UNASSIGNED: There is interest in using treatment breaks in oncology, to reduce toxicity without compromising efficacy.
UNASSIGNED: A Phase II/III multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial assessing treatment breaks in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma, starting tyrosine kinase inhibitor as first-line treatment at United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals.
UNASSIGNED: At trial entry, patients were randomised (1 : 1) to a drug-free interval strategy or a conventional continuation strategy. After 24 weeks of treatment with sunitinib/pazopanib, drug-free interval strategy patients took up a treatment break until disease progression with additional breaks dependent on disease response and patient choice. Conventional continuation strategy patients continued on treatment. Both trial strategies continued until treatment intolerance, disease progression on treatment, withdrawal or death.
UNASSIGNED: To determine if a drug-free interval strategy is non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of the co-primary outcomes of overall survival and quality-adjusted life-years.
UNASSIGNED: For non-inferiority to be concluded, a margin of ≤ 7.5% in overall survival and ≤ 10% in quality-adjusted life-years was required in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. This equated to the 95% confidence interval of the estimates being above 0.812 and -0.156, respectively. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated using the utility index of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions questionnaire.
UNASSIGNED: Nine hundred and twenty patients were randomised (461 conventional continuation strategy vs. 459 drug-free interval strategy) from 13 January 2012 to 12 September 2017. Trial treatment and follow-up stopped on 31 December 2020. Four hundred and eighty-eight (53.0%) patients [240 (52.1%) vs. 248 (54.0%)] continued on trial post week 24. The median treatment-break length was 87 days. Nine hundred and nineteen patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (461 vs. 458) and 871 patients in the per-protocol analysis (453 vs. 418). For overall survival, non-inferiority was concluded in the intention-to-treat analysis but not in the per-protocol analysis [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) intention to treat 0.97 (0.83 to 1.12); per-protocol 0.94 (0.80 to 1.09) non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval ≥ 0.812, intention to treat: 0.83 > 0.812 non-inferior, per-protocol: 0.80 < 0.812 not non-inferior]. Therefore, a drug-free interval strategy was not concluded to be non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of overall survival. For quality-adjusted life-years, non-inferiority was concluded in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses [marginal effect (95% confidence interval) intention to treat -0.05 (-0.15 to 0.05); per-protocol 0.04 (-0.14 to 0.21) non-inferiority margin: 95% confidence interval ≥ -0.156]. Therefore, a drug-free interval strategy was concluded to be non-inferior to a conventional continuation strategy in terms of quality-adjusted life-years.
UNASSIGNED: The main limitation of the study is the fewer than expected overall survival events, resulting in lower power for the non-inferiority comparison.
UNASSIGNED: Future studies should investigate treatment breaks with more contemporary treatments for renal cell carcinoma.
UNASSIGNED: Non-inferiority was shown for the quality-adjusted life-year end point but not for overall survival as pre-defined. Nevertheless, despite not meeting the primary end point of non-inferiority as per protocol, the study suggested that a treatment-break strategy may not meaningfully reduce life expectancy, does not reduce quality of life and has economic benefits. Although the treating clinicians\' perspectives were not formally collected, the fact that clinicians recruited a large number of patients over a long period suggests support for the study and provides clear evidence that a treatment-break strategy for patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is feasible.
UNASSIGNED: This trial is registered as ISRCTN06473203.
UNASSIGNED: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (NIHR award ref: 09/91/21) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 45. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Treatment breaks in cancer are of significant interest to patients and health professionals. Renal cell carcinoma is the most common type of kidney cancer. Sunitinib and pazopanib are both targeted treatments. They were commonly used to treat advanced kidney cancer but often cause side effects, sometimes requiring use of a reduced dose or even stopping treatment. The STAR trial was designed to see whether planned treatment breaks made patients with advanced kidney cancer being treated with sunitinib and pazopanib feel better, without substantially affecting how well the treatment worked. After 24 weeks of treatment, patients took sunitinib and pazopanib either as they normally would or in the alternative way with planned treatment breaks. Treating patients in this way was continued until drug-related side effects stopped treatment, patients’ disease worsened while taking treatment or the patient died. The trial compared how well the different treatment strategies worked in terms of how long patients lived and their quality of life over that time. This trial is the largest United Kingdom trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Patients took part from 60 United Kingdom centres between 2012 and 2017. It was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme and run by the Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit. In total, 920 patients took part. Four hundred and sixty-one patients were allocated to continue treatment and 459 were allocated to start at least one treatment break. Treatment breaks lasted on average 87 days. The length of time patients lived in both arms of the trial appeared similar, but this cannot be concluded due to insufficient information. Being allocated to have treatment breaks rather than continuing treatment did not negatively impact a patient’s quality of life. Additionally, allocating patients to have treatment breaks was shown to have significant cost savings compared to just continuing treatment. Importantly planned treatment breaks were shown to be feasible.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to prospectively analyze the effects of anticholinergic therapy using imidafenacin on detrusor overactivity occurring after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
METHODS: Patients were followed-up at outpatient visits 2-4 weeks post-surgery (visit 2) to confirm the presence of urinary incontinence. Those confirmed with urinary incontinence were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the anticholinergic medication group (imidafenacin 0.1 mg twice daily) or the control group. Patients were followed-up at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery for observational assessments, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS).
