Early stage

早期
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的出版物强调需要更新的建议,以解决<2厘米肿瘤的根治性手术,诱导化疗,或局部晚期宫颈癌的免疫疗法,以及复发或转移性宫颈癌的全身治疗。目的:总结目前诊断的证据,治疗,和宫颈癌的随访并提供循证临床实践建议。方法:根据AGREEII标准开发,该指南根据卫生技术评估和关税系统标准对科学证据进行分类。建议根据发展小组的证据强度和共识水平进行分级。主要结果:(1)早期癌症:基质浸润和淋巴血管间隙受累(LVSI)从预处理活检确定候选手术,特别是简单的子宫切除术。(2)手术方式:不建议进行微创手术,除了T1A,LVSI阴性肿瘤,由于预期寿命的减少。(3)局部晚期癌症:同步放化疗(CCRT),然后进行近距离放射治疗(BRT)是基础治疗。低风险患者(少于两个转移淋巴结或FIGOIB2-II)可以在7天后考虑诱导化疗(ICT),然后进行CCRT和BRT。高风险患者(两个或更多转移性淋巴结或FIGOIIIA,IIIB,和IVA)受益于pembrolizumab与CCRT和维持治疗。(4)转移,持久性,和复发癌症:来自预处理活检的PD-L1状态可识别Pembrolizumab与可用的全身治疗的候选者,而三联疗法(阿替珠单抗/贝伐单抗/化疗)成为PD-L1非依赖性选择。结论:这些循证指南旨在通过基于个体风险因素的精确治疗策略来改善临床结果。预测因子,和疾病阶段。
    Background: Recent publications underscore the need for updated recommendations addressing less radical surgery for <2 cm tumors, induction chemotherapy, or immunotherapy for locally advanced stages of cervical cancer, as well as for the systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Aim: To summarize the current evidence for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cervical cancer and provide evidence-based clinical practice recommendations. Methods: Developed according to AGREE II standards, the guidelines classify scientific evidence based on the Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System criteria. Recommendations are graded by evidence strength and consensus level from the development group. Key Results: (1) Early-Stage Cancer: Stromal invasion and lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) from pretreatment biopsy identify candidates for surgery, particularly for simple hysterectomy. (2) Surgical Approach: Minimally invasive surgery is not recommended, except for T1A, LVSI-negative tumors, due to a reduction in life expectancy. (3) Locally Advanced Cancer: concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) followed by brachytherapy (BRT) is the cornerstone treatment. Low-risk patients (fewer than two metastatic nodes or FIGO IB2-II) may consider induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by CCRT and BRT after 7 days. High-risk patients (two or more metastatic nodes or FIGO IIIA, IIIB, and IVA) benefit from pembrolizumab with CCRT and maintenance therapy. (4) Metastatic, Persistent, and Recurrent Cancer: A PD-L1 status from pretreatment biopsy identifies candidates for Pembrolizumab with available systemic treatment, while triplet therapy (Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab/chemotherapy) becomes a PD-L1-independent option. Conclusions: These evidence-based guidelines aim to improve clinical outcomes through precise treatment strategies based on individual risk factors, predictors, and disease stages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    膝关节自发性骨坏死(SONK)是一种鲜为人知但令人衰弱的疾病,这是单侧急性膝关节疼痛和肿胀的常见原因。在最新的病理学和影像学文献中,术语“SONK”已被术语“软骨下功能不全骨折”取代。很少有研究通过检查组织的组织学变化来研究SONK的发病机理。最近,SONK的发展与半月板根部撕裂有关。在首选成像方面,X线平片可以在晚期确认诊断;然而,通常需要进行磁共振成像(MRI)扫描。关于治疗,保守管理通常是早期选择的治疗方法,包括一段时间的非负重或使用药物,如非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDS)或双膦酸盐。然而,当SONK进展时,通常需要手术干预,比如膝关节置换,还有微创技术,如关节镜介入,已被描述。我们提出了一个早期SONK的病例,并讨论了SONK的可能发病机制,临床表现,放射学发现,我们将重点放在预防疾病进一步进展所需的早期诊断和早期卸载期的重要性上。
    Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) is a poorly understood but debilitating disease, that is a common cause of unilateral acute knee pain and swelling. The term \"SONK\" has been replaced by the term \"subchondral insufficiency fracture\" in the latest pathology and imaging literature. Few studies investigated the pathogenesis of SONK by examining the histological changes of the tissues. Very recently, the development of SONK was associated with a meniscal root tear. In terms of the preferred imaging, plain radiographs can confirm the diagnosis in late stages; however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is often required. Regarding the treatment, conservative management is usually the