OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of bracing on apical vertebral derotation and explore the factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. For patients with AIS, vertebral rotation causes cosmetic appearance abnormalities and acts as an indicator for curve progression. However, there have been few studies investigating the precise derotation effects of bracing for apical vertebra. The application of EOS imaging system enables quantitative evaluation of vertebral rotation in the axial plane in a standing position.
METHODS: There were 82 eligible patients enrolled in current study, who underwent EOS imaging evaluation before and immediately after bracing. The clinical demographic data (age, gender, Risser sign and menstrual status) were recorded. The correlation analyses between derotation effects and key parameters (age, pre-brace Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, vertebral rotation, pelvis axial rotation and apical vertebral level) were performed. The in-brace derotation effects stratified by gender, Risser sign, apical vertebral level, menarche status, coronal balance and sagittal balance were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The rotation of apical vertebra was decreased from 8.8 ± 6.0 degrees before bracing to 3.8 ± 3.3 degrees immediately after bracing (p < 0.001), and the derotation rate was 49.2 ± 38.3%. The derotation degrees in brace was significantly correlated with major curve Cobb angle (r = 0.240, p = 0.030), minor curve Cobb angle (r = 0.256, p = 0.020) and total curve Cobb angle (r = 0.266, p = 0.016). Both the pre-brace apical vertebral rotation and apical vertebral level were significantly correlated with derotation effects in brace (p < 0.001). Patients with thoracic major curve showed worse derotation effects than those with lumbar major curve (p < 0.001). In addition, patients with coronal balance showed better in-brace derotation effects than those with coronal decompensation (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: A satisfactory apical vertebral derotation rate (approximately 50%) could be obtained immediately after bracing in AIS patients. Pre-brace Cobb angle of curve, pre-brace apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral level and coronal balance exhibited close associations with in-brace derotation effects of apical vertebra.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning has become the gold standard for orthopedic surgeries, primarily relying on CT-reconstructed 3D models. However, in contrast to standing radiographs, a CT scan is not part of the standard protocol but is usually acquired for preoperative planning purposes only. Additionally, it is costly, exposes the patients to high doses of radiation and is acquired in a non-weight-bearing position.
METHODS: In this study, we develop a deep-learning based pipeline to facilitate 3D preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomies, based on 3D models reconstructed from low-dose biplanar standing EOS radiographs. Using digitally reconstructed radiographs, we train networks to localize the clinically required landmarks, separate the two legs in the sagittal radiograph and finally reconstruct the 3D bone model. Finally, we evaluate the accuracy of the reconstructed 3D models for the particular application case of preoperative planning, with the aim of eliminating the need for a CT scan in specific cases, such as high tibial osteotomies.
RESULTS: The mean Dice coefficients for the tibial reconstructions were 0.92 and 0.89 for the right and left tibia, respectively. The reconstructed models were successfully used for clinical-grade preoperative planning in a real patient series of 52 cases. The mean differences to ground truth values for mechanical axis and tibial slope were 0.52° and 4.33°, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We contribute a novel framework for the 2D-3D reconstruction of bone models from biplanar standing EOS radiographs and successfully use them in automated clinical-grade preoperative planning of high tibial osteotomies. However, achieving precise reconstruction and automated measurement of tibial slope remains a significant challenge.

UNASSIGNED: Recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) greatly affects active young individuals, necessitating the identification of risk factors for a better understanding of its cause. Previous research has connected RPD to lower limb alignment (LEA) abnormalities, such as increased femoral anteversion, tibial external rotation, knee valgus, and flexion. This study aims to use EOS technology to detect RPD-related LEA anomalies, enabling three-dimensional assessment under load conditions.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 100 limbs (50 in the RPD group, 50 in the control group) were retrospectively analyzed. In the RPD group, we included limbs with recurrent patellar dislocation, characterized by dislocations occurs at least two times, while healthy limbs served as the control group. We used EOS technology, including 2D and 3D imaging, to measure and compare the following parameters between the two groups in a standing position: Femoral neck shaft angle (NSA), Mechanical femoral tibial angle (MFTA), Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), Anatomical femoral anteversion (AFA), External tibial torsion (ETT), and Femorotibial rotation (FTR).