RESULTS: A total of 49 patients (25 in the treatment group and 24 in the control group) were randomized for the study. There were no differences observed between the groups in terms of age, comorbidities, prostate size, or pathological staging. According to the IPSS questionnaire results, there was no statistically significant difference between the medication and control groups (p=0.161). However, when comparing storage and voiding symptoms separately, there was a statistically significant improvement in storage symptom scores (p=0.012). OABSS also revealed statistically significant improvement in symptoms from 3 months post-surgery (p=0.005), which persisted until 6 months post-surgery (IPSS storage: p=0.023, OABSS: p=0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: In the case of urinary incontinence that occurs after RARP, even if the function of the intrinsic sphincter is sufficiently preserved, if urinary incontinence persists due to changes in the bladder, pharmacological therapy using imidafenacin can be beneficial in managing urinary incontinence.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to examine if prolonged thromboprophylaxis decreases the risk of thrombosis after intended curative surgery for oesophageal cancer. Study results are expected to inform a guideline for thromboprophylaxis after oesophageal cancer surgery. The perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this critically ill patient group. Thrombosis is the second-most common cause of cancer death after the cancer itself. The risk of thrombosis depends on the cancer type, and upper gastrointestinal cancers are considered high risk. This risk is further increased when patients undergo surgery. However, only few studies have investigated the peri- and postoperative coagulation profile in oesophageal cancer patients. Due to this lack of knowledge, prophylaxis is currently restricted to 5000 IU (international units) low-molecular weight heparin daily from surgery until discharge from hospital (approximately 10 days), whereas patients with gastric cancer receive 30 days of treatment. The present study examines whether a 30-day treatment is superior and safe, compared with the current standard treatment.
METHODS: The study is a randomised controlled trial. Inclusion is ongoing, and we aim to include 100 patients. Blood samples are drawn before and after surgery, and the coagulation is extensively examined. The primary endpoint is the difference in plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) 30 days after surgery between the intervention and the standard group. Furthermore, patients are examined with ultrasound to screen for asymptomatic venous thrombotic events (VTE). Secondary endpoints are incidence of bleeding, symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE and mortality 30 days 1 one year after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The study will provide valuable information on the perioperative coagulation profile and VTE risk of oesophageal cancer patients. The study seeks to aid in optimising the postoperative thromboprophylaxis, and the perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this at-risk patient population.
BACKGROUND: The trial was prospectively registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register with ID 2021-001335-24 on 30 June 2021 and at ClinicalTrials.gov with study identifier NCT05067153.

OBJECTIVE:  The duration of antibiotic coverage in hand tissues during surgery is unknown. We investigated the time the free concentration of cefuroxime was above the minimal inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 4 μg/mL in hand tissues after single and repeated administration.
METHODS:  In a prospective, unblinded randomized study 16 patients (13 female, age range 51-80 years) underwent trapeziectomy. Microdialysis catheters were placed in the metacarpal bone (primary effect parameter), synovial sheath, and subcutaneous tissue. Patients were randomized to postoperative administration of either intravenous single administration of cefuroxime (1,500 mg) (Group 1, n = 8) or repeated dosing (2 x 1,500 mg) with a 4 h interval (Group 2, n = 8). Samples were taken over 8 h.
RESULTS: The fT>MIC of 4 μg/mL was found to be significantly longer in the metacarpal bone in Group 2 compared with Group 1 with a mean difference of 199 min (95% confidence interval 158-239). The same trend was evident in the remaining compartments. A concentration of 4 μg/mL was reached in all compartments in both groups within a mean time of 6 min (range 0-27 min). In Group 1, the mean concentrations decreased below 4 μg/mL between 3 h 59 min and 5 h 38 min.
