OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to assess drug exposure handling in diabetic retinopathy (DR) risk prediction models, a network-meta-analysis to identify drugs associated with DR and a meta-analysis to determine which drugs contributed to enhanced model performance.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: We included studies presenting DR models incorporating drug exposure as a predictor. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS from inception to December 2023. We evaluated the quality of studies using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and certainty using GRADE. We conducted network meta-analysis and meta-analysis to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and pooled C-statistic, respectively, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) (PROSPERO: CRD42022349764).
RESULTS: Of 5,653 records identified, we included 28 studies of 678,837 type 1 or 2 diabetes participants, of which 38,579 (5.7%) had DR. A total of 19, 3, and 7 studies were at high, unclear, and low risk of bias, respectively. Drugs included in models as predictors were: insulin (n = 24), antihypertensives (n = 5), oral antidiabetics (n = 12), lipid-lowering drugs (n = 7), antiplatelets (n = 2). Drug exposure was modelled primarily as a categorical variable (n = 23 studies). Two studies handled drug exposure as time-varying covariates, and one as a time-dependent covariate. Insulin was associated with an increased risk of DR (OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.61-3.86). Models that included insulin (n = 9) had a higher pooled C-statistic (C-statistic = 0.84, CI: 0.80-0.88), compared to models (n = 9) that incorporated a combination of drugs alongside insulin (C-statistic = 0.79, CI: 0.74-0.84), as well as models (n = 3) not including insulin (C-statistic = 0.70, CI: 0.64-0.75). Limitations include the high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity in reviewed studies.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review assessing drug exposure handling in DR prediction models. Drug exposure was primarily modelled as a categorical variable, with insulin associated with improved model performance. However, due to suboptimal drug handling, associations between other drugs and model performance may have been overlooked. This review proposes the following for future DR prediction models: (1) evaluation of drug exposure as a variable, (2) use of time-varying methodologies, and (3) consideration of drug regimen details. Improving drug exposure handling could potentially unveil novel variables capable of significantly enhancing the predictive capability of prediction models.

BACKGROUND: The management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains challenging. Treatment outcome is influenced by multiple factors; the specific roles of diabetes and glycemic control remain uncertain. This study aims to assess the impact of glycemic control on drug exposure, to investigate the association between drug exposure and treatment outcomes, and to identify clinically significant thresholds predictive of treatment outcome, among patients with diabetes.
METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study involved patients with confirmed MDR-TB and diabetes. Drug exposure level was estimated by noncompartmental analysis. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for the individual Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. The influence of poor glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin ≥7%) on drug exposure and the associations between drug exposure and treatment outcome were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify the drug exposure/susceptibility thresholds.
RESULTS: Among the 131 diabetic participants, 43 (32.8%) exhibited poor glycemic control. Poor glycemic control was independently associated with decreased exposure to moxifloxacin, linezolid, bedaquiline, and cycloserine, but not clofazimine. Additionally, a higher ratio of drug exposure to susceptibility was found to be associated with a favorable MDR-TB treatment outcome. Thresholds predictive of 6-month culture conversion and favorable outcome were bedaquiline area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ≥245 and moxifloxacin AUC/MIC ≥67, demonstrating predictive accuracy in patients, regardless of their glycemic control status.
CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control and optimal TB drug exposure are associated with improved treatment outcomes. This dual management strategy should be further validated in randomized controlled trials of patients with MDR-TB and diabetes.

Subunit vaccines are an important platform for controlling current and emerging infectious diseases. The lymph nodes are the primary site generating the humoral response and delivery of antigens to these sites is critical to effective immunization. Indeed, the duration of antigen exposure within the lymph node is correlated with the antibody response. While current licensed vaccines are typically given through the intramuscular route, injecting vaccines subcutaneously allows for direct access to lymphatic vessels and therefore can enhance the transfer of antigen to the lymph nodes. However, protein subunit antigen uptake into the lymph nodes is inefficient, and subunit vaccines require adjuvants to stimulate the initial immune response. Therefore, formulation strategies have been developed to enhance the exposure of subunit proteins and adjuvants to the lymph nodes by increasing lymphatic uptake or prolonging the retention at the injection site. Given that lymph node exposure is a crucial consideration in vaccine design, in depth analyses of the pharmacokinetics of antigens and adjuvants should be the focus of future preclinical and clinical studies. This review will provide an overview of formulation strategies for targeting the lymphatics and prolonging antigen exposure and will discuss pharmacokinetic evaluations which can be applied toward vaccine development.