treatment of choice in early stages, including a period of non-weightbearing or the use of medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDS) or bisphosphonates. However, when SONK progresses, often a surgical intervention is required, such as knee replacement, but also minimally invasive techniques, such as arthroscopic intervention, have been described. We present a case of early SONK and discuss the possible pathogenesis of SONK, the clinical presentation, the radiological findings, and we focus on the importance of early diagnosis and early off-load period that is required to prevent further progression of the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,主要是由于晚期诊断和转移的存在。世界上有几个国家已经在全国范围内采用了基于LDCT的肺癌筛查,这将使患者受益。将诊断阶段转移到早期阶段,提供更多治疗选择。生物标志物可以帮助优化筛选过程,以及完善肺癌患者的TNM分层,提供有关预后的信息并推荐管理策略。此外,新的辅助治疗策略将明显受益于先前对给定早期手术切除肿瘤的潜在侵袭性和生物学特性的了解.本文重点介绍了蛋白质在肺癌筛查中作为有前途的生物标志物。尽管付出了巨大的努力,目前还没有成功的肺癌生物标志物的例子已经到达临床用于早期发现和早期治疗.因此,早期肺癌的生物标志物领域仍然是一个明显未满足的需求.这篇综述的一个更具体的目的是对蛋白质生物标志物在早期肺癌检测和管理中的潜在用途进行最新的技术评估。我们提供有关好处的概述,挑战,基于蛋白质的生物标志物开发过程中的陷阱和限制。此外,我们研究了许多新兴的蛋白质分析技术如何有助于优化新的稳健生物标志物,以筛查和有效治疗肺癌。
    Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, mainly due to late diagnosis and the presence of metastases. Several countries around the world have adopted nation-wide LDCT-based lung cancer screening that will benefit patients, shifting the stage at diagnosis to earlier stages with more therapeutic options. Biomarkers can help to optimize the screening process, as well as refine the TNM stratification of lung cancer patients, providing information regarding prognostics and recommending management strategies. Moreover, novel adjuvant strategies will clearly benefit from previous knowledge of the potential aggressiveness and biological traits of a given early-stage surgically resected tumor. This review focuses on proteins as promising biomarkers in the context of lung cancer screening. Despite great efforts, there are still no successful examples of biomarkers in lung cancer that have reached the clinics to be used in early detection and early management. Thus, the field of biomarkers in early lung cancer remains an evident unmet need. A more specific objective of this review is to present an up-to-date technical assessment of the potential use of protein biomarkers in early lung cancer detection and management. We provide an overview regarding the benefits, challenges, pitfalls and constraints in the development process of protein-based biomarkers. Additionally, we examine how a number of emerging protein analytical technologies may contribute to the optimization of novel robust biomarkers for screening and effective management of lung cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究治疗方式与早期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)第二原发恶性肿瘤风险的关系。
    方法:早期5年幸存者的数据(I-II期,第七个TNM分期手册)从2000年到2020年的HNSCC是从监测中提取的,流行病学,和结束结果(SEER)数据库。标准化发生率和绝对风险被用于评估外部第二原发性恶性肿瘤(SPM)的发展。估计相对风险以比较组内的SPM风险。Fine-Gray模型估计第二原发恶性肿瘤的累积发病率。
    结果:总体而言,纳入了8957名患有早期HNSCC的5年幸存者。接受确定性放疗的患者比手术患者的生存率低。手术与第二原发恶性肿瘤的风险较低相关(RR=0.89,95%CI0.80-0.99),尤其是口咽鳞癌(RR=0.56,95%CI0.39-0.82)。基于临床特征的亚组之间第二原发性恶性肿瘤的风险差异不显著。治疗方式对每个亚组第二原发恶性肿瘤的风险没有显著影响。
    结论:在5年存活者中,与确定性放疗相比,手术可提高生存率和降低第二原发恶性肿瘤的风险。第二原发恶性肿瘤的发病率和部位因原发部位而异,强调有针对性的长期监测的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: Investigating treatment modalities\' association with second primary malignancy risk in early-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
    METHODS: Data of 5-year survivors of early-stage (stages I-II, seventh TNM staging manual) HNSCC from 2000 to 2020 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Standardized incidence ratio and excess absolute risk were used to assess second primary malignancy (SPM) development externally. Relative risk was estimated to compare SPM risk within groups. Fine-Gray\'s model estimated cumulative incidence of second primary malignancy.
