UNASSIGNED: The demand for fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is increasing among patients with early-stage cervical cancer (CC). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of local excision as an alternative to hysterectomy in stage I CC patients aged 15-39 years-commonly referred to as adolescents and young adults (AYAs)-with varying clinicopathological characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. We examined treatment interventions across different age groups, degrees of histological types, tumor differentiation, and tumor stages. The effect of local excision vs. hysterectomy was assessed by comparing overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 10,629 stage I AYA cervical cancer patients were included in this study. Among these patients, 24.5% underwent local excision for fertility preservation, while 67.3% underwent radical hysterectomy. For patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), long-term outcomes favored local excision over hysterectomy, and a similar trend was observed in those with adenosquamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). However, the prognosis was comparable among patients with cervical adenocarcinoma (AC). In patients with well- and moderate- differentiated tumors, local excision demonstrated superior OS compared to hysterectomy. No significant differences in prognosis were found between the two surgical interventions for patients with poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors. In stage IA patients, local excision was considered a viable alternative to hysterectomy. In stage IB1-IB2, FSS yielded prognostic outcomes comparable to those of hysterectomy. Conversely, patients with stage IB3 exhibited significantly shorter 5-year OS and DSS following local excision than those who underwent hysterectomy.
UNASSIGNED: In stage IA-IB2 (diameter ≤4 cm) AYA patients, local excision may serve as a viable option for fertility preservation. The histological type of SCC, AC, and ASCC, along with differentiation, should not serve as restrictive factors in determining fertility preservation strategies for these patients. Patients with early-stage, well- or moderately-differentiated SCC may benefit from local excision surgery, even when fertility preservation is not the primary objective.

UNASSIGNED: Aim to investigate the impact of bedside assistant\'s work experience and learning curve on the short-term safety and efficacy in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
UNASSIGNED: Our research retrospectively retrieved 120 cases of early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. According to the different work experiences of the two bedside assistants (BA), patients were divided into a research group (inexperienced BA 1) and a control group (experienced BA 2). Furthermore, the learning curves of these BAs were plotted separately and divided into two distinct phases by cumulative summation: the first learning phase and the second master phase.
UNASSIGNED: In terms of work experience, comparing BA 1 with BA 2 who was more experienced, although the average operative time was prolonged by 29 min (P＜0.001), it did not increase the incidence of operative complication [24.4 % VS 29.1 %, P = 0.583], positive resection margin [4.9 % VS 7.6 %, P = 0.714], intraoperative organ damage [0 % VS 2.5 %, P = 0.546] and there was no significant difference in the number of lymph nodes [19 VS 15, P = 0.103]. Additionally, comparing two distinct phases of the same bedside assistant, there was no significant increasing rate in terms of operative complication, positive resection margin, intraoperative organ damage, and the number of lymph nodes (P＞0.05) neither BA 1 nor BA 2, except for a slight extension of operative time about 20 min in learning phase (P＜0.05).
UNASSIGNED: In robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer, work inexperience and the learning phase of BA only result in a slight extension of operative time, without causing worse short-term surgical outcomes.

Adjuvant treatments are valuable to decrease the recurrence rate and improve survival for early-stage cervical cancer patients (ESCC), Therefore, recurrence risk evaluation is critical for the choice of postoperative treatment. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based radiomics nomogram integrating postoperative adjuvant treatments was constructed and validated externally to improve the recurrence risk prediction for ESCC.
212 ESCC patients underwent surgery and adjuvant treatments from three centers were enrolled and divided into the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. Their clinical data, pretreatment T2-weighted images (T2WI) were retrieved and analyzed. Radiomics models were constructed using machine learning methods with features extracted and screen from sagittal and axial T2WI. A nomogram for recurrence prediction was build and evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis integrating radiomic signature and adjuvant treatments.
A total of 8 radiomic features were screened out of 1020 extracted features. The extreme gradient boosting (XGboost) model based on MRI radiomic features performed best in recurrence prediction with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.833, 0.822 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. The nomogram integrating radiomic signature and clinical factors achieved an AUC of 0.806, 0.718 in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively, for recurrence risk prediction for ESCC.
In this study, the nomogram integrating T2WI radiomic signature and clinical factors is valuable to predict the recurrence risk, thereby allowing timely planning for effective treatments for ESCC with high risk of recurrence.

Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) aims to achieve oncological outcomes that are non-inferior to radical treatment while preserving fertility and optimizing reproductive results. This study assesses in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer survivors following FSS, comparing radical and non-radical approaches.
This retrospective analysis used data from Hungary\'s National Health Insurance Fund (2004-2022) on patients who underwent IVF treatment following FSS for early-stage cervical cancer at ten Hungarian fertility clinics. Patients were classified into radical and non-radical surgical groups, with the uterine arteries being spared in the non-radical procedures. RStudio (R software version: 4.2.2) was used for statistical analysis. Student\'s t-test was used to compare group means, and Fisher\'s exact test was applied to assess independence and distributions between categorical variables, and to estimate odds.
The study analyzed data from 122 IVF treatment cycles involving 36 patients. The non-radical group had a significantly higher live birth rate (83%, 5/6 compared to the radical group (17%, 5/30). Additionally, the non-radical group had a significantly higher implantation rate and cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval (37%, 7/19 and 55%, 6/11 respectively) compared to the radical group (8%, 12/148 and 6%, 5/80 respectively).
This is the largest study to evaluate IVF outcomes in young cervical cancer survivors who have undergone FSS. The findings suggest that less radical procedures are associated with significantly better IVF outcomes. These results emphasize the importance of considering oncological safety and reproductive outcomes together when choosing FSS for early-stage cervical cancer patients. It also highlights the reproductive benefits of performing less radical surgery.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis aims to compare the surgery-related results and oncological outcomes between SH and RH in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
METHODS: We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane to collect studies that compared oncological and surgery-related outcomes between SH and RH groups in patients with stage IA2 and IB1 cervical cancer. A random-effect model calculated the weighted average difference of each primary outcome via Review Manager V.5.4.
RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 6977 patients were included into our study. For oncological outcomes, we found no statistical difference in recurrence rate [OR = 0.88; 95% CI (0.50, 1.57); P = 0.68] and Overall Survival (OS) [OR = 1.23; 95% CI (0.69, 2.19), P = 0.48]. No difference was detected in the prevalence of positive LVSI and lymph nodes metastasis between the two groups. Concerning surgery-related outcomes, the comprehensive effects revealed that the bladder injury [OR = 0.28; 95% CI (0.08, 0.94), P = 0.04] and bladder disfunction [OR = 0.10; 95% CI (0.02, 0.53), P = 0.007] of the RH group were higher compared to the SH group.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested there are no significant differences in terms of both recurrence rate and overall survival among patients with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer undergoing SH or RH, while the SH group has better surgery-related outcomes. These data confirm the need to narrow the indication for RH in early-stage cervical cancer.

This comprehensive review explores the transformative potential of radical trachelectomy as a minimally invasive approach to early-stage cervical cancer treatment. Cervical cancer, a significant global health concern, necessitates innovative strategies for effective intervention, particularly in its early stages. The review begins by providing a background on cervical cancer, emphasizing the pressing need for early-stage treatment options. The focal point is the meticulous examination of radical trachelectomy, a surgical technique that addresses the oncological aspects of treatment and preserves fertility. The conclusion encapsulates vital findings, highlighting this approach\'s dual benefits and challenges. Furthermore, the implications for clinical practice underscore the paradigm shift that radical trachelectomy brings, urging healthcare professionals to consider its integration into personalized treatment plans. The review concludes with a compelling call to action for further research, emphasizing the importance of refining surgical techniques and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the seamless implementation of radical trachelectomy. Overall, this review sets the stage for a transformative shift in the approach to early-stage cervical cancer, presenting radical trachelectomy as a promising frontier in the quest for effective and patient-centered interventions.

Minimally invasive surgery on treatment of early-stage cervical cancer is debatable. Traditional approaches of colpotomy are considered responsible for an inferior oncological outcome. Evidence on whether protective colpotomy could optimize minimally invasive technique and improve prognoses of women with early-stage cervical cancer remains limited. We produced a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare oncological outcomes of the patients treated by minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy to those treated by open surgery according to existing literature. We explored PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized controlled trials or observational studies published in English, (2) studies comparing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy to abdominal radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer, and (3) studies comparing survival outcomes. Two reviewers performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. A total of 8 retrospective cohort studies with 2020 women were included in the study, 821 of whom were in the minimally invasive surgery group, and 1199 of whom were in the open surgery group. The recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the minimally invasive surgery group were both similar to that in the open surgery group (pooled hazard ratio, 0.88 and 0.78, respectively; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.38 and 0.42-1.44, respectively). Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with protective colpotomy on treatment of early-stage cervical cancer had similar recurrence-free survival and overall survival compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy. Protective colpotomy could be a guaranteed approach to modifying minimally invasive technique.