Renal impairment is a common complication in patients with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF). Glucagon-like peptide-2 analogs, such as apraglutide, have been developed as a treatment option for SBS-IF. This study assessed the potential for apraglutide overexposure in individuals with severely impaired renal function versus healthy volunteers with normal renal function. In this phase 1, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, parallel-group study, a single dose of apraglutide 5 mg was administered subcutaneously to individuals with severely impaired renal function (<30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and healthy volunteers with normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and exposure to apraglutide (area under the curve [AUC] from time 0 to infinity [AUCinf], and AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration [AUClast]). Each group comprised 8 individuals. Results show that patients with severe renal impairment do not have increased apraglutide exposure. Apraglutide achieved a lower Cmax and AUCinf in individuals with severe renal impairment versus those with normal renal function (Cmax = 36.9 vs 59.5 ng/L; AUCinf = 3100 vs 4470 h · ng/mL, respectively). The respective geometric mean ratios were 0.620 and 0.693 for Cmax and AUCinf, and the upper bound of their 90% confidence intervals were <2, indicating patients with severe renal impairment were not overexposed to apraglutide versus those with normal renal function. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Apraglutide does not require dose reduction for any degree of renal impairment and could be used in a broader patient population of renally impaired patients without dose adjustment.

Pexidartinib is a systemic treatment for patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor not amenable to surgery. Oral absorption of pexidartinib is affected by food; administration with a high-fat meal (HFM) or low-fat meal (LFM) increases absorption by approximately 100% and approximately 60%, respectively, compared with the fasted state. Pexidartinib is currently dosed 250 mg orally twice daily with an LFM (approximately 11-14 g of total fat). We developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to determine the impact on drug exposure of dose timing with respect to meals, meal type, and caloric content. A 15%-16% increase in plasma exposure was predicted when consuming an HFM 1 hour after dosing with an LFM, but almost no effect on pharmacokinetics was predicted when an HFM was consumed 3 hours or more before or after pexidartinib dosing with an LFM. Exposure was not significantly affected when pexidartinib was taken with a 500-kcal LFM over the range of fat (approximately 11-14 g of total fat; 20%-25% calories from fat) for an LFM. These findings on timing of pexidartinib dose with respect to meals should be considered by patients and physicians to reduce the potential for side effects.

OBJECTIVE: Mitotane is the standard therapy of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) due to its relative selectivity of its cytotoxic effects toward adrenocortical cells. Therefore, it virtually always leads to adrenal insufficiency. Frequency and characteristics of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis recovery after discontinuation are ill-defined.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with ACC adjuvantly treated with mitotane for ≥12 months who were disease-free at mitotane stop and had a minimum follow-up ≥1 year. Primary endpoint was adrenal recovery. Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictive factors. Moreover, mitotane plasma elimination rate and hormonal changes after mitotane stop were investigated.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (36 women) treated with mitotane for a median time of 25 months and an average daily dose of 2.8 g were included. Median time after discontinuation until mitotane levels dropped below 5 and 2 mg/L, and the detection limit was 152 days (interquartile range: 114-202), 280 days (192-370), and 395 days (227-546), respectively. Full adrenal recovery was documented in 32 (57%) patients after a median time of 26 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.6-32.4). In 4 patients (7.1%), adrenal insufficiency persisted >5 years after discontinuation. Mitotane peak ≥ 27 mg/L significantly correlated with longer time to adrenal recovery (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.1-0.8, P = .03). Twenty-seven of 38 patients (71%) followed in reference centers achieved adrenal recovery compared with only 5/18 (28%) followed up in non-reference centers (HR = 4.51, 95% CI = 1.71-11.89, P = .002). Other investigated factors were not associated with adrenal function after discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that adrenal recovery occurs in most patients after stopping mitotane, particularly when followed up in specialized centers, but not in all. Elimination time of mitotane after treatment discontinuation is very long but individually quite variable.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between drug exposure and adverse events (AEs) during the standardized multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment, as well as to identify predictive drug exposure thresholds.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational multicenter study among participants receiving standardized MDR-TB treatment between 2016 and 2019 in China. AEs were monitored throughout the treatment and their relationships to drug exposure (e.g., the area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h, AUC0-24 h) were analyzed. The thresholds of pharmacokinetic predictors of observed AEs were identified by boosted classification and regression tree (CART) and further evaluated by external validation.
RESULTS: Of 197 study participants, 124 (62.9%) had at least one AE, and 15 (7.6%) experienced serious AEs. The association between drug exposure and AEs was observed including bedaquiline, its metabolite M2, moxifloxacin and QTcF prolongation (QTcF >450 ms), linezolid and mitochondrial toxicity, cycloserine and psychiatric AEs. The CART-derived thresholds of AUC0-24 h predictive of the respective AEs were 3.2 mg·h/l (bedaquiline M2); 49.3 mg·h/l (moxifloxacin); 119.3 mg·h/l (linezolid); 718.7 mg·h/l (cycloserine).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the drug exposure thresholds predictive of AEs for key drugs against MDR-TB treatment. Using the derived thresholds will provide the knowledge base for further randomized clinical trials of dose adjustment to minimize the risk of AEs.