    RESULTS: Overall, 8957 5-year survivors with early-stage HNSCC were enrolled. Patients receiving definitive radiotherapy had poorer survival than surgery patients. Surgery correlated with lower risk of second primary malignancy (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.99), especially for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.82). Differences in the risk of second primary malignancy among subgroups based on clinical characteristics were not significant. Treatment modalities did not significantly affect risk of second primary malignancy within each subgroup.
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgery led to better survival and lower risk of second primary malignancy compared to definitive radiotherapy in 5-year survivors. Incidence and sites of second primary malignancy varied by primary sites, emphasizing targeted long-term surveillance\'s importance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本文旨在通过使用Cox比例风险回归分析(CPH)对预后因素进行预测,并比较预测方法,根据早期乳腺癌患者的临床表现和病理信息,一些机器学习技术和加速失败时间(AFT)模型用于治疗后生存概率。
    方法:本研究分三个阶段进行。在第一阶段,采用CPH方法。在第二阶段,AFT模型和最后阶段,应用了机器学习方法。数据集包括697名乳腺癌患者,他们在1994年1月31日和2009年12月31日之间申请马尔马拉大学医院肿瘤诊所。根据C指数比较使用患者的各种参数获得的模型,5年生存率和10年生存率。
    结论:根据所应用的分析结果获得的模型,作为CPH方法和AFT方法的结果,MetLN和年龄作为一个显著的危险因素,而MetLN,年龄,肿瘤大小,LV1和囊外受累是机器学习方法中的危险因素。此外,当检查手持型号的c-index值时,对于CPH模型,它得到69.8,AFT型号为70.36,72.1为随机生存森林,72.8为梯度提升机。总之,该研究强调了将常规统计方法和机器学习算法进行比较以提高早期乳腺癌预后中危险因素确定的准确性的潜力.此外,应该努力提高机器学习模型的可解释性,确保所获得的结果可以被临床从业人员有效地传达和利用。这将为早期乳腺癌患者的治疗和随访过程提供更明智的决策和个性化护理。
    BACKGROUND: This article is aimed to make predictions in terms of prognostic factors and compare prediction methods by using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (CPH), some machine learning techniques and Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model for post-treatment survival probabilities according to clinical presentations and pathological information of early-stage breast cancer patients.
