BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) affects 2% to 4% of people, with increasing prevalence in Saudi Arabia reaching 13.4%. FMS can occur in adolescents, known as juvenile-onset fibromyalgia (JFM) with comorbidities including depression, anxiety, and psychological stress. Our patient presented to the child and adolescent psychiatry clinic at King Saud University Hospital Medical City. A year before coming to our clinic, at the age of 15 she was initially diagnosed with JFM followed by a comorbid persistent depressive disorder.
METHODS: As a novel treatment method, a combination treatment approach was used, including a pharmacological intervention with Duloxetine, and a non-pharmacological intervention with interpersonal psychotherapy for adolescents. She completed 16 weeks of therapy while monitoring for duloxetine response and side effects.
RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were in remission by treatment\'s end and continued to be in her first month posttreatment follow-up, and the FMS symptoms were also controlled.
CONCLUSIONS: Our present case highlights a combined approach to treat depression and JFM in adolescents as a novel intervention method thus we strongly recommend utilizing it for similar cases.

OBJECTIVE: To explore cancer survivors\' historical and current use of analgesics for chronic chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).
UNASSIGNED: 142 post-treatment cancer survivors who received neurotoxic chemotherapy and were experiencing moderate to severe CIPN.
UNASSIGNED: Participants completed the Treatment-Induced Neuropathy Assessment Scale at baseline and reported all analgesics used to manage CIPN. Frequency of historical or current prescription analgesic use for chronic CIPN was described and stratified by CIPN pain severity.
RESULTS: At baseline, 31% of participants reported historical use of analgesics for CIPN and 46% of participants were currently using analgesics for CIPN. Gabapentin was the most frequently used analgesic, historically (20%) and currently (34%), and duloxetine was used less frequently (6% historical use, 10% current use). Many participants with severe pain (59%) reported using analgesics for CIPN.
CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine, the first-line treatment for chronic CIPN pain, was used less frequently than gabapentin, a common prescription analgesic for neuropathic pain. Further research is needed to determine strategies to promote the implementation of evidence-based CIPN treatments in clinical practice.

Five types of sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBE-β-CD) and carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin (CM-β-CD) with different degrees of substitution were synthesized, and six and five racemates were respectively chosen to study the influence of the degree of substitution on the enantioseparation factor. The synthesized SBE-β-CD and CM-β-CD were characterized using 1H NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The results indicated that the influence of the degree of substitution on enantioseparation for distinct racemates exhibited significant variability. Increasing the degree of substitution of CM-β-CD led to an increasing enantioseparation factor, while SBE-β-CD with a specific degree of substitution provided the optimum enantioseparation factor for some racemates. The optimum enantioseparation factors of N-methyl duloxetine and duloxetine were obtained when a relatively low degree of substitution (DS = 3.5) was selected. And the optimum enantioseparation factor was obtained with a relatively high degree of substitution (DS = 7.5). SBE-β-CD with a low substitution degree of 3.5 was chosen to optimize the countercurrent chromatographic enantioseparation of N-methyl-duloxetine, which resulted in a significant improvement in peak resolution from 0.51 to 0.83. Molecular docking was used to construct three SBE-β-CDs with different degrees and distributions of substitution, and a good agreement was found between the docking results and the experimental results.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic neuropathy is a prevalent and debilitating complication of diabetes, necessitating effective pain management strategies. While pharmacological treatments, including opioids, are commonly employed, they pose significant challenges due to the risk of developing opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). This case report aims to illustrate the efficacy of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach in managing painful diabetic neuropathy complicated by OIH.
METHODS: A 64-year-old male patient presented to the Pain Treatment Clinic with severe lower limb pain due to diabetic polyneuropathy. He had a history of multiple comorbidities.
METHODS: The patient\'s condition and physical examination suggested the presence of opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Despite the increased dose of opioids, the patient did not report significant constipation or breathing difficulties but experienced drowsiness and dry mouth. A diagnosis of opioid and benzodiazepine dependence was made.
METHODS: The treatment plan involved the initiation of pregabalin and duloxetine, gradual reduction of opioid use, and psychiatric support for addiction management.
RESULTS: Over 12 months, the patient experienced significant pain reduction and minimal adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective management of OIH involves gradual opioid tapering and a multimodal therapeutic approach. However, the optimal treatment strategies and the frequency of OIH occurrence remain areas of uncertainty, relying heavily on clinical expertise and individualized patient care. Further research is needed to refine these treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is one of the frequent presenting complaints in diabetes and endocrine clinics. Our main objective was to compare effectiveness of three commonly prescribed drugs: amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine for treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
METHODS: This was a comparative, prospective, observational study conducted among 99 diabetic patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy having numeric rating pain scale ≥ 4. Thirty-three patients in each group were consecutively prescribed amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine in lower dose (10mg/75mg/20mg) for first two weeks to gradually up titrate to higher dose (25mg/150mg/30mg) as per pain response for total duration of eight weeks.
RESULTS: At the end of eight weeks, 84.9% in amitriptyline, 78.7% in pregabalin and 60.6% in duloxetine group had adequate pain reduction in form of mild or no pain. Among total patients, 42.5% patients had severe pain at baseline that decreased to 5% by the end of our study. Out of three drugs, 45.5% patients in amitriptyline group had complete resolution of pain as compared to 24.2% in pregabalin and 18.2% in duloxetine group (p value 0.05). Drowsiness (42.4%), dizziness (21.2%) and dry mouth (21.2%) were the commonest side effects among total participants in our study.
CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline, pregabalin and duloxetine were all associated with adequate pain reduction among patients of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in our study, however, amitriptyline had more favorable findings with tolerable side effects.

