Douglas' Pouch

道格拉斯袋
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的目的是阐明POP手术患者的盲囊闭塞频率。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2017年4月至2021年9月在我院接受腹腔镜POP手术的患者。
    结果:总计,191例纳入分析。10例患者(5.2%)出现盲囊闭塞。年龄无差异(73岁与72年,P=0.99),奇偶校验(2与2,P=0.64),或体重指数(BMI)(25.7kg/m2vs.24.7kg/m2,P=0.34)。以往腹部手术率无显著差异(50.0%vs.32.6%,P=0.46),POP-定量系统(POP-Q)≥2后部脱垂的发生率(40.0%vs.46.4%,P=0.98),以及排便症状对脱垂生活质量(p-QOL)评分的影响(阴道膨出排便:2.5vs.3.5,P=0.15;空肠感觉:3vs.3,P=0.72,便秘:3.5vs.3,P=0.58;拉肚子:3.5vs.3,P=0.82;手指空肠:1vs.1,P=0.55)。根据年龄,出生人数,以前的腹部手术,和直肠前突的存在;但是没有提取显著的危险因素。
    结论:根据年龄预测POP手术患者术前盲囊闭塞,以前的手术数量,以前的腹部手术,直肠膨出,排便症状很困难。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to clarify the frequency of cul-de-sac obliteration in patients undergoing POP surgery.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic POP surgery at our hospital between April 2017 and September 2021.
    RESULTS: In total, 191 cases were included in the analysis. Ten patients (5.2%) had cul-de-sac obliteration. No difference in age (73 years vs. 72 years, P = 0.99), parity (2 vs. 2, P = 0.64), or body mass index (BMI) (25.7 kg/m2 vs. 24.7 kg/m2, P = 0.34) was observed between the cul-de-sac obliteration and normal groups. No significant differences were observed in the rate of previous abdominal surgery (50.0% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.46), rate of POP - quantification system (POP-Q) ≥ 2 posterior prolapse (40.0% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.98), and effect of defecation symptoms on the prolapse quality of life (p-QOL) score (vaginal bulge emptying bowels: 2.5 vs. 3.5, P = 0.15; empty bowel feeling: 3 vs. 3, P = 0.72, constipation: 3.5 vs. 3, P = 0.58; straining to open bowels: 3.5 vs. 3, P = 0.82; empty bowels with fingers: 1 vs. 1, P = 0.55) between the cul-de-sac obliteration and normal groups. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for the cul-de-sac obliteration was performed for age, number of births, previous abdominal surgery, and presence of rectocele; however no significant risk factors were extracted.
    CONCLUSIONS: Predicting cul-de-sac obliteration preoperatively in patients undergoing POP surgery based on age, number of previous surgeries, previous abdominal surgeries, rectocele, and defecation symptoms is difficult.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:显示机器人辅助阴道NOTES(RvNOTES)治疗IV期子宫内膜异位症的可行性和短期结果在全子宫切除术期间有/无完全盲囊闭塞。
    方法:回顾性病例系列。
    方法:休斯顿的单一学术三级护理医院,德州,美国。
    方法:23例IV期子宫内膜异位症成年女性。
    方法:RvNOTES联合全子宫切除术切除重度子宫内膜异位症。
    结果:评估患者的各种指标,包括总手术时间,机器人停靠时间,机器人控制台时间,子宫切除时间,估计失血量,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)的围手术期疼痛,和并发症。平均总手术时间为224.3分钟。该研究还发现,与部分或无闭塞的患者相比,完全闭塞的患者手术时间明显更长,估计失血量更高。术后VAS疼痛评分在六周内显示出显着降低。并发症包括1例输尿管完全横切,盆腔血肿伴感染,阴道脓肿,尿路感染,和肺炎。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,RvNOTES可能是治疗IV期子宫内膜异位症的可行手术方法。即使在死胡同完全消失的情况下。
    OBJECTIVE: To show feasibility and short-term outcomes of robot-assisted vaginal NOTES (RvNOTES) for the treatment of stage IV endometriosis during total hysterectomy with/without complete cul-de-sac obliteration.
    METHODS: Retrospective case series.
    METHODS: Single academic tertiary care hospital in Houston, Texas, USA.
    METHODS: Twenty-three adult women with stage IV endometriosis.
    METHODS: RvNOTES with total hysterectomy for excision of severe endometriosis.
