Dose optimization is a critical challenge in drug development. Historically, dose determination in oncology has followed a divergent path from other non-oncology therapeutic areas due to the unique characteristics and requirements in Oncology. However, with the emergence of new drug modalities and mechanisms of drugs in oncology, such as immune therapies, radiopharmaceuticals, targeted therapies, cytostatic agents, and others, the dose-response relationship for efficacy and toxicity could be vastly varied compared to the cytotoxic chemotherapies. The doses below the MTD may demonstrate similar efficacy to the MTD with an improved tolerability profile, resembling what is commonly observed in non-oncology treatments. Hence, alternate strategies for dose optimization are required for new modalities in oncology drug development. This paper delves into the historical evolution of dose finding methods from non-oncology to oncology, highlighting examples and summarizing the underlying drivers of change. Subsequently, a practical framework and guidance are provided to illustrate how dose optimization can be incorporated into various stages of the development program. We provide the following general recommendations: 1) The objective for phase I is to identify a dose range rather than a single MTD dose for subsequent development to better characterize the safety and tolerability profile within the dose range. 2) At least two doses separable by PK are recommended for dose optimization in phase II. 3) Ideally, dose optimization should be performed before launching the confirmatory study. Nevertheless, innovative designs such as seamless II/III design can be implemented for dose selection and may accelerate the drug development program.

We previously reported the first-in-human assessment of three doses (2, 5, and 10 µg) of purified inactivated Zika virus vaccine (PIZV or TAK-426) in the Phase 1 ZIK-101 study (NCT03343626). Here, we report dose selection based on extended safety and immunogenicity data (6 months post-vaccination) and discuss considerations (e.g., immunological, historic, flavivirus immunological cross-reactions) for selecting a Zika virus (ZIKV) vaccine dose formulation. TAK-426 dose selection was conducted at the first interim analysis, and was based on cumulative safety data from both flavivirus-naïve (up to ≥28 days post-dose PD2) and flavivirus-primed participants (up to ≥28 days PD1), and on immunogenicity data from flavivirus-naïve participants only (at 28 days PD1 and 28 days PD2). The safety profile from TAK-426 recipients was compared to placebo recipients. Immunogenicity was assessed by geometric mean titer ratios of neutralizing anti-ZIKV antibodies and differences in seroconversion rates. There was no significant difference in safety between the three TAK-426 doses. The 10 μg dose provided the earliest and strongest immune response (with close to 100% seroconversion and higher antibody titers PD1 in flavivirus-naïve participants), and was well tolerated with acceptable safety profiles in both flavivirus-naïve and flavivirus-primed participants; this dose was selected for further development.

Daptomycin is gaining prominence for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. However, the dosage selection for daptomycin in critically ill patients remains uncertain, especially in Chinese patients. This study aimed to establish the population pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in critically ill patients, optimize clinical administration plans, and recommend appropriate dosage for critically ill patients in China. The study included 64 critically ill patients. Blood samples were collected at the designated times. The blood daptomycin concentration was determined using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A nonlinear mixed-effects model was applied for the population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations of daptomycin. The results showed a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model of daptomycin in critically ill adult Han Chinese patients. Monte Carlo simulations revealed that a daily dose of 400 mg of daptomycin was insufficient for the majority of critically ill adult patients to achieve the anti-infective target. For critically ill adult patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance rate >90 mL/min), the probability of achieving the target only reached 90% when the daily dose was increased to 700 mg. For patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), 24 h administration of 500 mg met the pharmacodynamic goals and did not exceed the safety threshold in most patients. Therefore, considering its efficacy and safety, intravenous daptomycin doses are best scaled according to creatinine clearance, and an increased dose is recommended for critically ill patients with hyperrenalism. For patients receiving CRRT, medication is recommended at 24 h intervals.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative bile duct injury is a significant complication in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography (NIFC) can reduce this complication. Therefore, determining the optimal indocyanine green (ICG) dosage for effective NIFC is crucial. This study aimed to determine the optimal ICG dosage for NIFC.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial at a single tertiary referral center, including 195 patients randomly assigned to three groups: lower dose (0.01 mg/BMI) ICG (n = 63), medium dose (0.02 mg/BMI) ICG (n = 68), and higher dose (0.04 mg/BMI) ICG (n = 64). Surgeon satisfaction and detection rates for seven biliary structures were compared among the three dose groups.
RESULTS: Demographic parameters did not significantly differ among the groups. The medium dose (72.1%) and higher dose ICG groups (70.3%) exhibited superior visualization of the common hepatic duct compared to the lower dose group (41.3%) (p < 0.001). No differences existed between the medium and higher dose groups. Similar trends were observed for the common bile duct and cystic common bile duct junction.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing fluorescent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the 0.02 mg/BMI dose of indocyanine green demonstrated better biliary structure detection rates than the 0.01 mg/BMI dose and was non-inferior to the 0.04 mg/BMI dose.

Advancements in systemic therapies for patients with metastatic cancer have improved overall survival and, hence, the number of patients living with spinal metastases. As a result, the need for more versatile and personalized treatments for spinal metastases to optimize long-term pain and local control has become increasingly important. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been developed to meet this need by providing precise and conformal delivery of ablative high-dose-per-fraction radiation in few fractions while minimizing risk of toxicity. Additionally, advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have also greatly improved care for patients with epidural disease and/or unstable spines, which may then be combined with SBRT for durable local control. In this review, we highlight the indications and controversies of SBRT along with new surgical techniques for the treatment of spinal metastases.