CONCLUSIONS:  The fT>MIC was longer after repeated administration compared with single administration in all compartments. A single administration of cefuroxime 1,500 mg provided antimicrobial hand tissue coverage for a minimum of 3 h 59 min. Cefuroxime administration in hand surgeries should be done minimum 27 min prior to incision to achieve sufficient coverage in all individuals. Cefuroxime readministration should be considered in hand surgeries lasting longer than 4 h from time of administration.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of tocilizumab treatment during the disease course of COVID-19 has yet to be adequately defined in the context of randomised controlled trials and the effect of tocilizumab on real-world populations remains unclear. We examined the effect of different timing of tocilizumab, on mortality, in a cohort of adults with COVID-19.
METHODS: All adults (≥18 years old) with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to four hospitals in the West of Scotland between 8 January 2021 and 31 March 2021 and who received tocilizumab were included in a retrospective observational cohort study. Patients were assigned to either an early (day of admission or first day after admission) or late (days 2-7 of admission) cohort based on tocilizumab initiation. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality in early versus late cohorts. Secondary outcomes were 28 and 180-day all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: 203 patients were included in the analysis (138 in the early cohort, 65 in the late cohort). Mortality in 90 days in the early cohort was 22% (n=30) compared with 45% (n=29) in the late cohort (p<0.001). The adjusted mortality was significantly higher in the late cohort compared with the early cohort (adjusted OR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.29 to 8.54; p=0.012). The secondary outcomes demonstrated the same effect with higher rates of death in 28 days (late cohort adjusted OR: 3.28; 95% CI: 1.23 to 8.75; p=0.018) and 180 days (late cohort adjusted OR: 3.70; 95% CI: 1.45 to 9.45; p=0.006). The effect was seen whether the outcome was adjusted or unadjusted.
CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of tocilizumab within the first 2 days of hospitalisation was associated with a significant survival benefit compared with late exposure. Late administration was associated with particularly high mortality. The observed association may be a result of residual confounders and further research is needed.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the safety and effectiveness of shorter versus longer duration antibiotic regimens for the treatment of suspected neonatal sepsis.

Since the effects of once-daily antihypertensive (HT) medications are more pronounced within the first few hours of ingestion, evening administration of anti-HT medications can be a feasible treatment for nocturnal HT. However, no relevant meta-analysis has been conducted in patients with nocturnal HT. This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials involving patients with elevated mean nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and compared evening anti-HT administration with morning administration. Multiple databases, including grey literature (e.g. clincialtrial.gov), were searched. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by two independent authors. Risk of bias assessment and overall quality of evidence were conducted using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and GRADE by two independent authors. A total of 107 studies were included, 76 of which were investigated in China and had not been identified in previous reviews. Only one trial was ranked low risk-of-bias. Evening administration of anti-HT medications was effective in reducing nocturnal systolic BP (4.12-9.10 mmHg; I2 = 80.5-95.2%) and diastolic BP (3.38-5.87 mmHg; I2 = 87.4-95.6%). Subgroup analyses found that the effectiveness of evening administration was contributed by data from the Hermida group and China. Evening administration did not provide additional nocturnal/daytime/24-h BP reduction in non-Hermida/non-China studies (I2 = 0) and in meta-analyses that included studies with unclear or low risk of bias. The effectiveness of nocturnal BP reduction was similar across different types, doses, and half-lives of medications. Evening administration of anti-HT medications may reduce proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), nondipping and morning surge. The overall quality of evidence was ranked as very low to low. Our results highlight the scarcity of low risk-of-bias studies and emphasize the need for such trials to evaluate the efficacy of evening dosing of anti-HT medications as a standard treatment for patients with nocturnal HT across diverse populations.

Weekly paclitaxel (WP) is a chemotherapeutic cornerstone in the management of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. Multiple WP dosing regimens have been used clinically and studied individually. However, no formal comparison of these regimens is available to provide objective guidance in clinical decision making. The primary objective of this study was to compare the cumulative dose of paclitaxel delivered using 80 mg/m2/week, administered using either a 3 weeks out of 4 (WP3) or a 4 weeks out of 4 (WP4) regimen. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with both regimens, including efficacy and toxicity parameters. Our retrospective cohort comprised 149 patients harboring platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated at the CHU de Québec from January 2012 to January 2023. WP3 and WP4 reached a similar cumulative dose (1353.7 vs. 1404.2 mg/m2; p = 0.29). No significant differences in the clinical outcomes were observed. The frequency of dose reduction was significantly higher for WP4 than WP3 (44.7% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.01), mainly due to treatment intolerance from toxicity (34.0% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.01). Our data suggest that a WP3 regimen delivers a similar cumulative dose to WP4, hence offering a better efficacy profile without compromising efficacy.

