mechanism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在当前知识经济时代,国家研究系统的能力是国家竞争力和社会经济发展的关键驱动力。本文比较了经合组织国家和其他八个相关经济体的科学地位。我们使用研究绩效的文献计量指标,首先在个人层面应用。这种方法避免了文献和实践中现存的总体水平分析的扭曲,这忽略了不同研究领域的不同出版强度。我们发现研究绩效与国家经济竞争力之间存在很强的相关性,研究绩效与研究支出倾向之间存在中等但显着的相关性。
    In the current knowledge-based economy, the abilities of the national research system are a key driver of the country\'s competitiveness and socio-economic development. This paper compares the scientific standing of the OECD countries and eight other relevant economies. We use a bibliometric indicator of research performance, applied first at the individual level. This approach avoids the distortions of the aggregate-level analyses extant in literature and practice, which overlook the different publication intensities across research fields. We find a strong correlation between research performance and the economic competitiveness of nations and a moderate but significant correlation between research performance and the propensity to spend on research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    日益突出的互联网平台不正当竞争问题严重制约了平台经济的健康可持续发展。基于IPUC“多代理共治”方案,本文引入随机扰动和连续策略集来改进经典的二元确定性演化博弈系统。结果表明,在考虑随机扰动后,平衡点(1,1)对应的正状态不再稳定,且所需参数条件较为严格。随机干扰下的IPUC“多代理共同治理”系统表现出特定的脆弱性。在连续策略集进化博弈系统中,政府部门和互联网平台可以在最大化预期收益的基础上灵活地做出最优决策,策略选择具有更好的弹性。不管进化游戏的场景如何,在提高处罚力度的同时,将非政府组织和公众的参与水平保持在一定的门槛之上,有利于游戏系统向积极状态的演变。分析过程和结论为政府设计IPUC监管体系和框架提供了见解和指导。
    The increasingly prominent issue of unfair competition on Internet platforms (IPUC) severely restricts the healthy and sustainable development of the platform economy. Based on the IPUC \"multi-agent co-governance\" scenario, this paper introduces stochastic disturbances and continuous strategy set to improve the classical binary deterministic evolutionary game system. The results show that after considering stochastic disturbances, the positive state corresponding to the equilibrium point (1,1) is no longer stable, and the required parameter conditions are more stringent. The IPUC \"multi-agent co-governance\" system under stochastic disturbances exhibits specific vulnerability. In the continuous strategy set evolutionary game system, government departments and Internet platforms can flexibly make optimal decisions based on maximizing expected returns, and strategy selection has better elasticity. Regardless of the evolutionary game scenario, maintaining the participation level of NGOs and the public above a certain threshold while increasing the penalty intensity is conducive to the evolution of the game system toward the positive state. The analysis process and conclusions provide insights and guidance for the governments to design the IPUC regulatory system and frameworks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们检查了不同所有权的美国医院质量的差异,连锁会员,和市场集中度。我们提出了一项新的质量指标,该指标来自旗舰医院减少入院计划对医院的处罚,并使用回归模型对医院特征和县级人口进行风险调整。虽然营利性所有权和质量之间的整体关联是负相关的,有证据表明有很大的异质性。营利性医院相对于非营利性医院的质量随着市场集中度的提高而下降。此外,质量差距主要是由营利链驱动的。虽然比赛结果反映了文献中早期的发现,连锁结果似乎是新的:它表明,连锁所提供的任何潜在质量收益大多是由非营利性医院实现的。
    We examine variation in US hospital quality across ownership, chain membership, and market concentration. We propose a new measure of quality derived from penalties imposed on hospitals under the flagship Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, and use regression models to risk-adjust for hospital characteristics and county demographics. While the overall association between for-profit ownership and quality is negative, there is evidence of substantial heterogeneity. The quality of for-profit relative to non-profit hospitals declines with increasing market concentration. Moreover, the quality gap is primarily driven by for-profit chains. While the competition result mirrors earlier findings in the literature, the chain result appears to be new: it suggests that any potential quality gains afforded by chains are mostly realized by not-for-profit hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号