    RESULTS: Patients were assessed for various metrics including total operative time, robot dock time, robot console time, hysterectomy time, estimated blood loss, perioperative pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and complications. The mean total operative time was 224.3 minutes. The study also found that patients with complete cul-de-sac obliteration had significantly longer operative times and higher estimated blood loss compared to those with partial or no obliteration. Postoperative VAS pain scores showed a significant reduction over a 6-week period. Complications included one case of complete ureteral transection, pelvic hematoma with infection, vaginal abscess, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that RvNOTES may be a feasible surgical approach in expert hands for treating stage IV endometriosis, even in cases with complete obliteration of the cul-de-sac.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:主要目的是描述标准化腹腔镜改良根治性子宫切除术技术在患有严重子宫内膜异位症和道格拉斯包袋的患者中的可行性,并报告单中心经验。
    方法:2012年12月至2021年5月在Poissy医院进行的单中心腹腔镜改良根治性子宫切除术系列病例。
    方法:单中心,妇科单元(III级),重点是子宫内膜异位症。
    方法:患有重度子宫内膜异位症(4期AFS)和DouglasOblitage的患者。
    结果:52例重度子宫内膜异位症患者接受了手术治疗。在这些患者中:23.1%接受了直肠剃须(n=12),1.9%的盘状切除术(n=1)和17.3%的直肠切除术(n=9),其中一例包括保护性回肠造口术.82.7%的患者进行了输尿管溶解(n=43)。平均住院时间为3.3天(1-12天)。7例患者需要间歇性自我导尿(13.5%)。25.9%的患者发生轻微并发症(Clavien-Dindo1级和2级),其中3.8%发生严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo3级,无4级)。两名患者(3.8%)再次手术:一名为术后枕骨脱发(秃顶),另一名为阴道裂开并有内脏。约50例患者(96.2%)完成子宫内膜异位症切除。中位随访时间为14个月(四分位数间距6-23个月),其中94.3%改善(非常多),3.8%改善最小。
    结论:根据我们的经验,腹腔镜改良根治性子宫切除术是一种可靠的手术,严重并发症发生率低。这种技术需要由全国和国外的其他外科医生和其他中心进行评估,以确定它的成功。
    OBJECTIVE: The main objective is to describe the feasibility and report a single-center experience of a standardized laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy technique among patients with severe endometriosis and pouch of Douglas obliteration.
    METHODS: A single-center case series of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy performed at the Poissy Hospital between December 2012 and May 2021.
    METHODS: Single-center, gynecology unit (level III) with a focus on endometriosis.
    METHODS: Patients with severe endometriosis (stage 4 American Fertility Society) and pouch of Douglas obliteration.
    RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with severe endometriosis underwent the surgical procedure. Of these patients, 23.1% underwent a rectal shaving (n = 12), 1.9% a discoid resection (n = 1), and 17.3% a rectal resection (n = 9), including a protective ileostomy in 1 case. Ureterolysis was performed on 82.7% of patients (n = 43). The average hospital stay was 3.3 days. Seven patients required intermittent self-catheterization (13.5%). Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and 2) occurred in 25.9% of the patients and severe complications in 3.8% of them (Clavien-Dindo grade 3, no grade 4). Two patients (3.8%) were reoperated: one for a postoperative occipital alopecia (balding) and the other for vaginal dehiscence with evisceration. Approximately 50 patients (96.2%) had a complete resection of endometriosis. The median follow-up was 14 months (interquartile range, 6-23 mo) with 94.3% of them improved (much and very much) and 3.8% minimally improved.
    CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy is a reliable procedure with a low rate of severe complications. This technique needs to be assessed by other surgeons and others centers across the country and abroad, to determine the likelihood of it succeeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:大约80%的子宫内膜异位症女性患有浅表子宫内膜异位症(SE),而不是卵巢或深部子宫内膜异位症(DE)。然而,到目前为止,非侵入性的进步,基于影像学的诊断仅限于DE或卵巢疾病。这项研究的目的是通过评估道格拉斯袋(POD)的腹膜来确定我们是否可以在经阴道超声扫描(TVS)上检测SE。
    方法:这是一项回顾性诊断测试研究,在伦敦一家三级医院的TVS期间,实践改变,包括POD腹膜对SE的评估。符合条件的患者在2018年4月至2021年9月期间接受了子宫内膜异位症扫描和后续外科手术(腹腔镜检查)的单一临床医生的TVS。参与者组成了连续的系列。将TVS结果与腹腔镜检查结果进行比较,以此作为金标准。通过计算诊断测试性能测量(灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性和阴性似然比)。
    结果:本研究共纳入100名患者。我们发现43/100(43.0%)患者没有子宫内膜异位症,33/100(33.0%)在腹腔镜检查中有SE,24/100(24.0%)有DE。在17/33例患者的TVS上正确检测到SE,灵敏度为51.5%(95%CI,33.5-69.2%),特异性为94.0%(95%CI,85.4-98.4%),PPV为81.0%(95%CI,60.8-92.1%),NPV为79.7%(95%CI,73.4-84.9%)。在20/24例中正确诊断为DE,包括所有的卵巢病例,灵敏度为83.3%(95%CI,62.3-95.3%),特异性为97.4%(95%CI,90.8-99.7%),PPV为90.9%(95%CI,71.6-97.5%),NPV为94.9%(95%CI,88.3-97.8%)。在TVS上检测SE在POD中最准确(灵敏度,50.0%;特异性,96.4%;PPV,76.9%;净现值,88.9%)。
    结论:这项研究表明,使用常规TVS可以检测POD中的SE。虽然阴性TVS不能可靠地确认没有疾病或取代诊断性腹腔镜检查,阳性TVS有助于非侵入性诊断比以前可能的更大的女性群体.这应该有助于减少从症状发作到诊断的时间,并能够在没有风险的情况下开始医疗,与手术诊断相关的费用和延误。©2023作者。由JohnWiley&SonsLtd代表国际妇产科超声学会出版的妇产科超声。
    Around 80% of women with endometriosis have superficial endometriosis (SE) rather than ovarian or deep endometriosis (DE). However, to date, advances in non-invasive, imaging-based diagnosis have been limited to DE or ovarian disease. The objective of this study was to determine whether we can detect SE on transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVS) by assessing the peritoneum of the pouch of Douglas (POD).