UNASSIGNED: The standard adjuvant treatment for patients with ERRB2-positive breast cancer is chemotherapy plus 1 year of trastuzumab. Shorter durations of trastuzumab administration improve cardiac safety, but more information is needed about their effect on survival.
UNASSIGNED: To compare survival outcomes after 9-week vs 1-year administration of trastuzumab with the same adjuvant chemotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: This post hoc secondary analysis of an open-label, multicenter, noninferiority-design randomized clinical trial included women aged 18 years or older with early ERBB2-positive, axillary node-negative or axillary node-positive breast cancer who were enrolled from January 3, 2008, to December 16, 2014, at 65 centers in 7 European countries. The current exploratory analysis was conducted after achieving the maximum attainable follow-up data when the last patient enrolled had completed the last scheduled visit in December 2022.
UNASSIGNED: Chemotherapy consisted of 3 cycles of docetaxel administered at 3-week intervals followed by 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide at 3-week intervals. Trastuzumab was administered in both groups for 9 weeks concomitantly with docetaxel. In the 9-week group, no further trastuzumab was administered after chemotherapy, whereas in the 1-year group, trastuzumab was continued after chemotherapy to complete 1 year of administration.
UNASSIGNED: The primary objective was disease-free survival (DFS). Distant DFS and OS were secondary objectives. Survival between groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test or univariable Cox proportional hazards regression.
UNASSIGNED: Among the 2174 women analyzed, median age was 56 years (IQR, 48-64 years). The median follow-up time was 8.1 years (IQR, 8.0-8.9 years); 357 DFS events and 176 deaths occurred. Trastuzumab for 9 weeks was associated with shorter DFS compared with trastuzumab for 1 year (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 90% CI, 1.14-1.62); 10-year DFS was 80.3% in the 1-year group vs 78.6% in the 9-week group. The 5-year and 10-year OS rates were comparable between the 9-week and 1-year groups (95.0% vs 95.9% and 89.1% vs 88.2%, respectively; HR for all time points, 1.20; 90% CI, 0.94-1.54). In multivariable analyses, 9-week treatment was associated with shorter DFS compared with 1-year treatment (HR for recurrence or death, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.10-1.68; P = .005), but there was no between-group difference in OS (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.90-1.64; P = .20). Only 4 patients (0.2%) died of a cardiac cause.
UNASSIGNED: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, 1-year vs 9-week adjuvant trastuzumab was associated with improved DFS among patients with ERRB2-positive breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, but there was no significant difference in OS between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00593697.

OBJECTIVE: Bismuth and non-bismuth quadruple therapy are the guideline-recommended first-line therapy in children with Helicobacter pylori infection in areas with high antibiotic resistance. However, their efficacy in children is uncertain and there are few well-designed studies. Here, we evaluated the eradication rates of standard triple therapy, bismuth-based quadruple therapy and sequential therapy in children with H. pylori infection.
METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was conducted in children infected with H. pylori in West China Second Hospital. They were randomly assigned to 14-day standard triple therapy (omeprazole + amoxicillin + clarithromycin), 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy (bismuth + omeprazole + amoxicillin + clarithromycin) and 10-day sequential therapy (omeprazole + amoxicillin for 5 days followed by omeprazole + clarithromycin + metronidazole for 5 days). The eradication rate was assessed by a 13C-urea breath test 4 to 6 weeks after therapy completion. Symptom improvement and adverse events were compared among the groups.
RESULTS: In total, 132 patients were enrolled. The eradication rates of 14-day standard triple therapy, 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy and 10-day sequential therapy were 70.0%, 78.9% and 50.0% in per-protocol analysis and 63.6%, 68.2% and 43.2% in intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. Symptom improvement and adverse drug event rates were similar in the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The three therapeutic regimens evaluated in this study are equally not recommendable for H. pylori infection treatment due to unsatisfactory eradication rates. The high prevalence of clarithromycin resistance makes the use of clarithromycin-based quadruple therapy not advisable, even in combination with amoxicillin and bismuth salts.