UNASSIGNED: The significant differences between the two groups were shown in NSA 3/2D, MFTA 3/2D, mLDFA 3/2D, MPTA 3D, AFA, FTR. No significant difference was shown in MPTA 2D, ETT between the RPD group and the control group. Further binary logistic regression analysis. Further binary logistic regression analysis was conducted on the risk factors affecting RPD mentioned above. and found four risk factors for binary logistic regression analysis: mLDFA (3D), AFA, NSA(3D), and FTR.
UNASSIGNED: EOS imaging identified abnormal LEA parameters, including NSA, MFTA, mLDFA, MPTA, AFA, and FTR, as risk factors for RPD. Children with these risk factors should receive moderate knee joint protection.

UNASSIGNED: With advancements in minimally invasive techniques, oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has gained widespread acceptance and is now commonly performed for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). The objective of this research paper is to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) intervertebral motions in EOS models before and after surgery and subsequently assess the efficacy of the 3D correction achieved through staged OLIF.
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, 29 consecutive patients diagnosed with ADS were included, with a mean age of 63.6 years, who underwent staged OLIF surgery between 2018 and 2021. Spinopelvic parameters were assessed using EOS images, and 3D models were reconstructed to measure intervertebral motion angles (IMAs) in 70 surgical intervertebral segments, comprising wedge, lordosis, and axial rotation angles. Regression analysis was conducted to compare IMAs in different planes before and after the staged OLIF surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Significant three-dimensional correction was observed in 70 intervertebral segments following the first-stage OLIF. The wedge angles decreased from 5.2°± 4.2° to 2.7°± 2.4° (P < 0.001). The lordosis angles increased from 5.1°± 5.9° to 7.8°± 4.6° (P = 0.014), while the axial rotation angles decreased from 3.8°± 2.6° to 2.3°± 2.1° (P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between wedge angles and axial angles preoperatively (P < 0.001, r = 0.43), as well as between corrected wedge angles and corrected axial angles (P < 0.001, r = 0.42).
UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrated that intervertebral motions had a correlation between coronal and axial planes in lumbar degenerative scoliosis. First-stage OLIF was efficient at correcting segmental scoliosis by inserting cages while correcting rotation deformity simultaneously, as well as improving the sagittal spinopelvic parameters.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the EOS imaging system compared to the gold standard computed tomography (CT) scan, for the measurement of native and postoperative/prosthetic hip parameters in adolescents and adults.
METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Systematic Review, and Web of Science databases were searched to obtain relevant articles published between January 1964 and February 2021. All articles published in English. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed according to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) framework. Three reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. A narrative synthesis of the articles and a meta-analysis were conducted. The heterogeneity exhibited by the effect sizes was obtained using a forest plot, the Q statistic and the I2 index. Reliability coefficients were transformed into Fisher\'s Z to normalise their distribution and stabilise the variances. For each meta-analysis, an effect size (average reliability coefficient) and a 95% confidence interval were calculated and presented in a forest plot. The amount of radiation dose between modalities was compared.
RESULTS: The search retrieved 75 articles, six of which met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis included five of these six studies (sample size from 20 to 90). Comparing EOS and CT, the estimated average correlation (effect size) for combined studies was significantly high (r = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.88, p-value < 0.001). With respect to Pearson\'s correlation between EOS and CT, the estimated average correlation for combined studies was significantly high (r = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.90, p-value < 0.001). Average radiation dose for EOS was 0.18 ± 0.05 mGy for the anteroposterior view (AP) and 0.45 ± 0.08 mGy for the lateral view; and for CT was 8.4 to 15.6 mGy.
