EVALI

EVALI
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    随着年轻人中与电子烟相关或与电子烟相关的肺损伤(EVALI)的迅速增加,使用电子烟(或电子烟)的肺部影响在2019年成为医疗保健问题。这导致了成千上万的青少年和年轻人的重症监护。肺功能成像定位良好,可以提供有关vaping的急性和慢性影响的信息。我们进行了系统评价,以检索相关的影像学研究,这些研究描述了与蒸发相关的肺结构功能异常的急性和慢性影像学发现。
    6月13日进行了系统审查,2023年使用PubMed使用以下标准搜索已发布的手稿:[(\“Vaping\”或\“电子烟\”或\“EVALI\”)和(\“MRI\”或\“CT\”或\“成像\”)]。我们只纳入了涉及人类参与者的研究,电子烟/电子烟的使用,MRI,CT和/或PET。
    搜索确定了445份手稿,其中110名(668名独特参与者)特别提到MRI,PET或CT成像的病例或回顾性病例系列的患者。这包括105篇CT特有的手稿(626名参与者),三份主要使用核磁共振成像的手稿(23名参与者),和两份描述PET研究结果的手稿(20名参与者)。大多数研究在北美进行(n=90),其余研究在欧洲进行(n=15),亚洲(n=4)和南美洲(n=1)。绝大多数出版物描述了案例研究(n=93),少数描述了较大的回顾性或前瞻性研究(n=17)。在电子烟使用者和EVALI患者中,主要的CT发现包括毛玻璃混浊,合并和胸膜下保留,MRI显示通气异常,灌注和通气/灌注匹配,而PET显示肺部炎症的证据。
    肺结构和功能成像异常常见于EVALI患者和有或没有呼吸道症状的电子烟使用者,这表明功能性MRI可能有助于研究与使用电子烟相关的肺部健康影响。
    UNASSIGNED: The pulmonary effects of e-cigarette use (or vaping) became a healthcare concern in 2019, following the rapid increase of e-cigarette-related or vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI) in young people, which resulted in the critical care admission of thousands of teenagers and young adults. Pulmonary functional imaging is well-positioned to provide information about the acute and chronic effects of vaping. We generated a systematic review to retrieve relevant imaging studies that describe the acute and chronic imaging findings that underly vaping-related lung structure-function abnormalities.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was undertaken on June 13th, 2023 using PubMed to search for published manuscripts using the following criteria: [(\"Vaping\" OR \"e-cigarette\" OR \"EVALI\") AND (\"MRI\" OR \"CT\" OR \"Imaging\")]. We included only studies involving human participants, vaping/e-cigarette use, and MRI, CT and/or PET.
    UNASSIGNED: The search identified 445 manuscripts, of which 110 (668 unique participants) specifically mentioned MRI, PET or CT imaging in cases or retrospective case series of patients who vaped. This included 105 manuscripts specific to CT (626 participants), three manuscripts which mainly used MRI (23 participants), and two manuscripts which described PET findings (20 participants). Most studies were conducted in North America (n = 90), with the remaining studies conducted in Europe (n = 15), Asia (n = 4) and South America (n = 1). The vast majority of publications described case studies (n = 93) and a few described larger retrospective or prospective studies (n = 17). In e-cigarette users and patients with EVALI, key CT findings included ground-glass opacities, consolidations and subpleural sparing, MRI revealed abnormal ventilation, perfusion and ventilation/perfusion matching, while PET showed evidence of pulmonary inflammation.
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary structural and functional imaging abnormalities were common in patients with EVALI and in e-cigarette users with or without respiratory symptoms, which suggests that functional MRI may be helpful in the investigation of the pulmonary health effects associated with e-cigarette use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • Vaping, i.e. the use of electronic nicotine/other substances delivery systems, increases a risk of vaping-associated lung injury. The review describes clinical manifestation, methods of diagnosis and diagnostic criteria, treatment of patients with this disease as well as risk stratification of vapers and approaches to their management based on Worchester classification and clinical guidance. The pathogenetic mechanisms of vaping-associated lung injury have been analyzed.