    METHODS: The study was carried out in three stages. In the first stage, the CPH method was applied. In the second stage, the AFT model and in the last stage, machine learning methods were applied. The data set consists of 697 breast cancer patients who applied to Marmara University Hospital oncology clinic between 01.01.1994 and 31.12.2009. The models obtained by using various parameters of the patients were compared according to the C index, 5-year survival rate and 10-year survival rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: According to the models obtained as a result of the analyses applied, MetLN and age were obtained as a significant risk factor as a result of CPH method and AFT methods, while MetLN, age, tumor size, LV1 and extracapsular involvement were obtained as risk factors in machine learning methods. In addition, when the c-index values of the handheld models are examined, it is obtained as 69.8 for the CPH model, 70.36 for the AFT model, 72.1 for the random survival forest and 72.8 for the gradient boosting machine. In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of comparing conventional statistical methods and machine-learning algorithms to improve the precision of risk factor determination in early-stage breast cancer prognosis. Additionally, efforts should be made to enhance the interpretability of machine-learning models, ensuring that the results obtained can be effectively communicated and utilized by clinical practitioners. This would enable more informed decision-making and personalized care in the treatment and follow-up processes for early-stage breast cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期肛门鳞状细胞癌(ASCC)通常采用放化疗(CRT)治疗,有好的结果。单独的放射治疗(RT)可能是足够的,同时降低毒性。
    方法:在2015/01和2020/04期间纳入法国前瞻性FFCD-ANABASE并接受T1-2N0ASCC治疗的患者分为CRT和RT组。报告了临床结果和毒性。对105对患者进行倾向评分匹配。
    结果:440例患者被分析:CRT组261例(59.3%),RT组179例(40.7%)。中位随访时间为35.7个月。接受CRT的患者更年轻,有更好的性能状态(PS)和较大的肿瘤。3年无病生存率无统计学差异(85.3%vs83%,p=0.28),总生存率(89.6%vs94.8%,p=0.69)和无结肠造口术生存率(84.5%vs87.2%,P=0.84)CRT和RT组之间,分别。倾向得分匹配分析证实了这些发现。CRT组的治疗中断频率明显更高(36.3%vs21.9%,p=0.0013),导致总治疗时间(OTT)延长7天。3级CTCAEv4.0毒性在CRT组中更为普遍(46%vs19%,p<0.001)。
    结论:在我们的研究中,在放疗中加入化疗并没有显著改善T1-2NASC0C的预后,但毒性和OTT增加。
    BACKGROUND: Early-stage anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC) are usually treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with good outcomes. Radiotherapy (RT) alone might be sufficient while reducing toxicity.
    METHODS: Patients included in the French prospective FFCD-ANABASE and treated for T1-2N0 ASCC between 2015/01 and 2020/04 were divided into CRT and RT groups. Clinical outcomes and toxicity were reported. Propensity score matching was conducted for 105 pairs of patients.
    RESULTS: 440 patients were analyzed: 261 (59.3 %) in the CRT group and 179 (40.7 %) in the RT group. The median follow-up was 35.7 months. Patients receiving CRT were younger, had better Performance Status (PS) and larger tumors. No statistical difference was observed for 3-year Disease-free survival (85.3 % vs 83 %, p = 0.28), Overall survival (89.6 % vs 94.8 %, p = 0.69) and Colostomy-free survival (84.5 % vs 87.2 %, p = 0.84) between CRT and RT groups, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed these findings. Treatment interruptions were significantly more frequent in the CRT group (36.3 % vs 21.9 %, p = 0.0013), resulting in an Overall Treatment Time (OTT) extended by 7 days. Grade 3 CTCAE v4.0 toxicities were more prevalent in the CRT group (46 % vs 19 %, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy did not significantly improve outcomes for T1-2N0 ASCC in our study, but increased toxicity and OTT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究比较了I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)≤2cm患者热消融与楔形切除术后的生存结果。
    方法:对2004年至2019年美国国家癌症研究所监测流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的数据进行回顾性分析。包括接受热消融或楔形切除术的I期NSCLC和病变≤2cm的患者。接受化疗或放疗的患者被排除在外。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡接受两种手术的患者之间的基线特征。
    结果:进行单变量和Cox回归分析以确定研究变量之间的关联,总生存期(OS),癌症特异性生存率(CSS)。PSM之后,328名患者仍有待分析。多变量Cox回归分析显示,与楔形切除术相比,热消融与不良OS的风险显著相关(校正后HR[aHR]:1.34,95%CI:1.09-1.63,p=0.004),但与CSS无关(aHR:1.28,95%CI:0.96-1.71,p=0.094).在分层分析中,无论组织学和分级如何,两种手术在OS和CSS方面均未观察到显著差异.在肿瘤大小为1至2厘米的患者中,与楔形切除术相比,热消融与OS不良的高风险显著相关(aHR:1.35,95%CI:1.10-1.66,p=0.004).相比之下,在肿瘤大小<1cm的患者中,热消融和楔形切除术在OS和CSS上没有发现显着差异。
    结论:在I期非小细胞肺癌且肿瘤大小<1cm的患者中,热消融具有与楔形切除相似的OS和CSS。
    BACKGROUND: This study compared the survival outcomes after thermal ablation versus wedge resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤ 2 cm.