BACKGROUND: Enantiodiscrimination of chiral drugs is critical for understanding physiological phenomena and ensuring medical safety. Although enantiomers of these drugs share identical physicochemical properties, they exhibit significant differences in pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological properties due to the differences in their three-dimensional shapes. Therefore, the development of effective methods for chiral recognition is of great significance and has been a hot topic in chemo/biological studies.
RESULTS: In this study, we designed a recognition receptor comprising a α-hemolysin (α-HL) nanopore and sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin (SBEβCD) for identifying the enantiomers of the antidepressant duloxetine at the single-molecule level. Chiral molecules were discriminated based on the different current blockages within the recognition receptor. The results indicated a strong interaction between R-duloxetine and the recognition receptor. By combining the experimental data and molecular docking results, we explored the recognition mechanism of the designed nanopore recognition receptor for chiral drug molecules. It was found that hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions play key roles in chiral recognition. Additionally, by comparing the binding kinetics of enantiomers to cyclodextrins in confined nanospace and bulk solution, we found that enantiomeric identification was better facilitated in the confined nanospace. Finally, the enantiomeric excess (ee) of the enantiomeric duloxetine mixture was measured using this recognized receptor.
CONCLUSIONS: This strategy has the advantages of low cost, high sensitivity, and no need for additional derivative modifications, providing a new perspective on the development of chiral recognition sensors with excellent enantioselectivity in drug design, pharmaceuticals, and biological applications.

暂无摘要。

Aim: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) induces chronic neuropathic pain in diabetic patients. Current treatments like pregabalin and duloxetine offer limited efficacy. This study evaluates combining pregabalin and duloxetine versus pregabalin alone for DPN pain relief, and explores gene modulation (PPARγ and Akt) to understand neuropathic pain\'s molecular basis.Materials & methods: Diabetic patients with DPN were randomized into groups receiving combination therapy or pregabalin alone for 4 weeks. Pain intensity, gene expression and quality of life were assessed.Results: Combination therapy significantly reduced pain, improved quality of life and upregulated PPARγ and Akt genes compared with monotherapy.Conclusion: Pregabalin and duloxetine combination therapy in DPN led to PPARγ mRNA upregulation and negative correlation of Akt gene expression with pain scores. This combination therapy effectively reduced pain and improved quality of life.Clinical Trial Registration: CTRI/2021/02/031068.
Combining medicines to reduce nerve pain in diabetic patientsWhat is this article about? People with diabetes often have nerve pain called diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Some medicines like pregabalin and duloxetine help, but are not enough. This study tested if using both medicines together works better than using just pregabalin. The study also looked at how these medicines affect certain genes.What were the results? Patients with DPN took either both medicines or just pregabalin for 4 weeks. The combined treatment reduced pain, improved life quality and affected certain genes.What do the results of the study mean? Using pregabalin and duloxetine together can reduce DPN pain more effectively. This offers hope for better treatment options.

OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the major side effects and main reasons for affecting quality of life and dose reduction or even discontinuation of treatment in breast cancer patients. One of the most widely prescribed chemotherapies is the \"taxanes.\" Considering that duloxetine has been used in treating neuropathies in recent years, this study aimed to investigate its effectiveness in preventing taxane-related neuropathy.
METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial on 47 patients: 24 received a placebo and 23 received duloxetine at 30 mg daily in the first week following the injection of paclitaxel and 60 mg during the second week in each chemotherapy cycle. Patients objective (nerve conduction velocity (NCV) values) and subjective symptoms (visual analog scale including; neuropathy, paresthesia, pain, cold sensitivity, and numbness), the grades of the patients\' neuropathy (calculated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5), and the presence of complications, before and after each chemotherapy cycle, were recorded.
RESULTS: The placebo group experienced significantly higher occurrences of new neuropathy (8/23 in duloxetine vs 16/24 in placebo, P = 0.029) in NCV by tibial nerve latency (- 0.28% vs 19.87%, P = 0.006), tibial amplitude (4.40% vs - 10.88%, P = 0.049), and median nerve latency (8.72% vs 31.16%, P = 0.039); administration of duloxetine significantly reduced the scores of neuropathies (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.027), during chemotherapy, and 6 weeks later; however, no significant effect was observed on paresthesia, numbness, cold sensitivity, and other NCV measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel can cause neuropathy, lasting for a long time. Our study showed duloxetine is potentially an effective medication that can prevent subjective and objective neuropathy.

Nitrosamine drug substance related impurities or NDSRIs can be formed if an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) has an intrinsic secondary amine that can undergo nitrosation. This is a concern as 1) nitrosamines are potentially highly potent carcinogens, 2) secondary amines in API are common, and 3) NDSRIs that might form from such secondary amines will be of unknown carcinogenic potency. Approaches for evaluating NDSRIs include read across, quantum mechanical modeling of reactivity, in vitro mutation data, and transgenic in vivo mutation data. These approaches were used here to assess NDSRIs that could potentially form from the drugs fluoxetine, duloxetine and atomoxetine. Based on a read across informed by modeling of physicochemical properties and mechanistic activation from quantum mechanical modeling, NDSRIs of fluoxetine, duloxetine, and atomoxetine were 10-100-fold less potent compared with highly potent nitrosamines such as NDMA or NDEA. While the NDSRIs were all confirmed to be mutagenic in vitro (Ames assay) and in vivo (TGR) studies, the latter data indicated that the potency of the mutation response was ≥4400 ng/day for all compounds-an order of magnitude higher than published regulatory limits for these NDSRIs. The approaches described herein can be used qualitatively to better categorize NDSRIs with respect to potency and inform whether they are in the ICH M7 (R2) designated Cohort of Concern.