CONCLUSIONS: The EOS imaging system has a high correlation with CT for preoperative and postoperative/prosthetic hip measurements, with considerably lower irradiation of patients.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic state is maintained by harmonizing the spine, pelvis and lower extremities. In the past few decades, several studies have demonstrated the associations between spinal imbalance and generalized osteoarthritis. The compensatory mechanisms of pelvis translation and knee flexion, however, have not been fully assessed.
METHODS: A total of 213 volunteers, over 40 years of age, were recruited. Radiological measurements were performed by EOS imaging system. Pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), global tilt (GT), hip-knee-angle (HKA), knee flexion angle (KFA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured. On the basis of SRS-Schwab, the subjects were classified into decompensated group (PI-LL > 20°), compensated group(10° ≤ PI-LL ≤ 20°), and normal group (PI-LL < 10°). Differences in radiographic parameters among groups were evaluated. Data of Knee Society Score (KSS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were collected via questionnaires.
RESULTS: Decompensated group showed larger pelvic parameters (PT) and low extremity parameters (LDFA, MPTA, HKA and KFA) than normal group (P < 0.05). Pelvic parameter was larger in the compensated group (median = 31°) compared to the normal group (median = 17°) (P < 0.05). There was no difference in low extremity parameters between the compensated and normal groups. At the sagittal plane, the radiological parameters of spine were greater in subjects with patellofemoral joint pain (PFP) than without PFP (P = 0.058). Higher PI-LL values were observed in women (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A correlation between sagittal spinal imbalance and knee joint angles was recognized. The progression of knee and low back pain was associated with the severity of sagittal spinal imbalance. Pelvic retroversion was considered to be the probable compensatory mechanism.

OBJECTIVE: The classical approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) are the direct lateral approach (DLA) and posterior lateral approach (PLA). There are few studies comparing implant orientation with these two approaches, and the impact of surgical approaches on implant orientation remains controversial. With the rise of the EOS imaging system, we aimed to use it to identify the differences between and factors associated with implant orientation after THA using DLA and PLA.
METHODS: In our department from January 2019 to December 2021, 321 primary unilateral THAs that used PLA and DLA were enrolled. A total of 201 patients who received PLA and 120 patients who received DLA were included in this study. Two blinded observers measured each case using EOS imaging data. Postoperative imaging metrics and other relevant influencing factors of the two surgical approaches were compared. Postoperative imaging metrics, including the anteversion and inclination of the cup, anteversion of the stem, and combined anteversion were measured based on EOS. Other relevant influencing factors included age, approach, gender, laterality, BMI, anterior pelvic plane inclination, femoral head diameter, femoral offset, lateral pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, pelvis axial rotation, sacral slope, sagittal pelvic tilt, and surgery time. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of acceptability for each imaging data point.
RESULTS: No dislocation was found in the 321 patients who underwent primary THA during this period. The mean anteversion and combined anteversion of the cups using the DLA were 21.33° ± 17.31° (-51.7°-60.8°) and 33.71° ± 20.85° (-38.8°-77.6°) and PLA were 25.34° ± 12.76° (-5.5°-57.0°) and 42.37° ± 18.85° (-8.7°-84.7°), respectively. The DLA group had smaller anteversion (p = 0.038) and combined anteversion (p < 0.001). We found that surgical approach (p < 0.05), anterior pelvic plane inclination (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), and femoral head diameter (p < 0.001) were important factors affecting acetabular cup anteversion (R2  = 0.375) and combined anteversion (R2  = 0.525).
CONCLUSIONS: In total hip arthroplasty, different prosthesis installation directions should be made according to different surgical approaches. Compared with the direct lateral approach, the acetabular anteversion can be intentionally enlarged when using the posterolateral approach. Surgical approach, anterior pelvic plane inclination (APPI), gender, and femoral head diameter were significant predictors of prosthesis orientation. The anterior pelvic plane inclination may be a useful standard for assessing the position of the prosthesis using EOS.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effective dose and cancer risk of examinations in EOS imaging system in different age and gender groups.