    METHODS: Data from the United States (US) National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with stage I NSCLC and lesions ≤ 2 cm who received thermal ablation or wedge resection were included. Patients who received chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline characteristics between patients who underwent the two procedures.
    RESULTS: Univariate and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between study variables, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). After PSM, 328 patients remained for analysis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed, compared to wedge resection, thermal ablation was significantly associated with a greater risk of poor OS (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09-1.63, p = 0.004) but not CSS (aHR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.96-1.71, p = 0.094). In stratified analyses, no significant differences were observed with respect to OS and CSS between the two procedures regardless of histology and grade. In patients with tumor size 1 to 2 cm, compared to wedge resection, thermal ablation was significantly associated with a higher risk of poor OS (aHR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.10-1.66, p = 0.004). In contrast, no significant difference was found on OS and CSS between thermal ablation and wedge resection among those with tumor size < 1 cm.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage I NSCLC and tumor size < 1 cm, thermal ablation has similar OS and CSS with wedge resection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    早期喉鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的治疗包括放疗(RT),放化疗(CRT),和保留喉的手术.在这项研究中,对I期(T1N0)肿瘤患者采用RT治疗早期喉部SCC,对II期(T2N0)肿瘤患者采用CRT和多西他赛(DOC)治疗,并比较治疗结果和化疗效果.
    本研究共纳入78例早期喉部SCC患者。T1N0患者作为门诊患者接受了原发性病变的总剂量为63-70Gy的放射治疗。相比之下,T2N0患者住院并接受CRT治疗,接收66-70Gy的总辐射剂量。多西他赛(DOC,10mg/m2)与放疗同时每周一次静脉内给药,连续6-8周。检查不良事件和生存率以及局部控制率。
    非声门T2N0患者的数量明显高于T1N0患者。尽管所有患者都完成了治疗计划,在T2N0患者中观察到明显更多的3级不良事件,特别是粘膜炎和皮炎,比T1N0患者。5年总生存率,疾病特异性生存率,本地控制率,T1N0和T2N0患者的喉保留率分别为86.1、93.3、88.6和94.3%和85.9、88.0、93.1和93.1%,分别。
    使用多西他赛的CRT在T2N0肿瘤患者中显示出最佳的治疗效果,具有较高的局部控制率,有效的喉部保存,和相对较少的不良事件。
    UNASSIGNED: Treatments for early laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) include radiotherapy (RT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and larynx-preserving surgery. In this study, early laryngeal SCC was treated with RT in patients with stage I (T1N0) tumors and with CRT and docetaxel (DOC) in patients with stage II (T2N0) tumors and the treatment results and effectiveness of the chemotherapy were compared.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 78 patients with early-stage laryngeal SCC were enrolled in this study. The T1N0 patients received radiation for the primary lesions as outpatients at a total dose of 63-70 Gy. By contrast, the T2N0 patients were hospitalized and treated with CRT, receiving a total radiation dose of 66-70 Gy. Docetaxel (DOC, 10 mg/m2) was administered intravenously once a week for 6-8 consecutive weeks concurrently with radiotherapy. The adverse events and survival rates with local control rates were examined.
