OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of conventional non-contrast CT, dual-energy spectral CT, and chemical-shift MRI (CS-MRI) in discriminating lipid-poor adenomas (> 10-HU on non-contrast CT) from non-adenomas.
METHODS: A total of 110 patients (69 men; 41 women; mean age 66.5 ± 13.4 years) with 80 lipid-poor adenomas and 30 non-adenomas who underwent non-contrast dual-layer spectral CT and CS-MRI were retrospectively identified. For each lesion, non-contrast attenuation on conventional 120-kVp images, ΔHU-index ([attenuation difference between virtual monoenergetic 140-keV and 40-keV images]/conventional attenuation × 100), and signal intensity index (SI-index) were quantified. Each parameter was compared between adenomas and non-adenomas using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and sensitivity to achieve > 95% specificity for adenoma diagnosis were determined.
RESULTS: Conventional non-contrast attenuation was lower in adenomas than in non-adenomas (22.4 ± 8.6 HU vs 32.8 ± 48.5 HU), whereas ΔHU-index (148.0 ± 103.2 vs 19.4 ± 25.8) and SI-index (41.6 ± 19.6 vs 4.2 ± 10.2) were higher in adenomas (all, p < 0.001). ΔHU-index showed superior performance to conventional non-contrast attenuation (AUC: 0.919 [95% CI: 0.852-0.963] vs 0.791 [95% CI: 0.703-0.863]; sensitivity: 75.0% [60/80] vs 27.5% [22/80], both p < 0.001), and near equivalent to SI-index (AUC: 0.952 [95% CI: 0.894-0.984], sensitivity 85.0% [68/80], both p > 0.05). Both the ΔHU-index and SI-index provided a sensitivity of 96.0% (48/50) for hypoattenuating adenomas (≤ 25 HU). For hyperattenuating (> 25 HU) adenomas, SI-index showed higher sensitivity than ΔHU-index (66.7% [20/30] vs 40.0% [12/30], p = 0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast spectral CT and CS-MRI outperformed conventional non-contrast CT in distinguishing lipid-poor adenomas from non-adenomas. While CS-MRI demonstrated superior sensitivity for adenomas measuring > 25 HU, non-contrast spectral CT provided high discriminative values for adenomas measuring ≤ 25 HU.
CONCLUSIONS: Spectral attenuation analysis improves the diagnostic performance of non-contrast CT in discriminating lipid-poor adrenal adenomas, potentially serving as an alternative to CS-MRI and obviating the necessity for additional diagnostic workup in indeterminate adrenal incidentalomas, particularly for lesions measuring ≤ 25 HU.
CONCLUSIONS: Incidental adrenal lesion detection has increased as abdominal CT use has become more frequent. Non-contrast spectral CT and CS-MRI differentiated lipid-poor adenomas from non-adenomas better than conventional non-contrast CT. For lesions measuring ≤ 25 HU, spectral CT may obviate the need for additional evaluation.

Advancing medical technology revolutionizes our ability to diagnose various disease processes. Conventional Single-Energy Computed Tomography (SECT) has multiple inherent limitations for providing definite diagnoses in certain clinical contexts. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) has been in use since 2006 and has constantly evolved providing various applications to assist radiologists in reaching certain diagnoses SECT is rather unable to identify. DECT may also complement the role of SECT by supporting radiologists to confidently make diagnoses in certain clinically challenging scenarios. In this review article, we briefly describe the principles of X-ray attenuation. We detail principles for DECT and describe multiple systems associated with this technology. We describe various DECT techniques and algorithms including virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI), virtual non-contrast (VNC) imaging, Iodine quantification techniques including Iodine overlay map (IOM), and two- and three-material decomposition algorithms that can be utilized to demonstrate a multitude of pathologies. Lastly, we provide our readers commentary on examples pertaining to the practical implementation of DECT\'s diverse techniques in the Gastrointestinal, Genitourinary, Biliary, Musculoskeletal, and Neuroradiology systems.