BACKGROUND: In pediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD), adalimumab is dosed using fixed weight-based bands irrespective of methotrexate co-treatment, disease activity (DA) or other factors that might influence adalimumab pharmacokinetics (PK). In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) adalimumab exposure between 2-8 mg/L is associated with clinical response. PRD data on adalimumab is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze adalimumab PK and its variability in PRD treated with/without methotrexate.
METHODS: A two-center prospective study in PRD patients aged 2-18 years treated with adalimumab and methotrexate (GA-M) or adalimumab alone (GA) for ≥ 12 weeks was performed. Adalimumab concentrations were collected 1-9 (maximum concentration; Cmax), and 10-14 days (minimum concentration; Cmin) during ≥ 12 weeks following adalimumab start. Concentrations were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (lower limit of quantification: 0.5 mg/L). Log-normalized Cmin were compared between GA-M and GA using a standard t-test.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (14 per group), diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (71.4%), non-infectious uveitis (25%) or chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (3.6%) completed the study. GA-M included more females (71.4%; GA 35.7%, p = 0.13). At first study visit, children in GA-M had a slightly longer exposure to adalimumab (17.8 months [IQR 9.6, 21.6]) compared to GA (15.8 months [IQR 8.5, 30.8], p = 0.8). Adalimumab dosing was similar between both groups (median dose 40 mg every 14 days) and observed DA was low. Children in GA-M had a 27% higher median overall exposure compared to GA, although median Cmin adalimumab values were statistically not different (p = 0.3). Cmin values ≥ 8 mg/L (upper limit RA) were more frequently observed in GA-M versus GA (79% versus 64%). Overall, a wide range of Cmin values was observed in PRD (0.5 to 26 mg/L).
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a high heterogeneity in adalimumab exposure in PRD. Adalimumab exposure tended to be higher with methotrexate co-treatment compared to adalimumab monotherapy although differences were not statistically significant. Most children showed adalimumab exposure exceeding those reported for RA with clinical response, particularly with methotrexate co-treatment. This highlights the need of further investigations to establish model-based personalized treatment strategies in PRD to avoid under- and overexposure.
BACKGROUND: NCT04042792 , registered 02.08.2019.

OBJECTIVE: Antipsychotic agents, which may increase the risk of infection through dopaminergic dysregulation, are prescribed to a fraction of patients following critical illness. We compared the rate of recurrent sepsis among patients who filled a prescription for antipsychotics with high- or low-D2 affinity.
METHODS: Population-based cohort with active comparator design. We included sepsis survivors older than 65 years with intensive care unit admission and new prescription of antipsychotics in Ontario 2008-2019. The primary outcome were recurrent sepsis episodes within 1 year of follow-up. Patients who filled a prescription within 30 days of hospital discharge for high-D2 affinity antipsychotics (e.g., haloperidol) were compared with patients who filled a prescription within 30 days of hospital discharge for low-D2 affinity antipsychotics (e.g., quetiapine). Multivariable zero-inflated Poisson regression models with robust standard errors adjusting for confounding at baseline were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS: Overall, 1879 patients filled a prescription for a high-D2, and 1446 patients filled a prescription for a low-D2 affinity antipsychotic. Patients who filled a prescription for a high-D2 affinity antipsychotic did not present a higher rate of recurrent sepsis during 1 year of follow-up, compared with patients who filled a prescription for a low-D2 affinity antipsychotic (IRR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.35).
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find conclusive evidence of a higher rate of recurrent sepsis associated with the prescription of high-D2 affinity antipsychotics (compared with low-D2 affinity antipsychotics) by 1 year of follow-up in adult sepsis survivors with intensive care unit admission.

Exposure to opioids can lead to the alteration of several neurotransmitters. Among these neurotransmitters, glutamate is thought to be involved in opioid dependence. Glutamate neurotransmission is mainly regulated by astrocytic glutamate transporters such as glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) and cystine/glutamate antiporter (xCT). Our laboratory has shown that exposure to lower doses of hydrocodone reduced the expression of xCT in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the hippocampus. In the present study, we investigated the effects of chronic exposure to hydrocodone, and tested ceftriaxone as a GLT-1 upregulator in mesocorticolimbic brain regions such as the NAc, the amygdala (AMY), and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). Eight-week-old male mice were divided into three groups: (1) the saline vehicle control group; (2) the hydrocodone group; and (3) the hydrocodone + ceftriaxone group. Mice were injected with hydrocodone (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline for 14 days. On day seven, the hydrocodone/ceftriaxone group was injected with ceftriaxone (200 mg/kg, i.p.) for last seven days. Chronic exposure to hydrocodone reduced the expression of GLT-1, xCT, protein kinase B (AKT), extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), and c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) in NAc, AMY, and dmPFC. However, hydrocodone exposure increased the expression of G-protein-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR5) in the NAc, AMY, and dmPFC. Importantly, ceftriaxone treatment normalized the expression of mGluR5, GLT-1, and xCT in all these brain regions, except for xCT in the AMY. Importantly, ceftriaxone treatment attenuated hydrocodone-induced downregulation of signaling pathways such as AKT, ERK, and JNK expression in the NAc, AMY, and dmPFC. These findings demonstrate that ceftriaxone has potential therapeutic effects in reversing hydrocodone-induced downregulation of GLT-1 and xCT in selected reward brain regions, and this might be mediated through the downstream kinase signaling pathways such as AKT, ERK, and JNK.