Immuno-oncology (IO) therapies have changed the cancer treatment landscape. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved overall survival in 20-40% of patients with malignancies that were previously refractory. Due to the uniqueness in biology, modalities and patient responses, drug development strategies for IO differed from that traditionally used for cytotoxic and target therapies in oncology, and quantitative pharmacology utilizing modeling approach can be applied in all phases of the development process. In this review, we used case studies to showcase how various modeling methodologies were applied from translational science and dose selection through to label change, using examples that included anti-programmed-death-1 (anti-PD-1), anti-programmed-death ligand-1 (anti-PD-L1), anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4), and anti-glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein (anti-GITR) antibodies. How these approaches were utilized to support phase I-III dose selection, the design of phase III trials, and regulatory decisions on label change are discussed to illustrate development strategies. Model-based quantitative approaches have positively impacted IO drug development, and a better understanding of the biology and exposure-response relationship may benefit the development and optimization of new IO therapies.

In 2022, the European Chemicals Agency issued advice on the selection of high dose levels for developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies indicating that the highest dose tested should aim to induce clear evidence of reproductive toxicity without excessive toxicity and severe suffering in parental animals. In addition, a recent publication advocated that a 10% decrease in body weight gain should be replaced with a 10% decrease in bodyweight as a criterion for dose adequacy. Experts from the European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals evaluated these recent developments and their potential impact on study outcomes and interpretation and identified that the advice was not aligned with OECD test guidelines or with humane endpoints guidance. Furthermore, data analysis from DART studies indicated that a 10% decrease in maternal body weight during gestation equates to a 25% decrease in body weight gain, which differs from the consensus of experts at a 2010 ILSI/HESI workshop. Dose selection should be based on a biological approach that considers a range of other factors. Excessive dose levels that cause frank toxicity and overwhelm homeostasis should be avoided as they can give rise to effects that are not relevant to human health assessments.

Selecting a safe and clinically beneficial dose can be difficult in drug development. Dose justification often relies on dose-response modeling where parametric assumptions are made in advance which may not adequately fit the data. This is especially problematic in longitudinal dose-response models, where additional parametric assumptions must be made. This paper proposes a class of longitudinal dose-response models to be used in the Bayesian model averaging paradigm which improve trial operating characteristics while maintaining flexibility a priori. A new longitudinal model for non-monotonic longitudinal profiles is proposed. The benefits and trade-offs of the proposed approach are demonstrated through a case study and simulation.

OBJECTIVE: The dose-escalation phase (phase Ia study) of a novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) FS-1502 included a dose range from 0.1 to 3.5 mg/kg in HER2-expressing advanced malignant solid tumours. However, the defined maximum tolerated dose was not reached. This model-informed approach integrated population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modelling and exposure-response (E-R) analysis to facilitate dose selection for phase II.
METHODS: The PopPK model was constructed using PK data from 109 Chinese patients who received doses of 0.1-3.5 mg/kg FS-1502 every 3 (Q3W) or 4 weeks during a phase I dose-escalation and dose expansion trial. The structural model consisted of compartment models for FS-1502 and unconjugated monomethyl auristatin F. E-R was explored for the percentage change in tumour size, overall response rate and treatment-related adverse events.
RESULTS: A semi-mechanistic 2-analyte PopPK model was developed. The FS-1502 PK data were best described by a 2-compartment PK model with parallel linear and nonlinear Michaelis-Menten eliminations. The PK of unconjugated monomethyl auristatin F was described by a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination. E-R analysis supported the clinically meaningful efficacy of FS-1502 at 2.3 mg/kg and above. However, 2.3 mg/kg Q3W was considered to have a better benefit-risk balance due to a lower incidence of safety events without a significant reduction in efficacy compared to 3.0 mg/kg Q3W.
CONCLUSIONS: This PopPK and E-R analysis guided the recommended phase II dose selection of 2.3 mg/kg Q3W and supported body weight-based dosing for an investigational HER2 ADC FS-1502.

Venetoclax, a potent BCL-2 inhibitor, is currently under development for treatment of t(11;14) Multiple myeloma (MM). The objective of this research was to investigate the exposure-response relationships of venetoclax for a phase 1/2 study evaluating venetoclax monotherapy or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory MM. A total of 117 patients receiving venetoclax at 300, 600, 800, 900, or 1200 mg were included in the analysis. The impact of venetoclax exposures on efficacy (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) as well as safety (treatment-emergent adverse effects (grade ≥3) of neutropenia, infection, and any grade of serious treatment-emergent adverse effects) was evaluated. In the t(11;14)-positive subpopulation, venetoclax exposure relationships to PFS and OS indicated a trend of longer PFS and OS with higher exposures. Moreover, logistic regression analyses for clinical response (ORR and ≥VGPR rate) demonstrated a statistically significant (p < 0.05) relationship with exposure. Evaluation of the exposure-safety relationships demonstrated a lack of a relationship between venetoclax exposures (AUCavg ) and grade ≥3 infections, grade ≥3 neutropenia, grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events or any grade serious treatment-emergent adverse events. These findings support further study of venetoclax at 800 mg QD dose in combination with dexamethasone in the t(11;14)-positive patient population where increased efficacy was observed without an increase in safety events.Clinical Trial: NCT01794520 registered 20 February 2013.