    Вейпинг, т.е. использование электронных средств доставки табака и/или других веществ для курения, повышает риск развития вейп-ассоциированного поражения легких. В обзоре приведены данные о клинических проявлениях, методах и критериях диагностики, лечения пациентов с данным заболеванием, а также стратификация риска вейперов и тактика их ведения на основании Ворчестерской классификации.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:英国最近的工作估计,目前基于大麻素的vaping的患病率高于美国,以前与EVALI相关的因素。美国的研究表明,在EVALI爆发之前,与电子烟有关的急诊部门的出勤率开始上升,这表明vapers也会经历更温和形式的vaping相关疾病。
    目标:量化当前英国vapers的症状患病率和医疗保健利用率。
    方法:对英国16岁及以上个人的自愿在线调查。
    方法:收集了有关人口统计的匿名数据,vaping/smokestatusandvapingsubstancesused.当前的vapers被问及以前的美国EVALI病例系列中存在10种普遍症状,给出的医疗服务和诊断。计算风险比以比较物质之间症状和出席的可能性。
    结果:分析了2477个完全应答。397名受访者是当前的vapers。过去12个月内的症状患病率范围为3.8-30.5%(血痰,咳嗽)。每个有症状的受访者的医疗保健出勤率范围为0.1-1.4(血痰,呼吸急促)。目前基于大麻素的产品(单独/组合)的vapers对9/10症状的每个症状受访者的出勤率最高,并且除了“咳嗽”(不含尼古丁的电子液体[RR1.7])之外,更有可能报告症状。据报道,临床医生从未诊断出与电子烟有关的疾病。
    结论:英国vapers经历了先前在EVALI病例中报告的症状,他们也寻求医疗保健。基于大麻素的产品的使用者更有可能报告症状,并导致更高的医疗负担。英国vapers也可能会遇到与vaping相关的疾病,不符合EVALI病例标准。
    BACKGROUND: Recent work in the UK estimated the prevalence of current cannabinoid-based vaping to be higher than in the USA, a factor previously associated with e-cigarette or vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI). Research in the USA has demonstrated that attendances to emergency departments relating to e-cigarettes began to rise before the EVALI outbreak, suggesting that vapers also experience milder forms of vaping-related illness.
    OBJECTIVE: Quantify symptom prevalence and healthcare utilization amongst current UK vapers.
    METHODS: Voluntary online survey of individuals aged 16 and over within the UK.
    METHODS: Anonymized data were collected on demographics, vaping/smoking status and vaping substances used. Current vapers were asked about the presence of 10 prevalent symptoms from previous US EVALI case series, healthcare attendances and diagnoses given. Risk-ratios were calculated to compare the likelihood of symptoms and attendances between substances.
    RESULTS: A total of 2477 complete responses were analysed. In all, 397 respondents were current vapers. Symptom prevalence within the previous 12 months ranged from 3.8% to 30.5% (bloody sputum, cough). Healthcare attendances per symptomatic respondent ranged from 0.1 to 1.4 (bloody sputum, shortness of breath). Current vapers of cannabinoid-based products (alone/in combination) had the most attendances per symptomatic respondent for 9/10 symptoms and were more likely to report symptoms aside from \'cough\' (nicotine-free e-liquids [risk ratio = 1.7]). Clinicians reportedly never diagnosed vaping-related illness.
    CONCLUSIONS: UK vapers experience symptoms previously reported in EVALI cases for which they also seek healthcare. Users of cannabinoid-based products were more likely to report symptoms and accounted for a higher healthcare burden. UK vapers may also experience vaping-related illness that does not meet EVALI case criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    电子烟(电子烟)使用或电子烟对肺功能的潜在不利影响以前已经有很好的记录,随着电子烟或电子烟使用相关肺损伤(EVALI)的诊断越来越普遍.在心血管功能和vaping方面的潜在影响是一个不太了解的领域。我们介绍了一个先前健康的年轻男性的急性呼吸窘迫和新发作的收缩功能降低的病例。
    The potential adverse effects of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use or vaping on pulmonary function have been previously well documented, with the diagnosis of e-cigarette- or vaping-use-associated lung injury (EVALI) has become increasingly common. The potential effects in terms of cardiovascular function and vaping is an area that is less well understood. We present a case of acute respiratory distress and newly onset reduced systolic function in a previously healthy young male.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电子烟(电子烟),或vaping,产品使用相关肺损伤(EVALI)于2019年首次被发现并报道,但当COVID-19大流行于2020年初开始时,媒体报道和病例报道大幅减少.自那时以来,该综合征一直持续发生,药剂师必须了解EVALI的表现,以及何时应将其视为潜在诊断。住院和门诊药师在EVALI的治疗中起着至关重要的作用,并且应该了解皮质类固醇的效用,尽管数据非常有限。药剂师应该了解从患者访谈中收集有关vaping的详细和准确信息的重要性。药剂师在戒烟咨询和治疗方面也起主导作用,选择可用于治疗尼古丁成瘾的药物,并协助过渡护理和后续行动。
    Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette), or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) was first identified and reported in 2019, but media coverage and reporting of cases drastically decreased when the COVID-19 pandemic started in early 2020. The syndrome has continued to occur since that time and it is critical that pharmacists are aware of how EVALI presents, and when it should be considered as a potential diagnosis. Inpatient and outpatient pharmacists play a vital role in the treatment of EVALI, and should be knowledgeable of the utility of corticosteroids, even though data are extremely limited. Pharmacists should understand the importance of collecting detailed and accurate information about vaping from patient interviews. Pharmacists also play a leading role in cessation counseling and treatment, selecting medications that can be used to treat nicotine addiction from vaping, and assisting with transitions of care and follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:吸入雾化尼古丁和大麻(俗称“vaping”)在年轻人中很普遍。Instagram影响者经常推广尼古丁和大麻蒸发器产品。然而,在2019年爆发电子烟或电子烟相关肺损伤(EVALI)期间,Instagram禁止使用这两种产品的帖子受到了全国媒体的关注。
    目的:该实验测试了查看有关EVALI的Instagram帖子的影响,图像和文本的价态各不相同,关于年轻人对尼古丁和大麻产品的危害性,使用尼古丁和大麻蒸发器的感知风险,以及将来使用尼古丁和大麻蒸发器的意图。
    方法:通过QualtricsResearchServices招募18-25岁(平均21.40,SD2.22)的参与者(N=1229),经常使用尼古丁或大麻蒸发器的过度采样(618/1229,50.3%)。参与者被随机分配查看来自年轻人的Instagram帖子,这些帖子描绘了他们在2(图像价:正或负)×2(文本价:正或负)受试者间实验中的EVALI经历。积极的图像是有吸引力和美观的自拍。关于停止使用汽化产品的正面文字是支持和令人振奋的。负面图像和文字是图形和恐惧诱导。看了3个帖子,参与者报告了尼古丁和大麻产品的危害性,尼古丁和大麻蒸发器使用的感知风险,以及将来使用尼古丁和大麻蒸发器的意图。有序逻辑回归模型评估了图像和文本效价对感知危害性和风险的主要影响和相互作用。二元逻辑回归模型评估了图像和文本效价对使用尼古丁和大麻蒸发器的意图的主要影响和相互作用。根据产品使用历史对分析进行了调整。
    结果:与查看正面图像相比,查看负面图像导致尼古丁的明显更大的感知危害(P=.02对于一次性基于豆荚的蒸发器和P=.04对于其他电子烟“mods”设备)和大麻汽化产品(P=.01),尼古丁蒸发器的感知风险更大(P<0.01),并降低将来使用尼古丁(P=.02)而不是大麻(P=.43)蒸发器的意图的几率。文本效价对感知伤害没有显著的主要影响,感知风险,以及使用尼古丁和大麻汽化产品的意图。没有发现图像和文本效价的显著交互作用。
    结论:Instagram上关于EVALI的负面图片可能传达了使用汽化产品的风险,并阻止了年轻人的这种行为。无论帖子文本的效价如何。关于Instagram上EVALI的公共卫生信息应强调使用大麻蒸发器的风险,因为年轻人可能会认为,只有使用尼古丁蒸发器会增加EVALI的风险。
    Inhaling aerosolized nicotine and cannabis (colloquially called \"vaping\") is prevalent among young adults. Instagram influencers often promote both nicotine and cannabis vaporizer products. However, Instagram posts discouraging the use of both products received national media attention during the 2019 outbreak of e-cigarette or vaping-associated lung injury (EVALI).
    This experiment tested the impact of viewing Instagram posts about EVALI, varying in image and text valence, on young adults\' perceived harmfulness of nicotine and cannabis products, perceived risk of nicotine and cannabis vaporizer use, and intentions to use nicotine and cannabis vaporizers in the future.
    Participants (N=1229) aged 18-25 (mean 21.40, SD 2.22) years were recruited through Qualtrics Research Services, oversampling for ever-use of nicotine or cannabis vaporizers (618/1229, 50.3%). Participants were randomly assigned to view Instagram posts from young people portraying their experiences of EVALI in a 2 (image valence: positive or negative) × 2 (text valence: positive or negative) between-subjects experiment. Positive images were attractive and aesthetically pleasing selfies. The positive text was supportive and uplifting regarding quitting the use of vaporized products. Negative images and text were graphic and fear inducing. After viewing 3 posts, participants reported the perceived harmfulness of nicotine and cannabis products, the perceived risk of nicotine and cannabis vaporizer use, and intentions to use nicotine and cannabis vaporizers in the future. Ordinal logistic regression models assessed the main effects and interactions of image and text valence on perceived harmfulness and risk. Binary logistic regression models assessed the main effects and interactions of image and text valence on intentions to use nicotine and cannabis vaporizers. Analyses were adjusted for product use history.
    Compared to viewing positive images, viewing negative images resulted in significantly greater perceived harm of nicotine (P=.02 for disposable pod-based vaporizers and P=.04 for other e-cigarette \"mods\" devices) and cannabis vaporized products (P=.01), greater perceived risk of nicotine vaporizers (P<.01), and lower odds of intentions to use nicotine (P=.02) but not cannabis (P=.43) vaporizers in the future. There were no significant main effects of text valence on perceived harm, perceived risk, and intentions to use nicotine and cannabis vaporized products. No significant interaction effects of image and text valence were found.
    Negative imagery in Instagram posts about EVALI may convey the risks of vaporized product use and discourage young adults from this behavior, regardless of the valence of the post\'s text. Public health messaging regarding EVALI on Instagram should emphasize the risk of cannabis vaporizer use, as young adults may otherwise believe that only nicotine vaporizer use increases their risk for EVALI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号