BACKGROUND: The primary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare type of gastrointestinal tract tumor. Limited resection (LR) has been increasingly performed for duodenal GIST. However, only a few studies reported minimally invasive limited resection (MI-LR) for primary duodenal GIST.
METHODS: The clinical data of 33 patients with primary duodenal GIST from December 2014 to February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed including 23 who received MI-LR and 10 who received laparoscopic or robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD/RPD).
RESULTS: A total of 33 patients with primary duodenal GIST were enrolled and retrospectively reviewed. Patients received MI-LR exhibited less OT (280 vs. 388.5min, P=0.004), EBL (100 vs. 450ml, P<0.001), and lower morbidity of postoperative complications (52.2% vs. 100%, P=0.013) than LPD/RPD. Patients received LPD/RPD burdened more aggressive tumors with larger size (P=0.047), higher classification (P<0.001), and more mitotic count/50 HPF(P=0.005) compared with patients received MI-LR. The oncological outcomes were similar in MI-LR group and LPD/RPD group. All the patients underwent MI-LR with no conversion, including 12 cases of LLR and 11 cases of RLR. All of the clinicopathological data of the patients were similar in both groups. The median OT was 280(210-480) min and 257(180-450) min, and the median EBL was 100(20-1000) mL and 100(20-200) mL in the LLR and the RLR group separately. The postoperative complications mainly included DGE (LLR 4 cases, 33.4% and RLR 4 cases, 36.4%), intestinal fistula (LLR 2 cases, 16.7%, and RLR 0 case), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (LLR 0 case and RLR 1 case, 9.1%), and intra-abdominal infection (LLR 3 cases, 25.0% and RLR 1 case, 9.1%). The median postoperative length of hospitalization was 19.5(7-46) days in the LLR group and 19(9-38) days in the RLR group. No anastomotic stenosis, local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed during the follow-up period in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive limited resection is an optional treatment for primary duodenal GIST with satisfactory short-term and long-term oncological outcomes.

Pancreas sparing total duodenectomy (PSTD) is an exceedingly rare procedure that is performed mostly for benign disease, widely involving the duodenum, that cannot be treated otherwise. PSTD requires meticulous dissection as well as reconstruction of both biliary and pancreatic drainage. Despite these technical aspects appear to be ideal for robotic assistance, robotic PSTD has not been described yet.Robotic PSTD was successfully performed in two patients. In both patients biliary and pancreatic drainage were reconstructed on the second jejunal loop, which was pulled in the duodenal bed. In the first patient, gastro-jejunostomy was performed on the blind end of the neo-duodenum (Billorth I type gastric reconstruction). In the second patient, gastro-jejunostomy was achieved in an antecolic position, 40 cm downstream the neo-ampulla in the second patient (Billorth II type gastric reconstruction). In both patients, indication to PSTD was duodenal polyps not amenable to endoscopic removal. The first patient suffered from prolonged delayed gastric emptying, but she is currently doing well 5 years and beyond after the procedure. The second patient complained of mild delayed gastric emptying that resolved spontaneously. He is now doing well 5 months after surgery.We have shown the feasibility of robotic PSTD in what we believe to be a world premiere. Further experience is required to refine the procedure and improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy (PSP) or pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) is an alternative method for patients with benign or low-grade malignant tumours at the pancreatic head or duodenum. It avoids traumatic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with pancreatic function preservation and improves quality of life. However, few studies have reported on robotic PSP (RPSP) or robotic PSD (RPSD).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 17 patients with benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic head and duodenal tumours who underwent RPSP or RPSD from January 2018 to February 2022 was conducted. The demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data of all patients were collected and analysed.
RESULTS: The operations were successful for all seventeen patients without conversion, including 10 cases of RPSP and 7 cases of RPSD. For RPSP, eight patients underwent pancreatic enucleation, and two patients underwent uncinate process resection. For RPSD, five patients underwent local duodenectomy, and two patients underwent segmental duodenectomy, with five simultaneous jejunostomies and two distal gastrectomies. The median OT and EBL were 135 min and 50 mL for RPSP and 220 min and 100 mL for RPSD, respectively. The median LOS was 8 days for RPSP and 19 days for RPSD. The main postoperative complications for RPSP included POPF (grade B, 6 cases), DGE (grade B, 1 case), PPH (1 case), and intra-abdominal infection (1 case). The main postoperative complications for RPSD included DGE (grade B, 1 case, grade C, 3 cases), postoperative haemorrhage (1 case), intra-abdominal infection (1 case), and duodenal fistula (1 case). One patient underwent interventional drain placement after RPSP because of POPF.
CONCLUSIONS: RPSP or RPSD is feasible for highly selected patients with benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic head and duodenal tumours, avoiding potential pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Parenchymal sparing duodenal and pancreatic resection are safe procedures in selected patients with the aim to reduce endocrine and exocrine long-term dysfunction. When the tumor is benign or borderline malignant, this appears to be a good option for the surgeon, associated with low rates of severe surgery-related early postoperative complications and low in-hospital mortality. This mini review offers comments, tips and tricks, and a review of literature concerning those different options with specific illustrations in order to clarify their indication.