UNASSIGNED: To assess the usefulness of various metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods in patients with hip prostheses.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included 47 consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and dual-energy CT. Conventional polyenergetic image (CI), orthopedic-MAR (O-MAR), and virtual monoenergetic image (VMI, 50-200 keV) were tested for MAR. Quantitative analysis was performed in seven regions around the prostheses. Qualitative assessments included evaluation of the degree of artifacts and the presence of secondary artifacts.
UNASSIGNED: The lowest amount of image noise was observed in the O-MAR, followed by the VMI. O-MAR also showed the lowest artifact index, followed by high-keV VMI in the range of 120-200 keV (soft tissue) or 200 keV (bone). O-MAR had the highest contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in regions with severe hypodense artifacts, while VMI had the highest CNR in other regions, including the periprosthetic bone. On assessment of the CI of pelvic soft tissues, VMI showed a higher structural similarity than O-MAR. Upon qualitative analysis, metal artifacts were significantly reduced in O-MAR, followed by that in VMI, while secondary artifacts were the most frequently found in the O-MAR (p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: O-MAR is the best technique for severe MAR, but it can generate secondary artifacts. VMI at high keV can be advantageous for evaluating periprosthetic bone.
UNASSIGNED: 고관절 인공치환물을 가진 환자에서 여러 가지 금속인공물 감소 효과를 비교하였다.
UNASSIGNED: 이 연구는 고관절 인공치환술과 이중에너지 전산화단층촬영을 시행한 47명 환자에서 시행하였다. 금속에서 발생한 인공물 감소효과는 서로 다른 3개의 영상(고식적 영상, 금속인공물 감소영상, 가상 단일에너지 영상)에서 비교하였다. 이를 위해 인공관절 주변 7곳에서 금속인공물에 대한 정량적 분석과 정성적 분석을 시행하였다.
UNASSIGNED: 금속인공물 감소영상에서 가장 낮은 영상잡음과 인공물 지수를 보였고, 다음으로는 가상 단일에너지 영상이었다. 금속인공물 감소영상은 저음영 인공물이 매우 심한 영역에서만 높은 대조도를 보인 반면, 가상 단일에너지 영상은 인공물 주변 골조직과 그 외 영역에서 높은 대조도를 보였다. 연부조직 분석에서도 금속인공물 감소영상이 더 우수함을 보여 주었다. 정성적 분석에서도 금속인공물 감소영상이 가상 단일에너지 영상보다 인공물 감소 효과가 뛰어남을 밝혔지만, 이차적인 인공물 발생도 가장 흔히 발생하였다.
UNASSIGNED: 금속인공물 감소영상이 심한 금속인공물감소에 가장 뛰어난 효과를 보였지만 새로운 이차적 인공물을 발생시켰다. 가상 단일에너지 영상은 인공물 주변 골조직 평가에서 우수함을 보였다.

The third-generation dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) is among the most advanced imaging methods. It employs noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI+) technology. It uses the frequency-split method to extract high-contrast image information from low-energy images and low-noise information from images reconstructed at an optimal energy level, combining them to obtain the final image with improved quality. This review is the first to summarize the results of clinical studies that primarily and recently evaluated the VMI+ technique based on tumor, blood vessel, and other lesion classification. We aim to assist radiologists in quickly selecting the appropriate energy level when performing image reconstruction for superior image quality in clinical work and providing several ideas for future scientific research of the VMI+ technique. Presently, VMI+ reconstruction is mostly used for images of various tumors or blood vessels, including coronary plaques, coronary stents, deep vein thromboses, pulmonary embolisms (PEs), active arterial hemorrhages, and endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. In addition, VMI+ has been used for imaging children\'s heads, liver lesions, pancreatic lacerations, and reducing metal artifacts. Regarding the reconstruction at the optimal energy level, the VMI+ technique yielded a higher image quality than the pre-optimized virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) technique and single-energy CT. Moreover, either low concentrations of contrast medium or low iodine injection rates can be applied before VMI+ reconstruction at a low-energy level to reduce contrast agent-related kidney injury risk. After reconstructing an image at the optimal energy level, both the image\'s window width and level can also be adjusted to improve the image effect\'s reach and diagnosis suitability. To improve image quality and lesion-imaging clarity and reduce the use of contrast agents, VMI+ reconstruction technology has been applied clinically, in which the selection of energy level is the key to the whole reconstruction process. Our review summarizes these optimal levels for radiologists\' reference and suggests new ideas for the direction of future VMI+ research.