    UNASSIGNED: The number of non-glottic T2N0 patients was significantly higher than that of T1N0 patients. Although all patients completed their treatment schedule, significantly more grade 3 adverse events were observed in the T2N0 patients, in particular mucositis and dermatitis, than in T1N0 patients. The 5-year overall survival rate, disease specific survival rate, local control rate, and laryngeal preserve rate of the T1N0 and T2N0 patients were 86.1, 93.3, 88.6, and 94.3% and 85.9, 88.0, 93.1, and 93.1%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: CRT with docetaxel showed the best therapeutic outcomes for the treatment of laryngeal SCC in patients with T2N0 tumours, with a higher local control rate, effective laryngeal preservation, and relatively few adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在根据早期小(≤2cm)病理阶段I非黏液性肺腺癌中肿瘤通过空气间隙扩散的分级,确定其临床表现和意义。回顾性分析I期肿瘤大小≤2cm患者的病历。在标准长度尺度(mm)上测量从肿瘤边缘通过空气空间扩散的最远距离。登记的患者分为通过空气空间传播(STAS)(-)和STAS(+),和STAS(+)根据其最远距离细分如下:STAS(+)-L(<2mm)和STAS(+)-H(≥2mm)。STAS(+)的危险因素包括乳头状为主亚型(p=0.027),微乳头状模式的存在(p<0.001),和EGFR(p=0.039)。三组的总生存期无显著差异(p=0.565)。STAS(+)-H组的无复发生存率明显低于STAS(-)和STAS(+)-L组(分别为p<0.001和p=0.039)。大量肺泡间隙是STAS(+)-H组的明确危险因素(p<0.001),男性可以是1(p=0.054)。在患有小(≤2cm)病理阶段I肺腺癌的患者组中,STAS≥2mm与无复发生存率显著降低相关.为了确定存在更远STAS的明确风险因素,应该从更大的研究人群中进行更精确的分析。
    This study aimed to identify the clinical manifestation and implications according to the grading of tumor spread through air spaces in early-stage small (≤2 cm) pathological stage I non-mucinous lung adenocarcinomas. Medical records of patients with pathological stage I tumors sized ≤2 cm were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The furthest distance of the spread through air spaces from the tumor margin was measured on a standard-length scale (mm). Enrolled patients were categorized into spread through air spaces (STAS) (-) and STAS (+), and STAS (+) was subdivided according to its furthest distance as follows: STAS (+)-L (<2 mm) and STAS (+)-H (≥2 mm). Risk factors for STAS (+) included papillary predominant subtype (p = 0.027), presence of micropapillary patterns (p < 0.001), and EGFR (p = 0.039). The overall survival of the three groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.565). The recurrence-free survival of STAS (+)-H groups was significantly lower than those of STAS (-) and STAS (+)-L (p < 0.001 and p = 0.039, respectively). A number of alveolar spaces were definite risk factors for STAS (+)-H groups (p < 0.001), and male gender could be one (p = 0.054). In the patient group with small (≤2 cm) pathological stage I lung adenocarcinomas, the presence of STAS ≥ 2 mm was related to significantly lower recurrence-free survival. For identifying definite risk factors for the presence of farther STAS, more precise analysis from a larger study population should be undertaken.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大多数乳腺癌患者的早期激素受体(HR)阳性,人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性疾病。尽管大多数患者的预后良好,有必要确定有不良结局风险的患者,并制定降低这种风险的策略.
    对于某些HR阳性早期乳腺癌患者,在标准新辅助化疗中加入免疫治疗是一种有希望的选择。迄今为止,三项随机临床试验已显示出良好的结果。在这次审查中,我们讨论了I-SPY2,CheckMate7FL(NCT04109066),和KEYNOTE-756(NCT03725059)。
    尽管这些试验取得了有希望的结果,在将新/辅助免疫疗法纳入早期HR阳性乳腺癌的治疗模式之前,需要考虑一些尚未解决的问题.未回答的问题的一个示例是患者选择。因为这些方案中使用的方案与长期毒性有关,确定更有可能从这些药物中获益的患者,例如通过使用生物标志物,是至关重要的。第二个例子是辅助疗法的最佳整合,可以提高无侵袭性疾病的生存率,如abemaciclib和ribociclib,不能与免疫疗法同时安全施用。
    UNASSIGNED: Most patients with breast cancer have early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative disease. Even though the prognosis for most of these patients is good, there is a need to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes and to develop strategies to mitigate this risk.
    UNASSIGNED: The addition of immunotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy represents a promising option for select patients with HR-positive early breast cancer. Three randomized clinical trials have shown favorable results to date. In this review, we discuss the findings of I-SPY2, CheckMate 7FL (NCT04109066), and KEYNOTE-756 (NCT03725059).
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the promising results of these trials, there are unanswered questions that need to be considered before incorporating neo/adjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm of early-stage HR-positive breast cancer. One example of an unanswered question is patient selection. Because the regimens used in these protocols are associated with long-term toxicities, identifying the patients who are more likely to derive a benefit from these agents, such as through the use of biomarkers, is critical. A second example is the optimal integration of adjuvant therapies that improve invasive disease-free survival, such as abemaciclib and ribociclib, which are not safely administered concurrently with immunotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号