    This was a retrospective diagnostic test study following a change in practice to include POD peritoneum assessment for SE during TVS at a tertiary London hospital. Eligible patients underwent TVS by a single clinician trained in endometriosis scanning and a subsequent surgical procedure (laparoscopy) between April 2018 and September 2021. Participants formed a consecutive series. The TVS findings were compared with those of laparoscopy as the gold standard. Comparison of TVS findings with intraoperative findings was performed by calculating the diagnostic test performance measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and positive and negative likelihood ratios).
    The study included a total of 100 patients. We found that 43/100 (43.0%) patients had no endometriosis, 33/100 (33.0%) had SE and 24/100 (24.0%) had DE on laparoscopy. SE was correctly detected on TVS in 17/33 patients, with a sensitivity of 51.5% (95% CI, 33.5-69.2%), specificity of 94.0% (95% CI, 85.4-98.4%), PPV of 81.0% (95% CI, 60.8-92.1%) and NPV of 79.7% (95% CI, 73.4-84.9%). DE was correctly diagnosed in 20/24 cases, including all ovarian cases, with a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI, 62.3-95.3%), specificity of 97.4% (95% CI, 90.8-99.7%), PPV of 90.9% (95% CI, 71.6-97.5%) and NPV of 94.9% (95% CI, 88.3-97.8%). The detection of SE on TVS was most accurate in the POD (sensitivity, 50.0%; specificity, 96.4%; PPV, 76.9%; NPV, 88.9%).
    This study shows that the detection of SE in the POD is possible using routine TVS. While negative TVS does not reliably confirm the absence of disease or replace diagnostic laparoscopy, positive TVS facilitates non-invasive diagnosis for a much larger group of women than was previously possible. This should help to reduce the time from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis and enable initiation of medical treatment without the risk, cost and delay associated with a surgical diagnosis. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Kissing卵巢标志是在患有深盆腔子宫内膜异位症的女性中看到的放射学标志。它是指卵巢在死胡同内的邻接。“亲吻卵巢”一词最早由Ghezzi等人描述。(2005),并已被广泛使用。当在影像学上看到时,它表明中度至重度子宫内膜异位症,卵巢束缚在盆腔异常软组织内,这可能需要手术管理。
    The Kissing ovaries sign is a radiological sign seen in women with deep pelvic endometriosis. It refers to abutment of the ovaries within the cul-de-sac. The term kissing ovaries was first described by Ghezzi et al. (2005) and has been since used widely. When seen on imaging it indicates moderate to severe endometriosis with the ovaries tethered within abnormal pelvic soft tissue, which may warrant surgical management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于严重的子宫内膜异位症,宫颈后腹膜和乙状结肠或直肠之间的致密粘连会消除盲囊并扭曲正常的解剖标志。子宫内膜异位症的手术与严重并发症有关,包括输尿管和直肠损伤以及排尿功能障碍。外科医生应认识到不仅要避免输尿管和直肠损伤,而且要注意保留腹下神经的重要性。我们在此报告了保留神经技术的腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗后盲囊闭塞的解剖学要点和手术步骤。
    Dense adhesions because of severe endometriosis between the posterior cervical peritoneum and the anterior sigmoid or rectum obliterate the cul-de-sac and distort normal anatomic landmarks. Surgery for endometriosis is associated with severe complications, including ureteral and rectal injuries and voiding dysfunction. Surgeons should recognize the importance of not only avoiding ureteral and rectal injuries but also focusing on the preservation of the hypogastric nerves. Herein, we reported the anatomic highlights and surgical steps of laparoscopic hysterectomy for posterior cul-de-sac obliteration with the nerve-sparing technique.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号