Cervical cancer incidence among premenopausal women is rising, and fertility-sparing surgery serves as an important option for this young population. There is a lack of evidence on what tumor size cutoff should be used to define candidacy for fertility-sparing surgery.
We sought to describe how the association between fertility-sparing surgery (compared with standard surgery) and life expectancy varies by tumor size among patients with cervical cancers measuring ≤4 cm in largest diameter. Our secondary objective was to quantify the probability of undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy among patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery as a function of tumor size.
We identified patients in the National Cancer Database aged ≤45 years, diagnosed with stage I cervical cancer with tumors ≤4 cm between 2006 and 2018, who received no preoperative radiation or chemotherapy, and who underwent either fertility-sparing surgery (cone or trachelectomy, either simple or radical) or standard surgery (simple or radical hysterectomy) as their primary treatment. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery with those who underwent standard surgery. A flexible parametric model was employed to quantify the difference in life expectancy within 5 years of diagnosis (restricted mean survival time) based on tumor size among patients who underwent fertility-sparing and those who underwent standard surgery. In addition, among those who underwent fertility-sparing surgery, a logistic regression model was used to explore the relationship between tumor size and the probability of receiving adjuvant radiation.
A total of 11,946 patients met the inclusion criteria of whom 904 (7.6%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery. After propensity-score matching, 897 patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery were matched 1:1 with those who underwent standard surgery. Although the 5-year life expectancy was similar among patients who had fertility sparing surgery and those who had standard surgery regardless of tumor sizes, the estimates of life-expectancy differences associated with fertility-sparing surgery were more precise among patients with smaller tumors (1-cm tumor: restricted mean survival time difference, -0.10 months; 95% confidence interval, -0.67 to 0.47) than among those with larger tumors (4-cm tumor: restricted mean survival time difference, -0.11 months; 95% confidence interval, -3.79 to 3.57). The probability of receiving adjuvant radiation increased with tumor size, ranging from 5.6% (95% confidence interval, 3.9-7.9) for a 1-cm tumor to 37% (95% confidence interval, 24.3-51.8) for a 4-cm tumor.
Within 5 years of diagnosis, young patients with stage I cancers measuring ≤4 cm had similar survival outcomes after either fertility-sparing surgery or standard surgery. However, because few patients with tumors >2 cm underwent fertility-sparing surgery, a clinically important survival difference could not be excluded in this population.

To analyze recurrent factors in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer (ESCC) following hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy.
We collected data from patients with ESCC, staged according to the 2009 Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging criteria, who underwent hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy between 2012 and 2019. These patients were subsequently restaged using the 2018 FIGO criteria. Univariable and multivariable analyses, along with nomogram analyses, were conducted to explore factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS).
A total of 310 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median follow-up time of 46 months. Among them, 126 patients with ESCC were restaged to stage III C1 or III C2 after surgery due to lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on the 2018 FIGO staging criteria. Of these, 60 (19.3%) experienced relapse. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 93.9%, 82.7%, and 79.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of positive lymph nodes (LNs), tumor diameter (TD) > 4 cm, and parametrial invasion (PI) were associated with recurrence. The nomogram indicated their predictive value for 3-year and 5-year RFS. Notably, the 5-year recurrence rate (RR) increased by 30.2% in patients with LNM, particularly those with ≥ 3 positive LNs (45.5%). Patients with stage III C2 exhibited a significantly higher RR than those with IIIC1 (56.5% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.001). The 5-year RFS for patients with TD > 4 cm was 65.8%, significantly lower than for those with TD ≤ 4 cm (88.2%). Subgroup analysis revealed higher 5-year RRs in patients with stage III C2 than that in patients with III-C1 (56.5% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.001), demonstrating a significant difference in the RFS survival curve.
RR in patients with clinical ESCC after hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is correlated with the number of positive LNs, TD > 4 cm, and PI. Emphasis should be placed on the common high-risk factor of LNM association with recurrence after radical hysterectomy in ESCC.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on preoperative 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2009) stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients who were treated with radical hysterectomy.
METHODS: A total of 47 patients with FIGO stage I-IIA cervical cancer who were evaluated preoperatively with biopsy and 18F-FDG PET/CT followed by radical hysterectomy were included in the study. Correlation between SUVmax and pathological risk factors or survival was studied.
RESULTS: The mean SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with large tumor size (≥4 cm), advanced stage (IIA>IB>IA) and depth of invasion >50%. No significant difference was noted in SUVmax between patients with and without pelvic lymph node involvement (P=0.639). SUVmax of the primary tumor with and without lymph-vascular invasion were 12.95 and 10.35, respectively (P=0.5). No significant difference was noted between patients with high SUVmax and low SUVmax with regards to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), using an optimal cut-off value of 7.65 for OS and DFS obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patient with tumor size >4cm had 5.9 times more probability of mortality compared to tumor size <4cm (P=0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study observations showed that although SUVmax is associated with pathological variables, it does not independently predict oncological outcomes in FIGO stage IA-IIA cervical cancer patients who were treated with radical hysterectomy. These findings suggest that SUVmax of primary tumor may be used for risk stratification, but not for prognostication in surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer patients. Not using other parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT like metabolic tumor volume (MTV), tumor lysis glycolysis (TLG), small sample size, variation in calculation of SUVmax, histopathologic heterogeneity, inclusion of stage IA patients in the study were constraints of present study. Further studies with large sample size using multi metabolic parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT, including the SUVmax,SUVmean,SUVpeak, MTV and TLG are needed.