In total, 555 patients who had undergone common EOS imaging examinations were entered into the study. Exposure parameters and patients\' characteristics for lower limb, full spine and full body imaging techniques, at different gender and age groups, were evaluated. Finally, effective dose and risk of exposure induced cancer death (REID) was calculated with the Monte Carlo based PCXMC software.
The difference between average effective doses of male and female was not significant (p ≥ 0.05), however, the corresponding REID showed statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.001). The average effective dose of patients (without considering technique, age and gender) was obtained as 0.13 mSv. The corresponding average REID was 8.84 per million. The maximum average effective dose value was obtained for patients over 10 years of age with the full body technique (0.17 ± 0.05 mSv). The maximum average REID value was obtained for full body technique and for patient with 0-10 years old (15.20 ± 10.00 per million).
In common EOS imaging examinations, the effective dose and REID values of patients in both genders in all age groups are less than the corresponding values in other imaging modalities (according to previous studies). However, according to stochastic effects of ionizing radiation and based on the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle, more considerations are necessary, especially in the full body technique and for female examinations.

BACKGROUND: The measurements of lower extremity rotational deformities in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) in the standing position are available with the application of the EOS imaging system. The aim of our case-control study was to identify the differences on the femur rotation between the supine and standing positions, and to investigate the differences of anatomical and functional femur rotation between RPD patients and controls.
METHODS: Thirty-five lower extremities affected by RPD from 30 patients and 27 intact lower extremities from 27 controls with acute meniscus tear or anterior cruciate ligament injury were recruited. Anatomical femoral anteversion (AFA), functional femoral anteversion (FFA), femorotibial rotation (FTR) and distal femoral torsion (DFT) of all subjects were measured with the EOS imaging system. Computed tomography scans were carried out to analyze the AFA and FFA in the supine position in PRD patients. The differences in FFA between supine and standing position and in AFA, FTR and DFT between RPD and controls were analyzed. The predictor importance of each variable on RPD was observed after cluster analysis.
RESULTS: The EOS images were available in all subjects. The FFA was significantly smaller in the standing position than in the supine position (P < 0.05) in RPD patients. When comparing with the controls, RPD patients showed higher AFA, FTR and DFT (P < 0.05) but comparable FFA (P < 0.05). The cluster model prompted that FTR and DFT had higher predictor importance than AFA.
CONCLUSIONS: Larger AFA but comparable FFA in patients with RPD than the controls in an upright standing position suggested more internally rotated distal femur in the RPD patients. AFA may be inadequate and FFA should also be considered while planning the treatment for RPD. DFT and FTR should be taken into consideration when evaluating the abnormalities in femur rotation in RPD patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the radiation dose, image quality and 3D spine parameter measurements of EOS low-dose and micro-dose protocols for in-brace adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.
We prospectively included 25 consecutive patients (20 females, 5 males) followed for AIS and undergoing brace treatment. The mean age was 12 years (SD 2 years, range 8-15 years). For each patient, in-brace biplanar EOS radiographs were acquired in a standing position using both the conventional low-dose and micro-dose protocols. Dose area product (DAP) was systematically recorded. Diagnostic image quality was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists for visibility of anatomical structures. The reliability of 3D spine modeling between two operators was quantitatively evaluated for the most clinically relevant 3D radiological parameters using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
The mean DAP for the posteroanterior and lateral acquisitions was 300 ± 134 and 433 ± 181 mGy cm2 for the low-dose radiographs, and 41 ± 19 and 81 ± 39 mGy cm2 for micro-dose radiographs. Image quality was lower with the micro-dose protocol. The agreement was \"good\" to \"very good\" for all measured clinical parameters when comparing the low-dose and micro-dose protocols (ICC > 0.73).
The micro-dose protocol substantially reduced the delivered dose (by a factor of 5-7 compared to the low-dose protocol) in braced children with AIS. Although image quality was reduced, the micro-dose protocol proved to be adapted to radiological follow-up, with adequate image quality and reliable clinical measurements. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.