BACKGROUND: There are no clearly defined indications for pancreas-preserving duodenectomy. The present study aimed to analyze postoperative morbidity and the outcomes of patients undergoing pancreas-preserving duodenectomy.
METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreas-preserving duodenectomy from April 2008 to May 2020 were included. We divided the series according to indication: scenario 1, primary duodenal tumors; scenario 2, tumors of another origin with duodenal involvement; and scenario 3, emergency duodenectomy.
RESULTS: We included 35 patients. Total duodenectomy was performed in 1 patient of adenomatous duodenal polyposis, limited duodenectomy in 7, and third + fourth duodenal portion resection in 27. The indications for scenario 1 were gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 13), adenocarcinoma (n = 4), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 3), duodenal adenoma (n = 1), and adenomatous duodenal polyposis (n = 1); scenario 2: retroperitoneal desmoid tumor (n = 2), recurrence of liposarcoma (n = 2), retroperitoneal paraganglioma (n = 1), neuroendocrine tumor in pancreatic uncinate process (n = 1), and duodenal infiltration due to metastatic adenopathies of a germinal tumor with digestive hemorrhage (n = 1); and scenario 3: aortoenteric fistula (n = 3), duodenal trauma (n = 1), erosive duodenitis (n = 1), and biliopancreatic limb ischemia (n = 1). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) developed in 14% (5/35), and postoperative mortality was 3% (1/35).
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas-preserving duodenectomy is useful in the management of primary duodenal tumors, and is a technical option for some tumors with duodenal infiltration or in emergency interventions.

The duodenum is traditionally reached and dissected by an anterior approach. Optimal exposure is achieved via complete hepatic flexure mobilization and kocherization of the duodenum and head of the pancreas, which can be technically challenging and time-consuming, especially in the setting of minimally invasive surgery. On the contrary, an inframesocolic approach provides a ready and neat access to the second and third segments of the duodenum with distinct advantages in terms of exposure and operative time. This video presents the details of our laparoscopic technique of approaching the duodenum via the inframesocolic route, as performed to treat a patient with symptomatic duodenal diverticulum.

BACKGROUND: Secondary aorto-duodenal fistula (sADF) is a complication of abdominal aorta artificial blood vessel replacement that often leads to death. However, an optimal operative method has not yet been established. We describe a patient who underwent artificial blood vessel reimplantation and duodenectomy after endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR) with positive outcomes.
METHODS: An 84-year-old man underwent artificial blood vessel replacement in 2015. In September 2016, he visited our emergency department and was diagnosed with sADF based on computed tomography. Urgent EVAR was performed, followed by duodenal segmental resection on the next day without opening the syringeal part to minimize the pollution of the operative field. Artificial blood vessel reimplantation and omental flap transposition were performed. As of 2020, about 3 years after surgery, there has been no relapse of the infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Using our novel operative method, we can minimize exposure of the artificial blood vessel and surrounding tissue to intestinal juice and pus. We believe that this reduces the risk of postoperative artificial blood vessel reinfection.
CONCLUSIONS: Controlling bleeding by EVAR and resection of the duodenum and artificial blood vessels as a group without opening the syringeal part can contribute to positive long-term results as this method minimizes the pollution of the duodenectomy surgical field.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in the third portion of the duodenum are rare. Intussusception and obstruction are rarely caused by GISTs because of their tendency to grow in an extraluminal manner. Herein, we report a case involving segmental duodenectomy in a patient with duodenojejunal intussusception secondary to a primary GIST.
METHODS: A 91-year-old woman with a history of iron-deficiency anemia presented with vomiting and anorexia. Preoperative imaging suggested duodenojejunal intussusception secondary to a GIST in the third portion of the duodenum. Segmental duodenectomy with end-to-end duodenojejunostomy without reduction of the intussusception was performed. At 6 months after the surgery, the patient\'s anemia had improved and she had no abdominal symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Adult intussusception requires surgical resection because most of the patients have intraluminal lesions. The location in relation to the Vater papilla, tumor size, and resection margin should be considered when selecting the type of surgical resection for duodenal GIST. Limited resection appears to be better than pancreaticoduodenectomy with respect to postoperative complications. Considering the age and performance status of this patient, a less invasive maneuver was selected.
CONCLUSIONS: Duodenal GISTs can be a rare cause of intussusception. Thus, a limited surgical resection procedure should be considered in such cases.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal lipoma is very rare with limited case reports present in literature. Owing to recent advances in endoscopy and modern imaging techniques, more cases are being diagnosed and treated. However, no systematic study of duodenal lipomas has been reported.
OBJECTIVE: To study the diagnosis and treatment of duodenal lipoma in a female patient and review the relative literatures to enhance the knowledge of it.
METHODS: A literature search for \'duodenal lipoma\' was performed on PubMed. Papers published from 1948 to 2016 in the English language were identified. Each article was then read in detail and analysed for clinical data, imaging features, diagnosis and therapy. Also, we hereby present a case of upper gastrointestinal obstruction secondary to multiple duodenal lipomas in a 67-year-old woman. The patient underwent a limited bowel resection with an uneventful recovery.
RESULTS: Literature review demonstrated 59 cases of duodenal lipoma, which indicate that duodenal lipomas are rare to occur but commonly found in the second part. The peak of incidence seems to be around the fifth and seventh decade of life. Duodenal lipomas may present as gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain, obstruction or upper abdominal fullness. CT, MRI, Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS), endoscopy are highly accurate diagnostic tools. The disease could be managed by endoscopy or surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review of literature indicated duodenal lipoma is extremely rare. The symptoms are nonspecific and CT is the first choice for diagnosis. The treatment depends on the patient\'s condition as well as the size and position of the tumour.

Duodenal variceal bleeding is an uncommon cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. Treatment strategies are reliant on case reports and case series with new developments in interventional treatment modalities including endoscopic therapy, radiological intervention, and surgery. Endoscopic treatment includes injection sclerotherapy using various agents, banding of varices and clipping of varices. Interventional radiological procedures include Transjugular Intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPSS), and Balloon- Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO). Surgical treatment could be suture ligation of varices or gastro-duodenectomy. In this article, a case report of upper gastrointestinal bleed, and management of duodenal varices is described, with review of the literature to offer optimum modern era treatment to these high risk gastrointestinal bleeds.